Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27139
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDRAYE, Anne Mie-
dc.contributor.advisorSCHNEIDER, Hildegard-
dc.contributor.authorGROENEN, Amoury-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-18T12:35:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-18T12:35:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isbn9789463800044-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/27139-
dc.description.abstractSince its adoption in 1995, the UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects has been a subject of contention between states, art market stakeholders and academics alike. Criticised by some as a too theoretical instrument with little practical relevancy, the convention has – at the same time – been praised by others as an important instrument in tackling the illicit trafficking of cultural property. The present research aims at clarifying the on-going debate on the convention by evaluating the appropriateness of its regime to cultural property theft. In doing so, it investigates the inner workings of this instrument – and, more specifically, of its Chapter II – in addressing cultural property theft and the plunder of archaeological materials. To do so, the research delimits the scope of application of the convention; analyses the restitutionary regime of Chapter II and compares it to existing regimes applicable in six different states: Belgium, France, The Netherlands, New Jersey, California and New York; discusses the relevancy of Article 3 (2) in retrieving stolen artefacts; addresses matters relating to the application of the instated regime; and positions the convention in the existing international legal framework. As a matter of conclusion, this study finds that the convention is appropriate in tackling cultural property theft. Nonetheless, several recommendations are formulated for UNIDROIT or the UCAP’s consideration to further refine the regime laid down in Chapter II.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© Copyright Amoury C. C. Groenen, Maastricht 2018-
dc.subject.othercultural property theft; illicit trafficking cultural property; cultural heritage; unidroit convention; private law; stolen or illegally exported cultural objects; Directive 93/7/EEC; Directive 2014/60/EU; works of fine art; art replevin; revindication of art; return of stolen cultural object; archaeological theft; demo dat quod non habet; third-party protection; statutes of limitations; relative period; absolute period; cultural objects; cultural property-
dc.titleUNIDROIT 1995: Tackling the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property Through Private Law Means – An Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the 1995 Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects to Cultural Property Theft in Comparative Perspective-
dc.typeTheses and Dissertations-
local.format.pages615-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatT1-
dc.relation.referencesBIBLIOGRAPHY Books / sections / articles A Abd El Wahed, M., ‘The 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: a View from Egypt’, 8 Uniform Law Review, (2003), pp. 529-540. Abdulkarim, M., ‘Illicit trafficking of Syrian cultural property’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 561-567. Académie du Droit International de La Haye / Hague Academy of International Law, “La notion de patrimoine culturel de l'humanité dans les instruments internationaux — rapport du directeur d'études de la section de langue française du centre”, in: J. A. R. Nafziger and T. Scovazzi (eds), Le patrimoine culturel de l’humanité – The Cultural Heritage of Mankind, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden/Boston, 2008), pp. 3-144. Alder, C., Polk, K., “The Illicit Traffic in Plundered Antiquities”, in: P. Reichel (ed), Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice, (Sage Publications: California, 2005), pp. 98-113. Alexander, V. C., ‘Practice Commentaries’, McKinney’s CPLR § 7101 – § 7101. When an action may be brought, NY CPLR § 7101. Anderson, M. L., “Art Market Challenges for American Museums”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 121-124. Anonymous, “Les points de vue des personnes et institutions concernées par la convention d’Unidroit sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés (débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d'UNIDROIT du 24 juin 1995 sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés. Actes d'une table ronde organisée le 2 octobre 1995 (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 63-89. Ardouin, C. D., “Vers un Trafic Licite des Biens Culturels? Quelques Réflexions et Questions à Partir d’une Perspective Anthropologique”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 73-85. Armbrüster, C., ‘La Revendication de Biens Culturels du Point de Vue du Droit International Privé’, Revue Critique du Droit International Privé, (2004), pp. 723-743. Atias, C., Droit Civil les Biens, (12e Édition, LexisNexis: Paris, 2014). Aubert, J.