Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/25856
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPLEVOETS, Bie-
dc.contributor.authorSOWINSKA-HEIM, Julia-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T09:26:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-12T09:26:51Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationCities, 78, p.128-139.-
dc.identifier.issn0264-2751-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/25856-
dc.description.abstractOver the past few decades, the adaptive reuse of buildings—transforming them to meet new functional and aesthetic needs and requirements—has become a highly specialized domain within architectural and conservation practice, and is becoming a field of scholarly study in its own right. However, in juxtaposition with this highly specialized practice, people reuse and adapt all sorts of buildings in spontaneous and informal ways in a process we call “vernacular adaptation.” This paper investigates such vernacular adaptation of built heritage, along with its specific characteristics, opportunities, and threats as well as its influence on more formal adaptive reuse practice. As methodology, we examine relevant literature to review historical and contemporary examples of vernacular adaptation and reuse. In conclusion, we present the vernacular approach as a valuable alternative to the “formal” or specialized, top-down method to managing existing built environment, especially for buildings and sites that possess compelling social value. Moreover, our study indicates that in practice, the division between the vernacular and the formal is not rigid, elaborating on the possibilities and risks of joined initiatives between local communities and private or public developers.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis joint research between Hasselt University and the University ofLodz has been supported by research grant by the ‘Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen’, grant V432116N and by thespecial research fund of Hasselt University (R-7843).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd-
dc.subject.otheradaptive reuse; heritage; urban renewal; vernacular; community initiative; bottom-up-
dc.titleCommunity initiatives as a catalyst for regeneration of heritage sites: Vernacular transformation and its influence on the formal adaptive reuse practice.-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage139-
dc.identifier.spage128-
dc.identifier.volume78-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesPlevoets, B (reprint author, Hasselt Univ, Hasselt, Belgium. bie.plevoets@uhasselt.be; julia.sowinska@uni.lodz.pl-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.007-
dc.identifier.isi000436884100014-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationPLEVOETS, Bie & SOWINSKA-HEIM, Julia (2018) Community initiatives as a catalyst for regeneration of heritage sites: Vernacular transformation and its influence on the formal adaptive reuse practice.. In: Cities, 78, p.128-139..-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2019-
item.contributorPLEVOETS, Bie-
item.contributorSOWINSKA-HEIM, Julia-
crisitem.journal.issn0264-2751-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-6084-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Community_initiatives_as_a_catalyst_for.pdfPeer-reviewed author version267.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
1-s2.0-S0264275117311265-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

45
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

130
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

456
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.