Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/223
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | LEGRAND, Catherine | - |
dc.contributor.author | SYLVESTER, Richard | - |
dc.contributor.author | DUCHATEAU, Luc | - |
dc.contributor.author | JANSSEN, Paul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Therasse, Patrick | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2004-08-30T11:38:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2004-08-30T11:38:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Journal of Cancer, 38(9). p. 1173-1181 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0959-8049 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/223 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The objective of a treatment outcome study is to investigate the heterogeneity in outcome between patients according to factors other than treatment, such as country, institution or physician. Results of treatment outcome studies have already been extensively presented in the medical literature. However, no clear methodology has emerged to perform treatment outcome studies and various methods have been used. This paper reviews the different types of questions addressed in treatment outcome studies, the different methodologies and the different endpoints used. Statistical techniques are mainly descriptive including tables, estimates of survival curves, but regression models have also been used. Most of the studies use registry data, while only a few use discharge data or data available from clinical trials. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD | - |
dc.subject | Clinical trials | - |
dc.subject | Frailty model | - |
dc.title | Treatment outcome studies: pitfalls in curent methods and practice | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1181 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1173 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 38 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcat | A1 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00085-0 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000176491100015 | - |
item.fullcitation | LEGRAND, Catherine; SYLVESTER, Richard; DUCHATEAU, Luc; JANSSEN, Paul & Therasse, Patrick (2002) Treatment outcome studies: pitfalls in curent methods and practice. In: European Journal of Cancer, 38(9). p. 1173-1181. | - |
item.contributor | LEGRAND, Catherine | - |
item.contributor | SYLVESTER, Richard | - |
item.contributor | DUCHATEAU, Luc | - |
item.contributor | JANSSEN, Paul | - |
item.contributor | Therasse, Patrick | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2003 | - |
item.accessRights | Closed Access | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 0959-8049 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1879-0852 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Sep 5, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
7
checked on Sep 20, 2024
Page view(s)
58
checked on Jun 19, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.