Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26150
Title: Is ENEA the New PreussenElektra?
Authors: ILIOPOULOS, Theodoros 
Issue Date: 2018
Source: European state aid law quarterly, 17(1), p. 19-27 (Art N° 2)
Abstract: In September 2017, the time came for the momentous but also controversial PreussenElektra formula to be applied again. In ENEA, not only did the CJEU confirm the PreussenElektra dogma, but it also expanded on its previous case law. Thus, a narrow interpretation of the notion of aid ‘granted by State or through State resources’ seems to be re-established. Therefore, ENEA has the potential to prove an influential judgment that will determine the design of national aid schemes and will contribute to the development of State aid law. This article analyses the ENEA judgment in light of previous CJEU landmark cases and raises certain questions concerning its implications.
Keywords: ENEA; PreussenElektra; State Resources; Imputability
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26150
ISSN: 1619-5272
DOI: 10.21552/estal/2018/1/4
Rights: Rights reserved by the publisher
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: vabb 2020
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
v2_Ilioupoulos_EStAL12018.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version185.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

92
checked on May 19, 2022

Download(s)

64
checked on May 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.