Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23861
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.authorHendriks, Niels-
dc.contributor.authorMARTENS, Sarah-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-12T07:00:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-12T07:00:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCoDesign (Print), 13(2), p. 96-109-
dc.identifier.issn1571-0882-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/23861-
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses counterfactual scripting to critically inquire and give form to Participatory Design (PD) processes in an age of ubiquitous participation. In its often superficial application in various societal domains, the processes and instruments for participation are often cut loose from their political context. The stories of what has happened in a PD process are told through a clear storyline that develops logically via different design moves towards a well-defined plot; leaving out any alternative narratives. Inspired by counterfactual history, we reject this teleological perspective and explore counterfactual scripting as a way to give renewed attention to the political context in PD. We do this by giving form to the design process as a pluralistic process that not only focuses on the future, but creates alternatives for the past to speculate about the future. We evaluate counterfactual thinking in a participatory architecture and urban planning process.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group-
dc.subject.otherparticipatory design; codesign; counterfactual scripting; design decisions-
dc.titleCounterfactual scripting: challenging the temporality of participation-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage109-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage96-
dc.identifier.volume13-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesHendriks, N (reprint author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, Social Spaces, LUCA Sch Arts, Luca Campus, Genk, Belgium. niels.hendriks@kuleuven.be-
dc.relation.referencesAkrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The de-Scription of Technical Objects.” Shaping Technology/Building Society, 205–24. Andersen, Lars Bo, Peter Danholt, Kim Halskov, Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, and Peter Lauritsen. 2015. “Participation as a Matter of Concern in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 250–61. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246. Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–24. Binder, Thomas, Giorgio De Michelis, Pelle Ehn, Giulio Jacucci, and Ina Wagner. 2011. Design Things. MIT Press. Blythe, Mark A., and Peter C. Wright. 2006. “Pastiche Scenarios: Fiction as a Resource for User Centred Design.” Interacting with Computers 18 (5): 1139–64. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2006.02.001. Bratteteig, Tone, and Ina Wagner. 2014. Disentangling Participation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-06163-4. De Bie, Maria, Stijn Oosterlinck, and Seppe De Blust. 2012. “Participatie, ontwerp en toe-eigening in een democratische stadsvernieuwing.” In Stadsvernieuwingsprojecten in Vlaanderen (2002-2011) : een eigenzinnige praktijk in Europees perspectief, 29–33. ASP nv. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2100027. Di Salvo, Carlo, Andrew Clement, and Volker Pipek. 2012. “Participatory Design For, With, and By Communities.” In International Handbook of Participatory Design, 182–209. Oxford: Routledge. Dindler, Christian. 2010. “The Construction of Fictional Space in Participatory Design Practice.” CoDesign 6 (3): 167–82. doi:10.1080/15710882.2010.493941. DiSalvo, Carl. 2009. “Design and the Construction of Publics.” Design Issues 25 (1): 48–63. Ehn, Pelle. 1988. “Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts.” Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A580037&dswid=4636. Ferguson, Niall. 2000. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. Basic Books. Forlano, Laura, and Anijo Mathew. 2014. “From Design Fiction to Design Friction: Speculative and Participatory Design of Values-Embedded Urban Technology.” Journal of Urban Technology 21 (4): 7–24. doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.971525. Ginderachter, Maarten van, Koen Aerts, and Antoon Vrints. 2015. Het land dat nooit was: een tegenfeitelijke geschiedenis van België. Bezige Bij. Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. “Causal Pluralism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Causation, edited by Helen Beebee, Peter Menzies, and Christopher Hitchcock, 326–337. Oxford University Press. Gonzatto, Rodrigo Freese, Frederick M. C. van Amstel, Luiz Ernesto Merkle, and Timo Hartmann. 2013. “The Ideology of the Future in Design Fictions.” Digital Creativity 24 (1): 36–45. doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.772524. Hales, Derek. 2013. “Design Fictions an Introduction and Provisional Taxonomy.” Digital Creativity 24 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.769453. Halskov, Kim, and Nicolai Brodersen Hansen. 2015. “The Diversity of Participatory Design Research Practice at PDC 2002–2012.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (February): 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003. Hitchcock, Christopher. 2007. “How to Be a Causal Pluralist.” In Thinking About Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics, edited by Peter K. Machamer and Gereon Wolters, 200–221. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140407-164135612. Lebow, Richard Ned. 2007. “Counterfactual Thought Experiments: A Necessary Teaching Tool.” The History Teacher 40 (2): 153–76. doi:10.2307/30036985. Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Blackwell Publishers. Lincoln, Yvonna S, and Egon G Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Vol. 75. Sage. Lukens, Jonathan, and Carl DiSalvo. 2011. “Speculative Design and Technological Fluency.” International Journal of Learning and Media 3 (4): 23–40. doi:10.1162/IJLM_a_00080. Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068. Sanoff, Henry. 2008. “Multiple Views of Participatory Design.” International Journal of Architectural Research 2 (1): 57–69. Wakkary, Ron, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz, and Henry Lin. 2015. “Material Speculation: Actual Artifacts for Critical Inquiry.” Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1 (1): 12. doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15710882.2017.1309438-
dc.identifier.isi000399999900004-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2018-
item.fullcitationHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; Hendriks, Niels & MARTENS, Sarah (2017) Counterfactual scripting: challenging the temporality of participation. In: CoDesign (Print), 13(2), p. 96-109.-
item.contributorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
item.contributorMARTENS, Sarah-
item.contributorHendriks, Niels-
crisitem.journal.issn1571-0882-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Counterfactual scripting. Challenging the temporality of participation (1).pdfPeer-reviewed author version180.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Counterfactual scripting challenging the temporality of participation.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.