Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25798
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeconinck, Nico-
dc.contributor.authorMuylaert, Koenraad-
dc.contributor.authorIvens, Wilfried-
dc.contributor.authorVANDAMME, Dries-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-27T07:04:07Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-27T07:04:07Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationAlgal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts, 31, p. 469-477-
dc.identifier.issn2211-9264-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/25798-
dc.description.abstractThe harvesting of microalgae for biofuel production consists of a primary concentration step, followed by a separation step to isolate the microalgal biomass from its aquatic environment. Recent research focussed mainly on the technological feasibility of various separation processes. However, to what extent these innovative harvesting strategies have been commercialized and therefore have led to actual innovation in the current microalgae biotech industry by the creation of intellectual property, has remained unexplored. This study re- views the scientific literature based on technological, economical and environmental criteria of 13 primary and 8 secondary harvesting methods. Commercial deployment was evaluated via patent analysis. Auto- and co-floc- culation, as well as sedimentation, overall scored best for economic (CAPEX and OPEX) and environmental (energy and GHG) criteria, while belt filters scored the highest on the technological criteria (TSS). Hence, only 4 patents based on auto-/co-flocculation, sedimentation and only two for belt filtration are still in force. Technologies based on organic, electrolytic and magnetic flocculation seem to be more successfully patented. Since patenting involves making the technology freely available for others, small but sometimes crucial im- provements in low-tech systems may be often kept as a company secret instead. So far, no single harvesting process with superior feasibility has emerged for application on a large commercial scale. This is mainly due to the difference in relative importance of technological, economical and environmental criteria for each harvesting process dependent on the used strain and the final products.-
dc.description.sponsorshipD. Vandamme is a postdoctoral researcher funded by the Research Foundation - Flanders Belgium (FWO) (12D8917N). We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Carolien Kroeze and Dr. Jan Lutgerink for their support and guidance.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.subject.othermicroalgae; harvesting; dewatering; concentration; IP; biofuels-
dc.titleInnovative harvesting processes for microalgae biomass production: a perspective from patent literature-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage477-
dc.identifier.spage469-
dc.identifier.volume31-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesVandamme, D (reprint author), KU Leuven Campus Kulak, Lab Aquat Biol, E Sabbelaan 53, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium, dries.vandamme@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedReview-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.algal.2018.01.016-
dc.identifier.isi000428687600049-
item.fullcitationDeconinck, Nico; Muylaert, Koenraad; Ivens, Wilfried & VANDAMME, Dries (2018) Innovative harvesting processes for microalgae biomass production: a perspective from patent literature. In: Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts, 31, p. 469-477.-
item.validationecoom 2019-
item.contributorDeconinck, Nico-
item.contributorMuylaert, Koenraad-
item.contributorIvens, Wilfried-
item.contributorVANDAMME, Dries-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn2211-9264-
crisitem.journal.eissn2211-9264-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OA nico2.pdfPeer-reviewed author version721.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
1-s2.0-S2211926417308512-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version311.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

78
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

182
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.