Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26010
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRAMAEKERS, Katrien-
dc.contributor.authorMerkuryeva, Galina-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Gerrit K.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-30T10:51:00Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-30T10:51:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationGonçalves, Paulo J.S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017), Eurosis-ETI Publication,p. 201-205-
dc.identifier.isbn9789492859006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/26010-
dc.description.abstractAn inventory system containing uncertainty, e.g. in demand or in lead-time requires to determine a safety inventory for re-ordering. The decision models need a probability distribution of the demand during lead-time. In the literature on inventory control, mostly a Normal distribution for describing this demand is assumed. Based on the knowledge of the variance and on the distribution assumption, the safety inventory is calculated, given a prescribed customer service level. However, the functional form of the probability distribution in practice might look different from the shape of a Normal distribution and by this wrong decisions are made which result in high costs or low service level. It is investigated here whether the use of semi-variance is more robust to a deviation in the shape from the Normal distribution. The determination of the safety inventory is worked out for a triangular distribution as an illustrative example.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEurosis-ETI Publication-
dc.subject.otherinventory management; safety inventory; semi-variance-
dc.titleThe concept of semi-variance as a tool for safety inventory decisions in case of uncertain demand-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsGonçalves, Paulo J.S.-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate25-27/10/2017-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameThe European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM'17)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceLisbon, Portugal-
dc.identifier.epage205-
dc.identifier.spage201-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeOstend, Belgium-
dc.relation.referencesBartezzaghi, E., R. Verganti and G. Zotteri. 1999. “Measuring the impact of asymmetric demand distributions on inventories.” International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61, 395- 404. Chen, W.; J. Li and X. Jin. 2016. “The replenishment policy of agriproducts with stochastic demand in integrated agricultural supply chains.” Expert Systems with Applications, 48, 55-66. Ehrhardt, R. 1979. “The power approximation for computing (s,S) policies.” Management Science, 25, 777-786. Grootveld, H. and W. Hallerbach. 1999. “Variance vs downside risk: is there really so much difference ?” European Journal of Opererational Research, 114, 304-319. Harlow, W.V. and R.K.S. Rao. 1989. “Asset pricing in a generalised mean lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3, 285-311. Jacobs, R. and H. Wagner. 1989. “Reducing inventory system by using robust demand estimators.” Management Science, 35, 771-784. Janssens, G.K, and K. Ramaekers. 2011. “A linear programming formulation for an inventory management decision problem with a service constraint.” Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 7929-7934. Kaki, A.; A. Salo and S. Talluri. 2013. “Impact of the shape of demand distribution in decision models for operations management.” Computers in Industry, 64, 765-775. Lau, H.-S., and A. Zaki. 1982. “The sensitivity of inventory decisions to the shape of lead time-demand distribution.” IIE Transactions, 14, 265-271. Markowitz, H.M. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Wiley, New York. Naddor, E. 1978. “Sensitivity to distributions in inventory systems.” Management Science, 24, 1769-1772. Ramaekers, K. and G.K. Janssens. 2007. “On the choice of a demand distribution for inventory management models.” European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2, No. 4, 479-491. Ramaekers, K. and G.K. Janssens. 2012. “Service-oriented decisions on inventory levels in the case of incomplete demand information.” Logistics Research, 5, Nos.1-2, 33-46. 205-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017)-
item.validationvabb 2021-
item.contributorRAMAEKERS, Katrien-
item.contributorMerkuryeva, Galina-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Gerrit K.-
item.fullcitationRAMAEKERS, Katrien; Merkuryeva, Galina & JANSSENS, Gerrit K. (2017) The concept of semi-variance as a tool for safety inventory decisions in case of uncertain demand. In: Gonçalves, Paulo J.S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017), Eurosis-ETI Publication,p. 201-205.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ramaekers_ESM2017.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version359.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.