Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22972Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | VERBRUGGHE, Jonas | - |
| dc.contributor.author | HAESEN, Mieke | - |
| dc.contributor.author | SPIERINGS, Ruth | - |
| dc.contributor.author | WILLEMS, Kim | - |
| dc.contributor.author | CLAES, Guido | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Olivieri, Enzo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | CONINX, Karin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | TIMMERMANS, Annick | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-04T10:33:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-01-04T10:33:40Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (Print), 12(8), p. 801-807 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1748-3107 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/22972 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Neck pain (NP) and low back pain (LBP) are highly prevalent. Exercise therapy helps, but effect sizes and therapy compliance remain low. Client-centred therapy and technology use may play a role to improve therapy outcomes. To offer technology supported rehabilitation matching patient’s goals, training preferences for rehabilitation and technology familiarity need to be known. Purpose: This study aims to (1) inventory training preferences and motives, (2) evaluate whether these change during rehabilitation, and (3) evaluate familiarity with using technologies, in persons with NP/LBP. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with regard to training preferences and usage of mainstream technological devices. Results: Persons with NP (n = 40) preferred to train on “lifting”, “prolonged sitting” and “driving a car”. Persons with LBP (n = 40) preferred to train on “household activities”, “lifting” and “prolonged walking”. Motives were predominantly “ability to work” and “ability to do free time occupations”. Preferences shifted in ranking but remained the same during rehabilitation. Participants were familiar with the surveyed technologies. Conclusion: Persons with NP or LBP prefer to train on exercises supporting the improvement of everyday life skills. They use technologies in their professional and personal life, which may lower the threshold for the adoption of rehabilitation technologies. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.rights | (c) 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | - |
| dc.subject.other | low back pain; neck pain; training preferences; technology use; client-centred care | - |
| dc.title | Skill training preferences and technology use in persons with neck and low back pain | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 807 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 8 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 801 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 12 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
| dc.relation.references | 1. Hoy D, Protani M, De R, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 2010;24(6):783-792. 2. Airaksinen O, Brox J, Cedraschi Co, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion A, Reis S, Staal J, Ursin H. Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. European spine journal 2006;15:s192-s300. 3. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology 2010;24(6):769-781. 4. Urquhart DM, Kelsall HL, Hoe VC, Cicuttini FM, Forbes AB, Sim MR. Are psychosocial factors associated with low back pain and work absence for low back pain in an occupational cohort? The Clinical journal of pain 2013;29(12):1015-1020. 5. Brooks PM. The burden of musculoskeletal disease—a global perspective. Clinical rheumatology 2006;25(6):778-781. 6. McLean SM, Burton M, Bradley L, Littlewood C. Interventions for enhancing adherence with physiotherapy: a systematic review. Manual therapy 2010;15(6):514-521. 7. Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, Foster NE. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. The Cochrane Library 2010. 8. van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, Verhagen AP, Ostelo R, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. European Spine Journal 2011;20(1):19-39. 9. Bertozzi L, Gardenghi I, Turoni F, Villafañe JH, Capra F, Guccione AA, Pillastrini P. Effect of therapeutic exercise on pain and disability in the management of chronic nonspecific neck pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Physical therapy 2013;93(8):1026-1036. 10. Slade SC, Patel S, Underwood M, Keating JL. What Are Patient Beliefs and Perceptions About Exercise for Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain?: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. The Clinical journal of pain 2014;30(11):995-1005. 11. Beinart NA, Goodchild CE, Weinman JA, Ayis S, Godfrey EL. Individual and intervention-related factors associated with adherence to home exercise in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. The Spine Journal 2013;13(12):1940-1950. 12. Sluijs EM, Kok GJ, van der Zee J. Correlates of exercise compliance in physical therapy. Physical therapy 1993;73(11):771-782. 13. Bassett SF. The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation. New Zealand journal of physiotherapy 2003;31(2):60-66. 14. Brewer BW, Cornelius AE, Van Raalte JL, Petitpas AJ, Sklar JH, Pohlman MH, Krushell RJ, Ditmar TD. Protection motivation theory and adherence to sport injury rehabilitation revisited. Sport Psychologist 2003;17(1):95-103. 15. Grahn BE, Borgquist LA, Ekdahl CS. Rehabilitation benefits highly motivated patients: a six-year prospective cost-effectiveness study. International journal of technology assessment in health care 2004;20(02):214-221. 