Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/24252
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStarinieri, Pascal-
dc.contributor.authorDeclercq, Peter E.-
dc.contributor.authorROBIC, Boris-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Alaaddin-
dc.contributor.authorVan Tornout, Michiel-
dc.contributor.authorDubois, Jasperina-
dc.contributor.authorMees, Urbain-
dc.contributor.authorHENDRIKX, Marc-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-17T13:37:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-17T13:37:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationPERFUSION-UK, 32(5), p. 403-408-
dc.identifier.issn0267-6591-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/24252-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Even though results have been encouraging, an unequivocal conclusion on the beneficial effect of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery cannot be derived from previous publications. Long-term outcomes are rarely reported and a significant decrease in operative mortality has not been shown. Most studies have a limited number of patients and are underpowered. They merely report on short-term results of a heterogeneous intraoperative group using different types of ECC system in aortic valve surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether MiECC systems are more beneficial than conventional extracorporeal systems (CECC) with regard to mortality, hospital stay and inflammation and with only haemodilution and blood-air interface as differences. Methods: We retrospectively analysed data regarding mortality, hospital stay and inflammation in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery. Forty patients were divided into two groups based on the type of extracorporeal system used; conventional (n=20) or MiECC (n=20). Results: Perioperative blood product requirements were significantly lower in the MiECC group (MiECC: 0.20.5 units vs CECC: 0.9 +/- 1.2 units, p=0.004). No differences were seen postoperatively regarding mortality (5% vs 5%, p=0.99), total length of hospital stay (10.6 +/- 7.2 days (MiECC) vs 12.1 +/- 5.9 days (CECC), p=0.39) or inflammation markers (CRP: MiECC: 7.09 +/- 13.62 mg/L vs CECC: 3.4 +/- 3.2 mg/L, p=0.89). Conclusion: MiECC provides circulatory support that is equally safe and feasible as conventional extracorporeal circuits. No differences in mortality, hospital stay or inflammation markers were observed.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD-
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017-
dc.subject.otherMiECC; aortic valve surgery; minimally invasive surgery-
dc.subject.otherMiECC; aortic valve surgery; minimally invasive surgery-
dc.titleA comparison between minimized extracorporeal circuits and conventional extracorporeal circuits in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery: is 'minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation' just low prime or closed loop perfusion ?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage408-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage403-
dc.identifier.volume32-
local.format.pages6-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Starinieri, Pascal] Jessa Hosp, Dept Clin Perfus, Hasselt, Belgium. [Declercq, Peter E.] Jessa Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Hasselt, Belgium. [Declercq, Peter E.] Univ Leuven, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Leuven, Belgium. [Robic, Boris; Yilmaz, Alaaddin; Mees, Urbain; Hendrikx, Marc] Jessa Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Hasselt, Belgium. [Robic, Boris; Hendrikx, Marc] Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium. [Van Tornout, Michiel; Dubois, Jasperina] Jessa Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.publisher.placeLONDON-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0267659117691814-
dc.identifier.isi000402297200010-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.contributorROBIC, Boris-
item.contributorDeclercq, Peter E.-
item.contributorHENDRIKX, Marc-
item.contributorStarinieri, Pascal-
item.contributorVan Tornout, Michiel-
item.contributorYilmaz, Alaaddin-
item.contributorMees, Urbain-
item.contributorDubois, Jasperina-
item.fullcitationStarinieri, Pascal; Declercq, Peter E.; ROBIC, Boris; Yilmaz, Alaaddin; Van Tornout, Michiel; Dubois, Jasperina; Mees, Urbain & HENDRIKX, Marc (2017) A comparison between minimized extracorporeal circuits and conventional extracorporeal circuits in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery: is 'minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation' just low prime or closed loop perfusion ?. In: PERFUSION-UK, 32(5), p. 403-408.-
item.validationecoom 2018-
crisitem.journal.issn0267-6591-
crisitem.journal.eissn1477-111X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
starinieri2017.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version412.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Jun 29, 2022

Page view(s)

48
checked on May 20, 2022

Download(s)

40
checked on May 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.