Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26677Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | BIELY, Katharina | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Dries, Maes | - |
| dc.contributor.author | VAN PASSEL, Steven | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-10T13:30:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-10T13:30:50Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sustainability, 10(8), p. 1-23 (Art N° 2843) | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2071-1050 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26677 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Market power is a complex matter that is approximated with quantitative indicators within economics. However, these indicators may not fully capture market power, or they may fail to identify it, although it may be present. Moreover, a quantitative approach restricts market power as a concept, impeding the ability to discuss its relationship with other concepts, such as sustainability. This paper extends the definition of market power, following Foucault’s understanding of power and the associated theoretical discussions of power from different disciplines. We extended Foucault’s work by including systems thinking to capture the importance of the prevalent system’s paradigm, which is the ultimate initiator of action. Apart from distinguishing different elements of power, we also integrate an instrumental view on the elements of power. The developed frame allows us to understand the dynamic character of power as a force that strives to maintain or ameliorate the position of the paradigm that it serves. Based on this frame, we outline how this extended understanding of power can be used to analyze market power itself, and its relation with sustainability | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This research was performed within the frame of the HORIZON 2020 project SUFISA with the grant agreement number 635577. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject.other | power; market power; Foucault; sustainability; systems thinking | - |
| dc.title | Market Power Extended: From Foucault to Meadows | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 23 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 8 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 10 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
| dc.description.notes | Biely, K (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Business Econ, Ctr Environm Sci, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium. katharina.biely@uhasselt.be; dries.maes@ewi.vlaanderen.be; steven.vanpassel@uhasselt.be | - |
| dc.relation.references | European Parliament. Report on Unfair Trading Practices in the Food Supply Chain (2015/2065(ini))—a8-0173/2016; European Parliament: Strasbourg, France; Brussels, Belgium, 2016; Available online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2016-0173+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN (accessed on 10 August 2018). Blaug, M. Is competition such a good thing? Static efficiency versus dynamic efficiency. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2001, 19, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Rockstrom, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, A.; Chapin, F.S.; Lambin, E.F.; Lenton, T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Ripple, W.J.; Wolf, C.; Newsome, T.M.; Galetti, M.; Alamgir, M.; Crist, E.; Mahmoud, M.I.; Laurance, W.F. World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience 2017, 67, 1026–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Meadows, D. Die Grenzen des Denkens: Wie Wir Sie Mit System Erkennen Koennen und Ueberwinden Koennen; Oekom: Muenchen, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar] Daly, H.E. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development; Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1996; p. 253. [Google Scholar] Jackson, T. Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] Ball, W.T.; Alsing, J.; Mortlock, D.J.; Staehelin, J.; Haigh, J.D.; Peter, T.; Tummon, F.; Stübi, R.; Stenke, A.; Anderson, J.; et al. Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 1379–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Vitousek, P.M.; Naylor, R.; Crews, T.; David, M.B.; Drinkwater, L.E.; Holland, E.; Johnes, P.J.; Katzenberger, J.; Martinelli, L.A.; Matson, P.A.; et al. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science 2009, 324, 1519–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Likens, G.E.; Driscoll, C.T.; Buso, D.C. Long-term effects of acid rain: Response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science 1996, 272, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Melikoglu, M.; Lin, C.S.K.; Webb, C. Analysing global food waste problem: Pinpointing the facts and estimating the energy content. Cent. Eur. J. Eng. 2013, 3, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Widmer, R.; Oswald-Krapf, H.; Sinha-Khetriwal, D.; Schnellmann, M.; Böni, H. Global perspectives on e-waste. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2005, 25, 436–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Rochman, C.M.; Browne, M.A.; Halpern, B.S.; Hentschel, B.T.; Hoh, E.; Karapanagioti, H.K.; Rios-Mendoza, L.M.; Takada, H.; Teh, S.; Thompson, R.C. Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature 2013, 494, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Clapp, J.; Fuchs, D. Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] Maxwell, J.; Briscoe, F. There’s money in the air: The cfc ban and dupont’s regulatory strategy. Bus. Strategy Environ. 1997, 6, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Myllyvirta, L. Smoke & Mirrors: How Europe’s Biggest Polluters Became Their Own Regulators; Greenpeace: Schaerbeek, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar] HRC. