Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22004
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBRAEYE, Toon-
dc.contributor.authorVerheagen, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorMignon, Annick-
dc.contributor.authorFlipse, Wim-
dc.contributor.authorPierard, Denis-
dc.contributor.authorHuygen, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorSchirvel, Carole-
dc.contributor.authorHENS, Niel-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T10:03:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-13T10:03:37Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPloS one, 11(8) (Art N° e0159832)-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/22004-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Surveillance networks are often not exhaustive nor completely complementary. In such situations, capture-recapture methods can be used for incidence estimation. The choice of estimator and their robustness with respect to the homogeneity and independence assumptions are however not well documented. Methods We investigated the performance of five different capture-recapture estimators in a simulation study. Eight different scenarios were used to detect and combine case-information. The scenarios increasingly violated assumptions of independence of samples and homogeneity of detection probabilities. Belgian datasets on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pertussis provided motivating examples. Results No estimator was unbiased in all scenarios. Performance of the parametric estimators depended on how much of the dependency and heterogeneity were correctly modelled. Model building was limited by parameter estimability, availability of additional information (e.g. covariates) and the possibilities inherent to the method. In the most complex scenario, methods that allowed for detection probabilities conditional on previous detections estimated the total population size within a 20–30% error-range. Parametric estimators remained stable if individual data sources lost up to 50% of their data. The investigated nonparametric methods were more susceptible to data loss and their performance was linked to the dependence between samples; overestimating in scenarios with little dependence, underestimating in others. Issues with parameter estimability made it impossible to model all suggested relations between samples for the IPD and pertussis datasets. For IPD, the estimates for the Belgian incidence for cases aged 50 years and older ranged from 44 to58/ 100,000 in 2010. The estimates for pertussis (all ages, Belgium, 2014) ranged from 24.2 to30.8/100,000. Conclusion We encourage the use of capture-recapture methods, but epidemiologists should preferably include datasets for which the underlying dependency structure is not too complex, a priori investigate this structure, compensate for it within the model and interpret the results with the remaining unmodelled heterogeneity in mind.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2016 Braeye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.-
dc.titleCapture-Recapture Estimators in Epidemiology with Applications to Pertussis and Pneumococcal Invasive Disease Surveillance-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.volume11-
local.format.pages20-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesBraeye, T (reprint author), Sci Inst Publ Hlth, Epidemiol, Dept Epidemiol Infect Dis, Brussels, Belgium. Toon.Braeye@wiv-isp.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnre0159832-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0159832-
dc.identifier.isi000381476700002-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationBRAEYE, Toon; Verheagen, Jan; Mignon, Annick; Flipse, Wim; Pierard, Denis; Huygen, Kris; Schirvel, Carole & HENS, Niel (2016) Capture-Recapture Estimators in Epidemiology with Applications to Pertussis and Pneumococcal Invasive Disease Surveillance. In: PloS one, 11(8) (Art N° e0159832).-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2017-
item.contributorBRAEYE, Toon-
item.contributorVerheagen, Jan-
item.contributorMignon, Annick-
item.contributorFlipse, Wim-
item.contributorPierard, Denis-
item.contributorHuygen, Kris-
item.contributorSchirvel, Carole-
item.contributorHENS, Niel-
crisitem.journal.issn1932-6203-
crisitem.journal.eissn1932-6203-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Braeye et al. (PLoS One 2016).pdfPublished version572.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on May 16, 2024

Page view(s)

78
checked on Aug 2, 2022

Download(s)

118
checked on Aug 2, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.