Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/24449
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLovik, Aniko-
dc.contributor.authorNASSIRI, Vahid-
dc.contributor.authorVERBEKE, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorSodermans, An Katrien-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-08T14:13:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-08T14:13:15Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationPERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 117, p. 122-129-
dc.identifier.issn0191-8869-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/24449-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we examine the Dutch language version of the Big Five Inventory, a short questionnaire used to measure the Big Five personality factors, on a Flemish sample coming from the Divorce in Flanders study. Our aim is twofold. First, we show that based on the Flemish sample the Dutch BFI has good psychometric properties and a clear factor structure comparable to a previous Dutch sample and in the international Big Five research literature. Second, we compare the usual method of analysis, namely factor analysis with principal component extraction with varimax rotation, to several methods that each address a common problem in factor analysis. We compare the original analysis to factor analysis with a non-orthogonal rotation (addressing the problem of correlated factors), after ipsatisation (considering individual response styles), using polychoric correlations (taking into account the type of the responses), and using multiple imputation to handle missingness (to account for potential bias due to listwise deletion). The five factor analyses do not differ substantially. However, the analysis using polychoric correlations has the highest factor loadings and explains more of the variance than any other analysis; the analysis using ipsatised scores provides the worst results in supporting the Big Five structure. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.otherBig Five Inventory; Divorce in Flanders; Factor analysis; Factor rotation; Ipsatisation; Listwise deletion; Missing data; Multiple imputation; Ordinal variables; Polychoric correlation-
dc.subject.otherbig five inventory; divorce in Flanders; factor analysis; factor rotation; ipsatisation; listwise deletion; missing data; multiple imputation; ordinal variables; polychoric correlation-
dc.titlePsychometric properties and comparison of different techniques for factor analysis on the Big Five Inventory from a Flemish sample-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage129-
dc.identifier.spage122-
dc.identifier.volume117-
local.format.pages8-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Lovik, Aniko; Nassiri, Vahid; Verbeke, Geert; Molenberghs, Geert] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, I BioStat, Leuven, Belgium. [Verbeke, Geert; Molenberghs, Geert] Hasselt Univ, I BioStat, Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Sodermans, An Katrien] Univ Leuven, Ctr Sociol Res, Leuven, Belgium.-
local.publisher.placeOXFORD-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.048-
dc.identifier.isi000406567500020-
item.fullcitationLovik, Aniko; NASSIRI, Vahid; VERBEKE, Geert; MOLENBERGHS, Geert & Sodermans, An Katrien (2017) Psychometric properties and comparison of different techniques for factor analysis on the Big Five Inventory from a Flemish sample. In: PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 117, p. 122-129.-
item.validationecoom 2018-
item.contributorLovik, Aniko-
item.contributorNASSIRI, Vahid-
item.contributorVERBEKE, Geert-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.contributorSodermans, An Katrien-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0191-8869-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-3549-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
lovik 1.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version276.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
BFI_factor_analysis2015_160310 (1).pdfPeer-reviewed author version173.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Sep 5, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

354
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.