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food; Human Rights Council: Geneva, Switzerland, 24 January 2017. [Google Scholar] Meeks, M.; Chen, R.J.C. Can walmart integrate values with value? From sustainability to sustainable business. J. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Time Inc. Fortune 500. Available online: http://fortune.com/fortune500/walmart/ (accessed on 21 November 2017). Pulker, C.E.; Trapp, G.S.A.; Scott, J.A.; Pollard, C.M. What are the position and power of supermarkets in the australian food system, and the implications for public health? A systematic scoping review. Obes. Rev. 2018, 19, 198–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Tilman, D.; Clark, M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 2014, 515, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Clapp, J.; Fuchs, D. Agrifood corporations, global governance, and sustainability: A framework for analysis. In Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance; Clapp, J., Fuchs, D., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] Boas, T.C.; Gans-Morse, J. Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Stud. Compar. Int. Dev. 2009, 44, 137–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Flew, T. Six theories of neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven 2014, 122, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Birch, K. Neoliberalism: The whys and wherefores … and future directions. Sociol. Compass 2015, 9, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Senker, P. The triumph of neoliberalism and the world dominance of capitalism. Prometheus 2015, 33, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Jessop, B. The continuing ecological dominance of neoliberalism in the crisis. In Economic Transitions to Neoliberalism in Middle-Income Countries: Policy Dilemmas, Crises, Mass Resistance; Alfredo Saad-Filho, G.L.Y., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] Appel, H.; Orenstein, M.A. Why did neoliberalism triumph and endure in the post-communist world? Compar. Politics 2016, 48, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Biebricher, T. Power in neoliberal thought. J. Political Power 2014, 7, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Foucault, M. The subject and power. Crit. Inq. 1982, 8, 777–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Read, J. A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. In A Foucault for the 21st Century: Governmentability, Biopolitics and Discipline in the New Millenium; Binkley, S., Capetillo, J., Eds.; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar] Behrent, M.C. A seventies thing: On the limits of foucault’s neoliberallism course for understanding the present. In A Foucault for the 21st Century: Governmentability, Biopolitics and Discipline in the New Millenium; Binkley, S., Capetillo, J., Eds.; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar] Binkley, S. Introduction. In A Foucault for the 21st Century: Governmentability, Biopolitics and Discipline in the New Millenium; Binkley, S., Capetillo, J., Eds.; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar] Ahlborg, H. Towards a conceptualization of power in energy transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2017, 25, 122–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Economist, T. The superstar company: A giant problem. The Economist, 17 September 2016. [Google Scholar] Callens, I.; Tyteca, D. Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: A productive efficiency perspective. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 28, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Lankoski, L. Alternative conceptions of sustainability in a business context. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Laszlo, C.; Zhexembayeva, N. Embedded Sustainability: The Next Big Competitive Advantage; Greenleaf Publishing: Austin, TX, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] Cabral, L.M.B. Introduction to Industrial Organization; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar] Pindyck, R.S.; Rubinfeld, D.L. Microeconomics, 8th ed.; Pearson: Edinburgh, UK, 2015; p. 739. [Google Scholar] Bardhan, P. On the concept of power in economics. Econ. Politics 1991, 3, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] White, G. Towards a political analysis of markets. IDS Bull. 1993, 24, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Elliott, J.E. Adam smith’s conceptualization of power, markets, and politics. Rev. Soc. Econ. 2000, 58, 429–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bowles, S.; Gintis, H. The revenge of homo economicus: Contested exchange and the revival of political economy. J. Econ. Perspect. 1993, 7, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Williamson, O.E. Hierarchies, markets and power in the economy: An economic perspective. Ind. Corp. Chang. 1995, 4, 21–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Williamson, O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1985; p. 450. [Google Scholar] Slade, M.E. Competing models of firm profitability. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2004, 22, 289–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Brown, J.H. Structure–conduct–performance: A comment on blaug’s “is competition such a good thing? Static efficiency versus dynamic efficiency”. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2002, 21, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Vanberg, V.J. The Freiburg School: Walter Eucken and Ordoliberalism; Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics; Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre for Economics: Freiburg, Germany, 2004; Available online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/4343/1/04_11bw.