Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26737
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREINOLSMANN, Nora-
dc.contributor.authorBRIJS, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorBRIJS, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorAlhajyaseen, Wael-
dc.contributor.authorCORNU, Joris-
dc.contributor.authorMOLLU, Kristof-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-25T08:05:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-25T08:05:28Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in transportation studies, 45(July), p. 77-92-
dc.identifier.issn1824-5463-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/26737-
dc.description.abstractCongestion and stopped traffic on motorways constitute a potential safety hazard for drivers. In particular, unexpected hard congestion tails are the causes of serious rear-end crashes as they compromise the drivers’ ability to gradually lower speed and avoid erratic maneuvers. Advance congestion warning has been proposed as a countermeasure to prepare drivers adapting to the changing traffic conditions in real time. Typically, Variable Message Signs (VMS) can be installed on a gantry (i.e., overhead sign bridge) or cantilever (i.e., road-side pole) to display a congestion warning. In this study, we used a driving simulator and eye tracker to evaluate the effect of several congestion warning message sign strategies on driving behavior on the motorway. In total, we developed seven scenarios to investigate the effect of varying message designs and warning distances on driving speed, deceleration and accident involvement. The results showed that a gantry-mounted congestion warning displaying a pictogram in combination with the word ‘congestion’ at 1 km before the congestion tail had the best impact on speed, resulting in smooth deceleration and safe stopping distances. Overall, the effectiveness of congestion warning via VMS is dependent upon visibility conditions (i.e., drivers need to be able to clearly see and read the warning message) and message-incident contingency (i.e., warning messages located too far away from the congested area have no clear link with the critical event warned for anymore, and therefore, lose their effect on driving behavior).-
dc.description.sponsorshipNPRP award [NPRP 9-360- 2-150] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation)-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherVariable Message Sign; gantry; cantilever; congestion warning; distance; driving simulator-
dc.titleVariable Message Sign strategies for congestion warning on motorways – a driving simulator study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage92-
dc.identifier.issueJuly-
dc.identifier.spage77-
dc.identifier.volume45-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.references[1] D. Adminaite, R. Allsop, and G. Jost, “ETSC - RANKING EU PROGRESS ON IMPROVING MOTORWAY SAFETY PIN Flash Report 28,” no. March, 2015. [2] C. Wiacek, “REAL-WORLD ANALYSIS OF FATAL REAR-END CRASHES,” pp. 1–15, 2014. [3] N. Christie, A review of accidents and injuries to road transport drivers. 2010. [4] P. Marchesini and W. Weijermars, “The relationship between road safety and congestion on motorways,” SWOV Inst. Road Saf. Res., p. 28, 2010. [5] H. P. Totzke, I., Naujoks, F., Mühlbacher, D., & Krüger, “Precision of congestion warnings: Do drivers really need warnings with precise information about the position of the congestion tail.,” Hum. factors Syst. Technol., pp. 235–247, 2012. [6] A. Arbaiza and A. Lucas-Alba, “Variable Message Signs Harmonisation PRINCIPLES OF VMS MESSAGES DESIGN Supporting guideline,” EasyWay. no. December, pp. 1–60, 2012. [7] D. Evans, “Highways Agency policy for the use of Variable Signs and Signals (VSS),” no. December, 2011. [8] Federal Highway Administration, “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices,” Citeseer, p. 864, 2009. [9] M. Koyuncu and S. Amado, “Effects of stimulus type, duration and location on priming of road signs: Implications for driving,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 108–125, 2008. [10] M. Cristea and P. Delhomme, “Factors influencing drivers’ reading and comprehension of on-board traffic messages,” Rev. Eur. Psychol. Appliquée/European Rev. Appl. Psychol., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 211–219, 2015. [11] D. Shinar and M. Vogelzang, “Comprehension of traffic signs with symbolic versus text displays,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 18, pp. 72–82, 