Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Electric vehicle users and their travel patterns in Greater Stockholm||Authors:||LANGBROEK, Joram
Franklin, Joel P.
Susilo, Yusak O.
|Issue Date:||2017||Publisher:||PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD||Source:||TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 52, p. 98-111||Abstract:||Electric vehicles (EVs) show promise for improving the environmental sustainability of the transport system since, as opposed to conventional vehicles, they have no tailpipe exhaust gas emissions. The use of EVs can also decrease the amount of greenhouse gas emissions, especially if the electricity has been generated with renewable energy sources. However, the scale of projected benefits can be questioned since the travel patterns of car drivers may not stay the same after changing to EVs, due to various factors such as higher investment costs, lower operation costs and general perceptions associated with electric vehicles. In this study, the travel patterns of both electric vehicle users and conventional vehicle users in Greater Stockholm are compared with regard to the number of trips made and the modal share of the car in the total travel distance. For this purpose, a one-day travel diary carried out in autumn 2014 has been used. The main findings are the following: firstly, the EV is generally perceived by respondents to be more environmentally friendly than public transport modes. Secondly, EV users make significantly more trips than their non-EV using counterparts, according to their one-day travel diaries and controlling for socio-economic and situational variables. Thirdly, EV users choose the car for a significantly larger percentage of their total travel distance than conventional vehicle users. Those observations would suggest a rebound effect, as EVs still consume a considerable amount of energy and contribute to other external effects such as congestion. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.||Notes:||[Langbroek, Joram H. M.; Franklin, Joel P.; Susilo, Yusak O.] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Transport Sci, Teknikringen 72, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden. [Langbroek, Joram H. M.] Hasselt Univ, Sch Transportat Sci, Diepenbeek, Belgium.||Keywords:||Electric vehicle; Travel behaviour; Trip production; Mode choice; Rebound effect;electric vehicle; travel behaviour; trip production; mode choice; rebound effect||Document URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/1942/24248||ISSN:||1361-9209||e-ISSN:||1879-2340||DOI:||10.1016/j.trd.2017.02.015||ISI #:||000401398400008||Rights:||(C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.||Category:||A1||Type:||Journal Contribution||Validations:||ecoom 2018|
|Appears in Collections:||Research publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Published version||1.37 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open Request a copy|
checked on Sep 3, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 21, 2022
checked on May 25, 2022
checked on May 25, 2022
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.