Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26041
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN DEN BERGH, Bart-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-13T14:57:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-13T14:57:56Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationDeclerck, Charlotte; Pintens, Walter (Ed.). Patrimonium 2017, die Keure, p. 255-281-
dc.identifier.isbn9789048632008-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/26041-
dc.language.isonl-
dc.publisherdie Keure-
dc.titleOver de rol van de notaris-vereffenaar: “lijdelijke sfinx of actieve factotum”?-
dc.typeBook Section-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsDeclerck, Charlotte-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsPintens, Walter-
dc.identifier.epage281-
dc.identifier.spage255-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatB2-
local.publisher.placeBrugge-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedBook Section-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitlePatrimonium 2017-
item.fullcitationVAN DEN BERGH, Bart (2017) Over de rol van de notaris-vereffenaar: “lijdelijke sfinx of actieve factotum”?. In: Declerck, Charlotte; Pintens, Walter (Ed.). Patrimonium 2017, die Keure, p. 255-281.-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.validationvabb 2020-
item.contributorVAN DEN BERGH, Bart-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Aug 6, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.