Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26010
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | RAMAEKERS, Katrien | - |
dc.contributor.author | Merkuryeva, Galina | - |
dc.contributor.author | JANSSENS, Gerrit K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-30T10:51:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-30T10:51:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gonçalves, Paulo J.S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017), Eurosis-ETI Publication,p. 201-205 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789492859006 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26010 | - |
dc.description.abstract | An inventory system containing uncertainty, e.g. in demand or in lead-time requires to determine a safety inventory for re-ordering. The decision models need a probability distribution of the demand during lead-time. In the literature on inventory control, mostly a Normal distribution for describing this demand is assumed. Based on the knowledge of the variance and on the distribution assumption, the safety inventory is calculated, given a prescribed customer service level. However, the functional form of the probability distribution in practice might look different from the shape of a Normal distribution and by this wrong decisions are made which result in high costs or low service level. It is investigated here whether the use of semi-variance is more robust to a deviation in the shape from the Normal distribution. The determination of the safety inventory is worked out for a triangular distribution as an illustrative example. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Eurosis-ETI Publication | - |
dc.subject.other | inventory management; safety inventory; semi-variance | - |
dc.title | The concept of semi-variance as a tool for safety inventory decisions in case of uncertain demand | - |
dc.type | Proceedings Paper | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Gonçalves, Paulo J.S. | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate | 25-27/10/2017 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | The European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM'17) | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Lisbon, Portugal | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 205 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 201 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C1 | - |
local.publisher.place | Ostend, Belgium | - |
dc.relation.references | Bartezzaghi, E., R. Verganti and G. Zotteri. 1999. “Measuring the impact of asymmetric demand distributions on inventories.” International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61, 395- 404. Chen, W.; J. Li and X. Jin. 2016. “The replenishment policy of agriproducts with stochastic demand in integrated agricultural supply chains.” Expert Systems with Applications, 48, 55-66. Ehrhardt, R. 1979. “The power approximation for computing (s,S) policies.” Management Science, 25, 777-786. Grootveld, H. and W. Hallerbach. 1999. “Variance vs downside risk: is there really so much difference ?” European Journal of Opererational Research, 114, 304-319. Harlow, W.V. and R.K.S. Rao. 1989. “Asset pricing in a generalised mean lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3, 285-311. Jacobs, R. and H. Wagner. 1989. “Reducing inventory system by using robust demand estimators.” Management Science, 35, 771-784. Janssens, G.K, and K. Ramaekers. 2011. “A linear programming formulation for an inventory management decision problem with a service constraint.” Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 7929-7934. Kaki, A.; A. Salo and S. Talluri. 2013. “Impact of the shape of demand distribution in decision models for operations management.” Computers in Industry, 64, 765-775. Lau, H.-S., and A. Zaki. 1982. “The sensitivity of inventory decisions to the shape of lead time-demand distribution.” IIE Transactions, 14, 265-271. Markowitz, H.M. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Wiley, New York. Naddor, E. 1978. “Sensitivity to distributions in inventory systems.” Management Science, 24, 1769-1772. Ramaekers, K. and G.K. Janssens. 2007. “On the choice of a demand distribution for inventory management models.” European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2, No. 4, 479-491. Ramaekers, K. and G.K. Janssens. 2012. “Service-oriented decisions on inventory levels in the case of incomplete demand information.” Logistics Research, 5, Nos.1-2, 33-46. 205 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Proceedings Paper | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.btitle | Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017) | - |
item.validation | vabb 2021 | - |
item.contributor | RAMAEKERS, Katrien | - |
item.contributor | Merkuryeva, Galina | - |
item.contributor | JANSSENS, Gerrit K. | - |
item.fullcitation | RAMAEKERS, Katrien; Merkuryeva, Galina & JANSSENS, Gerrit K. (2017) The concept of semi-variance as a tool for safety inventory decisions in case of uncertain demand. In: Gonçalves, Paulo J.S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference (ESM '2017), Eurosis-ETI Publication,p. 201-205. | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.accessRights | Restricted Access | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ramaekers_ESM2017.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 359.28 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.