Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRAFIAANI, Parisa-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorLebailly, Philippe-
dc.contributor.authorKUPPENS, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorAZADI, Hossein-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DAEL, Miet-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-15T08:58:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-15T08:58:54Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThe 11th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (SDEWES2016), Lisbon, Portugal, 04-09/09/2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/21781-
dc.description.abstractBiobased industries require to be assessed on their positive and negative impacts on sustainable development. However, social factors are usually neglected in the majority of impact assessments of biobased industries: they are mainly focused on environmental performance and (techno)-economic assessments. This review proposes a new systemic approach for assessing and integrating the social dimension into sustainability assessments of biobased industries. First the main methodologies for assessing social impacts in biobased industries are compared. Social Life Cycle Analysis (SLCA) is considered to have promising methodological attributes for biobased industries’ social sustainability assessment, although it is still in its early steps of development. Second, a new systemic framework was developed following the four main iterative steps of an SLCA framework and based on three useful SLCA-based approaches including Product Social Impact Assessment; Prosuite and the UNEP SETAC Guidelines for SLCA of Products. The proposed framework allows incorporating the social impacts into a techno-economic assessments (TEA) model through providing both a final social score and separate scores for each indicator category and life cycle phase. The result of this study particularly highlights the importance of considering social issues in biobased industries’design and innovation. Using the proposed systemic approach, industry and policy makers gain a better insight into the full sustainability performance (i.e. including social aspects) of biobased industries.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.othersocioeconomic indicator; biobased industries; social life cycle; techno-economic assessment-
dc.titleIntegrating social aspects into sustainability assessments of biobased industries: Towards a systemic approach-
dc.typeConference Material-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate04-09/09/2016-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameThe 11th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (SDEWES2016)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceLisbon, Portugal-
local.format.pages22-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
dc.relation.references1. Haer, T., Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability of Biobased Plastics; Bio-polyethylene from Brazil and polylactic acid from the U.S. Master thesis, CIO, Center for Isotope Research IVEM, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies. University of Groningen, 2012. http://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/14446149/EES-2012-128T_ToonHaer.pdf 2. Morone, P., Tartiu, V.E., Falcone, P., Assessing the potential of biowaste for bioplastics production through social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 90., pp 43-54, 2015. 3. European Bioplastics,. Relevant EU Strategies, 2013. http://en. european-bioplastics.org/policy/general-strategies/ 4. CEN (The European Committee for Standardization), European standards supporting the market for bio-based products. CEN – European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2014. 5. European Commission, D2.3 -Report on the “Assessment of the Bio-based Products Market Potential for Innovation”, the BIOCHEM project activities, 2010. 6. Salimbeni, A., Half a million jobs, €78 billion per year: The socio-economic impact of the European Bio-based Industry. EUBIA, Belgium. 2015, http://bioenergy-nw.eu/socio-economic-impact-of-european-bio-based-industry/#.Vr2oZDa_Nok, Viewed March 2016. 7. Jeswani, H.K., Azapagic, A., Schepelmann, P., and Ritthoff, M., Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches. J. Clean. Prod., Vol. 18, pp 120–127, 2010. 