Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25058Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | VANHEUSDEN, Bernard | - |
| dc.contributor.author | GORDEEVA, Yelena | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-18T08:24:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-10-18T08:24:33Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25058 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | International environmental law, based on the scientific evidence, available at the time, has commenced to address the global environmental problems such as climate change, deforestation and forest degradation relatively independently from and parallel to one another. On the one hand, there is a comprehensive international climate change regime, established by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), focusing on the regulation of GHG emissions. On the other hand, there is the international forest law, as a vague aggregate of rules and processes included in a desperate array of treaties and non-binding instruments, aiming at reversing the loss of forest cover worldwide, forest protection and sustainable forest management (SFM). The most recent scientific evidence provides, however, that the global environmental problems are interconnected and do not fit neatly into a single international environmental regime. Thus, the regulation of the climate change issue touches upon the topics, subject to the international forest law. This gives rise to various interactions between the international forest-related environmental regimes (e.g. synergetic, conflicting, and neutral). Conflicting interactions, in particular, if not detected and addressed timely, may further exacerbate the global environmental problems. For instance, combating climate change may contribute to global deforestation and forest degradation. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | I gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Luc De Schepper, the Rector of the Hasselt University, and the Special Research Fund (BOF) of Hasselt University for the financial support of the present PhD project. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject.other | international climate change law; international forest law; EU environmental law; Russian environmental law. | - |
| dc.title | European and Russian Forests under International Climate Change Law | - |
| dc.type | Theses and Dissertations | - |
| local.format.pages | 632 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | T1 | - |
| dc.relation.references | Bibliography I. Treaties 1. Charter of the United Nations, adopted 26 June 1945, in force 24 October 1945; 2. Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, adopted 16 November 1972, in force 17 December 1975; 3. Convention on Biological Diversity, adopted 5 June 1992, in force 29 December 1993; 4. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, adopted 3 March 1973, in force 1 July 1975; 5. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat, Ramsar, adopted 2 February 1971, in force 21 December 1975; 6. Convention to Combat Desertification, adopted 17 June 1994, in force December 1996; 7. Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol, adopted 8 December 2012; 8. International Plant Protection Convention, adopted 6 December 1951, in force 3 April 1952; 9. International Tropical Timber Agreement, adopted 18 November 1983, entered into force 1 April 1985; 10. International Tropical Timber Agreement, adopted 26 January 1994, provisionally entered into force 01 January 1997; 11. International Tropical Timber Agreement, adopted 27 January 2006, in force 7 December 2011; 12. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, adopted 3 November 2001, in force 29 June 2004; 13. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, adopted 11 December 1997, in force 16 February 2005; 14. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization, adopted 29 October 2010, in force 12 October 2014; 15. Paris Agreement, adopted 12 December 2015, entry into force 04 November 2016; 16. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat, adopted 2 February 1971, in force 21 December 1975; 17. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, adopted 17 June 1994, in force 26 September 1996; 18. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, adopted 9 May 1992, in force 21 March 1994; 19. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, adopted 10 December 1982, in force 16 November 1994; 20. Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, adopted 22 March 1985, entered into force 22 September 1988; 21. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, adopted 23 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980. II. Non-Legally Binding Agreements 1. Agenda 21, adopted 13 June 1992; 2. Copenhagen Accord, adopted 18 December 2009; 3. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, 16 June 1972; 4. Non-Legally Binding Authoritative Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on the Management, Conservation and Sustainable Development of All Types of Forests, adopted 14 June 1992; 5. Non-Legally Binding Instrument on All Types of Forests, adopted 17 December 2007; 6. New York Declaration on Forests, adopted 23 September 2014; 7. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, adopted 14 June 1992. III. Official Documents, Drafts, Guidelines and Reports of International Organizations 1. ECOSOC, E/2015/42-E/CN.18/2015/14, International Arrangement on Forests Beyond 2015; 2. FAO UN, Constitution, adopted 16 October 1945; 3. FAO UN, Global Forest Resources Assessment, 2010; 4. FAO UN, Global Forest Resources Assessment, 2015; 5. FAO UN, Forestry Paper 144, Climate Change and the Forest Sector, Possible National and Subnational Legislation, 2004; 6. FAO UN, State of the World’s Forests 2009, 2009; 7. IEA, Global Wood Pellet Industry – Market and Trade Study, 2011; 8. ILC, Fragmentation of International Law, Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of Study Group of the International Law Commission, UN Doc. A/CN.4./L.682, 13 April 2006; 9. ILC, Report of the International Law Commission of the work of its fifty-second session, 1 May – 9 June and 10 July – 18 August 2000, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-fifth session, supplement no. 10, UN Doc. A/55/10; 10. IPCC, Good Practice Guidance for Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry, 2003; 11. IPCC, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2006; 12. IPCC, Revised Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 1996; 13. IPCC, Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol, 2013; 14. IPCC, Special Report Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: Summary for Policymakers, 2000; 15. IPCC, Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands, 2013; 16. IUCN, Environmental Law Centre, Wetlands, Water and the Law, Using Law to Advance Wetland Conservation and Wise Use, IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper, 38, 1999; 17. IUCN, UNEP, WWF, World Conservation Strategy, Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, 1980; 18. UN GA Resolution, 70th Plenary Meeting, A/RES/43/53, 6 December 1988; 19. UN GA, Resolution A/RES/70/1, Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 25 September 2015; 20. UN GA, Resolution A/RES/37/7, World Charter for Nature, 28 October 1982; 21. UN, UNECE, FAO, The European Forest Sector Outlook Study II 2010 – 2030, 2011; 22. UNECE, FAO, Joint Wood Energy Enquiry, 2015; 23. UNEP, Governing Council Decision SS. VII/4, Compliance with and Enforcement of Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Doc. UNEP (DEPI)/MEAs/WBG. 1/3, Annex II, February, 2002; 24. UNEP, The Emission Gap Report, 2012; 25. UNEP, The Importance of Mangroves to People: A Call to Action, 2014; 26. UNFCCC, Key Documents Relating to the Consideration of LULUCF under the Kyoto Protocol, FCCC/SBSTA/2004/ Misc. 1, FCCC/SBSTA/2004/Misc. 5, FCCC/SBSTA/2005/Misc. 9; 27. UNFCCC, Decision 17/CMP.1, Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF Activities under art. 3 and 4 of the Kyoto Protocol 28. UNFCCC, Decision 3/CMP.1, Modalities and Procedures for a CDM; 29. UNFCCC, Glossary of JI Terms, Version 03; 30. UNFF, Report of the Sixth Session, 27 May 2005 and 13-24 February 2006, ECOSOC Official Records, 2006, Supplement 22, UN Doc. E/CN.18/2006/18, Decision No. E/2006/para 3, global Objective on Forests; 31. World Bank, Sustaining Forests: A development Strategy, 2004; IV. EU Legislation and Policy Regulations (Chronological Order) 1. Council of the European Union, Council Regulation, No 2173/2005 on the Establishment of a FLEGT Licensing Scheme for Imports of Timber into the European Community, OJ L 347/1, 30 December 2005; 2. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Regulation No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the Obligations of Operators who Place Timber and Timber Products on the Market, OJ L 295/23, 12 November 2010; 3. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Regulation 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011, Laying down the Rules and General Principles Concerning Mechanisms for Control by Member States of the Commission’s Exercise of Implementing Powers, OJ L 55/13, 28 February 2011; Directives (Chronological Order) 4. Directive 2001/42/EC of 27 June 2001 On the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programs on the Environment, OJ L 197/30, 27 June 2001; 5. European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003, Establishing a Scheme for GHG Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, O.J., L 275, 25 October 2003; 6. Directive 2009/30/EC of the EU Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 98/70/EC as regards the specification of petrol, diesel and gas-oil and introducing a mechanism to monitor and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and amending Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the specification of fuel used by inland waterway vessels and repealing Directive 93/12/EEC, O. J. L 140/88, 23 April 2009; 7. European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009, On the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide and Amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) 1013/2006, O.J. L 140/114, 05 June 2009; 8. European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009, on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, O.J. L 140/16, 05 June 2009; 9. European Parliament and the Council of the EU, Directive 200/60/EC of 23 October 2000, Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy, O.J. L. 327/1; 10. Directive 2011/92/EU of 13 December 2011 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment, OJ L 26/1, 13 December 2011; Decisions 11. Council of the European Union, Council Decision 94/69/EEC of 15 December 1993, Concerning the Conclusion of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, OJ L 33/11, 7 February 1994; 12. Council of the European Union, Council Decision 2002/358/EC, Concerning the Approval on behalf of the European Community of the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC and the Joint Fulfilment of commitments thereunder, OJ L 130, 25 April 2002; 13. European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, Decision 406/2009/EC of the E.P. and of the Council 23 April 2009 on the Effort of Member States to reduce their Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Meet the Community’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Commitments up to 2020, O.J., L 140/136, 05 June 2009; 14. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Decision 529/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on accounting rules on greenhouse gas emissions and removals resulting from activities relating to land use, land use change and forestry and on information concerning actions relating to those activities, OJ L 165/8018, June 2013; 15. European Commission, Commission Decision Determining the Respective Emission Levels Allocated to the Community and each of its Member States under the Kyoto Protocol Pursuant to Council Decision 2002/358/EC, OJ L 332/41, 16 December 2010; Conclusions 16. European Council, Conclusions of 23d and 24th of October, 2014, EUCO 169/14.// < http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/145397.pdf >, last viewed 08 October 2016; 17. European Council, Presidency Conclusions of 8th and 9th March 2007, 7224/1/07.// < https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/93135.pdf>, last viewed 07 October 2016; 18. European Council, Presidency Conclusions 29th and 30th of October 2009. // < http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/cooperate/baltic/pdf/council_concl_30102009.pdf>, last viewed 08 October 2016; 19. Council of the European Union, Council Conclusions Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) 268/2003, OJ C 268/1, 7 November 2003; 20. Council of the European Union, Council Conclusions on Preparing Forests for Climate Change: Forest Protection and Information in the EU, 3021 Environmental Council Meeting, 11 June 2010. European Commission Communications (Chronological Order) 21. European Commission, Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM (2000) 1 Final, Brussels 2 February 2000; 22. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT), Proposal for an EU Action Plan, COM (2003) 251 Final, 21 May 2003; 23. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Reporting on the Implementation of the EU Forestry Strategy, COM (2005) 84 final, 10 March 2005; 24. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, On an EU Forest Action Plan, COM (2006), 302 Final, 15 June 2006; 25. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2020 by 2020 Europe’s climate change Opportunity, COM (2008) 30 final, 23 January 2008; 26. European Commission, Green Paper on Forest Protection and Information in the EU: Preparing Forests for Climate Change, COM (2010) 66 Final, 25 September 2010; 27. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the E.P., the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Energy Efficiency Plan, 2014, COM 201/109/Final, 8 March 2011; 28. European Commission, Communication to the EP and the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, “A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050”, COM (2011), 112 final, 8 March 2011; 29. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Accounting for land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) in the Union’s climate change commitments, COM (2012), 94 final, 12 March 2012; 30. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A new EU Forest Strategy: for Forests and the Forest-Based Sector, COM (2013), 659 final, 20 September 2013. Legislative Proposals (Chronological Order) 31. European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Binding annual Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 for a Resilient Energy Union and to meet Commitments under the Paris Agreement and Amending Regulation No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a Mechanism for Monitoring and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions and other Information Relevant to Climate Change, COM (2016) 482 final, 2016/0231 (COD), 20 July 2016; 32. European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Inclusion of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry into the 2030 Climate and Energy Framework and amending Regulation 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a Mechanism for Monitoring and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Other Information Relevant to Climate Change, COM (2016) 479 final, 2016/0230 (COD), 20 July 2016; 33. European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Directive 2003/87/EC to Enhance Cost – Effective Emission Reductions and Low-Carbon Investments, COM (2015), 337 final, 2015/148 (COD), 15 July 2015; 34. European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources (Recast), COM (2016) 767 Final, 2016/0382 (COD) 30 November 2016; Commission Staff Working Documents, Reports and Documents of EU Institutions 35. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment of the Role of land use land use change and forestry (LULUCF) in the EU’s climate change commitments, Accompanying the document, Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on accounting rules and action plans on greenhouse gas emissions and removals resulting from activities related to land use, land use change and forestry, SWD (2012) 41 final, 12 March 2012; 36. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment, Accompanying Document to the Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Sustainability Requirements for the Use of Solid and Gaseous Biomass Sources in Electricity, Heating and Cooling, EU Biomass Report, SEC (2010), 65 final, 25 February 2010; 37. European Commission, Commission SWD, State of Play on the Sustainability of Solid and Gaseous Biomass used for Electricity, Heating and Cooling in the EU, SWD (2014) 259 final, 28 July 2014; 38. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment, Sustainability of Bioenergy, Accompanying the Document, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and or the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources (Recast), SWD (2016) 418 Final, 22 June 2016; 39. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment, accompanying the Document, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, on the Inclusion of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry into the 2030 Climate and Energy Framework and Amending Regulation No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a Mechanism for Monitoring and Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Other Information Relevant to Climate Change, SWD (2016), 249 final, 20 July 2016; 40. EU, INDC of the EU, 2015;// <http://www4.unfccc.int/Submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Latvia/1/LV-03-06-EU%20INDC.pdf>, last viewed 04 November 2016; 41. European Commission, Proposal to Integrate the Land Use Sector into the EU 2030 Climate and Energy Framework, Questions and Answers, What is the Commission’s Proposal on Land Use and Forestry about?, 20 July 2016.// < http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-2496_en.htm>, last viewed 30 October 2016; 42. European Commission, Climate Action, Consultations on Addressing GHG Emissions from Agriculture and LULUCF in the Context of the 2030 EU Climate and Energy Framework.