-F., ‘Conclusions’, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, et M.-A. Renold (eds), La Convention d'UNIDROIT du 24 juin 1995 sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés. Actes d'une table ronde organisée le 2 octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 91-98. Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice, (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2007). B Barbagallo, S., ‘The universal value of ecclesiastical cultural property: from Renaissance safeguarding to present-day protection’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 583-593. Bartels, S. E., Mierlo (van), A. I. M., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht – Vermogensrecht algemeen – Deel IV Algemeen goederenrecht, (Kluwer: Deventer, 2013). Bator, P. M., ‘An Essay on the International Trade in Art’, 34 Stanford Law Review, (1982), pp. 275-384. Bauman, Z., Modernity and the Holocaust, (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New York, 1986). Bengs, B., ‘Dead on Arrival? A Comparison of the UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects and U.S. Property Law,’ 6 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, (1996), pp. 503-535. Bergé, J. -S., ‘La Convention d’UNIDROIT les biens culturels: retour sur un texte majeur dans la lutte contre un fait international illicite de circulation’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 535-560. Bergé, J. -S., ‘La Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels (*): Remarques sur la Dynamique des Sources en Droit International’, 127 Journal du Droit International, (2000), pp. 215-262. Bergel, J. L., Bruschi, M., Cimamonti, S., Traité de Droit Civil – Les biens, (Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence (L.G.D.J.), 2e édition, 2010). Biondi, A., ‘The Merchant, the Thief and the Citizen: the Circulation of Works of Art within the European Union’, 34 Common Market Law Review, (1997), pp. 1173-1195. Bolaño, M. F., ‘International Art Theft Disputes: Harmonizing Common Law Principles with Article 7(b) of the Unesco Convention’, 15 Fordham International Law Journal, (1991-1992), pp. 129-173. Boonyakiet, J., ‘L’ICOM et la lutte contre le trafic illicite des biens culturels’, École du Louvre, Monographie, (1998-1999), pp. 1-56. Boufflette, S., La Possession, (Larcier: Bruxelles, 2010). Breitler, C., Byrne-Sutton, Q., Geisinger-Mariéthoz, F., Renold, M. A. (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997). Briat, M., Freedberg, J. A., (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996). Brodie, N., “Archaeological Looting and Economic Justice”, in: P. M. Messenger, G. S. Smith (eds), Cultural Heritage Management: A Global Perspective (Cultural Heritage Studies), (University Press of Florida: Tampa, 2010), pp. 261-277. Brodie, N., “An Archeologist’s View of the Trade in Unprovenanced Antiquities”, in: B. T. Hoffman, Art and Cultural Heritage – Law, Policy and Practice, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2009), pp. 52-63. Brodie, N., “Export Deregulation and the Illicit Trade in Archaeological Material”, in: J. R. Richman & M. P. Forsyth, Legal Perspective on Cultural Resources, (Altamaria Press, 2004), pp. 85-99. Brodie, N., Renfrew, C., ‘Looting and the World’s Archaeological Heritage: The Inadequate Response’, 34 Annual Review of Anthropology, (2005), pp. 343-361. Browne, A., ‘Unesco and Unidroit: The Role of Conventions in Eliminating the Illicit Art Market’, 7 (1) Art, Antiquity and Law, (2002), pp. 379-385. Bouckaert, B., Depoorter, B. W. F., “1200 Adverse Possession – Title-Systems”, in: B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume II. Civil Law and Economics, (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, 2000), 1200, pp. 18-31. Brunner, C. J. H., “Gestolen Roerende Zaken en het Europees Privaatrecht”, in: P. J. I. M. de Waart, G. A. L. Droz, F. Rigaux, C. J. H. Brunner, Kunsthandel (Inclusief Antiquiteiten) en de Bescherming van Nationaal Cultureel Erfgoed, (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Internationaal Recht, November 1994), pp. 101-134. Burke, K. T., ‘International Transfer of Stolen Cultural Property: Should