8. Kloepffer, W, Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int. J. LCA, Vol. 13, pp 89-95, 2008 9. European Commission, Joint Technology Initiative in the field of Bio-based industries. RTD.DDG3.E.2. 11/2012. http://ec.europa.eu/smartregulation/impact/planned_ia/docs/2013_rtd_007_biobased_industries_en.pdf 10. Dale, V.H., Efroymson, R.A., Kline, K.L., Langholtz, M.H., Leiby, P.N., Oladosu, G.A., Davis, M.R., Downing, M.E., and Hilliard. R.E., Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: A short list of practical measures. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 26, pp 87–102, 2013. 11. Kulshreshtha, S., McConkey, B. G., Liu, T. T., Dyer, J. A., Vergé, X. P. C., and Desjardins, R. L., Biobased Economy–Sustainable Use of Agricultural Resources, Environmental Impact of Biofuels, Dr. Marco Aurelio Dos Santos Bernardes (Ed.), 2011. InTech, http://www.intechopen.com/books/environmental-impact-of-biofuels/biobased-economy-sustainable-use-of- agricultural-resources. 12. Edrisi, S.A., and Abhilash, P.C., Book Review: Socio-Economic Impacts of Bioenergy Production. Front Bioeng Biotechnol., Vol. 3, pp 174. 2015. 13. Diaz-Chavez, R., Indicators for Socio-Economic Sustainability Assessment. In D. Rutz, R. Janssen (eds.), Socio-Economic Impacts of Bioenergy Production, 17, 2014. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03829-2_2, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. 14. Vermeulen, S., and Vorley, B., Biofuels: Strategic Choices for Commodity Development Countries. In Common Fund for Commodities, 2007. available from: http://www.globalbioenergy.org/uploads/media/0711_CFC__Strategic_Choices_on_Biofuels.pdf. 15. Domac, J., Richards, K., et al., Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp 97-106. 2005. 16. Global-Bio-Pact., Global-Bio-Pact Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct Impacts on Socio-economics and Sustainability. FP7 EU funded project. http://www.globalbiopact.eu/. 2012. 17. European Union, Final Report - Global-Bio-Pact (Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct Impacts on Socio-economics and Sustainability). Project reference: 245085, Funded under: FP7-KBBE. http://cordis.europa.eu/publication/rcn/16662_en.html, 2016. 18. Bowling, I.M., Maria Ponce-Ortega, J., and El-Halwagi, M.M., Facility location and supply chain optimization for a biorefinery. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 50 No. 10, pp 6276- 6286. 2011. 19. Krishnahumar, P., and Ileleji, K.E., A comparative analysis of the economics and logistics requirements of different biomass feedstock types and forms for ethanol production. Applied Eng. in Agric. Vol. 26, No.5, pp 899-907. 2010. 20. Carolan, J.E., Joshi, S.V., and Dale, B.E., Technical and financial feasibility analysis of distributed bioprocessing using regional biomass pre-processing centers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, Vol. 5, No.2. 2007. 21. Mu, D., Min, M., Krohn B., Mullins, K.A., Ruan R., and Hill, J., Life cycle environmental impacts of wastewater-based algal biofuels. Environmental science & technology, Vol. 48, pp 11696–704, 2014. 22. Grierson, S., and Strezov, V., Life Cycle Assessment of the Microalgae Biofuel Value Chain: A critical review of existing studies. BIONATURE 2012: The Third International Conference on Bioenvironment, Biodiversity and Renewable Energies. p. 6. 2012. 23. Clarens, A.F., Nassau, H., Resurreccion, E.P., White, M.A., and Colosi L.M, Environmental impacts of algae-derived biodiesel and bioelectricity for transportation. Environmental science & technology, Vol. 45, pp 7554–60, 2011. 24. Agusdinata, D.B., Zhao, F., Ileleji, K., DeLaurentis, D., Life cycle assessment of potential biojet fuel production in the United States. Environmental science & technology, Vol. 45, pp 9133–43. 2011. 25. Raman, S., Alison Mohr, Richard Helliwell, Barbara Ribeiro, Orla Shortall, Robert Smith, Kate Millar., Integrating social and value dimensions into sustainability assessment of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 82, pp 49–62, 2015. 26. Santoyo-Castelazo, E., and Azapagic, A., Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 80, No. 1, pp 119–138, 2014. 27. Halog, A., and Manik, Y., Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp 469–499, 2011. 