Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22522
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVANCAUWENBERGH, Sadia-
dc.contributor.authorPOELMANS, Hanne-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-28T09:58:07Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-28T09:58:07Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationCRIS 2016: Communicating and measuring research responsibly: profiling, metrics, impact, interoperability, St. Andrews - Scotland, 8-10 June 2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/22522-
dc.description.abstractSince the first publication of the Shanghai ranking, the number of university rankings has been vastly growing. Over the years, this has resulted in wide variety of rankings ranging in their scope, underlying methodologies and indicators used. As university rankings receive extensive media attention, it is crucial that ranking results are interpreted correctly. All too often hasty conclusions are drawn without considering the exact meaning of a particular ranking result. However, this is becoming increasingly important as rankings are more than ever seen as a possible evaluation instrument of a university’s performance. During this tutorial, first an overview will be given on the different types of university rankings. Specific attention will be given to worldwide rankings, i.e. the Shanghai, THE, QS, CWTS Leiden ranking and U-Multirank. The underlying methodologies used to measure an indicator performance as well as methods for calculating final ranking scores will be explained. In the second part of the workshop, the attendees will get acquainted with the many different kinds of misinterpretations that frequently occur when evaluating ranking results.-
dc.description.sponsorshipECOOM-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleAssessment of University Rankings in the frame of measuring university performance-
dc.typeConference Material-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate2016, June 8-10-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameCRIS 2016: Communicating and measuring research responsibly: profiling, metrics, impact, interoperability-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceSt. Andrews - Scotland-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedConference Presentation-
item.fullcitationVANCAUWENBERGH, Sadia & POELMANS, Hanne (2016) Assessment of University Rankings in the frame of measuring university performance. In: CRIS 2016: Communicating and measuring research responsibly: profiling, metrics, impact, interoperability, St. Andrews - Scotland, 8-10 June 2016.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorVANCAUWENBERGH, Sadia-
item.contributorPOELMANS, Hanne-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2016-06-10 euroCRIS tutorial.pdfConference material1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.