// http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/articles/0026_en.htm, last viewed 28 October 2016; 43. European Commission, Biomass, Green Energy for Europe, 2005. // < https://ec.europa.eu/research/energy/pdf/biomass_en.pdf >, last viewed 30 March 2017; 44. European Commission, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Sustainability Requirements for the Use of Solid and Gaseous Biomass Sources in Electricity, Heating and Cooling, COM (2010) 11 final, 25 February 2010; 45. European Commission, Results of the Public Consultation on Additional Sustainability Measures at EU Level for Solid and Gaseous Biomass Used in Electricity, Heating and Cooling, 2011. //< https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/20110329_biomass_consultation_report.pdf>, last viewed 30 March 2017; 46. European Commission, EU Biomass Report, COM (2010), 11 final; 47. European Commission, Environment, Nature and Biodiversity, Forests, Forest Information, Forest Management Plans or Equivalent Instruments in the European Union.// < http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/information.htm >, last viewed 26 November 2016. 48. Eurostat, Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Statistics, 2014 Edition, 2015; 49. EEA, European Forest Ecosystems State and Trends, Report No 5/2016, 2016. V. RF Legislation and Policy Federal Laws (Chronological Order) 1. RF Federal Law № 34 - FZ, On Ratification of the UNFCCC, Federal Law, 04 November 1994; 2. RF Federal Law № 174 – FZ, Оn Ecological Expertise, (Федеральный Закон «Об Экологической Экспертизе» № 174 – ФЗ от 23 Ноября 1995), 23 November 1995; 3. RF Federal Law № 7-FZ, On Environmental Protection, (Федеральный Закон «Об Охране Окружающей Среды» № 7-ФЗ от 10 января 2002), 10 January 2002; 4. RF Federal Law № 128 - FZ, On Ratification of the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC, 04 November 2004; 5. RF Federal Law № 261 – FZ, (Федеральный Закон № 261 - ФЗ), On Energy Conservation and Increasing Energy Efficiency and Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation, (Об Энергосбережении и о Повышении Энергетической Эффективности и о Внесении Изменений в Отдельные Законодательные Акты РФ), 23 November 2009; 6. RF Federal Law № 35-FZ, (Федеральный Закон) 26 March 2003, On Electricity Power Industry (Об Электроэнергетике), as amended 28 December 2016; Orders of the RF President (Chronological Order) 7. RF President Order № 889 – President Order (Указ Президента РФ), On Measures to Increase Energy and Ecological Efficiency of Various Sectors of Russian Economy, (О некоторых мерах по повышению энергетической и экологической эффективности российской экономики), 4 June 2008; 8. RF President Order № 752-President Order (Указ Президента РФ), On GHG Emissions Reduction (О Сокращении Выбросов Парниковых Газов), 30 September 2013; Decree of the RF President 9. RF President Decree № 861-RP, RF Climate Doctrine, (Распоряжение Президента РФ “О Климатической Доктрине”, 861-РП, 17.12.2009), 17 December 2009; Decrees of the RF Government (Chronological Order) 10. RF Decree of the RF Government № 417, (Постановление Правительства РФ от 30 Июня 2007), Forest Fire Safety Rules (Об Утверждении Правил Пожарной Безопасности в Лесах), 30 June 2007; 11. RF Decree of the RF Government № 426, (Постановление Правительства РФ от 3 июня 2008), On the Qualification of a Renewable Energy Generating Facility (О Квалификации Генерирующего Объекта, Функционирующего на Основе Использования Возобновляемых Источников Энергии), 03 June 2008; 12. RF Decree of the RF Government № 449 (Постановление Правительства РФ от 28 мая 2013), On the Mechanism of Promoting the Use of Renewable Energy in the Wholesale Market of Electric Energy and Power, (О Механизме Стимулирования Использования Возобновляемых Источников Энергии на Оптовом Рынке Электрической Энергии и Мощности), 28 May 2013; 13. RF Decree of the RF Government No 449 (Постановление Правительства РФ от 28 мая 2013), On the Mechanism of Promoting the Use of Renewable Energy in the Wholesale Market of Electric Energy and Power, (О Механизме Стимулирования Использования Возобновляемых Источников Энергии на Оптовом Рынке Электрической Энергии и Мощности), 28 May 2013; 14. RF Decree of the RF Government No 321, (Постановление Правительства РФ от 15 Апреля 2014), Approval of the RF State Program “Energy Efficiency and Energy Development” (Об утверждении государственной программы РФ «Энергоэффективность и Развитие Энергетики»), 15 April 2014; 15. RF Decree of the RF Government № 47, (Постановление Правительства РФ от 23 января 2015), On Changes to Certain Acts of the Government of the RF in order to Incentivize the Use of Renewable Energy Sources in the Retail Market of Electricity, (О внесении Изменений в некторые Акты Правительства РФ по Вопросам Стимулирвания Использования Возобновляемой Энергии на Розничных Рынках Электрической Энергии), 23 January 2015; Resolutions of the RF Government (Chronological Order) 16. RF Government Resolution № 278 – R (Распоряжение Правительства РФ № 278-Р от 1 марта 2006), The Measures for Creation of the Russian System for Estimating anthropogenic emissions in order to implement the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC (with amendments), О мерах по Созданию Российской Системы Оценки Антропогенных Выбросов в Целях Реализации Киотского Протокола к Рамочной Конвенции ООН об Изменении Климата (с изменениями и дополнениями), 01 March 2006; 17. RF Government Resolution of the Russian Federation № 215 – R (Распоряжение Правительства РФ № 215-Р от 20. 02. 2006), To fulfil the Commitments of the Russian Federation within the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC (В Целях Реализации Обязательств РФ, вытекающих из Киотского Протокола к Рамочной Конвенции ООН об Изменении Климата), 20 February 2006; 18. RF Government Resolution № 1715 – R (Распоряжение Правительства РФ), Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period until 2030 (Об Энергетической Стратегии России на Период до 2030 года), 13 November 2009; 19. RF Government Resolution № 730-R, (Распоряжение Правительства РФб Об Утверждении Комплексного Плана Реализации Климатической Доктрины РФ на Период до 2020 года), RF Climate Doctrine Implementation Plan until 2020, 25 April 2011; 20. RF Government Resolution № 504-R, (Распоряжение Правительства РФ от 02 Апреля 2014), In Pursuance of the RF President’s Order No 752, dated 30th September 2013, “About GHG Emissions Reductions” (Во Исполнение Указа Президента РФ от 30 сентября 2013 г. ), 02 April 2014; 21. RF Government Resolution № 716-R, (Распоряжение Правительства РФ от 22 апреля 2015), Development Concept on the RF System for GHG Emissions Monitoring, Reporting and Verification, (Концепция Формирования Системы Мониторинга, Отчетности и Проверки Объема Выбросов Парниковых Газов в РФ), 22 April 2015; 22. RF Government Resolution № 1662-R, (Распоряжение Правительства РФ от 17 Ноября 2008), The Concept for the Long-Term Social and Economic Development of the RF to 2020, ( «О Концепции Долгосрочного Социально-Экономического Развития Российской Федерации на Период до 2020 года»), 17 November 2017; Order of the RF Government 23. RF Government Order № 3028п-П9, (Указ Правительства РФ), Plan of Measures on Creating Enabling Environment for Forest Biomass Utilization for Heating and Electricity Energy Production (План Мероприятий по Созданию Благоприятнтых Условий для Использования Возобновляемых Древесных Источников для Производства Тепловой и Электрической Энергии), 31 May 2013; Legislative Acts of the RF Institutions (Chronological Order) 24. RF, Order of the Federal Forest Service № 21, On Approval of the RF Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management (Приказ Федерального Агентства Лесного Хозяйства от 5 Февраля 1998 года № 21 «Об Утверждении Критериев и Индикаторов Устойчивого Управления Лесами РФ»), 5 February 1998. 25. RF, Ministry of Energy, Order № 316 (Приказ Минэнерго России от 29 Июля 2011), On the Allocation scheme of Renewable Energy Generating Facilities on the Territory of the RF (Об утверждении Схемы Размещения Генерирующих Объектов Электроэнергетики на Основе Использования Возобновляемых Источников Энергии на Территории РФ), 29 July 2011, as amended 20 August 2012; 26. RF Government, No 1853p-P8, State Coordination Program, Development of Biotechnology in the Russian Federation until 2020, 24 April 2012; 27. RF, RF Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, (Министерство Природных Русурсов и Экологии РФ), Decree No 300 (Приказ от 30 Июня 2015), 30 June 2015; 28. RF Federal Forestry Agency, Future Projection of the anthropogenic GHG emissions in the national forest sector.// < http://www.rosleshoz.gov.ru/media/news/1984>, last viewed 09 February 2017; Legislative Proposals (Chronological Order) 29. RF Federation Council, Proposal for a Federal Law № 98033104-2, On the State Politics in the Sphere of Utilization of Non-traditional Renewable Energy Sources (Информация о Причинах Отклонения Федерального Закона «О Госудраственной Политике в Сфере Использования Нетрадиционных Возобновляемых Источников Энергии» Президентом РФ), 22 April 1999; 30. RF Government, Proposal for a RF Government Resolution, RF Energy Strategy up until 2035, Revision date 1 February 2017. // < http://minenergo.gov.ru/node/1920>, last viewed 15 February 2017. Reports, Programs and Documents of the RF Institutions (Chronological Order) 31. RF Government, Information on the Reasons to Decline the Federal Law “On the State Politics in the Sphere of Utilization of Non-traditional Renewable Energy Sources” by the RF President (Информация о Причинах Отклонения Федерального Закона «О Госудраственной Политике в Сфере Использования Нетрадиционных Возобновляемых Источников Энергии» Президентом РФ), 25 November 1999, № Пр-1544. 