Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25514
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.authorHendriks, Niels-
dc.contributor.authorYndigegn, Signe Louise-
dc.contributor.authorMalmborg, Lone-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-19T15:00:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-19T15:00:20Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationCoDesign (Print), 14(1), p. 17-31-
dc.identifier.issn1571-0882-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/25514-
dc.description.abstractDesigning participation over time is a challenge that is regularly discussed in the fields of Participatory Design (PD) and Codesign. This paper describes two living labs-cases concerned with designing IT during long-term engagements with communities. Both labs aim to enable participatory exchanges after the designer leaves and are thus confronted with challenges that transcend the time of the traditional design ‘project’. We addressed these challenges via defining the IT design process as scripting, which is a process that better articulates the participants’ different voices and timelines. In this process three types of scripts are made, supported by the facilitator role: personal scripts as portrayals of individuals’ views on issues in the community and timelines to address these; community scripts aspiring to combine personal scripts into pluralistic views on the community and scripts for action as ways to rehearse how the community might unfold after the designer leaves. Key to this approach is that diverse people’s views and timelines play a role in co-constructing IT platforms that support participation in the community over time. By creating IT tools that are enabled by and support scripting, designing for participation over time becomes a pluralistic endeavour.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFP7, Marie Curie-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights(C) 2018 informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis group-
dc.subject.otherparticipatory design; codesign; scripting-
dc.titleScripting: an exploration of designing for participation over time with communities-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage31-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage17-
dc.identifier.volume14-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesHendriks, N (reprint author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, LUCA Sch Arts, Genk, Belgium. niels.hendriks@kuleuven.be-
dc.relation.referencesAkrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The de-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by Wiebe Bijker and John Law, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar] Binder, Thomas. 1999. “Setting the Stage for Improvised Video Scenarios.” In CHI ‘99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 230–231. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/632716.632859.[Crossref], [Google Scholar] Binder, Thomas, Eva Brandt, Joachim Halse, Maria Foverskov, Sissel Olander, and Signe Yndigegn. 2011. “Living the (Codesign) Lab.” Nordic Design Research Conference, no. 4: 1–10. [Google Scholar] Binder, Thomas, Eva Brandt, Pelle Ehn, and Joachim Halse. 2015. “Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 152–165. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Blomberg, Jeanette, and Helena Karasti. 2013. “Reflections on 25 Years of Ethnography in CSCW.” CSCW 22 (4–6): 373–423. doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9183-1.[Crossref], [Google Scholar] Clarke, Rachel. 2016. “The New Design Ethnographers 1968–1974: Towards a Critical Historiography of Design Anthropology.” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by Rachel Charlotte Smith, K. T. Vangkilde, M. G. Kjaersgaard, Ton Otto, Joachim Halse, and Thomas Binder, 71–88. New York, NY: Bloomsbury. [Google Scholar] Ehn, Pelle. 2008. “Participation in Design Things.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 92–101. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University. [Google Scholar] Ehn, Pelle, and Dan Sjögren. 1992. “From System Descriptions to Scripts for Action.” In Design at Work, edited by Joan Greenbaum and Morten Kyng, 241–268. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] Ehn, Pelle, Elisabet M. Nilsson, and Richard Topgaard. 2014. Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy. London: MIT Press. [Google Scholar] Graber, Julia A., and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. 1996. “Transitions and Turning Points: Navigating the Passage from Childhood through Adolescence.” Developmental Psychology 32 (4): 768–776.10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.768[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Halse, Joachim. 2008. Design Anthropology: Borderland Experiments with Participation. Copenhagen: IT University Copenhagen. http://nordicom.statsbiblioteket.dk/ncom/services/downloadRegister/86421/design_anthropology-1.pdf. [Google Scholar] Huybrechts, Liesbeth, and Niels Hendriks. 2016. “Counterfactual Scripting: Acknowledging the Past as a Resource for PD”. Proceedings of the 14th PD Conference: Full Papers—Volume 1: 111–120.[Crossref], [Google Scholar] Karasti, Helena, Karen S. Baker, and Florence Millerand. 2010. “Infrastructure Time: Long-term Matters in Collaborative Development.” CSCW 19 (3–4): 377–415. doi:10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z.[Crossref], [Google Scholar] Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature. London: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] Mazé, Ramia. 2016. “Design and the Future: Temporal Politics of ‘Making a Difference.’” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by Rachel Charlotte Smith, K. T. Vangkilde, M. G. Kjaersgaard, Ton Otto, Joachim Halse, and Thomas Binder. New York: Bloomsbury. [Google Scholar] Portigal, Steve. 2008. “Persona Non Grata.” Interactions-New York 15 (1): 72.10.1145/1330526[Crossref], [Google Scholar] Salvo, Di, Andrew Clement Carlo, and Volker Pipek. 2012. “Participatory Design for, with, and by Communities.” In International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson, 182–209. Oxford: Routledge. [Google Scholar] Simon, Herbert A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. London: MIT press. [Google Scholar] Storni, Cristiano. 2013. “Design for Future Uses: Pluralism, Fetishism and Ignorance.” Nordic Design Research Conference, no. 5: 1 (5): 50–59. [Google Scholar]-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15710882.2018.1424205-
dc.identifier.isi000423883100003-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; Hendriks, Niels; Yndigegn, Signe Louise & Malmborg, Lone (2018) Scripting: an exploration of designing for participation over time with communities. In: CoDesign (Print), 14(1), p. 17-31.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
item.contributorHendriks, Niels-
item.contributorYndigegn, Signe Louise-
item.contributorMalmborg, Lone-
item.validationecoom 2019-
crisitem.journal.issn1571-0882-
crisitem.journal.eissn1745-3755-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Scripting- an exploration of designing for participation over time with communities author copy.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Scripting an exploration of designing for participation over time with communities.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

62
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

236
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.