Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22043
Title: Visual detection of cortical breaks in hand joints: reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT compared to microCT
Authors: Scharmga, A.
Peters, Martijn
van Tubergen, A.
VAN DEN BERGH, Joop 
de Jong, J.
Loeffen, D.
van Rietbergen, B.
Weijers, R.
GEUSENS, Piet 
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
Source: BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 17 (Art N° 271)
Abstract: Background: To study the reliability and validity of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) with microCT (mu CT) as gold standard in the visual detection of cortical breaks in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. Methods: Ten cadaveric fingers (10 MCP and 9 PIP joints) were imaged by HR-pQCT and mu CT and visually analyzed by two independent readers. Intra-and interreader reliability were evaluated for the presence (yes/no, kappa statistics) and the total number (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) of cortical breaks. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV respectively NPV) of HR-pQCT in detecting cortical breaks were calculated. Results: With HR-pQCT, mean 149 cortical breaks were identified and with mu CT mean 129 (p < 0.05). Intrareader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.52 (95 % CI 0.48-0.56) and 0.71 (95 % CI 0.67-0.75) for HR-pQCT and mu CT, respectively, and for the total number of cortical breaks 0.61 (95 % CI 0.49-0.70) and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.68-0.82). Interreader reliability for the presence of a cortical break per quadrant was 0.37 (95 % CI 0.33-0.41) and 0.45 (95 % CI 0.41-0.49) for HR-pQCT and mu CT, respectively, and for the number of cortical breaks 0.55 (95 % CI 0.43-0.65) and 0.54 (95 % CI 0.35-0.67). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of HR-pQCT were 81.6, 64.0, 81.6, and 64 % respectively. Conclusion: Cortical breaks were commonly visualized in MCP and PIP joints with HR-pQCT and mu CT. Reliability of both HR-pQCT and mu CT was fair to moderate. HR-pQCT was highly sensitive to detect cortical breaks with mu CT as gold standard.
Notes: [Scharmga, A.; Peters, M.; van Tubergen, A.; van den Bergh, J.; de Jong, J.; Geusens, P.] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Rheumatol, POB 5800NL, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands. [Scharmga, A.; Peters, M.; van den Bergh, J.; de Jong, J.] Maastricht Univ, NUTRIM Sch Nutr & Translat Res Metab, Maastricht, Netherlands. [Scharmga, A.; Peters, M.; van Tubergen, A.; Geusens, P.] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Maastricht, Netherlands. [van den Bergh, J.] Viecuri Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Venlo, Netherlands. [van den Bergh, J.; Geusens, P.] Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium. [Loeffen, D.; Weijers, R.] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Maastricht, Netherlands. [van Rietbergen, B.] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Keywords: imaging; computed tomography; hand; bone; rheumatoid arthritis;Imaging; Computed tomography; Hand; Bone; Rheumatoid arthritis
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22043
e-ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1148-y
ISI #: 000379711600001
Rights: © 2016 The Author(s). Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2017
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
scharmaga 1.pdfPublished version1.89 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

58
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

102
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.