Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27127
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVAN SCHOUBROECK, Sophie-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DAEL, Miet-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorMALINA, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-03T13:47:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-03T13:47:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationRenewable & sustainable energy reviews, 94, p. 115-126-
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/27127-
dc.description.abstractCompanies dealing with chemical products have to cope with large amounts of waste and environmental risk due to the use and production of toxic substances. Against this background, increasing attention is being paid to “green chemistry” and the translation of this concept into biobased chemicals. Given the multitude of economic, environmental and societal impacts that the production and use of biobased chemicals have on sustainability, assessment approaches need to be developed that allow for measurement and comparison of these impacts. To evaluate sustainability in the context of policy and decision-making, indicators are generally accepted means. However, sustainability indicators currently predominantly exist for low-value applications in the bioeconomy, like bioenergy and biofuels. In this paper, a review of the state-of-the-art sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals is conducted and a gap analysis is performed to identify indicator development needs. Based on the analysis, a clear hierarchy within the concept of sustainability is found where the environmental aspect dominates over economic and social indicators. All one-dimensional indicator-sets account for environmental impacts (50%), whereas two-dimensional sets complement the environmental issues with economic indicators (34%). Moreover, even the sets encompassing all three sustainability dimensions (16%) do not account for the dynamics and interlinkages between the environment, economy and society. Using results from the literature review, an indicator list is presented that captures all indicators currently used within sustainability assessment of biobased chemicals. Finally, a framework is proposed for future indicator selection using a stakeholder survey to obtain a prioritized list of sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.subject.otherbiobased economy; green chemistry; biobased chemicals; sustainability indicators; environmental indicators; economic indicators; social indicators-
dc.titleA review of sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage126-
dc.identifier.spage115-
dc.identifier.volume94-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesVan Schoubroeck, S (reprint author), UHasselt Hasselt Univ, Environm Econ Res Grp, Ctr Environm Sci CMK, Agoralaan, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. sophie.vanschoubroeck@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.007-
dc.identifier.isi000446310000008-
item.contributorVAN SCHOUBROECK, Sophie-
item.contributorVAN DAEL, Miet-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorMALINA, Robert-
item.validationecoom 2019-
item.fullcitationVAN SCHOUBROECK, Sophie; VAN DAEL, Miet; VAN PASSEL, Steven & MALINA, Robert (2018) A review of sustainability indicators for biobased chemicals. In: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 94, p. 115-126.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1364-0321-
crisitem.journal.eissn1879-0690-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Version before Lay out RSER (but after peer review).pdfPeer-reviewed author version826.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Van Schoubroeck.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version962.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

54
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

144
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

406
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.