Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26150
Title: | Is ENEA the New PreussenElektra? | Authors: | ILIOPOULOS, Theodoros | Issue Date: | 2018 | Source: | European state aid law quarterly, 17(1), p. 19-27 (Art N° 2) | Abstract: | In September 2017, the time came for the momentous but also controversial PreussenElektra formula to be applied again. In ENEA, not only did the CJEU confirm the PreussenElektra dogma, but it also expanded on its previous case law. Thus, a narrow interpretation of the notion of aid ‘granted by State or through State resources’ seems to be re-established. Therefore, ENEA has the potential to prove an influential judgment that will determine the design of national aid schemes and will contribute to the development of State aid law. This article analyses the ENEA judgment in light of previous CJEU landmark cases and raises certain questions concerning its implications. | Keywords: | ENEA; PreussenElektra; State Resources; Imputability | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26150 | ISSN: | 1619-5272 | DOI: | 10.21552/estal/2018/1/4 | Rights: | Rights reserved by the publisher | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | vabb 2020 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
v2_Ilioupoulos_EStAL12018.pdf Restricted Access | Peer-reviewed author version | 185.21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Page view(s)
92
checked on May 19, 2022
Download(s)
64
checked on May 19, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.