28. Zhang, Y., White, M.A., and Colosi, L.M., Environmental and economic assessment of integrated systems for dairy manure treatment coupled with algae bioenergy production. Bioresource technology, Vol 130, pp 486–94. 2013. 29. Weidema, B., The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11, Special Issue 1, pp 89–96. 2006. 30. Geibler, J.V., Walbaum, H., and Liedke, C., Development of Sustainable Bioprocesses: Modelling and Assessment, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, pp 82–113. 2006. 31. Elghali, L., Clift, R., Sinclair, P., Panoutsou, C., and Bauen, A., Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems. Energy Policy, Vol. 35, pp 6075–6083. 2007. 32. Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles. (IGCP). Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. US. Dep. Commerce., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-16, 29p. 1994. 33. Carrera, D.G., and Mack, A., Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts. Energy Policy, Vol. 38, pp 1030–1039. 2010 34. Palme, U., Social aspects in work towards sustainable supply chains, TOSCA report. April 2011. 35. Diaz-Chavez, R.A., Rettenmaier, N., Rutz, D., and Janssen, R., Global-Bio-Pact set of selected socio-economic sustainability criteria and indicators. WP8 – Task 8.2 – D8.2. October 2012. www.globalbiopact.eu, viewed March 2016. 36. Mackenzie., Issues and recommendations for social and economic impact assessment in the Mackanzie Valley. Yellowknife, Canada, Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board. 2007. 37. Van Dam, J., Faaij, A., Rutz, D., and Janssen, R., Socio-economic impacts of biomass feed- stock production, Global BioPact project. Utrecht: Utrecht University. 2010. 38. Labuschagne, C., Brent, A.C., van Erck, R.P.G., Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 13 pp 373-385, 2005. 39. FAO, The Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) Sustainability Indicators for Bioenergy. First edition, 223p. 2011. 40. Hasenheit, M., Gerdes, H., Kiresiewa, Z., and Beekman, V., Summary report on the social, economic and environmental impacts of the bioeconomy, 2016. http://bio-step.eu/fileadmin/BioSTEP/Bio_documents/BioSTEP_D2.2_Impacts_of_the_bioeconomy.pdf. 41. UNEP-SETAC, Methodological Sheets for 31 Sub-categories of Impact – Draft for Consultation. UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, 2010, http://lcinitiative.unep.fr/default.asp?site=lcinit&page_id=A8992620-AAAD-4B81- 9BAC-A72AEA281CB9. 42. Fontes, J et al., Handbook for product social impact assessment. Version 2.0 - September 2014. PRé Sustainability Stationsplein, The Netherlands. 2014, www.product-social-impact-assessment.com/handbook. 43. Benoit‐Norris C, Vickery‐Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B., Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol. 16, No.7, pp 682‐690, 2011. 44. Manhart, A., and Grießhammer, R., Social impacts of the production of notebook PCs – Contribution to the development of a Product Sustain- ability Assessment (PROSA). Öko-Institut e.V., Freiburg, Germany. 2006. 45. Barthel, L., Wolf, M.A., and Eyerer, P., Methodology of Life Cycle Sus- tainability for Sustainability Assessments. Presentation on the 11th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference (AISDRC), 6th–8th of June 2005, Helsinki, Finland. 46. Ekener-Petersen, E., Höglund, J., Finnveden, G., Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles. Energy Policy, Vol. 73, pp 416–426, 2014. 47. Margot J. Hutchins, John W. Sutherland, An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 16, Issue 15, October 2008, Pages 1688-1698. 48. Grießhammer, R., Benoît, C., Dreyer, L.C., Flysjö, A., Manhart, A., Mazijn, B., Méthot, A., Weidema, B.P., Feasibility Study: Integration of social aspects into LCA. Discussion paper from UNEP-SETAC Task Force. Freiburg, Germany. 2006. 49. Benoit, C., Norris, G.A., Valdivia, S., Ciroth, A., Moberg, A., Bos, U., Prakash, S., Ugaya, C., and Beck, T., The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: Just in time!, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 15, No.2, pp 156 163, 2010. 50. Dreyer, L.C., Hauschild, M., and Schierbeck, J., A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp 88-97, 2006. 51. Jørgensen, A., Le Bocq, A., Nazarkina, L., and Hauschild, M, Methodologies for Social Life Cycle Assessment. Int J LCA., Vol.13., No. 2, pp 96 – 103, 2008. 