Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/223
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLEGRAND, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorSYLVESTER, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorDUCHATEAU, Luc-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSEN, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorTherasse, Patrick-
dc.date.accessioned2004-08-30T11:38:17Z-
dc.date.available2004-08-30T11:38:17Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cancer, 38(9). p. 1173-1181-
dc.identifier.issn0959-8049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/223-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of a treatment outcome study is to investigate the heterogeneity in outcome between patients according to factors other than treatment, such as country, institution or physician. Results of treatment outcome studies have already been extensively presented in the medical literature. However, no clear methodology has emerged to perform treatment outcome studies and various methods have been used. This paper reviews the different types of questions addressed in treatment outcome studies, the different methodologies and the different endpoints used. Statistical techniques are mainly descriptive including tables, estimates of survival curves, but regression models have also been used. Most of the studies use registry data, while only a few use discharge data or data available from clinical trials.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.subjectClinical trials-
dc.subjectFrailty model-
dc.titleTreatment outcome studies: pitfalls in curent methods and practice-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1181-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage1173-
dc.identifier.volume38-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00085-0-
dc.identifier.isi000176491100015-
item.validationecoom 2003-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.contributorLEGRAND, Catherine-
item.contributorSYLVESTER, Richard-
item.contributorDUCHATEAU, Luc-
item.contributorJANSSEN, Paul-
item.contributorTherasse, Patrick-
item.fullcitationLEGRAND, Catherine; SYLVESTER, Richard; DUCHATEAU, Luc; JANSSEN, Paul & Therasse, Patrick (2002) Treatment outcome studies: pitfalls in curent methods and practice. In: European Journal of Cancer, 38(9). p. 1173-1181.-
crisitem.journal.issn0959-8049-
crisitem.journal.eissn1879-0852-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Sep 5, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on May 16, 2024

Page view(s)

58
checked on Jun 19, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.