Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25650
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHANSEN, Dominique-
dc.contributor.authorROVELO RUIZ, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorIliou, Marie-Christine-
dc.contributor.authorVromen, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorHinton, Sally-
dc.contributor.authorFREDERIX, Ines-
dc.contributor.authorWilhelm, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Jean-Paul-
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorAmbrosetti, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Porrero, Esteban-
dc.contributor.authorCONINX, Karin-
dc.contributor.authorDENDALE, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-06T08:30:42Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-06T08:30:42Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of preventive cardiology, 25 (7), pag. 682-691-
dc.identifier.issn2047-4873-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/25650-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although disease-specific exercise guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are widely available, it remains uncertain whether these different exercise guidelines are integrated properly for patients with different CVDs. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with various CVDs and to compare these prescriptions with recommendations from the EXercise Prescription in Everyday practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) tool, a digital decision support system for integrated state-of-the-art exercise prescription in CVD. Design: The study was a prospective observational survey. Methods: Fifty-three CV rehabilitation clinicians from nine European countries were asked to prescribe exercise intensity (based on percentage of peak heart rate (HRpeak)), frequency, session duration, programme duration and exercise type (endurance or strength training) for the same five patients. Exercise prescriptions were compared between clinicians, and relationships with clinician characteristics were studied. In addition, these exercise prescriptions were compared with recommendations from the EXPERT tool. Results: A large inter-clinician variance was found for prescribed exercise intensity (median (interquartile range (IQR)): 83 (13) % of HRpeak), frequency (median (IQR): 4 (2) days/week), session duration (median (IQR): 45 (18) min/session), programme duration (median (IQR): 12 (18) weeks), total exercise volume (median (IQR): 1215 (1961) peak-effort training hours) and prescription of strength training exercises (prescribed in 78% of all cases). Moreover, clinicians’ exercise prescriptions were significantly different from those of the EXPERT tool (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study reveals significant inter-clinician variance in exercise prescription for patients with different CVDs and disagreement with an integrated state-of-the-art system for exercise prescription, justifying the need for standardization efforts regarding integrated exercise prescription in CV rehabilitation.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The development of the proof of concept of the EXPERT tool was supported by an UHasselt IOF PoC project.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights(C) The European Society of Cardiology 2018-
dc.subject.othercardiovascular disease; exercise prescription; EXPERT tool-
dc.titleDo clinicians prescribe exercise similarly in patients with different cardiovascular diseases? Findings from the EAPC EXPERT working group survey-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage691-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage682-
dc.identifier.volume25-
local.format.pages11-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesHansen, D (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr, REVAL, Agoralaan,Bldg, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. dominique.hansen@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusIn Press-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2047487318760888-
dc.identifier.isi000432062700003-
item.validationecoom 2019-
item.contributorHANSEN, Dominique-
item.contributorROVELO RUIZ, Gustavo-
item.contributorDoherty, Patrick-
item.contributorIliou, Marie-Christine-
item.contributorVromen, Tom-
item.contributorHinton, Sally-
item.contributorFREDERIX, Ines-
item.contributorWilhelm, Matthias-
item.contributorSchmid, Jean-Paul-
item.contributorAbreu, Ana-
item.contributorAmbrosetti, Marco-
item.contributorGarcia-Porrero, Esteban-
item.contributorCONINX, Karin-
item.contributorDENDALE, Paul-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationHANSEN, Dominique; ROVELO RUIZ, Gustavo; Doherty, Patrick; Iliou, Marie-Christine; Vromen, Tom; Hinton, Sally; FREDERIX, Ines; Wilhelm, Matthias; Schmid, Jean-Paul; Abreu, Ana; Ambrosetti, Marco; Garcia-Porrero, Esteban; CONINX, Karin & DENDALE, Paul (2018) Do clinicians prescribe exercise similarly in patients with different cardiovascular diseases? Findings from the EAPC EXPERT working group survey. In: European journal of preventive cardiology, 25 (7), pag. 682-691.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn2047-4873-
crisitem.journal.eissn2047-4881-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
paper EXPERT survey revision1.pdfPeer-reviewed author version631.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
eurjpc0682.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version336.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.