Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25844
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVERBRUGGHE, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorAGTEN, Anouk-
dc.contributor.authorOP 'T EIJNDE, Bert-
dc.contributor.authorOlivieri, Enzo-
dc.contributor.authorHUYBRECHTS, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorSeelen, Henk-
dc.contributor.authorVANDENABEELE, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorTIMMERMANS, Annick-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-11T10:38:34Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-11T10:38:34Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 31 (4), p. 657-666-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/25844-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Although low to moderate intensity exercise therapy is a predominant part of rehabilitation in nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP), effect sizes are small and optimal exercise modalities/intensities are unclear. Conversely, effects of high intensity training have not yet been investigated in this population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of high intensity training (HIT) and to explore the magnitude of the effects of a HIT program may have on exercise capacity and disease related outcome measures compared to conventional therapy for persons with NSCLBP. METHODS: In this non-randomized controlled feasibility study, treatment satisfaction, adherence, disability, pain, physical activity, body composition, exercise capacity and self-reported motivation, were assessed in persons with NSCLBP, before (PRE) and after (POST) 6 weeks (12 sessions, 1.5 hours/session, 2 x/week) of high intensity cardiovascular (100% VO2Max) and high load resistance (80% 1RM) training (HIT, n= 10) and compared to average intensity/load (60% VO2max) conventional physical therapy (CON, n= 10). RESULTS: At PRE, CON and HIT did not differ, except for gender ratio and lean mass. Compared to CON, HIT retained motivation to rehabilitate better (HIT: +3%; CON: -25%) and had higher therapy adherence (+16%) during the study course. No adverse events were noted in both groups. Whereas disability reduced in both groups (HIT: -10.4%; CON: -8.3%), peak workload (+7.0%), time to exhaustion (+9.5%), and activity level (+5.6%) only improved in HIT. CONCLUSIONS: High intensity exercise therapy appears to be a feasible rehabilitation approach in NSCLBP. Outcomes improved following the HIT protocol, warranting the investigation of its effectiveness in future large scale RCT studies.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights(c) 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.otherlow back pain; rehabilitation; high intensity; exercise therapy-
dc.titleFeasibility of high intensity training in nonspecific chronic low back pain: A clinical trial-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage666-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage657-
dc.identifier.volume31-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesVerbrugghe, J (reprint author), Agoralaan 5,Gebouw A, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. Jonas.verbrugghe@uhasselt.be-
dc.relation.references1. Woolf AD, Erwin J, March L. The need to address the burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology 2012;26:183-224. 2. Washburn RA, Zhu W, McAuley E, Frogley M, Figoni SF. The physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities: development and evaluation. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002;83:193-200. 3. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2006;15 Suppl 2:S192-300. 4. Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. The Lancet 2012;379:482-91. 5. van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology 2010;24:193-204. 6. Macedo LG, Saragiotto BT, Yamato TP, et al. Motor control exercise for acute non‐specific low back pain. The Cochrane Library 2016. 7. Wang XQ, Zheng JJ, Yu ZW, et al. A meta-analysis of core stability exercise versus general exercise for chronic low back pain. PloS one 2012;7:e52082. 8. Meng X-G, Yue S-W. Efficacy of aerobic exercise for treatment of chronic Low back pain: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2015;94:358-65. 9. Henchoz Y, So AK-L. Exercise and nonspecific low back pain: a literature review. Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme 2008;75:533-9. 10. Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, Chuter V. Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clinical rehabilitation 2015;29:1155-67. 11. Smeets RJ, Wade D, Hidding A, Van Leeuwen PJ, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus JA. The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review. Disability and rehabilitation 2006;28:673-93. 12. Duque I, Parra JH, Duvallet A. Maximal aerobic power in patients with chronic low back pain: a comparison with healthy subjects. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2011;20:87-93. 13. Verbunt JA, Westerterp KR, van der Heijden GJ, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus JA. Physical activity in daily life in patients with chronic low back pain. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2001;82:726-30. 14. Pinto RZ, Ferreira PH, Kongsted A, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Kent P. Self-reported moderate-to-vigorous leisure time physical activity predicts less pain and disability over 12 months in chronic and persistent low back pain. Eur J Pain 2014;18:1190-8. 15. Steele J, Bruce-Low S, Smith D. A reappraisal of the deconditioning hypothesis in low back pain: review of evidence from a triumvirate of research methods on specific lumbar extensor deconditioning. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30:865-911. 16. Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports medicine 2013;43:313-38. 17. Gibala MJ, Little JP, MacDonald MJ, Hawley JA. Physiological adaptations to low‐volume, high‐intensity interval training in health and disease. The Journal of physiology 2012;590:1077-84. 18. Seynnes OR, de Boer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. Journal of applied physiology 2007;102:368-73. 19. Weston M, Batterham AM, Tew GA, et al. Patients Awaiting Surgical Repair for Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Can Exercise at Moderate to Hard Intensities with a Low Risk of Adverse Events. Frontiers in physiology 2017;7:684. 20. Wens I, Dalgas U, Vandenabeele F, et al. High Intensity Exercise in Multiple Sclerosis: Effects on Muscle Contractile Characteristics and Exercise Capacity, a Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS One 2015;10:e0133697. 21. Spruit MA, Eterman R-M, Hellwig V, Janssen P, Wouters E, Uszko-Lencer N. A systematic review on the effects of moderate-to-high intensity resistance training in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart 2009. 22. Beauchamp MK, Nonoyama M, Goldstein RS, et al. Interval versus continuous training in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-a systematic review. Thorax 2010;65:157-64. 