32. INDCs as communicated by Parties, INDC of the Russian Federation, 2015.// http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx, last viewed 04 November 2016; 33. Second Bi-annual Report of the Russian Federation to the UNFCCC, 2015.// <https://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/biennial_reports_and_iar/submitted_biennial_reports/application/pdf/2br_rus.pdf>, last viewed 03 November 2016; 34. RF’s Sixth National Communication to the UNFCCC, 2013. // < http://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/application/pdf/6nc_rus_final.pdf>, last viewed 30 March 2017; 35. RF Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (Министерство Природных Ресурсов и Экологии РФ), Roshydromet (Росгидромет), Russia’s Sixth National Communication under the UNFCCC, (Шестое Национальное Сообщение Российской Федерации), December, 2013; 36. RF Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology (Министерство Природных Ресурсов и Экологии РФ), 2015 Report on Implementation of the RF CDIP for the Period up until 2020 (Доклад о Ходе Реализации в 2015 году Комплексного Плана Реализации Климатической Доктрины Российской Федерации на Период до 2020 года), 2015. // < http://www.mnr.gov.ru/regulatory/detail.php?ID=143628>, last viewed 07 November 2016; 37. RF State Duma (Государственная Дума Федерального Собрания РФ Шестого Созыва), Committee on Natural Resources, the Use of Natural Resources and Ecology (Комитет по Природным Ресурсам, Природопользованию и Экологии), Proceedings of the Meeting, Legal Regulation of the GHG Emissions in the RF, 15 June 2016. VI. Books and Dissertations 1. Bodansky D., et al, Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, 2007; 2. Birinchuk M.M., Environmental Law, Second Edition, 2011; 3. Birnie P., Boyle A., Redgewell C., International Law and the Environment, Third Edition, 2009; 4. Bogolubov S. A. (ed.), Environmental Law, Second Edition, 2011; 5. Canadian Council on International Law (ed.), Global Forests and International Environmetnal Law, 1996; 6. Eikermann A., Forests in International Law, Is there Really Need for an International Forest Convention?, 2015; 7. Fitzmaurice M., French D., International Environmental Law and Governance, 2015; 8. Freer Smith P. H., et al (eds), Forestry and Climate Change, 2007; 9. Holmgren S., Governing Forests in a Changing Climate, Exploring Patterns of Thought in the Climate Change – Forest Policy Intersection, Doctoral Thesis No. 2015: 61, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, 2015; 10. Humphreys D., Deforestation and the Crises of Global Governance, 2006; 11. Humphreys D., Forest Politics, The Evolution of International Cooperation, 1996; 12. Jans J. H., Hans H.B. Vedder, European Environmental Law, Fourth Edition, 2012; 13. Kramer L., EC Environmental Law, Sixth Edition, 2007; 14. Klink B., Taekema S., Law and Method, Interdisciplinary Research into Law, 2011; 15. Kiss A., Shelton D., Guide to International Environmental Law, 2007; 16. Kislitsyna N.F. (Кислицина Н.Ф.), The Contemporary Development of the International Law System (Развитие системы международного права на современном этапе), 2014; 17. Lesniewska F., Laws for Forests, An Introductory Guide to International Forest and Forest Related Legal Materials that Shape Forest Ethics and Practice, 2005; 18. Lyster R., MacKenzie C., McDermott C. (eds), Law, Tropical Forests and Carbon, The Case of REDD+, 2013; 19. Massai L., The Kyoto Protocol in the EU, European Community and Member States under International and European Law, 2011; 20. Maguire R., Global Forest Governance, Legal Concepts and Policy Trends, 2013; 21. Pisarenko A. I., Strakhov V.V. (А. И. Писаренко, В.В. Страхов), Boreal Forests and Forestry, (Бореальные Леса и Лесное Хозяйство), 2012; 22. Pisarenko A. I., Strakhov V.V. (А. И. Писаренко, В.В. Страхов), Forestry in the RF: National and Global Significance, (Лесное Хозяйство России: Национальное и Глобальное Значение), 2011; 23. Peeters M., Schomerus T., Renewable Energy Law in the EU, Legal Perspectives on Bottom-Up Approaches, 2014; 24. Rayfuse R., Sh., Scott (eds), International Law in the Era of Climate Change, 2012; 25. Reeve R., Policing International Trade in Endangered Species: The CITES Treaty and Compliance, 2002; 26. Shaw M. N., International Law, Sixth Edition, 2008; 27. Schimel D., Climate and Ecosystems, 2013; 28. Squintani L., Vedder H., Reese M., Vanheusden B. (eds), Sustainable Energy United in Diversity: Challenges and Approaches in Energy Transition in the EU, European Environmental Law Book Series, Volume 1, 2014; 29. Streck Ch., O’Sullivan R., Janson-Smith T., Tarasofsky R. (eds), Climate Change and Forests, Emerging Policy and Market Opportunities, 2008; 30. van Asselt H., The Fragmentation of Global Climate Governance, 2015; 31. Voigt Ch, Research Handbook on REDD + and International Law, 2016; 32. Woerdman E., Roggenkamp M., Holwerda M., Essential EU Climate Law, 2015; 33. Wolfrum R., Matz N., Conflicts in International Environmental Law, 2003; 34. Young M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law, Facing Fragmentation, 2012; 35. Young O., et al, Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Fit, Interplay and Scale, 2002; VII. Articles 1. Abanina E. N. (Абанина Е.Н.), Protection of Forests in International Environmental Law (Охрана Лесов в Международном Экологическом Праве), New Legal Thought (Новая Правовая Мысль), 2, 2013, pp. 24-31; 2. Abdul Razak, et al, Afforestation and Reforestation with he Clean Development Mechanism: Potentials, Problems and Future Directions, Forest Sciece and Technology, 5, 2, 2009; 3. Agrawala S., Explaining the Evolution of the IPCC Structure and Process, Global Environmental Assessment Project, Environmental and Natural Resources Program, Harvard University, 1997; 4. Aguilar S., Regulatory Tools for the Management of Fish and Timber Species through CITES, RECIEL, 22, 3, 2013; 5. Akehurst M., Equity and General Principles of Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 25, 1976; 6. Anton D. K., Treaty Congestion in Contemporary International Environmental Law, in Sh. Alam, et al (eds), Routledge Handbook of International Environmental Law, 2012; M. Young (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law, Facing Fragmentation, 2012; 7. Assembe-Mvondo S., The Customary Law Nature of Sustainable Forest Management States Practice in Central America and European Union, Journal of Sustainable Development, 3, 2, 2010; 8. Bashmakov I., Low-Carbon Russia, (Низкоуглеродная Россия), 2009.// < http://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/conf/2009/27052009/270509_prz_BASH.pdf>, last viewed 11 November 2016; 9. Bedritsky A. (А. Бедрицкий), Special Adviser to the RF President on Climate Change Issues, Russia will not Artificially Speed Up the Ratification Process (РФ не будет Искусственно Ускорять Ратификацию Парижского Соглашения).// < http://tass.ru/obschestvo/3639933 >, last viewed 03 November 2016; 10. Bedritsky A. I., On Russia’s International Commitments to Limit GHG Emissions under the New International Climate Agreement (Об обязательствах России по Ограничению Выбросов Парниковых Газов в Рамках Нового Соглашения по Климату), in RF State Duma (Государственная Дума Федерального Собрания РФ Шестого Созыва), Committee on Natural Resources, the Use of Natural Resources and Ecology (Комитет по Природным Ресурсам, Природопользованию и Экологии), Proceedings of the Meeting, Legal Regulation of the GHG Emissions in the RF, 15 June 2016; 11. Benvenisti E., Downs G.W., The empire’s new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law, Stanford Law Review, 60, 2007, pp. 595-632; 12. Bernier P., Schoene D., Adapting Forests and their Management to Climate Change: An Overview, Adapting Forest Management Practices; 13. Bobylev S.N., Stetsenko A. V., Forest Projects: Climate Change and Ecosystem Services (Лесные Проекты: Климатические Изменения и Экосистемные Услуги), Proceedings of the Saint Petersburgh Scientific Research Institute of Forest Management (Труды Санкт-Петербургского Научно-Исследовательского Института Лесного Хозяйства), 3, 2016; 14. Bodansky D., Does one Need to Be an International Lawyer to be an International Environmental Lawyer?, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 303, 2006; 15. Bodansky D., Diringer E., Alternative Models for the 2015 Climate Change Agreement, Fridtjof Nansen Institute Climate Policy Perspectives, 13, 2014; 16. Bodansky D., O’Connor S. D., A Tale of Two Architectures: The Once and Future U.N. Climate Change Regime. // <http://www.global-systems-science.