Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23841
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHANOULLE, Katrien-
dc.contributor.authorVERBRUGGEN, Frank-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-30T10:44:04Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-30T10:44:04Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationMoratti, S.; Patterson, D. (Ed.). Legal Insanity and the Brain: Science, Law and European Courts, Hart Publishing, p. 41-76-
dc.identifier.isbn9781509902323-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/23841-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherHart Publishing-
dc.title'Neurosceptism' in the courtroom: the limited role of neuroscientific evidence in Belgian criminal proceedings-
dc.typeBook Section-
dc.relation.edition1-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsMoratti, S.-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsPatterson, D.-
dc.identifier.epage76-
dc.identifier.spage41-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatB2-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedBook Section-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:423736-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleLegal Insanity and the Brain: Science, Law and European Courts-
item.validationvabb 2019-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.fullcitationHANOULLE, Katrien & VERBRUGGEN, Frank (2016) 'Neurosceptism' in the courtroom: the limited role of neuroscientific evidence in Belgian criminal proceedings. In: Moratti, S.; Patterson, D. (Ed.). Legal Insanity and the Brain: Science, Law and European Courts, Hart Publishing, p. 41-76.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorHANOULLE, Katrien-
item.contributorVERBRUGGEN, Frank-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Aug 25, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.