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2018). Cross, H. Neoliberalism, labour power and democracy—The sense of an ending. Rev. Afr. Political Econ. 2017, 44, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Schröter, H.G. Cartelization and decartelization in europe, 1870–1995: Rise and decline of an economic institution. J. Eur. Econ. Hist. 1996, 25, 129. [Google Scholar] Rieter, H.; Schmolz, M. The ideas of german ordoliberalism 1938–45: Pointing the way to a new economic order. Eur. J. Hist. Econ. Thought 1993, 1, 87–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bonefeld, W. Adam smith and ordoliberalism: On the political form of market liberty. Rev. Int. Stud. 2013, 39, 233–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Pigou, A.C. The Economics of Welfare; Macmillan and Co.: London, UK, 1932. [Google Scholar] Harvey, D. Neoliberalism as creative destruction. ANNALS Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 2007, 610, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bowles, S.; Gintis, H. Contested exchange: New microfoundations for the political economy of capitalism. Politics Soc. 1990, 18, 165–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Chandhoke, N. Marxian political economy as method: How political is political economy? Econ. Political Wkly 1994, 29, PE15–PE24. [Google Scholar] Springer, S. Neoliberalism as discourse: Between foucauldian political economy and marxian poststructuralism. Crit. Discourse Stud. 2012, 9, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Busch, L.; Juska, A. Beyond political economy: Actor networks and the globalization of agriculture. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 1997, 4, 688–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Cox, R.; Schechter, M.G. The Political Economy of a Plural World: Critical Reflections on Power, Morals and Civilisation; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar] Milios, J. Social classes in classical and marxist political economy. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 2000, 59, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Lukes, S. Power: A Radical View; The Macmillan Press LTD: London, UK, 1974. [Google Scholar] Hindess, B. Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar] Rezabakhsh, B.; Bornemann, D.; Hansen, U.; Schrader, U. Consumer power: A comparison of the old economy and the internet economy. J. Consum. Policy 2006, 29, 3–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Emerson, R.M. Power-dependence relations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1962, 27, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kaplow, L. Market definition, market power. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2015, 43, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Podszun, R. The arbitrariness of market definition and an evolutionary concept of markets. Antitrust Bull. 2016, 61, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Massey, P. Market definition and market power in competition analysis—Some practical issues. Econ. Soc. Rev. 2000, 31, 309328. [Google Scholar] Levy, D.L.; Egan, D. A neo-gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations*. J. Manag. Stud. 2003, 40, 803–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] French, J.R.P.; Raven, B. The bases of social power. In Studies in Social Power; Cartwright, D., Ed.; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar] Lopez, R.; Azzam, A.; Lirón-España, C. Market power and/or efficiency: A structural approach. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2002, 20, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Hebden, L.; King, L.; Kelly, B. Art of persuasion: An analysis of techniques used to market foods to children. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2011, 47, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] O’Barr, W.M. Children and advertising. Advert. Soc. Rev. 2008, 9. [Google Scholar] Martin, S. Market structure and market performance. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2012, 40, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Meadows, D. Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. In Hartland; Sustainability Institute: Stellenbosch, South Africa, 1999. [Google Scholar] Jackson, J.; Bradford, B.; Hough, M.; Myhill, A.; Quinton, P.; Tyler, T.R. Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. Br. J. Criminol. 2012, 52, 1051–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Tankebe, J. Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology 2013, 51, 103–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R. Creating shared value. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011. [Google Scholar] Colby, M.E. Environmental management in development: The evolution of paradigms. Ecol. Econ. 1991, 3, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Barry, J. Green political economy: Beyond orthodox undifferentiated economic growth as a permanent feature of the economy. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory; Gabrielson, T., Hall, C., Meyer, J.M., Schlosberg, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 305–317. [Google Scholar] Best, H. Organic agriculture and the conventionalization hypothesis: A case study from west germany. Agric. Hum. Values 2008, 25, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] De Wit, J.; Verhoog, H. Organic values and the conventionalization of organic agriculture. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2007, 54, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Scott, S.; Vandergeest, P.; Young, M. Certification standards and the governance of foods in southeast asia. In Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance; Clapp, J., Fuchs, D., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] Padel, S.; Röcklinsberg, H.; Schmid, O. The implementation of organic principles and values in the european regulation for organic food. Food Policy 2009, 34, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ferguson, J. The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode 2010, 41, 166–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ims, K.J.J.; Ove, D. Cooperation and competition in the context of organic and mechanic worldviews—A theoretical and case based discussion. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 66, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Korten, D.C. When corporations rule the world. Eur. Bus. Rev. 1998, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Lipsey, R.; Chrystal, A. Economics, 13th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar] Black, J.; Hashimzade, N.; Myles, G. A Dictionary of Economics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] Xhoxhi, O.; Pedersen, S.M.; Lind, K.M.; Yazar, A. The determinants of intermediaries’ power over farmers’ margin-related activities: Evidence from adana, turkey. World Dev. 2014, 64, 815–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bassiry, G.R.; Jones, M. Adam smith and the ethics of contemporary capitalism. J. Bus. Ethics 1993, 12, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Gopinath, M.; Wu, J. Environmental externalities and the optimal level of market power. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1999, 81, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Thampapillai, D.J. Perfect competition and sustainability. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2010, 37, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Buchanan, J.M. Individual choice in voting and the market. J. Political Econ. 1954, 62, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Glennon, R. Water scarcity, marketing, and privatization. Texas Law Rev. 2005, 8, 1873–1902. [Google Scholar] Rothbard, M.N. Power & Market: Government and the Economy; Institute for Humane Studies: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar] Evensky, J. Retrospectives: Ethics and the invisible hand. J. Econ. Perspect. 1993, 7, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Leat, P.; Revoredo-Giha, C.; Lamprinopoulou, C. Scotland’s food and drink policy discussion: Sustainability issues in the food supply chain. Sustainability 2011, 3, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Luke, T.W. Environmental governmentality. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory; Gabrielson, T., Hall, C., Meyer, J.M., Schlosberg, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 461–474. [Google Scholar] Hediger, W. Reconciling “weak” and “strong” sustainability. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 1999, 26, 1120–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Jabareen, Y. A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2008, 10, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Quental, N.; Lourenço, J.M.; da Silva, F.N. Sustainability: Characteristics and scientific roots. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2011, 13, 257–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Smythe, E. In whose interests? Transparency and accountability in the global governance od food: Agribusiness, the codex alimentarius, and the world trade organization. In Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance; Clapp, J., Fuchs, D., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] General Assembly. The Right to Food: Seed Policies and the Right to Food: Enhancing Agrobiodiversity and Encouraging Innovation; United Nations, General Assembly: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Available online: http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20091021_report-ga64_seed-policies-and-the-right-to-food_en.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2018). Moseley, W.G. A risky solution for the wrong problem: Why gmos won’t feed the hungry of the world. Geogr. Rev. 2017, 107, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Fuchs, D.; Kalfagianni, A.; Artensen, M. Retail power, private standards, and sustainability in the global food system. In Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance; Clapp, J., Fuchs, D., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] Geels, F. Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the netherlands (1850–1930)—A case study in multi-level perspective. Technol. Soc. 2005, 27, 363–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kenis, A.; Bono, F.; Mathijs, E. Unravelling the (post-)political in transition management: Interrogating pathways towards sustainable change. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2016, 18, 568–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Markard, J.; Raven, R.; Truffer, B. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ross, C.T.; Richerson, P.J.; Rogers, D.S. Mechanisms of cultural change and the transition to sustainability. In Global Environmental Change; Freedman, B., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 943–950. [Google Scholar] Avelino, F.; Wittmayer, J.M. Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2016, 18, 628–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.artnr | 2843 | - |
| local.class | dsPublValOverrule/author_version_not_expected | - |
| local.type.programme | H2020 | - |
| local.relation.h2020 | 635577 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082843 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | 000446767700259 | - |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2843 | - |
| item.fullcitation | BIELY, Katharina; Dries, Maes & VAN PASSEL, Steven (2018) Market Power Extended: From Foucault to Meadows. In: Sustainability, 10(8), p. 1-23 (Art N° 2843). | - |
| item.validation | ecoom 2019 | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.contributor | BIELY, Katharina | - |
| item.contributor | Dries, Maes | - |
| item.contributor | VAN PASSEL, Steven | - |
| crisitem.journal.eissn | 2071-1050 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Power Extended: From Foucault to Meadows.pdf | Published version | 1.53 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
7
checked on May 16, 2024
Page view(s)
178
checked on Jun 30, 2022
Download(s)
212
checked on Jun 30, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.