52. Flysjö, A., Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle Assessment – A Case Study of Salmon. Presentation held 17th of June 2006 , Lausanne. 2006. 53. Bare, J.C., P. Hofstetter, D. Pennington and H.A. Udo de Haes., Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary: Midpoints vs Endpoints – The Sacrifices and Benefits. International journal of life cycle assessment, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp 319-326, 2000. 54. Dale, V.H., Efroymson, R.A., Kline, K.L., Langholtz, M.H., Leiby, P.N., Oladosu, G.A., Davis, M.R., Downing, M.E., and Hilliard. R.E, Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: A short list of practical measures. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 26, pp 87–102. 2013. 55.Efroymson, R.A., Dale, V.H., Langholtz, M.H., Socioeconomic indicators for sustainable design and commercial development of algal biofuel systems. GCB Bioenergy. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12359. 2016. 56. Sbarra, R., and Hilbert, J., Socio-economic impacts of the Soy chain in Argentina. Case study within the Global-Bio-Pact project 'Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct impacts on socio-economics and sustainability'. Buenos Aires, Argentina, INT A. 2011. 57.Wright, A., Socio-Economic Impacts of the Palm oil chain in Indonesia. Case study within the Global-Bio-Pact project 'Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct impacts on socio-economics and sustainability. Jakarta, Green Light Biofuels. 2011. 58.Gerber Machado, P., and Walter, A., Socio-economic impacts of the Sugarcane chain in Brazil. Case study within the Global-Bio-Pact project 'Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct impacts on socio-economics and sustainability'. Campinas, UNICAMP. 2011. 59. Cárdenas, A. and Fallot, A., Socio-economic impacts of the sugarcane-to-ethanol production chain in Costa Rica. Case study within the Global-Bio-Pact project 'Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct impacts on socio-economics and sustainability'. Turrialba Cartago, Costa Rica, CATIE. 2011. 60. Sawe, E.N., Shuma, J., et al., Socio-economic impacts of the Jatropha chain in Tanzania. Case study within in the Global-Bio-Pact project 'Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct impacts on socio-economics and sustainability. Dar-es- Salaam, TATEDO. 2011. 61. Burrel, T., Ouattara, O., et al., Socio-economic impacts of Jatropha production and its conversion routes in Mali. Case study within the Global-Bio-Pact project 'Global Assessment of Biomass and Bioproduct impacts on socio-economics and sustainability'. Bamako, Mali, Mali-Folkecenter Nyetaa. 2011. 62. Sleen, P. v., Vis, M., et al., Socio-economic impacts of lignocellulosic biomass in Canada. Case study within the Global-Bio-Pact project 'Global assessment of biomass and bioproduct impacts on socio-economics and sustainability. Enschede (the Netherlands), Oxford (UK), BTG, Proforest. 2011. 63. Köppen, S., Fehrenbach, H., Markwardt, S., and Hennecke, S., Implementing the GBEP Indicators for Sustainable Bioenergy in Germany. Final Report, ifeu - Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung gGmbH and IINAS - International Institute for Sustainability Analysis and Strategy GmbH, Heidelberg, Darmstadt, Berlin October 2014. http://www.iinas.org/tl_files/iinas/downloads/bio/IFEU_IINAS_2014_GBEP_Application_indicators_in_Germany.pdf 64. Hayashi, T., van Ierland, E.C., and Zhu, X.,. A holistic sustainability assessment tool for bioenergy using the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) sustainability indicators. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 66, pp 70–80. 2014. 65. FAO, Pilot Testing of GBEP Sustainability Indicators for Bioenergy in Colombia. Rome, Italy, 2014. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4058e.pdf 66. Siebert, A., Sinéad O’Keeffe, A.B., and Thrän, D., Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Int J Life Cycle Assess., 2016. DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0. 67. Blom, M., and Solmar, C., How to socially assess biofuels: a case study of the UNEP/SETAC code of practice for social-economical LCA – University Publication - Master’s thesis in cooperation with the Division of Quality and Environmental Management at Luleå University of Technology, commissioned by Enact, 2009. 