Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23575
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLehner, Rea-
dc.contributor.authorMEESEN, Raf-
dc.contributor.authorWenderoth, Nicole-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-10T06:58:16Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-10T06:58:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationNeuropsychologia, 101, p. 1-9-
dc.identifier.issn0028-3932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/23575-
dc.description.abstractObserving another person experiencing exogenously inflicted pain (e.g. by a sharp object penetrating a finger) modulates the excitability of the observer’ primary motor cortex (M1). By contrast, far less is known about the response to endogenously evoked pain such as sudden back pain provoked by lifting a heavy object. Here, participants (n=26) observed the lifting of a heavy object. During this action the actor (1) flexed and extended the legs (LEG), (2) flexed and extended the back (BACK) or (3) flexed and extended the back which caused visible pain (BACKPAIN). Corticomotor excitability was measured by applying a single transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse to the M1 representation of the muscle erector spinae and participants scored their perception of the actor's pain on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). The participants scored vicarious pain as highest during the BACKPAIN condition and lowest during the LEG condition. MEP size was significantly lower for the LEG than the BACK and BACKPAIN condition. Although we found no statistical difference in the motor-evoked potential (MEP) size between the conditions BACK and BACKPAIN, there was a significant correlation between the difference in NPRS scores between the conditions BACKPAIN and BACK and the difference in MEP size between these conditions. Participants who believed the vicarious pain to be much stronger in the BACKPAIN than in the BACK condition also exhibited higher MEPs for the BACKPAIN than the BACK condition. Our results indicate that observing how others lift heavy objects facilitates motor representations of back muscles in the observer. Modulation occurs in a movement-specific manner and is additionally modulated by the extent to which the participants perceived the actor's pain. Our findings suggest that movement observation might be a promising paradigm to study the brain's response to back pain.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Wim Dankaerts for important advice on lower back pain, Sarah Keller who supported all measurements, Marc Bachinger for technical support and Karin Lussi for useful suggestions. This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF 320030_149561).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.otherback pain; movement observation; vicarious pain perception; motor resonance; empathy; primary motor cortex-
dc.titleObserving back pain provoking lifting actions modulates corticomotorexcitability of the observer’s primary motor cortex-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage9-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.volume101-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesLehner, R (reprint author), ETH, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Neural Control Movement Lab, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. rea.lehner@hest.ethz.ch; raf.meesen@uhasselt.be; nicole.wenderoth@hest.ethz.ch-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.003-
dc.identifier.isi000404703400001-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2018-
item.contributorLehner, Rea-
item.contributorMEESEN, Raf-
item.contributorWenderoth, Nicole-
item.fullcitationLehner, Rea; MEESEN, Raf & Wenderoth, Nicole (2017) Observing back pain provoking lifting actions modulates corticomotorexcitability of the observer’s primary motor cortex. In: Neuropsychologia, 101, p. 1-9.-
crisitem.journal.issn0028-3932-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-3514-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lehner Meesen Wenderoth.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
S0028393217301690.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version64.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Sep 28, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

298
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.