23. Weston KS, Wisløff U, Coombes JS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine 2014;48:1227-34. 24. Ryan CG, Wellburn S, McDonough S, Martin DJ, Batterham AM. The association between displacement of sedentary time and chronic musculoskeletal pain: An isotemporal substitution analysis. Physiotherapy 2017. 25. Manniche C, Bentzen L, Hesselso̸e G, Christensen I, Lundberg E. Clinical trial of intensive muscle training for chronic low back pain. The Lancet 1988;332:1473-6. 26. Rissanen A, Alaranta H. Effect of intensive training on the isokinetic strength and structure of lumbar muscles in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 1995;20:333-9. 27. Chatzitheodorou D, Kabitsis C, Malliou P, Mougios V. A pilot study of the effects of high-intensity aerobic exercise versus passive interventions on pain, disability, psychological strain, and serum cortisol concentrations in people with chronic low back pain. Physical therapy 2007;87:304-12. 28. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients with Low Back Pain. Spine 2005;30:1331-4. 29. Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in nursing & health 2008;31:180-91. 30. Akuthota V, Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2004;85:86-92. 31. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2004;36:674-88. 32. Markland D, Hardy L. On the factorial and construct validity of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory: Conceptual and operational concerns. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 1997;68:20-32. 33. Rietjens G, Kuipers H, Kester A, Keizer H. Validation of a computerized metabolic measurement system (Oxycon-Pro®) during low and high intensity exercise. International journal of sports medicine 2001;22:291-4. 34. Glickman SG, Marn CS, Supiano MA, Dengel DR. Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity. Journal of Applied Physiology 2004;97:509-14. 35. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain: part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. spine 1983;8:141-4. 36. van den Berg-Emons RJ, L'Ortye AA, Buffart LM, et al. Validation of the Physical Activity Scale for individuals with physical disabilities. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2011;92:923-8. 37. Verbunt JA, Huijnen IP, Seelen HA. Assessment of physical activity by movement registration systems in chronic pain: methodological considerations. The Clinical journal of pain 2012;28:496-504. 38. John D, Freedson P. ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2012;44:S86. 39. Peach D, Van Hoomissen J, Callender HL. Exploring the ActiLife® filtration algorithm: converting raw acceleration data to counts. Physiological measurement 2014;35:2359. 40. Roelofs J, Goubert L, Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: further examination of psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia. European journal of pain 2004;8:495-502. 41. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones N, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Bmj 1992;305:160-4. 42. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Halberstadt Y, Cermak T, Heiller I. Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1998;79:475-87. 43. Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:495-506. 44. Thum JS, Parsons G, Whittle T, Astorino TA. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PloS one 2017;12:e0166299. 45. Jung ME, Bourne JE, Little JP. Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate-and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum. PloS one 2014;9:e114541. 46. Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2011;92:176-83. 47. Kolt G, McEvoy J. Adherence to rehabilitation in patients with low back pain. Manual therapy 2003;8:110-6. 48. Schunk DH. Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 1995;7:112-37. 49. Jack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, Gardiner E. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Manual therapy 2010;15:220-8. 50. McQuADE KJ, TURNER JA, BUCHNER DM. Physical Fitness and Chronic Low Back Pain: An Analysis of the Relationships Among Fitness, Functional Limitations, and Depression. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1988;233:198-204. 51. Vuori IM. Dose-response of physical activity and low back pain, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2001;33:S551-86; discussion 609-10. 52. Murtezani A, Hundozi H, Orovcanec N, Sllamniku S, Osmani T. A comparison of high intensity aerobic exercise and passive modalities for the treatment of workers with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine 2011;47:359-66. 53. Wisløff U, Ellingsen Ø, Kemi OJ. High-intensity interval training to maximize cardiac benefits of exercise training? Exercise and sport sciences reviews 2009;37:139-46. 54. Gibala MJ, McGee SL. Metabolic adaptations to short-term high-intensity interval training: a little pain for a lot of gain? Exercise and sport sciences reviews 2008;36:58-63. 55. Heyward VH, Gibson A. Advanced fitness assessment and exercise prescription 7th edition: Human kinetics; 2014. 56. Verbunt JA, Huijnen IP, Köke A. Assessment of physical activity in daily life in patients with musculoskeletal pain. European Journal of Pain 2009;13:231-42. 57. Hansen FR, Bendix T, Skov P, et al. Intensive, Dynamic Back-Muscle Exercises, Conventional Physiotherapy, or Placebo-Control Treatment of Low-Back Pain: A Randomized, Observer-Blind Trial. Spine 1993;18:98-108. 58. Kell RT, Asmundson GJ. A comparison of two forms of periodized exercise rehabilitation programs in the management of chronic nonspecific low-back pain. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2009;23:513-23. 59. Herbert JT, Trusty J. Clinical supervision practices and satisfaction within the public vocational rehabilitation program. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 2006;49:66-80.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.statusIn Press-
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-170810-
dc.identifier.isi000445002100009-
item.validationecoom 2019-
item.fullcitationVERBRUGGHE, Jonas; AGTEN, Anouk; OP 'T EIJNDE, Bert; Olivieri, Enzo; HUYBRECHTS, Xavier; Seelen, Henk; VANDENABEELE, Frank & TIMMERMANS, Annick (2018) Feasibility of high intensity training in nonspecific chronic low back pain: A clinical trial. In: JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 31 (4), p. 657-666.-
item.contributorVERBRUGGHE, Jonas-
item.contributorAGTEN, Anouk-
item.contributorOP 'T EIJNDE, Bert-
item.contributorOlivieri, Enzo-
item.contributorHUYBRECHTS, Xavier-
item.contributorSeelen, Henk-
item.contributorVANDENABEELE, Frank-
item.contributorTIMMERMANS, Annick-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1053-8127-
crisitem.journal.eissn1878-6324-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bmr--1-bmr170810.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on May 9, 2024

Page view(s)

76
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

738
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.