Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/26759
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLIEBEN, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorDEPAIRE, Benoit-
dc.contributor.authorJANS, Mieke-
dc.contributor.authorJOUCK, Toon-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-01T14:21:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-01T14:21:12Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationPergl, Robert; Babkin, Eduard; Lock, Russell; Malyzhenkov, Pavel; Merunka, Vojtěch (Ed.). An Improved Way for Measuring Simplicity During Process Discovery, Springer,p. 49-62 (Art N° 4)-
dc.identifier.isbn9783030007867-
dc.identifier.issn1865-1348-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/26759-
dc.description.abstractIn the domain of process discovery, there are four quality dimensions for evaluating process models of which simplicity is one. Simplicity is often measured using the size of a process model, the structuredness and the entropy. It is closely related to the process model understandability. Researchers from the domain of business process management (BPM) proposed several metrics for measuring the process model understandability. A part of these understandability metrics focus on the control-flow perspective, which is important for evaluating models from process discovery algorithms. It is remarkable that there are more of these metrics defined in the BPM literature compared to the number of proposed simplicity metrics. To research whether the understandability metrics capture more understandability dimensions than the simplicity metrics, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 18 understandability metrics. A sample of 4450 BPMN models, both manually modelled and artificially generated, is used. Four dimensions are discovered: token behaviour complexity, node IO complexity, path complexity and degree of connectedness. The conclusion of this analysis is that process analysts should be aware that the measurement of simplicity does not capture all dimensions of the understandability of process models.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFWO-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Business Information Processing-
dc.subject.otherunderstandability metrics; simplicity; process models; exploratory factor analysis; BPMN-
dc.titleAn Improved Way for Measuring Simplicity During Process Discovery-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsPergl, Robert-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsBabkin, Eduard-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsLock, Russell-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsMalyzhenkov, Pavel-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsMerunka, Vojtěch-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate11-15/06/2018-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameCAiSE 2018: 14th International Workshop on Enterprise & Organizational Modeling and Simulation-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceTallinn, Estonia-
dc.identifier.epage62-
dc.identifier.spage49-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeCham, Switzerland-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.relation.ispartofseriesnr332-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr4-
local.type.programmeVSC-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-00787-4_4-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleAn Improved Way for Measuring Simplicity During Process Discovery-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationLIEBEN, Jonas; DEPAIRE, Benoit; JANS, Mieke & JOUCK, Toon (2018) An Improved Way for Measuring Simplicity During Process Discovery. In: Pergl, Robert; Babkin, Eduard; Lock, Russell; Malyzhenkov, Pavel; Merunka, Vojtěch (Ed.). An Improved Way for Measuring Simplicity During Process Discovery, Springer,p. 49-62 (Art N° 4).-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorLIEBEN, Jonas-
item.contributorDEPAIRE, Benoit-
item.contributorJANS, Mieke-
item.contributorJOUCK, Toon-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Factor analysis eomas 2018.pdfPeer-reviewed author version183.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

70
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

58
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.