68. Myaka, C.M.N., Social Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel in South Africa: An Initial Assessment, The 9 International Conference on EcoBalance, November 9-12, Tokyo, Japan. 2010. 69. Chingono, T.T., and Mbohwa, C., Social Impacts of Biofuels Production in the Kwa-Zulu Natal and Western Cape Regions of South Africa. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Vol II WCECS 2015, October 21-23, 2015, San Francisco, USA. 70. Valente, C., Saur Modahl, I., and Askham, C., Method development for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) of New Norwegian Biorefinery . Project title: Nytt Norsk Bioraffineri, Report no.: OR.39.13. 2013. 62p. http://ostfoldforskning.no/uploads/dokumenter/publikasjoner/715.pdf. 71. Black, A., The quest for sustainable, healthy communities. Effective Sustainability Education Conference, NSW Council on Environmental Education, UNSW, Sydney, 18–20, February, 2004. 72. Joyce, S.A., and MacFarlane, M., Social Impact Assessment in the Mining Industry: Current Situation and Future Directions. The International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). England, No. 46, 2002. 73. Tiwari, S., Harrison, J.A., and von Maltiz, G., Chapter 6 Assessing Social Impacts of Bioenergy Projects. pp. 119-147. In Amezaga, J. M., G. von Maltitz and S. Boyes (edits.). 2010, “Assessing the Sustainability of Bioenergy Projects in Developing Countries: A framework for policy evaluation”, Newcastle University, 179 p. 2010. 74. Hunkeler, D., Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol. 11, No.6, pp 371–382. 2006. 75. Macombe, C., Feschet, P., Garrabé, M., and Loeillet, D., Reporting the social indicators to the functional unit for food product. Theoretical contribution regarding the collection of relevant data, 7th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri‐Food Sector, 2010. 76. Lehmann, A., Russi, D., Bala, A., Finkbeiner, M., Fullana-i-Palmer, P, Integration of social aspects in decision support. Based Life Cycle Think Sustain, Vol. 3, No.4, pp 562–577, 2011. 77. Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Anke Siebert& Alberto Bezama & Sinéad O’Keeffe& Daniela Thrän. Int J Life Cycle Assess DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0 78. Bork, C.A.S., De Barba Junior, D.J., and de Oliveira Gomes, J., Social Life Cycle Assessment of three companies of the furniture sector. The 22nd CIRP conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 29, pp 150 – 155, 2015. 79. Kruse, S., Flysjö, A., Kasperczyk, N., and Scholz, A.J., Socioeconomic indicators as a complement to life cycle assessment—an application to salmon production systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp 8-18, 2008. 80. Aparcana, S., and Salhofer, S.. Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., Vol. 18m No. 5, pp 1116–1128. 2013. 81. Foolmaun, R.K., and Ramjeeawon, T., Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp 155–171, 2013. 82. Prosuite., Handbook on a novel methodology for the sustainability impact assessment of new technologies, 2013. www.prosuite.org 83.Macombe, C (ed)., Social LCAs: socio-economic effects in value chains. FruiTrop, Montpellier, 2013. 84. German, L. and Schoneveld, G., A review of social sustainability considerations among EU-approved voluntary schemes for biofuel, with implications for rural livelihood, Energy Policy, Vol. 51, pp 765-778, 2012. 85. IUCN, A Global Assessment of the Environmental and Social Impacts Caused by the Production and Use of Biofuels. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 42pp. 2014. 86. Ekener Petersen, E. Tracking down Social Impacts of Products with Social Life Cycle Assessment. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Sustainable development, Environmental science and Engineering School of Architecture and the Built Environment KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. 2013, www.kth.se/abe/ 87. Thomassen, G., Van Dael, M., Lemmens, B., and Steven Van Passel., A review of the sustainability of algal-based biorefineries: Towards an integrated assessment framework, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016. 88. GRI. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines Implementation Manual, 2013, https://g4.globalreporting.org/introduction/how-to-use-guidelines/Pages/default.aspx. 89. International Organization for Standardization., ISO 26000 Social Responsibility. 