Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21783
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | IONESCU, Vlad | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-15T09:30:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-15T09:30:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Architectural histories, 4 (1) | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2050-5833 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21783 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The paper questions Jacques Rançière’s conception of the modern aesthetic regime as the correlation between visuality and language by returning to two fundamental gures of modern art history, Heinrich Wöl in and Wilhelm Worringer. First, Wöl in’s “Prolegomena” (1886) is interpreted as an attempt to conceive architectural space in terms of a ectivity. Second, this conception of space is related to the Th. Vischer’s and J. Volkelt’s theory of symbolism. Third, the paper integrates this aesthetics in a model that conceives form as force (Goethe). Fourth, this modulation of a ectivity that justi es architectural space is confronted with Wilhelm Worringer’s concept of abstraction. After all, this notion responds also to a conception of art in terms of space and a ectivity. Finally, the paper debates the role of Wöl in’s “Prolegomena” from the perspective of architectural design and its relation to modernity. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | Vakgroep Architectuur & Stedenbouw, Faculteit Ingenieurswetenschappen, Universiteit Gent | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.rights | Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject.other | architectural theory; architectural design; empathy; space; aesthetics | - |
dc.title | Architectural Symbolism: Body and Space in Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 4 | - |
local.format.pages | 9 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
local.identifier.vabb | c:vabb:414942 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5334/ah.213 | - |
item.validation | vabb 2018 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.fullcitation | IONESCU, Vlad (2016) Architectural Symbolism: Body and Space in Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer. In: Architectural histories, 4 (1). | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.contributor | IONESCU, Vlad | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 2050-5833 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 2050-5833 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IONESCU - Body & Space Wölfflin Worringer.pdf | Published version | 412.02 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
74
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
98
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.