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Bodansky_2011.pdf>, last viewed 27 July 2015; 17. Bodansky D., O’Connor S. D., Rajamani L., Key Legal Issues in the 2015 Climate Negotiations, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2015; 18. Bodansky D., Current Developments – The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: A Post-Mortem, The American Journal of International Law, 2010; 19. Boer B., Commentary: Developments in International Environemental Law Relating for Forests, Environment and Planning Law Journal, 14, 1997; 20. Bonan G. B., Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests, Science, 320, 2008; 21. Booker Ch., New Evidence of the IPCC’s Failures, the Telegraph, 30 January 2010; 22. Bowman M. J., The Ramsar Convention Comes of Age, Netherlands International Law Review, 42, 1, 1995; 23. Boyd W., Ways of Seeing in Environmental Law: How Deforestation Became an Object of Climate Governance, Ecology Law Quarterly, 37, 3, 2010; 24. Boyd W., Climate Change, Fragmentation and the Challenges of Global Environmental Law: Elements of a post-Copenhagen assemblage, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 32, 2010; 25. Boyle A., Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48, 4, 1999; 26. Boyle A., Climate Change and International Law – A Post Kyoto Perspective, Environmental Policy and Law, 42/6, 2012; 27. Brown A. V., Russian Renewable Energy Market: Design and Implementation of National Policy, Russian Energy and Mining Law Journal, 6, 2005; 28. Brown Weiss E., International Environmental Law and the Emergence of a New World Order, the Georgetown Law Journal, 81, 1993, pp. 675-710; 29. Brunnee J., Coping with Consent: Law-Making under Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Leiden Journal of International Law, 15, 1, 2002; 30. Brunnee J., A Conceptual Framework for an International Forest Convention: Customary Law and Emerging Principles, in Canadian Council on International Law (ed), Global Forests and International Law, 1996; 31. Brunnee J., Nollkaemper A., Between the Forests and the Trees: An Emerging International Forest Law, Environmental Conservation, 23, 4, 1996; 32. Burns W.C.G., Belt and Suspenders? The World Heritage Convention’s Role in Confronting Climate Change, RECIEL, 18 (2), 2009; 33. Canaveira P., Options and Elements for an Accounting Framework for the Land Sector in the Post-2020 Climate Regime, Terraprima Report to the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, 2014; 34. Carlarne C. P., Good Climate Governance: Only a Fragmented System of International Law Away?, Law and Policy, 30, 4, 2008; 35. Carlin A., Global Climate Change Control: Is there a Better Strategy Than Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions?, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155, 2006-2007; 36. Cassimatis A., International Human Rights Law, and Fragmentation of International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56, 3, 2007; 37. Chandani A., Distributive Justice and Sustainability as a Viable Foundation for the Future Climate Change Regime, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 2, 2007, pp. 152-163, p. 156; 38. Chaparro M. L. R., DNA Structure and CDM Project Approval Process in Five Latin American Countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru, CDM Investment Newsletter, 2, 2006. // < https://www.numarkassoc.com/res/CDM.pdf >, last viewed 24 February 2017; 39. Chinkin Ch. M., The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 38, 1989; 40. Chludeneva N. I., Challenges and Prospects for Legal Regulation on GHG Emissions at the National Level (RF’s Experience), RF State Duma (Государственная Дума Федерального Собрания РФ Шестого Созыва), Committee on Natural Resources, the Use of Natural Resources and Ecology (Комитет по Природным Ресурсам, Природопользованию и Экологии), Proceedings of the Meeting, Legal Regulation of the GHG Emissions in the RF, 15 June 2016; 41. Cooney R., CITES and the CBD: Tensions and Synergies, RECIEL, 10, 3, 2001; 42. Churchill R., Ulfstein G., Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-noticed Phenomenon in International Law, 94, 4, American Journal of International Law, 2000; 43. Couzens Ed, CITES at Forty: Never Too Late, to Make Lifestyle Changes, RECIEL, 22, 3, 2013; 44. Cullet Ph., Kameri-Mbote A. P., Joint Implementation and Forestry Projects: Conceptual and Operational Fallacies, International Affairs, 74, 2, 1998; 45. Davenport D. S., Wood P., Finding the Way Forward for the International Arrangement on Forests: UNFF – 5, -6, and -7, RECIEL, 15 (3), 2006; 46. Davenport D. S., An Alternative Explanation for the Failure of the UNCED Forest Negotiations, Global Environmental Politics, 5, 1, 2005; 47. Davenport D.S., Wood P., Finding the Way Forward for the International Arrangement of Forests: UNFF – 5, - 6, -7, Review of European Community and International Environmetnal Law, 2006; 48. Delimatsis P., The Fragmentation of International Trade Law, Journal of World Trade, 45, 1, 2011; 49. Dimitrov R., International Nonregimes, International Studies Review, 2007; 50. Doeh D., Shergold St., Fominykh S., Consideration of JI Projects in Russia, International Energy Law Review, 3, 2009; 51. Dupuy P. M., Soft Law and the International Law of the Environment, Michigan Journal of International Law, 12, 1991; 52. Ellison D., Peterson H., Lundblad M.,. Wikberg P. E, The Incentive Gap: LULUCF and the Kyoto Mechanism before Durban, Global Change Biology, Bioenergy, 5, 2013; 53. Eshbach R., A Global Approach to the Protection of the Environment: Balancing State Sovereignty and Global Interests, Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 4, 2, 1990; 54. Faure M., Effectiveness of Environmental Law: What does the Evidence Tell us?, William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 36, 293, 2012; 55. Figueres C., Sectoral CDM: Opening the CDM to the Yet Unrealized Goal of Sustainable Development, McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2, 2006 56. Fritsche U.R., et al, Extending the EU Renewable Energy Directive Sustainability Criteria to Solid Bioenergy from Forests, Natural Resources Forum, 38, 2014; 57. Fritsche U. R., Iriarte L., et al, Outcome Paper: Sustainability Criteria and Indicators for Solid Bionenergy from Forests, based on the Joint Workshops on Extending the RED Sustainability Requirements to Solid Bioenergy, 2012; 58. Fry I., If a Tree Falls in a Kyoto Forest and Nobody is There to Hear it, will it be Accounted for? An Insider’s View of the Negotiations Surrounding Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry for the Second Commitment Period of the Kyoto Protocol, 20, 2, 2011; 59. Fry I., More Twists, Turns and Stumbles in the Jungle: A Further Exploration of Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Decisions within the Kyoto Protocol, RECIEL, 16 (3), 2007; 60. Fry I., Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation: Opportunities and Pitfalls in Developing a New Legal Regime, RECIEL 17 (2), 2008; 61. Fry I., Twists and Turns in the Jungle: Exploring the Evolution of Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Decisions within the Kyoto Protocol, RECIEL, 11 (2), 2002; 62. Fuchs C., Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES): conservation efforts undermine the legality principle, German Law Journal, 9, 2008; 63. Futter M. N., et al, Forests, Forestry and the Water Framework Directive in Sweden: A Trans-Disciplinary Commentary, Forests, 2, 2011; 64. Galbraith Marlin C., Environmental Effects of Timber Harvest and Utilization of Logging Residues, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review. // < http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1988&context=ealr>, last viewed 30 March 2017; 65. Giessen L., Reviewing the main Characteristics of the International Forest Regime Complex and Partial Explanation for its Fragmentation, International Forestry Review, 15, 1, 2013; 66. Gluck P., et al, Options for Strengthening the Intenationa Legal Regime for Forests, 1997; 67. Gordeeva Y.M., (Гордеева Е.М.), Sources of International Forest Regulation (Источники Международного Права Лесов), Proceedings of the International Scientific Forum “Society, Politics, Economics, Law” (Материалы Международного Научного Форума: Общество, Политика, Экономика, Право), Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2013; 68. Gordeeva Y.M., Wood Biomass Sustainability under the Renewable Energy Directive, in L. Squintani, H. Vedder, Sustainable Energy United in Diversity – Challenges and Approaches in Energy Transition in the EU, European Environmental Law Forum Book Series, Volume 1, 2014; 69. Gordeeva Y.M., The RF and the International Climate Change Regime, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 3, 2014; 70. Gordeeva Y.M., EU Forest Law and Policy (Право и Политика ЕС в Области Лесного Хозяйства), Current Issues of Russian Law (Актуальные Проблемы Российского Права), 12, 2014; 71. Graichen P., Can Forestry Gain from Emissions Trading?, Rules Governing Sink Projects Under the UNFCCC and the EU Emissions Trading System, Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law, 14, 1, 2005; 72. Groves M., Rutherford C., CITES and Timber, A guide to CITES-listed Tree Species, 2015; 73. Gulbrandsen L., Overlapping Public and Private Governance: Can Forest Certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime?, Global Environmental Politics, 4, 2, p. 76; 74. Hanafi A. G., Joint Implementation: Legal and Institutional Issues for an Effective International Program to Combat Climate Change, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 441, 1998; 75. Hafner G., Pros