Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26531
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBOGAERTS, Katleen-
dc.contributor.authorWalentynowicz, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DEN HOUTE, Maaike-
dc.contributor.authorConstantinou, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorVan den Bergh, Omer-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-01T12:21:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-01T12:21:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citation6th Annual Scientific Conference of the European Association of Psychosomatic Medicine (EAPM 2018), Verona, Italy, 27-30/06/2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/26531-
dc.description.abstractAims: We developed the Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire (IAQ) to respond to two concerns related to existing assessment tools for body awareness:(a) the lack of a clear distinction between sensations and symptoms, and (b) the limited number of interoceptive response channels. The IAQ is a 19-item multi-modal self-report measure assessing awareness of interoceptive stimuli. Factor analysis performed on a large healthy sample (N=1366) revealed two subscales with good psychometric properties:(F1) awareness of sensations, referring to sensory information from within the body, and (F2) awareness of symptoms, denoting experiences of bodily information in a negative manner. Here we aimed to explore 1) whether patients who experience stress -related physical symptoms in daily life differ in scores on the IAQ compared with healthy controls, and 2) whether there are differences between patient groups with regard to the IAQ. Methods: IAQ data were compared in 6 datasets:(1) panic disorder (N=27) vs overstrain (N=34) vs chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/fibromyalgia(FM; N=23); (2) healthy (N=20) vs CFS/FM (N=18) vs irritable bowel syndrome(IBS;N=14); (3) healthy(N=30) vs CFS/FM(N=28) vs overstrain(N=30) vs panic disorder(N=29) vs burn-out(N=29); (4) healthy(N=24) vs IBS(N=26); (5) healthy(N=25) vs medically unexplained dyspnea(MUD; N=29); (6) healthy (N=41) vs CFS/FM(N=80). Results: Overall, patients scored higher on IAQ than healthy controls, more specifically on the Sensations subscale(F1). Within patient groups, panic patients had higher scores on the Symptom subscale (F2) compared with other patient groups. Conclusions: Whereas awareness of sensations differentiates between patients and healthy controls, awareness of symptoms differs between patient groups. The results may help to further disentangle adaptive and maladaptive aspects of interoceptive awareness.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleThe Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire (IAQ) differentiates between and within patient groups with stress-related bodily complaints versus healthy controls-
dc.typeConference Material-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate27-30/06/2018-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename6th Annual Scientific Conference of the European Association of Psychosomatic Medicine (EAPM 2018)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceVerona, Italy-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedPoster-
item.fullcitationBOGAERTS, Katleen; Walentynowicz, Marta; VAN DEN HOUTE, Maaike; Constantinou, Elena & Van den Bergh, Omer (2018) The Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire (IAQ) differentiates between and within patient groups with stress-related bodily complaints versus healthy controls. In: 6th Annual Scientific Conference of the European Association of Psychosomatic Medicine (EAPM 2018), Verona, Italy, 27-30/06/2018.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorBOGAERTS, Katleen-
item.contributorWalentynowicz, Marta-
item.contributorVAN DEN HOUTE, Maaike-
item.contributorConstantinou, Elena-
item.contributorVan den Bergh, Omer-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EAPM 2018 poster_Katleen Bogaerts.pdfConference material375.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Aug 3, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Aug 3, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.