Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22574
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBIELY, Katharina-
dc.contributor.authorMAES, Dries-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-10T08:27:22Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-10T08:27:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironment, development and sustainability, 20 (1), p. 223-232-
dc.identifier.issn1387-585X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/22574-
dc.description.abstractSince the introduction of the sustainability challenge, scientists disagree over the interpretation of the term “sustainability.” Weak and strong sustainability are the two main interpretations of sustainability, which are opposing each other. Some researchers stated that the interpretation of the term depends on the context; others disagree pointing out that it always implies the meaning of continuation. The term “sustainability” can be used as attribute, which adds a certain characteristic to the noun. If something can be attributed as being sustainable, it can also be unsustainable. The sustainability challenge consists of shifting from the current unsustainable towards a sustainable system. This paper outlines that the weak sustainability term is illegitimate, as it leads to a contradiction with the acknowledged assumption that the current state is unsustainable. This contradiction is revealed through an analysis of the occurrence of decoupling in agriculture: Agricultural land use could be decoupled from agricultural production, but only with the trade-off of massive increases in fertilizer, pesticide, energy and water usage. This paper outlines an inherent inconsistency within the ongoing discussion about the interpretation of sustainability. Through identifying the invalidity of the weak sustainability interpretation the focus can be shifted form the discourse to the sustainability challenge itself.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the reviewers for their time and their comments on the draft version. This paper was supported by the Horizon 2020 project SUFISA (Grant Agreement No. 635577).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.-
dc.subject.otherweak sustainability; strong sustainability; decoupling; agriculture-
dc.titleThe idea of weak sustainability is illegitimate-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage232-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage223-
dc.identifier.volume20-
local.format.pages10-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesBiely, K (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Business Econ, Ctr Environm Sci, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium. katharina.biely@uhasselt.be-
dc.relation.referencesAlcott, B. (2005). Jevons' paradox. Ecological Economics, 54(1), 9-21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020 Alcott, B. (2008). The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics, 64(4), 770-786. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.015 Altieri, M. A. (1998). Ecological impacts of industrial agriculture and the possibilities for truly sustainable farming. Monthly Review, 50(3), 60-71. Andrady, A. L., & Neal, M. A. (2009). Applications and societal benefits of plastics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1977-1984. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0304 Behrens, A., Giljum, S., Kovanda, J., & Niza, S. (2007). The material basis of the global economy: Worldwide patterns of natural resource extraction and their implications for sustainable resource use policies. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 444-453. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.034 Blowers, A. (2011). Why Fukushima is a moral issue? The need for an ethic for the future in the debate about the future of nuclear energy. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 8(2), 73-80. doi:10.1080/1943815X.2011.585760 Brand, U. (2012). Green Economy – the Next Oxymoron? No Lessons Learned from Failures of Implementing Sustainable Development. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 21(1), 28-32. Burton, I. (1968). The Quality of the Environment: A Review. Geographical Review, 58(3), 472-481. doi:DOI: 10.2307/212567 Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8059-8061. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231333100 Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2011). Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(12), 2588-2597. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025 Costanza, R., & Patten, B. C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15(3), 193-196. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00048-8 Csereklyei, Z., & Stern, D. I. (2015). Global energy use: Decoupling or convergence? Energy Economics, 51, 633-641. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.029 Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press. Davies, G. R. (2013). Appraising Weak and Strong Sustainability: Searching for a Middle Ground. Consilience: The journal for Sustainable Development, 10(1), 111-124. Dittmar, M. (2012). Nuclear energy: Status and future limitations. Energy, 37(1), 35-40. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.040 Duffey, R. B. (2005). Sustainable futures using nuclear energy. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 47(1–4), 535-543. