Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26467
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSTESSEL, Bjorn-
dc.contributor.authorFiddelers, Audrey A. A.-
dc.contributor.authorMarcus, Marco A.-
dc.contributor.authorvan Kuijk, Sander M. J.-
dc.contributor.authorJoosten, Elbert A.-
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Madelon L.-
dc.contributor.authorBuhre, Wolfgang F. F. A.-
dc.contributor.authorGramke, Hans-Fritz-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-30T12:37:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-30T12:37:14Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 33(5), p. 405-413-
dc.identifier.issn0749-8047-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/26467-
dc.description.abstractObjectives:In 2009, Gramke and colleagues have described predictive factors to preoperatively detect those at risk for moderate to severe acute postsurgical pain (APSP) after day surgery. The aim of the present study is to externally validate this initial model and to improve and internally validate a modified version of this model.Materials and Methods:Elective patients scheduled for day surgery were prospectively enrolled from November 2008 to April 2010. Model discrimination was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration was assessed by visual inspection of the calibration plot. Subsequently, we modified (different assignment of type of surgery, different cutoff for moderate to severe APSP, continuous of dichotomized variables and testing of additional variables) and internally validated this model by standard bootstrapping techniques.Results:A total of 1118 patients were included. The AUC for the original model was 0.81 in the derivation data set and 0.72 in our validation data set. The model showed poorly calibrated risk predictions. The AUC of the modified model was 0.82 (optimism-corrected AUC=0.78). This modified model showed good calibration.Conclusions:The original prediction model of Gramke and colleagues performed insufficiently on our cohort of outpatients with respect to discrimination and calibration. Internal validation of a modified model shows promising results. In this model, preoperative pain, patient derived expected pain, and different types of surgery are the strongest predictors of moderate to severe APSP after day surgery.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsCopyright (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc-
dc.subject.otherday surgery; postoperative pain; predictive model; validation; modification-
dc.titleExternal Validation and Modification of a Predictive Model for Acute Postsurgical Pain at Home After Day Surgery-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage413-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage405-
dc.identifier.volume33-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.classdsPublValOverrule/author_version_not_expected-
local.classdsPublValOverrule/internal_author_not_expected-
local.classIncludeIn-ExcludeFrom-List/ExcludeFromFRIS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AJP.0000000000000413-
dc.identifier.isi000398813000003-
item.fullcitationSTESSEL, Bjorn; Fiddelers, Audrey A. A.; Marcus, Marco A.; van Kuijk, Sander M. J.; Joosten, Elbert A.; Peters, Madelon L.; Buhre, Wolfgang F. F. A. & Gramke, Hans-Fritz (2017) External Validation and Modification of a Predictive Model for Acute Postsurgical Pain at Home After Day Surgery. In: CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 33(5), p. 405-413.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorSTESSEL, Bjorn-
item.contributorFiddelers, Audrey A. A.-
item.contributorMarcus, Marco A.-
item.contributorvan Kuijk, Sander M. J.-
item.contributorJoosten, Elbert A.-
item.contributorPeters, Madelon L.-
item.contributorBuhre, Wolfgang F. F. A.-
item.contributorGramke, Hans-Fritz-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0749-8047-
crisitem.journal.eissn1536-5409-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
stessel2016.pdfPublished version289.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Sep 24, 2024

Page view(s)

66
checked on Aug 10, 2022

Download(s)

108
checked on Aug 10, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.