and Cons ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law, Michigan Journal of International Law, Pros and Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law, 25, 2003; 76. Hirsbrunner S., Important Aspects of Sinks for Linking Emission Trading Systems, Climate Change, 2011; 77. Hooker A., The International law of Forests, Natural Resources Journal, 34, 1994; 78. Hudson B., Federal Constitutions, Global Governance, and the Role of Forests in Regulating Climate Change, Indiana Law Journal, 87, 2012; 79. Humphreys St., Structural Ambiguity: Technological Transfer in Three Regimes, in M. Young (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law, Facing Fragmentation, 2012; 80. Iversen P., Lee D., Rocha M., Understanding Land Use in the UNFCCC, 2014; 81. Jacobs R. E., Threading Deep Waters: Substantive Issues in Tuvalu’s Threat to Sue the U.S. in the International Court of Justice, Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 2005; 82. Jacquemont F., Caparros A., The Convention on Biological Diversity and Climate Change Convention 10 Years after Rio: Towards a Synergy of the Two Regimes?, RECIEL, 11, 2, 2002; 83. Jamal A., The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa; Implementing Agenda 21, RECIEL, 6, 1, 1997; 84. Jenks C. W., The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties, British Year Book of International Law, 30, 1953; 85. Johannsdottir A., Cresswell I., Bridgewater P., The Current Framework for International Governance of Biodiversity: Is it Doing More Harm than Good?, RECIEL, 19, 2, 2010; 86. Kakitelashvili M. M., The Prospects of Russia’s Participation in the Kyoto Protocol (Перспективы Участия России в Киотском Протоколе), Environmental Law, (Экологическое Право), 2016; 87. Kasimbazi E., An International Legal Framework for Forest Management and Sustainable Development, Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law, Volume 2, 1995; 88. Klabbers J., The Redundancy of Soft Law, Nordic Journal of International Law, 65, 2, 1996; 89. Klyukanova L. G., Sustainable Forest Management as the Fundamental Principle of Forestry Management in the Russian Federation. // < http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ustoychivoe-upravlenie-lesami-kak-osnovnoy-printsip-vedeniya-lesnogo-hozyaystva-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii>, last viewed 17 March 2017; 90. Kokorin A., Korppoo A., Russian Greenhouse Gas Target 2020, 2014.// <http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/10632.pdf> last viewed 04 November 2016; 91. Korppoo A., Kokorin A., Russia’s 2020 GHG emission target: Emission Trends and Implementation, Climate Policy, 2015; 92. Korppoo A., Gutbrod M., Sitnikov S., Russian Law on Climate Change, in C. P. Carlarne, K. R. Gray, R. Tarasofsky (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Climate Change Law, 2016; 93. Kokko K., et al, EU Competences in Forestry Policy, 2006; 94. Kokorin A., Kroppoo A., Russia’s Post – Kyoto Climate Policy: Real Action or Merely Window-Dressing?, 2013. // < http://www.wwf.ru/resources/publ/book/eng/833>, last viewed 09 November 2016; 95. Kopylov A. E. (А.Е. Копылов), Status and Prospects of Developing Legislative and Regulatory Frameworks for Russia’s System Supporting Renewable Energy Sources (Состояние и Перспективы Развития Законодательной и Нормативной Базы Российской Системы Поддержки ВИЭ), Energy Law (Энергетическое Право), 2, 2015; 96. Kopylov M.N., Solncev A.M. (Копылов М.Н., Солнцев А.М.), The 1971 Ramsar Convention and an Ecosystem Based Approach to the Wise Use and Sustainable Development of Wetlands (Рамсарская Конвенция 1971 года и Экосистемный Подход к Разумному Использованию и Устойчивому Развитию Водно-Болотных Угодий), Environmental Law (Экологическое Право), 2012, 3; 97. Kozlov S.V. (Козлов C.В.), Renewable Energy in Russia and Germany: Present State and Future Prospects of the Legal Framework (Возобновляемая Энергетика в России и Германии: Cостояние и Перспективы Правового Регулирования), Legal Bulletin of Young Scientists (Юридический Вестник Молодых Ученых), 2015; 98. Kunzmann K., The Non-legally Binding Instrument on Sustainable Managemnt of All Types of Forests – Towards a Legal Regime for Sustainable Forest Management, German Law Review, 9, 8, 2008; 99. Laframboise D., The Delinquent Teenager who was mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert, 2011; 100. Lesniewska F., UNFCCC Conference of the Parties: The Key International Forest Law-makers for Better or for Worse, in M. Fitzmaurice, D. French, International Environmental Law and Governance, 2013; 101. Lesniewska F., Laws for Forests, An Introductory Guide to International Forest and Forest Related Legal Materials that Shape Forest Ethics and Practice, 2005; 102. Lesniewska F., UNFCCC REDD + COP Decisions: The Cumulative Effect on Forest Related Law Processes, International Community Law Review, 15, 2013; 103. Levin J., Russian Forest Laws – Scant Protection during Troubled Times, Ecology Law Quarterly, 19, 4, 1992; 104. Lipszutz R., Why is there no International Forestry Law?: An examination of International Forestry Regulation both Public and Private, UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 19, 1, 2000; 105. Lovbrand E., Revisititng the Politics of Expertise in Light of the Kyoto Negotiations on Land Use Change and Forestry, Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 2009; 106. Lund H. G., Definitions of Forest, Deforestation, Afforestation, and Reforestation, 2015; 107. Ma M., Haapanen T., Singh R.B., and Hietala R., Integrating Ecological Restoration into CDM Forestry Projects, Environmental Science and Policy, 2013; 108. Mackenzie C.P., Lessons from Forestry for International Environmental Law, RECIEL, 21, 2, 2012; 109. Mackenzie C.P., Future Prospects for International Forest Law, International Forestry Review, 2012, 14 (2); 110. Marceau G., Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: the relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties, Journal of World Trade, 35, 6, 2001, p. 1082; 111. Martynyuk A.A., Forest Resource Potential for Bioenergy Goals in the Russian Federation, Current Issues of the RF Forest Sector, 37, 2013.// < http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/potentsial-lesnyh-resursov-dlya-tseley-bioenergetiki-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii>, last viewed 18 February 2017; 112. Makarieva A. M., Gorshkov V.G., The Biotic Pump: Consideration, Atmospheric Dynamics and Climate, International Journal of Water, 4, 5, 2010; 113. Malakhov V., Economic Perspectives on Low-carbon Development in Russia, International Journal of Low-Carbon Development, 5 (4), 2010; 114. Mehling M., Design Elements of the Post 2020 Climate Regime, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 1, 2014; 115. Melo I., Turnhout E., Arts B., Integrating Multiple Benefits in Market-Based Climate Mitigation Schemes: The Case of the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Certification Scheme, Environmental Science and Policy, 35, 2014; 116. Moen J., Rist L., Bishop K., et al., Eye on the Taiga: Removing Global Policy Impediments to Safeguard the Boreal Forest, Conservation Letters, a Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, Volume 7, issue 4, 2014; 117. Morgera E., Far Away, so Close, A Legal Analysis of the Increasing Interactions between the Convention on Biological Diversity and Climate Change Law, Climate Law, 2, 2011; 118. Morega E., Kulovesi K., Munoz M., Environmental Integration and the Multifaced International Dimensions of EU Law: Unpacking the EU’s 2009 Climate and Energy Package, Common Market Law Review, 48, 2011; 119. Muller A., How to Make the CDM Mechanism Sustainable – the Potential of Rent Extraction, Energy Policy, 35, 2007; 120. Nollkaemper A., Brunnee J., Between the Forests and the Trees – an Emerging International Forest Law, Environmental Conservation, 1996; 121. Nagtzaam G., The International Tropical Timber Organization and Conservationist Forestry Norms: A Bridge too Far.// < http://works.bepress.com/gerry_nagtzaam/4/>, last viewed 18 April 2016; 122. Nagtzaam G., Into the Woods: Analyzing Normative Evolution and the International Tropical Timber Organization, Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 5, 2, 2014; 123. Novak A., RF Minister of Energy at the Meeting of the RF Government, 7 March 2013.// < http://government.ru/news/707/>, last viewed 06 November 2016; 124. Olsen K. H., Arens Ch., Mersmann Fl., Learning from CDM SD Tool Experience for Article 6.4. of the Paris Agreement, Climate Policy, 2017; 125. Orakhelashvili A., The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism or Convergence?, European Journal of International Law, 19, 1, 2008; 126. Oberthur S., Kelly C., EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges, International Spectator, 43, 35, 2008; 127. O’Sullivan R., Streck Ch., Conservation Carbon: A New Voluntary Market Mechanism to Protect Forests, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 3, 2008; 128. Papenov K.V., Kazantseva A. N., State Support for Renewable Energy Resources (Государственная Поддержка Развития Альтернативной Энергетики), Entrepreneurship Law (Предпринимательское Право), 2, 2016; 129. Parker C., Karlsson C., Climate Change and the European Union’s Leadership Momemnt: An Inconvenient Truth, Journal of Common Market studies, 48, 2010; 130. Parker Ch., Merger E.,. Streck Ch, Conway D., Tennigkeit T., and Wilkes A., The Land-Use Sector within the Oost-2020 Climate Regime, TemaNord, 2014; 131. Pauwelyn J., Conflicts of Norms in Public International Law, How WTO law relates to Other Rules of International Law, 2003, p. 166-175; 132. Peeters M., Schomerus T., Modifying Our Society with Law: The Case of EU Renewable Energy Law, Climate Law, 4, 2014; 133. Peeters M., An EU Law Perspective on the Paris Agreement: Will the EU Consider Strengthening its Mitigation Effort?, Climate Law, 6, 2016; 134. Pelkonen P., et al, Forest Bioenergy for Europe, What Science Can tell Us?, 2014.