Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23915
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | VANHEUSDEN, Bernard | - |
dc.contributor.author | VAN DEN BERGHE, Griet | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-22T09:18:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-22T09:18:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal for European environmental & planning law (Print), 14(1), p. 7-40 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1613-7272 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/23915 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Nagoya Protocol of 2010 on Access and Benefit-sharing and the related European Regulation 511/2014 provide an answer to the question how access to genetic resources may be ensured. However, the EU itself as well as several EU member states struggle with the implementation of the protocol (and the regulation). This article analyses the difficulties encountered at the European and the national level (in five member states) with the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol obligations. It concludes that, although the Nagoya Protocol is an important step forward for the protection of biodiversity and the fight against biopiracy, it clearly is a compromise text, with all the issues arising therefrom. Also Regulation 511/2014 drops a few stiches in the clear delineation of obligations. However, on the national level this does not lead to extremely discrepant national enforcement mechanisms, at least within the five reviewed member states. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | This article is based on legal support that the authors performed in 2015–2016 for the Flemish Government. The authors would like to thank the Flemish Government. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.rights | © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2017 | - |
dc.subject.other | access and benefit-sharing; Nagoya Protocol; regulation 511/2014; implementation in five eu member states; enforcement and inspection tools | - |
dc.title | The Implementation of 'Access and Benefit-sharing' in Five EU Member States: The Achievements and Deficiencies of the Nagoya Protocol and the EU Regulation 511/2014 | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 40 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 14 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
local.identifier.vabb | c:vabb:437706 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1163/18760104-01401003 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000399983800002 | - |
item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.validation | vabb 2019 | - |
item.contributor | VANHEUSDEN, Bernard | - |
item.contributor | VAN DEN BERGHE, Griet | - |
item.fullcitation | VANHEUSDEN, Bernard & VAN DEN BERGHE, Griet (2017) The Implementation of 'Access and Benefit-sharing' in Five EU Member States: The Achievements and Deficiencies of the Nagoya Protocol and the EU Regulation 511/2014. In: Journal for European environmental & planning law (Print), 14(1), p. 7-40. | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 1613-7272 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1876-0104 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Article B. Vanheusden and G.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 231.79 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
18760104_014_01_s003_text.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 304.99 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Sep 2, 2020
Page view(s)
66
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
250
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.