16. Kidd MO, Bond CH, Bell ML. Patients’ perspectives of patient-centredness as important in musculoskeletal physiotherapy interactions: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy 2011;97(2):154-162. 17. Cooper K, Smith BH, Hancock E. Patient-centredness in physiotherapy from the perspective of the chronic low back pain patient. Physiotherapy 2008;94(3):244-252. 18. Coppack RJ, Kristensen J, Karageorghis CI. Use of a goal setting intervention to increase adherence to low back pain rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation 2012;26(11):1032-1042. 19. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist 2002;57(9):705. 20. Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, Dearing KA. Patient‐centered care and adherence: Definitions and applications to improve outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2008;20(12):600-607. 21. Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. The Annals of Family Medicine 2011;9(2):100-103. 22. Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson A-M, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2002;34(1):5-11. 23. Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, Kingma H. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2009;6(1):1. 24. Halton J. Virtual rehabilitation with video games: A new frontier for occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Now 2008;9(6):12-14. 25. Kato PM. Video games in health care: Closing the gap. Review of General Psychology 2010;14(2):113. 26. Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation 2004;26(1):1-8. 27. Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances: Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ: British Medical Journal 2000;320(7246):1385. 28. Balaam M, Rennick Egglestone S, Fitzpatrick G, Rodden T, Hughes A-M, Wilkinson A, Nind T, Axelrod L, Harris E, Ricketts I. Motivating mobility: designing for lived motivation in stroke rehabilitation. 2011. ACM. p 3073-3082. 29. Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Seelen HA. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9(52):0003-9. 30. Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, Mcalpine C, Goldsmith CH. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy 2009;39(5):400-C12. 31. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain: part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. spine 1983;8(2):141-144. 32. Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, Bakx W, De Ruyter B, Lanfermann G, Kingma H. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Disability and rehabilitation 2009;31(16):1344-1352. 33. Lemmens RJ, Janssen-Potten YJ, Timmermans AA, Defesche A, Smeets RJ, Seelen HA. Arm hand skilled performance in cerebral palsy: activity preferences and their movement components. BMC neurology 2014;14(1):52. 34. Grunert KG, Grunert SC. Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: Theoretical considerations and methodological problems. International journal of research in marketing 1995;12(3):209-225. 35. Preece J, Sharp H, Rogers Y. Interaction Design-beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons; 2015. 36. Lazar J, Feng JH, Hochheiser H. Research methods in human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons; 2010. 37. Andrew Walsh D, Jane Kelly S, Sebastian Johnson P, Rajkumar S, Bennetts K. Performance problems of patients with chronic low-back pain and the measurement of patient-centered outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(1):87-93. 38. Roe C, Sveen U, Cieza A, Geyh S, Bautz-Holter E. Validation of the Brief ICF core set for low back pain from the Norwegian perspective. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009;45(3):403-14. 39. Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Iwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2003;35(3):127-131. 40. Fogg BJ. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002;2002(December):5. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.identifier.vabb | c:vabb:414832 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17483107.2016.1269208 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | 000418495700005 | - |
| item.validation | vabb 2018 | - |
| item.contributor | VERBRUGGHE, Jonas | - |
| item.contributor | HAESEN, Mieke | - |
| item.contributor | SPIERINGS, Ruth | - |
| item.contributor | WILLEMS, Kim | - |
| item.contributor | CLAES, Guido | - |
| item.contributor | Olivieri, Enzo | - |
| item.contributor | CONINX, Karin | - |
| item.contributor | TIMMERMANS, Annick | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fullcitation | VERBRUGGHE, Jonas; HAESEN, Mieke; SPIERINGS, Ruth; WILLEMS, Kim; CLAES, Guido; Olivieri, Enzo; CONINX, Karin & TIMMERMANS, Annick (2016) Skill training preferences and technology use in persons with neck and low back pain. In: Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (Print), 12(8), p. 801-807. | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| crisitem.journal.issn | 1748-3107 | - |
| crisitem.journal.eissn | 1748-3115 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| totale document final typewrite - UHasselt library.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 438.28 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
| Skill training preferences and technology use in persons with neck and low back pain.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 949.27 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Page view(s)
96
checked on Jun 30, 2022
Download(s)
410
checked on Jun 30, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.