Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26010
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRAMAEKERS, Katrien-
dc.contributor.authorMerkuryeva, Galina-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Gerrit K.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-30T10:51:00Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-30T10:51:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationGonçalves, Paulo J.S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017), Eurosis-ETI Publication,p. 201-205-
dc.identifier.isbn9789492859006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/26010-
dc.description.abstractAn inventory system containing uncertainty, e.g. in demand or in lead-time requires to determine a safety inventory for re-ordering. The decision models need a probability distribution of the demand during lead-time. In the literature on inventory control, mostly a Normal distribution for describing this demand is assumed. Based on the knowledge of the variance and on the distribution assumption, the safety inventory is calculated, given a prescribed customer service level. However, the functional form of the probability distribution in practice might look different from the shape of a Normal distribution and by this wrong decisions are made which result in high costs or low service level. It is investigated here whether the use of semi-variance is more robust to a deviation in the shape from the Normal distribution. The determination of the safety inventory is worked out for a triangular distribution as an illustrative example.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEurosis-ETI Publication-
dc.subject.otherinventory management; safety inventory; semi-variance-
dc.titleThe concept of semi-variance as a tool for safety inventory decisions in case of uncertain demand-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsGonçalves, Paulo J.S.-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate25-27/10/2017-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameThe European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM'17)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceLisbon, Portugal-
dc.identifier.epage205-
dc.identifier.spage201-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeOstend, Belgium-
dc.relation.referencesBartezzaghi, E., R. Verganti and G. Zotteri. 1999. “Measuring the impact of asymmetric demand distributions on inventories.” International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61, 395- 404. Chen, W.; J. Li and X. Jin. 2016. “The replenishment policy of agriproducts with stochastic demand in integrated agricultural supply chains.” Expert Systems with Applications, 48, 55-66. Ehrhardt, R. 1979. “The power approximation for computing (s,S) policies.” Management Science, 25, 777-786. Grootveld, H. and W. Hallerbach. 1999. “Variance vs downside risk: is there really so much difference ?” European Journal of Opererational Research, 114, 304-319. Harlow, W.V. and R.K.S. Rao. 1989. “Asset pricing in a generalised mean lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3, 285-311. Jacobs, R. and H. Wagner. 1989. “Reducing inventory system by using robust demand estimators.” Management Science, 35, 771-784. Janssens, G.K, and K. Ramaekers. 2011. “A linear programming formulation for an inventory management decision problem with a service constraint.” Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 7929-7934. Kaki, A.; A. Salo and S. Talluri. 2013. “Impact of the shape of demand distribution in decision models for operations management.” Computers in Industry, 64, 765-775. Lau, H.-S., and A. Zaki. 1982. “The sensitivity of inventory decisions to the shape of lead time-demand distribution.” IIE Transactions, 14, 265-271. Markowitz, H.M. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Wiley, New York. Naddor, E. 1978. “Sensitivity to distributions in inventory systems.” Management Science, 24, 1769-1772. Ramaekers, K. and G.K. Janssens. 2007. “On the choice of a demand distribution for inventory management models.” European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2, No. 4, 479-491. Ramaekers, K. and G.K. Janssens. 2012. “Service-oriented decisions on inventory levels in the case of incomplete demand information.” Logistics Research, 5, Nos.1-2, 33-46. 205-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017)-
item.validationvabb 2021-
item.contributorRAMAEKERS, Katrien-
item.contributorMerkuryeva, Galina-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Gerrit K.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationRAMAEKERS, Katrien; Merkuryeva, Galina & JANSSENS, Gerrit K. (2017) The concept of semi-variance as a tool for safety inventory decisions in case of uncertain demand. In: Gonçalves, Paulo J.S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017), Eurosis-ETI Publication,p. 201-205.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ramaekers_ESM2017.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version359.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

64
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.