2013. [12] P. B. Wiles, S. A. Cooner, Y. Rathod, and D. G. Wallace, “Advance Warning of Stopped Traffic on Freeways: Field Studies of Congestion Warning Signs,” vol. 7, no. 2, p. 68p, 2005. [13] Federal Highway Administration, “CHAPTER 2E . GUIDE SIGNS - FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS,” pp. 1–82, 2000. [14] C. J. G. van Driel, M. Hoedemaeker, and B. van Arem, “Impacts of a Congestion Assistant on driving behaviour and acceptance using a driving simulator,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2007. [15] D. Popiv and C. Rommerskirchen, “Effects of assistance of anticipatory driving on driver’s behaviour during deceleration phases,” Hum. Centred Des. Intell. Transp. Syst., pp. 133–143, 2010. [16] H. Alm and L. Nilsson, “Incident Warning Systems and Traffic Safety: A Comparison Between the PORTICO and MELYSSA Test Site Systems,” Transp. Hum. Factors, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77–93, 2000. [17] C. Oh, T. Kim, J. Lee, S. Choi, and S. Joo, “A Method for Determining Variable Message Sign (VMS) Locations for Safe Exiting at Freeway Off-Ramp based on Driving Simulation Experiments,” Transp. Res. Board 2012 Annu. Meet. Washingt. D.C., pp. 1–15, 2012. [18] F. Bella, “Can Driving Simulators Contribute to Solving Critical Issues in Geometric Design?,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2138, no. 1, pp. 120–126, 2010. [19] K. Mollu, J. Cornu, K. Brijs, M. Van Der Linden, J. De Boer, and T. Brijs, “Gantries or Cantilevers for Route Guidance on a Reorganized Arterial Road? A before Study of Route Choice Effectiveness Using a Traffic Sign Simulator (Case Study),” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 14, no. 0, pp. 4277–4285, 2016. [20] M. Sodhi, B. Reimer, and I. Llamazares, “Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction,” Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 529–538, 2002. [21] D. Crundall, E. Van Loon, and G. Underwood, “Attraction and distraction of attention with roadside advertisements,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 671–677, 2006. [22] K. Mollu, J. Cornu, K. Declercq, K. Brijs, and T. Brijs, “The use of gantries and cantilevers at a redesigned intersection : a simulator study on lane choice and visual search behavior,” vol. 42, pp. 55–68, 2017. [23] M. A. Recarte and L. M. Nunes, “Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making.,” J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 119–137, 2003. [24] W. Horrey and C. Wickens, “In-Vehicle Glance Duration: Distributions, Tails, and Model of Crash Risk,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2018, pp. 22–28, 2007. [25] S. G. Klauer, T. a. Dingus, V. L. Neale, J. D. Sudweeks, and D. J. Ramsey, “The Impact of Driver Inattention On Near Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data,” Analysis, no. April, p. 226, 2006. [26] G. Abe and J. Richardson, “Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 577–586, 2006. [27] C. MacCarley, C. Ackles, and T. Watts, “Highway Traffic Response to Dynamic Fog Warning and Speed Advisory Messages,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 1980, no. 1, pp. 95–104, 2006. [28] F. Sagberg and T. Bjørnskau, “Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 407–414, 2006.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.atsinternationaljournal.com/index.php/2018-issues/xlv-july-2018/967-variable-message-sign-strategies-for-congestion-warning-on-motorways-a-driving-simulator-study-
item.validationvabb 2020-
item.contributorREINOLSMANN, Nora-
item.contributorBRIJS, Kris-
item.contributorBRIJS, Tom-
item.contributorAlhajyaseen, Wael-
item.contributorCORNU, Joris-
item.contributorMOLLU, Kristof-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationREINOLSMANN, Nora; BRIJS, Kris; BRIJS, Tom; Alhajyaseen, Wael; CORNU, Joris & MOLLU, Kristof (2018) Variable Message Sign strategies for congestion warning on motorways – a driving simulator study. In: Advances in transportation studies, 45(July), p. 77-92.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1824-5463-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Reinolsmann et al. (2018) Variable Message Sign strategies for congestion warning on motorways – a driving simulator study.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version2.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Reinolsmann_77-92.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version679.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

30
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.