Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/2284
Title: A tree based lack-of-fit test for multiple logistic regression
Authors: MOONS, Elke 
AERTS, Marc 
WETS, Geert 
Issue Date: 2004
Publisher: JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
Source: STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 23(9). p. 1425-1438
Abstract: Several omnibus tests have been developed to assess the fit of a regression model. But many of these lack-of-fit tests focus on the simple regression setting. Here, we focus on multiple logistic regression. Pearson's well-known chi-square test statistic and the deviance statistic are no longer valid in the case that the model contains one or more continuous covariates. To overcome this difficulty, Hosmer and Lemeshow proposed a Pearson type statistic based on groups defined by the so-called deciles of risk. We propose a test statistic that is similar in approach to the Hosmer and Lemeshow statistic in that the observations are classified into distinct groups. In the procedure proposed here however, the grouping is not according to probabilities fitted under the null model. We use a recursive partitioning algorithm to divide the sample space into different groups. This generally allows for a more powerful assessment of the model fit. Simulations are carried out to compare the results of the proposed test to that of Hosmer and Lemeshow. Three data examples illustrate the performance of the tree based lack-of-fit test, in comparison to several other tests. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
Notes: Limburgs Univ Ctr, Data Anal & Modeling Grp, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. Limburgs Univ Ctr, Ctr Stat, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.Moons, E, Limburgs Univ Ctr, Data Anal & Modeling Grp, Univ Campus Gebouw D, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.elke.moons@luc.ac.be
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/2284
ISSN: 0277-6715
e-ISSN: 1097-0258
DOI: 10.1002/sim.1750
ISI #: 000221118500006
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2005
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

82
checked on Jun 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.