2011, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_and_leadership_standards/social_res ponsibility.htm. 90. ESMAP., The World Bank., and ICMM., Community Development Toolkit. ISBN: 0-9549954- 3-0. 2005. 91. Buchholz, T., Rametsteiner, E., et al., Multi Criteria Analysis for bioenergy systems assessment. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, pp 484-495, 2009. 92. Daim, T., Yates, D., Peng, Y., and Jimenez, B., Technology assessment for clean energy technologies: The case of the Pacific Northwest, Technology in Society, Vol 31, pp 232–4-243. 2009. 93. Nigim, K., Munier, N., and Green, J., Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy, Vol. 29, pp 1775–1791. 2004. 94. Antunes, P., Karadzic, V., Santos, R., Beça, P., and Osann, A., Participatory multi-criteria analysis of irrigation management alternatives: The case of Caia irrigation district, Portugal. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp 334-349, 2011. 95. Prosuite, Approaches to integration in sustainability assessment of technologies. Lisbon, 01 February 2012. Report prepared within the EC 7th framework project. http://www.prosuite.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=c378cd69-f785-40f2-b23e-ae676b939212&groupId=12772. 96. Baumgartner, R. Dealing with uncertainty—integrated sustainability assessment based on Fuzzy Logic Sustainable Development and Planning II; WIT Press: Billerica, MA, USA; 2006 Volumes 1, 2. 97. Martínez-Blanco, J.; Lehmann, A.; Muñoz, P.; Antón, A.; Traverso, M.; Rieradevall, J.; Finkbeiner, M. Application challenges for the social LCA of fertilizers within Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. J. Clean. Prod., Vol.69, pp 34–48. 2014. 98. Petti, L., Serreli, M., Di Cesare, S, Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2016 DOI 10.1007/s11367-016-1135-4. 99. Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P, Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol. 16, pp 596–598. 2011. 100. Umair, S., Björklund, A., Ekener-Petersen, E, Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using SETAC SETAC guidelines. Resour Conserv Recycl., Vol. 95, pp 46–57, 2015. 101. Manik, Y., Leahy, J., and Halog, A, Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol. 18 pp 1386–1392, 2013. 102. Nemarumane, T., and Mbohwa, C, Social impact assessment of sugar production operations in South Africa: a social life cycle assessment perspective. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp 71–113, 2015. 103. Paragahawewa, U., Blackett, P., and Small, B, Social Life Cycle Analysis (S-LCA): Some Methodological Issues and Potential Application to Cheese Production in New Zealand. AgResearch Ltd., June 2009. http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Library/SocialLCA-FinalReport_July2009.pdf 104. Schmidt, I., Meurer, M., Saling, P., Kicherer, A., Reuter, W., and Gensch, C, SEE balance: managing sustainability of products and process with the socio eco efficiency analysis by BASF. Greener Management International, Vol. 45, pp 79-94. 2004. 105. Swarr TE (2009) Societal life cycle assessment—could you repeat the question? Int J Life Cycle Assess, Vol.14, No.4, pp 285–289, 2009. 106. BLAKELINDLEY. Social Life Cycle Assessment: Recognising the challenges ahead. The IES Blog. https://iesinternships.wordpress.com/2014/07/21/social-life-cycle-assessment-recognising-the-challenges-ahead/ July 21, 2014. 107. Wu, R., Yang, D and Chen, J. Social Life Cycle Assessment Revisited. Sustainability, Vol.6, 4200-4226, 2014. doi:10.3390/su6074200 108. Halog A. Models for evaluating energy, environmental and sustainability perform‐ ance of biofuels value chain. International Journal of Global Energy Issue, Vol.32, pp 87-101, 2009.-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedPaper-
item.contributorRAFIAANI, Parisa-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorLebailly, Philippe-
item.contributorKUPPENS, Tom-
item.contributorAZADI, Hossein-
item.contributorVAN DAEL, Miet-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationRAFIAANI, Parisa; VAN PASSEL, Steven; Lebailly, Philippe; KUPPENS, Tom; AZADI, Hossein & VAN DAEL, Miet (2016) Integrating social aspects into sustainability assessments of biobased industries: Towards a systemic approach. In: The 11th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (SDEWES2016), Lisbon, Portugal, 04-09/09/2016.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.