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.05.054 Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., & De Groot, R. (2003). A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44(2–3), 165-185. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00272-0 FAO. (2011). THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S H LAND AND WATER RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S LAND AND WATER RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE: Managing systems at risk. Retrieved from London, Rome: http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i1688e/i1688e.pdf FoEI. (2009). Overconsumption? Our use of the world’s natural resources. Retrieved from http://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Overconsumption_Sep09.pdf Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., . . . Zaks, D. P. M. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337-342. doi:http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v478/n7369/abs/nature10452.html#supplementary-information Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209-1218. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2004). Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 199-213. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.013 Hardin, G. (1970). To Trouble a Star: The Cost of Intervention in Nature. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26(1), 17-20. doi:10.1080/00963402.1970.11457756 Hediger, W. (1999). Reconciling “weak” and “strong” sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(7/8/9), 1120-1144. doi:doi:10.1108/03068299910245859 Huesemann, M. H., & Huesemann, J. A. (2008). Will progress in science and technology avert or accelerate global collapse? A critical analysis and policy recommendations. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(6), 787-825. doi:10.1007/s10668-007-9085-4 Ishwaran, N. (2012). Science in intergovernmental environmental relations: 40 years of UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme and its future. Environmental Development, 1(1), 91-101. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2011.11.001 Jabareen, Y. (2008). A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(2), 179-192. doi:10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z Juma, C. (2002). The global sustainability challenge: from agreement to action. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 2(1-2), 1-14. doi:doi:10.1504/IJGENVI.2002.000985 Kastenberg, W. E., Hauser-Kastenberg, G., & Norris, D. (2005). A new way of Thinking about Sustainability, Risk and Environmetnal Decision-Making. In P. A. Wilderer, E. D. Schroeder, & H. Kopp (Eds.), Global Sustainability: The Impact of Local Cultures, A New Perspective for Science and Engineering, Economics and Politics (pp. 87-93). Weinheim: Wiley-vch Veralg GmbH &Co. KGaA. Kessler, G. (2002). Requirements for nuclear energy in the 21st century nuclear energy as a sustainable energy source. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 40(3–4), 309-325. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(02)00024-0 Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2009). Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2696-2705. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007 Krysiak, F. C. (2006). Entropy, limits to growth, and the prospects for weak sustainability. Ecological Economics, 58(1), 182-191. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.017 Meadows, D. (2010). Die Grenzen des Denkens: Wie wir sie mit System erkennen koennen und ueberwinden koennen (K. Bossel & H. Bossel, Trans.). Muenchen: oekom. Nel, W., & Ward, J. (2015). Towards a rational sustainability framework. Sustainability Science, 10(3), 515-520. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0279-z Olivier, J. G. J., Van Aardenne, J. A., Dentener, F. J., Pagliari, V., Ganzeveld, L. N., & Peters, J. A. H. W. (2005). Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions:regional trends 1970–2000 and spatial distributionof key sources in 2000. Environmental Sciences, 2(2-3), 81-99. doi:10.1080/15693430500400345 Pearce, D. (1992). Green Economics. Environmental Values, 1(1), 3-13. doi:10.3197/096327192776680179 Pearce, D., Markandya, A., & Barbier, E. B. (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan. Pimentel, D., & Patzek, T. W. (2005). Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower. Natural Resources Research, 14(1), 65-76. doi:10.1007/s11053-005-4679-8 Pinstrup‐Andersen, P., & Hazell, P. B. R. (1985). The impact of the green revolution and prospects for the future. Food Reviews International, 1(1), 1-25. doi:10.1080/87559128509540765 Quental, N., Lourenço, J. M., & da Silva, F. N. (2011). Sustainability: characteristics and scientific roots. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13(2), 257-276. doi:10.1007/s10668-010-9260-x Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212-227. doi:10.1002/sd.281 Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., . . . Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472-475. Rostow, W. W. (1969). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Comunist Manifesto. USA: Cambridge. Scott, D. (2011). The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24(3), 207-226. doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9253-7 Shrivastava, P., & Berger, S. (2010). Sustainability principles: a review and directions. Organization Management Journal, 7(4), 246-261. doi:10.1057/omj.2010.35 Smith, P. (2013). Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Global Food Security, 2(1), 18-23. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.008 Smith P., M. B., H. Ahammad, H. Clark, H. Dong, E.A. Elsiddig, H. Haberl, R. Harper, J. House, M. Jafari, O. Masera,, & C. Mbow, N. H. R., C.W. Rice, C. Robledo Abad, A. Romanovskaya, F. Sperling, and F. Tubiello. (2014). Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). Retrieved from Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Song, J.-D. (2009). Bertrand equilibrium with differentiated products considering fixed costs: Korean price regulation in the mobile telephone industry. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10–11), 676-685. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.003 Steffen, W., Persson, Å., Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., . . . Svedin, U. (2011). The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship. AMBIO, 40(7), 739-761. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x Steinberger, J. K., & Roberts, J. T. (2010). From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 425-433. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.014 Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., . . . Swackhamer, D. (2001). Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change. Science, 292(5515), 281-284. doi:10.1126/science.1057544 Trucost. (2013). Natural Capital at Risk: The Top 100 Externalities of Business. Retrieved from http://www.trucost.com/published-research/99/natural-capital-at-risk-the-top-100-externalities-of-business http://www.trucost.com/_uploads/publishedResearch/TEEB%20Final%20Report%20-%20web%20SPv2.pdf UNDESA. (2012). A Guidebook to the Green Economy Issue 1: Green Economy, Green Growth, and Low-Carbon Development - history, definitions and a guide to recent publications. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=634 UNEP. (2008). UNEP YearBook 2008: An Overview of our Changing Environment. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2008/ UNEP. (2009a). Global Green New Deal Policy Brief. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/pdf/A_Global_Green_New_Deal_Policy_Brief.pdf UNEP. (2009b). UNEP YearBook 2009: New Science and Developments in our Changing Environment UNEP. (2010). UNEP YearBook 2010: New Science and Developments in our Changing Environment Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2010/ UNEP. (2011a). Towards a Green Economy Report: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Powerty Eradication. Retrieved from http://web.unep.org/greeneconomy/sites/unep.org.greeneconomy/files/field/image/green_economyreport_final_dec2011.pdf UNEP. (2011b). UNEP YearBook 2011: New Science and Developments in our Changing Environment Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/yearbook/2011/ van den Bergh, J. C. (2001). Ecological economics: themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics. Regional Environmental Change, 2(1), 13-23. doi:10.1007/s101130000020 Van Hoogstraten, H. D. (2001). Deep Economy: Caring for Ecology, Humanity and Religion. Cambridge: James Clarke and Co. . Van Mierlo, J., & Maggetto, G. (2007). Fuel Cell or Battery: Electric Cars are the Future. Fuel Cells, 7(2), 165-173. doi:10.1002/fuce.200600052 Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494-499. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494 WCED. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf Weber-Blaschke, G., Mosandl, R., & Faulstich, M. (2005). Histroty and Mandate of Sustainability: From Local Forestry to Global Policy. In P. A. Wilderer, E. D. Schroeder, & H. Kopp (Eds.), Global Sustainability: The Impact of Local Cultures, A New Perspective for Science and Engineering, Economics and Politics (pp. 5-19). Weinheim: Wiley-vch Veralg GmbH &Co. KGaA. Whittaker, R. H., & Likens, G. E. (1975). The Biosphere and Man. In H. Lieth & R. H. Whittaker (Eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (pp. 305-328). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Wilson, L. (2013). Shades of Green: Electric Cars’ Carbon Emissions Around the Globe. Retrieved from http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Shades-of-Green-Full-Report.pdf Wright, S. L., Thompson, R. C., & Galloway, T. S. (2013). The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: A review. Environmental Pollution, 178, 483-492. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.031-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:415013-
local.type.programmeH2020-
local.relation.h2020635577-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10668-016-9878-4-
dc.identifier.isi000423142700011-
item.contributorBIELY, Katharina-
item.contributorMAES, Dries-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.fullcitationBIELY, Katharina; MAES, Dries & VAN PASSEL, Steven (2016) The idea of weak sustainability is illegitimate. In: Environment, development and sustainability, 20 (1), p. 223-232.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2019-
item.validationvabb 2018-
crisitem.journal.issn1387-585X-
crisitem.journal.eissn1573-2975-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The idea of weak sustainability is illegitimate.pdfPublished version486.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 5, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

23
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

632
checked on Jun 30, 2022

Download(s)

1,048
checked on Jun 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.