Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22682Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hendriks, Niels | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-22T10:09:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-11-22T10:09:53Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bossen, Claus; Smith, Rachel Charlotte; Kanstrup, Anne Marie; McDonnell, Janet; Teli, Maurizio; Bødker, Keld (Ed.). Proceedings of the 14th Participatory design Conference: Full Papers – Volume 1, ACM,p. 111-120 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781450340465 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2150-5896 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22682 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses counterfactual scripting as a framework to critically inquire and give form to design decisions in Participatory Design (PD) processes. The stories of what has happened in a design process are often told in a clear storyline that develops logically via different design moves towards a well- defined plot. Counterfactual scripting is a rejection of this teleological perspective. Inspired by counterfactual history, counterfactual scripting gives form to the PD process via the creation of plausible alternatives for the past and speculations about the future. In this way, the (materialised) counterfactual script facilitates in the perception of a more pluralistic view of past and future. In this paper we form the basis for a framework of counterfactual scripting by connecting theory on decision-making in PD with theory on counterfactual thinking in history and design. This framework is applied and evaluated in a case study in participatory spatial planning. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | ACM | - |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | ACM International Conference Proceeding Series | - |
| dc.rights | © 2016 ACM | - |
| dc.subject.other | participatory design; counterfactual scripting; design decisions; counterfactual historiography | - |
| dc.title | Counterfactual scripting: acknowledging the past as a resource for PD. | - |
| dc.type | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Bossen, Claus | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Smith, Rachel Charlotte | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Kanstrup, Anne Marie | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | McDonnell, Janet | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Teli, Maurizio | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Bødker, Keld | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate | 15-19 August 2016 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | 14th Participatory Design Conference | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Aarhus, Denmark | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 120 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 111 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C1 | - |
| local.publisher.place | New York, USA | - |
| dc.relation.references | 1. Akrich, M. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects. Shaping technology/building society: 205–224. 2. Andersen, L., Danholt, P., Halskov, K. Brodersen Hansen, N. and Lauritsen, P. 2015. Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design. CoDesign 11, 3-4: 250–261. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246 3. Arnstein, S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners 35, 4: 216–224. 4. Binder, T. 1999. Setting the Stage for Improvised Video Scenarios. CHI ’99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 230–231. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1145/632716.632859 5. Binder, T., Brandt, E., Ehn, P. and Halse, J. 2015. Democratic design experiments: between parliament and laboratory. CoDesign 11, 3-4: 152–165. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248 6. Bleecker, J. 2009. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction – Near Future Laboratory. Retrieved January 6, 2016 from http://blog.nearfuturelaboratory.com/2009/03/17/design-fiction-a- short-essay-on-design-science-fact-and-fiction/ 7. Brandt, E. and Grunnet, C. 2000. Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. Proc. of PDC 2000. 11–20. 8. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I.. 2012. Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference. ACM, 41–50. 9. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I. 2014. Disentangling Participation. Springer International Publishing, Cham. 10. De Bie, M., Oosterlinck, S. and De Blust, S. 2012. Participatie, ontwerp en toe-eigening in een democratische stadsvernieuwing. In Stadsvernieuwingsprojecten in Vlaanderen (2002-2011) : een eigenzinnige praktijk in Europees perspectief. ASP nv, 29–33. 11. De Bleeckere, S. and De Ridder, R. 2014. Het open kerkgebouw. Pelckmans. 12. DiSalvo, C. 2009. Design and the Construction of Publics. Design issues 25, 1: 48–63. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48 13. DiSalvo, C., Clement, A. and Pipek, V. 2012. Participatory Design For, With, and By Communities. In International Handbook of Participatory Desig. Routledge, Oxford, 182–209. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543.ch8 14. Ehn, P. 1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. 15. Ehn, P. and Sjögren, D.. 1992. From system descriptions to scripts for action. In Design at Work. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds.). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 241–268. 16. Ertner, M., Kragelund, A. and Malmborg, L. 2010. Five Enunciations of Empowerment in Participatory Design. Proc. of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM, 191– 194. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900475 17. Ferguson, N. 2000. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. Basic Books. 18. Geertz, C. 1994. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Readings in the philosophy of social science: 213–231. 19. Ginderachter, M., Aerts, K. and Vrints, A. 2015. Het land dat nooit was: een tegenfeitelijke geschiedenis van België. Bezige Bij. 20. Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Causal Pluralism. In The Oxford Handbook of Causation, Helen Beebee, Peter Menzies and Christopher Hitchcock (eds.). Oxford University Press, 326–337. 21. Goffman, G. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 22. Gonzatto, R., Amstel, F., Merkle, L. and Hartmann, T. 2013. The ideology of the future in design fictions. Digital Creativity 24, 1: 36–45. 23. Hales, D. 2013. Design fictions an introduction and provisional taxonomy. Digital Creativity 24, 1: 1–10. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.769453 24. Hitchcock, C. 2007. How to be a Causal Pluralist. In Thinking About Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics, Machamer, P. and Wolters, G. (eds.). Un. of Pittsburgh Press, 200–221. 25. Huybrechts, L. and Jansen, S. 2009. Carefree living in the elderly care. A description of an experience design research process. Royal C. of Art, Helen Hamlyn Research Centre, 1–6. 26. Latour, B. and Weibel, P. 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. The MIT Press. 27. Lebow. R. 2007. Counterfactual Thought Experiments: A Necessary Teaching Tool. The History Teacher 40, 2: 153–176. 28. Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Blackwell Publishers. 29. Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. 30. Lukens, J. and DiSalvo, C. 2011. Speculative Design and Technological Fluency. Int. Journal of Learning and Media 3, 4: 23–40. DOI=http://doi.org/10.1162/IJLM_a_00080 31. Sanders, E. and Stappers, P. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1: 5–18. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 32. Telier, A., Binder, T., De Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G. and Wagner, I. 2011. Design things. MIT Press. 33. Wakkary, R., Odom, W., Hauser, S., Hertz, G. and Lin, H. 2015. Material Speculation: Actual Artifacts for Critical Inquiry. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1: 12. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299 34. Ytreberg, E. 2002. Erving Goffman as a theorist of the mass media. Critical Studies in Media Communication 19, 4: 481–497. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393180216570 | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.identifier.vabb | c:vabb:414868 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/2940299.2940304 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.btitle | Proceedings of the 14th Participatory design Conference: Full Papers – Volume 1 | - |
| item.contributor | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth | - |
| item.contributor | Hendriks, Niels | - |
| item.accessRights | Restricted Access | - |
| item.fullcitation | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth & Hendriks, Niels (2016) Counterfactual scripting: acknowledging the past as a resource for PD.. In: Bossen, Claus; Smith, Rachel Charlotte; Kanstrup, Anne Marie; McDonnell, Janet; Teli, Maurizio; Bødker, Keld (Ed.). Proceedings of the 14th Participatory design Conference: Full Papers – Volume 1, ACM,p. 111-120. | - |
| item.validation | vabb 2018 | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| paper117.pdf Restricted Access | Peer-reviewed author version | 1.24 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
| p111-huybrechts.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 999.66 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.