// < http://www.efi.int/files/attachments/publications/efi_wsctu_4_net.pdf>; 135. Pelli P., et al, Mid-term Evaluation of the Implementation of the EU Forest Action Plan: A Study for DG Agriculture and Rural Development, 2009; 136. Persson R., Where is the United Nations Forum on Forests Going?, International Forestry Review, 7, 4, 2005; 137. Pisarenko A. I., Strakhov V.V. (А. И. Писаренко, В.В. Страхов), Forest Plantations and their Prospects for Reforestation and Afforestation (Перспективы Развития Лесных Плантаций как Основы Лесовосстановления), Forestry (Лесное Хозяйство), 5, 2014; 138. Pontecorvo C. M., Interdependence between Global Environmental Regimes: The Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change and Forest Protection, Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 59,3, 1999; 139. Potvin C., Bovarnick A., Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries: Key Actors, Negotiations and Actions, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 3, 2008; 140. Pulzl H., Hogl K., et al, European Forest Governance: Issues at Stake and the Way Forward, 2013; 141. Pistorius T., From RED to REDD +: the Evolution of a Forest-Based Mitigation Approach for Developing Countries, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 2012; 142. Pistorius T., Benick D., Reinecke S., REDD + and Safeguards under the UNFCCC and the CBD, in T. Pistorius and C. Schmitt (eds), The Protection of Forests under Global Biodiversity and Climate Policies, 2013; 143. Ralf M., Pauwelyn J., Conflict of norms or conflict of laws? Different techniques in the Fragmentation of Public International Law, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 2012; 144. Rametsteiner E., Smula M., Forest Certification – an Instrument to Promote Sustainable Forest Managements, Journal of Environmental Management, 67, 2003; 145. Raunkar R., et al, Global Outlook for Wood and Forests with Bioenergy Demand Implied by Scenarios of the IPCC, Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 2010; 146. Rajamani L., The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility and the Balance of Commitments under the Climate Regime, RECIEL, 9, 2, 2000; 147. Rayner J., et al, Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance, 2010; 148. Rosental E., Watson R., Multilateral Efforts to Reduce Black Carbon Emissions: A Lifeline for the Warming Arctic?, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 20, 1, 2011; 149. Rousseaux S., Carbon Sinks in the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism: An Obstacle to the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity?, Environmental Law Review, 7, 2005; 150. Ruis B.M.G.S., No Forest Convention, but Ten Tree Treaties // < http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/y1237e/y1237e03.htm>, last viewed 08 April 2016; 151. Rusakova U. A., Climate Policy of the Russian Federation and Solving the Problem of Global Climate Change, (Климатическая Политика РФ и Решение Проблем Изменения Глобального Климата), Vestnik MGMIO, (Вестник МГИМО), 1 (40), 2015; 152. Sagemuller I., Forest Sinks under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, Opportunity or Risk for Biodiversity?, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 31, 2, 2006; 153. Sand P. H., Institution Building to Assist Compliance with International Environmental Law, Max-Planck-Institut fur Auslandisches Offentliches Recht und Volkerrecht, 1996. //< http://www.zaoerv.de/56_1996/56_1996_3_a_774_795.pdf >, last viewed 17 July 2015; 154. Sand P. H., Enforcing CITES: The Rise and Fall of Trade Sanctions, RECIEL, 22, (3), 2013; 155. Sand P. H., Whither CITES? The Evolution of a Treaty Regime in the Borderland of Trade and Environment, European Journal of International Law, 1, 1997; 156. Sangha K. K., Jalota R. K., Value of Ecological Services of Exotic Eucalyptus tereticornis and Native Dalbergia sissoo Tree Plantations of North-Western India, Conservation and Society, 3, 1, 2005; 157. Savaresi A., Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries under the UNFCCC: Caveats and Opportunities for Biodiversity, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 21, 81, 2011; 158. Savaresi A., Glimpse into the Future of the Climate Regime: Lessons from the REDD+ Architecture, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 25, 2, 2016; 159. Schally H., Forests: Towards an International Legal Regime, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 4, 1993; 160. Schlamadinger B., Bird N., Johns J., (et al.), A Synopsis of Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakesh Accords, Environmental Science and Policy, 2007; 161. Shaffer G., Pollack M. A., Hard Vs Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance, Minnesota Law Review, 94, 3, 2010; 162. Shelton D., Equity, Equity and International Law, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnee, E. Hey (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, 2007; 163. Schrijver N., Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Balancing Rights and Duties, 1997.// < http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam034/96033595.pdf>, last viewed 14 July 2016; 164. Schneider L., Is the CDM Fulfilling Its Environmental and Sustainable Development Objectives? An Evaluation of the CDM and Options for Improvement, Oko Institute for Applied Ecology, 2007; 165. Schoene D., Netto M., The Kyoto Protocol: What Does it Mean for Forests and Forestry?, Unasylva, 222, 56, 3, 2002; 166. Scholz I., A Forest Convention – Yes or No? Position Paper for the BMZ on the State and the Perspectives for Creating a Legally Binding Instrument for International Forest Policy, 2004; 167. Silchenko A.I., Proposal for the Briefing on “Regulatory Measures on GHG accounting in the RF”, in RF State Duma, Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the 6th Convocation, Highest Ecological Council, Materials of the Meeting “Regulatory Measures on the GHG Emissions in the RF”, 15 June 2016; 168. Simma B., Self-contained regimes, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 16, 1985, pp. 111-136; 169. Sjostedt B., Case Note, Costa Rica and Nicaragua before the International Court of Justice: Trying to Work Out the Complicated Relationship between Law and the Environment, RECIEL, 22, 3, 2013; 170. Skala-Kuhmann A., Legal Instruments to Enhance the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Forest Resources at the International Level, a Study Commissioned by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), and Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, 1996; 171. Skjaerseth J. B., Stokke O. Schram, Wettestad J., Soft Law, Hard Law, and Effective Implementation of International Environmental Norms, Global Environmental Politics, 6, 3, 2006; 172. Skodvin T., Structure and Agent in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change, An Empirical Case Study of Science –Policy Interaction in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2003; 173. Skovpen A.A. (А.А. Сковпень), The Use of Renewable Energy Sources: Legal Analysis of the Foreign and National Laws (Использование Возобновляемых Источников Энергии: Анализ Зарубежного и Национального Законодательства), Legal Energy Forum (Правовой Энергетический Форум), 3, 2013; 174. Smith T.M., Fischlein M., Rival Private Governance Networks: Competing to Define the Rules of Sustainability Performance, Global Environmental Change, 20, 2010; 175. Srivastava N., Changing Dynamics of Forest Regulation: Coming Full Circle?, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 20, 2, 2011; 176. Stanturf J. A., et al, Eucalyptus beyond its Native Range: Environmental Issues in Exotic Bioenergy Plantations, International Journal of Forestry Research, 2013; 177. Steiner M., After a Decade of Global Forest Negotiations, Where are We now?, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 10, 1, 2001; 178. Streck Ch., Forests, Carbon Markets, and Avoided Deforestation: Legal Implications, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 3, 2008; 179. Streck Ch., Scholz S. M., The Role of Forests in Global Climate Change: Whence we Come and Where we Go?, International Affairs, 82, 5, 2006; 180. Streck Ch., Schlamadinger B., R. O’Sullivan, Will Joint Implementation LULUCF projects be impossible in practice?.