Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22955
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBann, Seamus-
dc.contributor.authorMALINA, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorStaples, Mark D.-
dc.contributor.authorSuresh, Pooja-
dc.contributor.authorPearlson, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorTyner, Wallace E.-
dc.contributor.authorHileman, James-
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-03T07:53:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-03T07:53:09Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationBioresource technology, 227, p. 179-187-
dc.identifier.issn0960-8524-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/22955-
dc.description.abstractThis study quantifies and compares the costs of production for six alternative jet fuel pathways using consistent financial and technical assumptions. Uncertainty was propagated through the analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. The six processes assessed were HEFA, advanced fermentation, Fischer-Tropsch, aqueous phase processing, hydrothermal liquefaction, and fast pyrolysis. The results indicate that none of the six processes would be profitable in the absence of government incentives, with HEFA using yellow grease, HEFA using tallow, and FT revealing the lowest mean jet fuel prices at $0.91/liter ($0.66/liter-$1.24/liter), $1.06/liter ($0.79/liter-$1.42/liter), and $1.15/liter ($0.95/liter-$1.39/liter), respectively. This study also quantifies plant performance in the United States with a Renewable Fuel Standard policy analysis. Results indicate that some pathways could achieve positive NPV with relatively high likelihood under existing policy supports, with HEFA and FPH revealing the highest probability of positive NPV at 94.9% and 99.7%, respectively, in the best-case scenario.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights(c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.otheralternative jet fuel; techno-economic analysis; Monte-Carlo simulation; United States alternative fuel policy; Renewable Fuel Standard-
dc.titleThe costs of production of alternative jet fuel: A harmonized stochastic assessment-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage187-
dc.identifier.spage179-
dc.identifier.volume227-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesMalina, R (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium. robert.malina@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusIn press-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.032-
dc.identifier.isi000397923200022-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorBann, Seamus-
item.contributorMALINA, Robert-
item.contributorStaples, Mark D.-
item.contributorSuresh, Pooja-
item.contributorPearlson, Matthew-
item.contributorTyner, Wallace E.-
item.contributorHileman, James-
item.contributorBarrett, Steven-
item.fullcitationBann, Seamus; MALINA, Robert; Staples, Mark D.; Suresh, Pooja; Pearlson, Matthew; Tyner, Wallace E.; Hileman, James & Barrett, Steven (2017) The costs of production of alternative jet fuel: A harmonized stochastic assessment. In: Bioresource technology, 227, p. 179-187.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2018-
crisitem.journal.issn0960-8524-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-2976-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bann_et_al_2016.pdfPeer-reviewed author version592.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
1-s2.0-S0960852416316911-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.