Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23061
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDANIELS, Silvie-
dc.contributor.authorWITTERS, Nele-
dc.contributor.authorBeliën, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorVRANCKEN, Kristof-
dc.contributor.authorVANGRONSVELD, Jaco-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-06T08:51:13Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-06T08:51:13Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationEcological economics, 134, p. 160-173-
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/23061-
dc.description.abstractIn spite of global actions, biodiversity is declining at an alarming rate. Despite the need for objectively comparable monetary standards to include biodiversity arguments in policymaking, research on the relationship between species diversity and its valuation from a societal perspective is still scarce. In this paper, a methodological framework for the valuation of natural predators based on their ecological role in the agroecosystem is introduced. The framework integrates a dynamic ecological model simulating interactions between species with an economic model, thereby quantifying the effect of reduced numbers of natural predators on the net farm income. The model attributes an objective monetary value to increased species diversity through the changes in the provisioning of a marketable good. Results indicate that the loss of three predators could decrease net farm income with 88.86 €ha-1 to 2186.5 €ha-1. For the pear production sector in Flanders in 2011, this constitutes to an indirect use value of 0,68 million € for one predator and 16.63 million € for the presence of three predators. The aim is to provide a justification for the argument for biodiversity conservation, based on the ecological function of species, through the delivery of comparable monetary standards.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research was made possible with the financial aid from a BOF grant of the Centre for Environmental Sciences (CMK, Hasselt University). Nele Witters is funded by Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO). The authors would like to thank Ellen Elias from Symbio for providing relevant data and insights into the complex interplay between pest insects, natural predators and human impacts from fertilizers and pesticide use.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.othermonetary valuation; ecological function; biodiversity loss; biological pest control; ecological-economic modeling-
dc.titleMonetary Valuation of Natural Predators for Biological Pest Control in Pear Production-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate08/09/2014 - 12-09/2014-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameEcosystem Services Partnership-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceSan José, Costa Rica-
dc.identifier.epage173-
dc.identifier.spage160-
dc.identifier.volume134-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesDaniels, S (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, BE, Belgium. silvie.daniels@uhasselt.be; nele.witters@uhasselt.be; tim.belien@pcfruit.be; kristof.vrancken@pcfruit.be; steven.vanpassel@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.029-
dc.identifier.isi000395219300018-
item.contributorDANIELS, Silvie-
item.contributorWITTERS, Nele-
item.contributorBeliën, Tim-
item.contributorVRANCKEN, Kristof-
item.contributorVANGRONSVELD, Jaco-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.fullcitationDANIELS, Silvie; WITTERS, Nele; Beliën, Tim; VRANCKEN, Kristof; VANGRONSVELD, Jaco & VAN PASSEL, Steven (2017) Monetary Valuation of Natural Predators for Biological Pest Control in Pear Production. In: Ecological economics, 134, p. 160-173.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2018-
crisitem.journal.issn0921-8009-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-6106-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Manuscript.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on May 1, 2024

Page view(s)

100
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

170
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.