// <http://www.climatefocus.com/sites/default/files/will_joint_implementation_lulucf_projects_be_impossible_in_practice__.pdf>, last viewed 16 October 2015; 181. Subak S., Forest Certification Eligibility as a Screen for CDM Sinks Projects, Climate Policy, 2, 2002; 182. Tacconi L., Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: Theory and Narrative, Global Environmental Change, 17, 3; 183. Takoukam P. T., Sustainable Forest Management Tools – National Legal Frameworks since 1992, Environmental Policy and Law, 41/2, 2011; 184. Tarasofsky R.G., The International Forest Regime: Legal and Policy Issues, 1995; 185. Tarasofsky R.G., Options for Strengthening the International Legal Regime for Forests, A Report prepared for the European Commission under the study contract B7-8110/96/000221/D4, 1997; 186. Tarasofsky R. G., Assessing the International Forest Regime, IUCN Environmental Law Center, Policy and Law Paper 37, 1999; 187. Tarlock D., Exclusive Sovereignty versus Sustainable Development of a Shared Resource: The Dilemma of Latin American Rainforest Management, Texas International Law Journal, 32, 1, 1997; 188. Tewari R., Mapping of Criteria, set by DNAs to Assess Sustainable Development Benefits of CDM Projects, CDM Policy Dialogue, 2012; 189. Thrurer D., International Law as Progress and Prospect, Soft Law- Norms in the Twilight between Law and Politics// < http://www.legalanthology.ch/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Th%C3%BCrer-International-Law-as-Progress-and-Prospect.pdf>, last viewed 07 July 2016; 190. Trowborst A., Prevention, Precaution, Logic and Law: The Relationship between the Precautionary Principle and the Preventative Principle in International Law and Associated Questions, Erasmus Law Review, 2, 2, 2009; 191. Underdal A., One Question, Two Answers, in E. L. Miles et al. (eds.), Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, 2001; 192. van Asselt H. Managing the Fragmentation of International Environmental Law: Forest at the Intersection of the Climate and Biodiversity Regimes, International Law and Politics, 44, 2012; 193. van Asselt H., McDermott C. L., The Institutional Complex for REDD +: A “Benevolent Jigsaw”? , in C. Voigt (ed.), Research Handbook on REDD + and International Law, 2016; 194. Vedder H. H. D., The Treaty of Lisbon and European Environmental Law, Journal of Environmental Law, 22, 2, 2010; 195. Vihma A., Climate of Consensus: Managing Decision Making in the UN Climate Change Negotiations, RECIEL, 24 (1), 2015, p. 58; 196. Vorner A., Sogandares O., Press Release, UN’s Offsetting Project Barro Blanco Hampers Panama Peace-Talks, Carbon Market Watch, 15 March, 2012; 197. Voigt Ch., Ferreira F., Differentiation in the Paris Agreement, Climate Law, 6, 2016; 198. Vranes E., Trade and the Environment, Fundamental Issues in International and WTO Law, 2009; 199. Wang S., Towards an International Convention on Forests: Building Blocks versus Stumbling Blocks, International Forestry Review, 3, 4, 2001; 200. Weiss E.B., Environmental Equity: The Imperative for the Twenty-First Century, in W. Lang (ed.) Sustainable Development and International Law, 1995; 201. Weiss E.B., In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony and Intergenerational Equity, 1989; 202. Weiss E.B., The Planetary Trust: Conservation and Intergenerational equity, Ecology Law Quarterly, 11, 4, 1984; 203. Yamin F., The Kyoto Protocol: Origins, Assessment and Future Challenges, 7, 2, RECIEL, 1998; 204. Yamineva Y., The Governance of Scientific Assessment in the Context of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Lessons for International Cooperation in Science, Technology, and Innovation, German Development Institute, Discussion Paper 7/2014, 2014; 205. Young M., Climate Change Law and Regime Interaction, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 4, 2, 2011; 206. Zhang Y., Ulgiati S., Dong X., and Pfahler D., Using Ecological Criteria to Develop CDM Projects in Zhifanggou Valley, Loess Plateau, China, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 141, 3-4, 2011. VIII. Websites 1. BirdLife International.// < http://www.birdlife.org/>, last viewed 30 March 2017; 2. Bonn Challenge.// < http://www.bonnchallenge.org/content/challenge>, last viewed 05 May 2016; 3. CBD.// < https://www.cbd.int/>, last viewed 05 May 2016; 4. CCBA, Climate Community and Biodiversity Standards. // < http://www.climate-standards.org/ccb-standards/>, last viewed 28 February 2017; 5. CIFOR.// <http://www.cifor.org/about-cifor/>, last viewed 23 February 2016; 6. Climate Funds Update. // < http://www.climatefundsupdate.org/>; 7. CPF.// <www.cpfweb.org>, last viewed 05 April 2016; 8. CITES.// < https://cites.org/eng>, last viewed 26 April 2016; 9. Delovaya Rossija. // <www.Deloros.ru>, last viewed 11 November 2016; 10. EFI, EU FLEGT Facility, VPA Countries. // < http://www.euflegt.efi.int/vpa-countries>, last viewed 10 February 2017; 11. European Commission, Climate Action, 2020 Climate and Energy Package.// < https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2020_en#tab-0-0 >, last viewed 05 February 2017; 12. European Commission, Climate Action, Kyoto 1st Commitment Period, (2008-2012). // < https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/progress/kyoto_1_en>, last viewed 26 March 2017; 13. European Commission, Legal Service.// < http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/recasting_en.htm >, last viewed 22 March 2017; 14. European Commission, Climate Action, Progress Made in Cutting Emissions. // < https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/progress_en >, last viewed 23 October 2016; 15. Eurostat, Energy from Renewable Sources, 2016.// < http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Energy_from_renewable_sources >, last viewed 21 November 2016; 16. Eurostat, Statistics Explained, Energy Production and Imports. // < http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Energy_production_and_imports>, last viewed 07 October 2016; 17. FAO.// <www.fao.org>, last viewed 08 April 2016; 18. FAO, The Russian Federation Forest Sector, Outlook Study to 2030, 2012, p. 12. // < http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3020e/i3020e00.pdf >, last viewed 17 February 2017; 19. FCPF.// < https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/> 20. Fern NGO.// < http://www.fern.org/about-us >, last viewed 20 March 2017; 21. Forest Europe.// <http://www.foresteurope.org/>, last viewed 21 January 2016; 22. FSC, official webpage.// < https://ic.fsc.org/en/what-is-fsc/governance>, last viewed 28 February 2017; 23. GEF.//< https://www.thegef.org/gef/whatisgef>, last viewed 23 February 2016; 24. Greenpeace, Protecting China’s Forests, the Secret behind the Fast Growth of Eucalyptus. //< http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/campaigns/forests/work/protecting-china-forests/>, last viewed 26 February 2017; 25. ICRAF.// <http://www.worldagroforestry.org/>, last viewed 23 February 2016; 26. IEA, Renewable Energy in Russia, from Potential to Reality.// < https://www.iea.org/media/translations/russian/RenewRussian2003.pdf>, last viewed 18 February 2017; 27. ILC.// < http://legal.un.org/ilc/>, last viewed 01 February 2016; 28. IPCC. //<http://www.ipcc.ch/index.htm>; 29. ITTO. // < http://www.itto.int/>, last viewed 24 January 2016; 30. IUCN.// <http://iucn.org/>, last viewed 23 February 2016; 31. IUFRO.// < http://www.iufro.org/discover/organization/>, last viewed 25 January 2016; 32. International Finance Corporation (IFC), Renewable Energy Policy in Russia, Waking the Green Giant, “Green” Paper for Discussion, 2011.// < https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/bf9fff0049718eba8bcaaf849537832d/PublicationRussiaRREP-CreenGiant-2011-11.pdf?MOD=AJPERES>, last viewed 17 February 2017; 33. Ramsar Convention.// < http://www.ramsar.org/>, last viewed 08 April 2016; 34. UNCCD.// < http://www.unccd.int/en/about-the-convention/Pages/About-the-Convention.aspx>, last viewed 01 April 2016; 35. UN Climate Summit.// < http://www.un.org/climatechange/summit/programme/>, last viewed 09 May 2016; 36. UNFCCC.// < http://newsroom.unfccc.int/>, last viewed 29 March 2017; 37. UNFCCC, JI project, Project Overview, Romania Afforestation of Degraded Agricultural Land.// <http://ji.unfccc.int/JIITLProject/DB/UUPQK3EXX9F5KBJQ4PGDO6WWTDLRD7/details>, last viewed 26 March 2017; 38. UNFCCC, JI Project Overview, Track 1, Track 2, Russian Federation. // < http://ji.unfccc.int/JI_Projects/ProjectInfo.html>, last viewed 28 March 2017; 39. UNFCCC, Project Search. // https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/projsearch.html, last viewed 27 February 2017; 40. UNFF.// http://www.un.org/esa/forests/, last viewed 14 April 2017. 41. UN-REDD Program. // < http://www.un-redd.org/AboutREDD/tabid/102614/Default.aspx>; 42. WHC.// < http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/>, last viewed 12 April 2016; 43. World Bank. // < http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/forests/overview#2>, last viewed 23 February 2016; 44. WWF.// < http://wwf.panda.org/>, last viewed 27 January 2016. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Non-Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Phd thesis | - |
| item.contributor | GORDEEVA, Yelena | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fullcitation | GORDEEVA, Yelena (2017) European and Russian Forests under International Climate Change Law. | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | PhD Theses - Law Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhD YM Gordeeva UHasselt FINAL11102017.pdf | 6.83 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.