Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25646
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStaples, Mark D.-
dc.contributor.authorMALINA, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorSuresh, Pooja-
dc.contributor.authorHileman, James I.-
dc.contributor.authorBarret, Steven R.H.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-05T16:24:33Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-05T16:24:33Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationEnergy policy, 114, p. 342-354-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/25646-
dc.description.abstractAlthough a relatively small contributor to annual anthropogenic CO2 emissions (~2.6%), commercial aviation activity is growing at ~5% per annum. As a result, alternative jet fuel (AJF) technologies have garnered interest as a means to achieve large, near-term emissions reductions for the industry. This analysis quantifies the potential for AJF to reduce aviation's CO2 emissions by assessing: the availability of AJF feedstock; AJF volumes that could be produced from that feedstock; the lifecycle emissions of AJF compared to petroleum-derived jet fuel; and the number of bio-refineries and capital investment required to achieve the calculated emission reductions. We find that, if the use of AJF is to reduce aviation's lifecycle GHG emissions by 50% or more by 2050, prices or policies will have to significantly incentivize the production of bioenergy and waste feedstocks, and AJF production will need to be prioritized over other potential uses of these resources. Reductions of 15% by 2050 would require construction of ~60 new bio-refineries annually (similar to growth in global biofuel production capacity in the early 2000s), and capital investment of ~12 billion USD2015 per year (~1/5 of annual capital investment in petroleum refining).-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the US Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Environment and Energy, under FAA Award Number 13-C-AJFE-MIT, Amendment Nos. 003, 012, 016, and 028. The project was managed by James Hileman, Daniel Williams and Nathan Brown, FAA. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the FAA.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.subject.otheraviation; climate change; alternative jet fuel; LCA; ICAO; CORSIA-
dc.titleAviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage354-
dc.identifier.spage342-
dc.identifier.volume114-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesStaples, MD (reprint author), MIT, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Lab Aviat & Environm, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA. mstaples@mit.edu-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.007-
dc.identifier.isi000424962800032-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorStaples, Mark D.-
item.contributorMALINA, Robert-
item.contributorSuresh, Pooja-
item.contributorHileman, James I.-
item.contributorBarret, Steven R.H.-
item.fullcitationStaples, Mark D.; MALINA, Robert; Suresh, Pooja; Hileman, James I. & Barret, Steven R.H. (2018) Aviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels. In: Energy policy, 114, p. 342-354.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2019-
crisitem.journal.issn0301-4215-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-6777-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Energy Policy Staples Malina et al.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Staples.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version858.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.