Thieves Continue to Benefit from Domestic Laws Favoring Bona Fide Purchasers?’, 13 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal, (1990-1991), pp. 427-466. Byrne-Sutton, Q., “Introduction”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 9-17; Byrne-Sutton, Q., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold, (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), p. 73. C Caamiña Domínguez, C. M., Conflicto de Jurisdicción y de Leyes en el Tràfico Ilícito de Bienes Culturales, (Colex: Madrid, 2007). Cahn, H., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold, (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), p. 79. Calvo Caravaca, A. L., “Private International Law and the Unidroit Convention of 24th June 1995 on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects”, in: H. -P. Mansel, Festschrift für Erik Jayme, (European Law Publishers, Sellier: München, 2004), pp. 87-104. Calvo Caravaca, A. L., Caamiña Domínguez, C. M., “El Convenio de Unidroit de 24 de Junio 1995”, in: C. R. Fernández Liesa / J. Prieto de Pedro (dirs), La Protección Jurídico Internacional del Patrimonio Cultural. Especial Referencia a España, (Colex: Madrid, 2009), pp. 155-189. Campbell, P. B., ‘The Illicit Antiquities Trade as a Transnational Criminal Network: Characterizing and Anticipating Trafficking of Cultural Heritage’, 20 (2) International Journal of Cultural Property, (2013), pp. 113-153. Carducci, G., ‘Complémentarité Entre les Conventions de l’UNESCO de 1970 et d’UNIDROIT de 1995 sur les Biens Culturels’, 11 Revue de Droit Uniforme, (2006), pp. 93-102. Carey Miller, D. L., Meyers, D. W., Cowe, A., ‘Restitution of Art and Cultural Objects: A Reassessment of the Role of Limitation’, VI (1) Art Antiquity & Law, (2001), pp. 1-17. Carl, M. H., “Legal Issues Associated With Restitution – Conflict of Law Rules Concerning Ownership and Statutes of Limitations”, in: International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes, (Kluwer Law International: The Hague, 2004), pp. 185-192. Caro (De), S., ‘Considérations sur le rôle de l’ICCROM’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 659-661. Carruthers, J. M., ‘Cultural Property and Law – An International Private Law Perspective’, Juridical Review, (2001), pp. 127-145. Carss-Frisk, M., ‘A guide to the implementation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights’, in: Council of Europe – Directorate General of Human Rights, Human rights handbooks, No. 4, (Strasbourg, 2001). Text available at https://rm.coe.int/ CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168007ff4a, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Cauffman C., Sagaert, V., “National Report on the Transfer of Movables in Belgium”, W. Faber and B. Lurger, National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Vol. 4, (Sellier: Munich, 2011), pp. 189-361. Chechi, A., Bandle, A. L., Renold, M. A., ‘Case Egyptian Archaeological Objects – United States v. Frederick Schultz’, Platform ArThemis (http://unige.ch/art-adr), Art-Law Centre, University of Geneva, available at https://plone.unige.ch/art-adr/cases-affaires/egyptian-archaeological-objects-2013-us-v-schultz/case-note-2013-egyptian-archaeological-objects-2013-united-states-v-schultz, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Clippele, M. -S., ‘Quand l’art ouvre la voie au droit: le palais Stoclet’, Journal des tribunaux, (26 janvier 2013), 4-N°6506, pp. 49-59. Coggins, C. C., “A Licit International Traffic in Ancient Art”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art – Vol. V – International Sales of Works of Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York; Kluwer Law International: The Hague / London / Boston, 1996), pp. 47-56. Coggins, C. C., ‘A Licit International Traffic in Ancient Art: Let There Be Light!’, 4 International Journal of Cultural Property, (1995), pp. 61-79. Coltoff, P., 66 American Jurisprudence, (Second Edition, May 2017 update). Cornu, G., Vocabulaire Juridique, (Association Henri Capitant, Quadrige / PUF: Paris, 7ème édition, 2005). Cornu, M., ‘Fighting Illicit Trafficking in Cultural Objects, Searching for Provenance and Exercising Due Diligence in the European Union’, Joint European Commission-UNESCO Project, “Engaging the European Art Market in the fight against the illicit trafficking of cultural property”, Study for the capacity-building conference, (20-21 March 2018), pp. 1-31. Cornu, M., ‘Recasting restitution: interactions between EU and international law’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 637-646. Cornu, M., Wallaert, C., Fromageau, J., Dictionnaire comparé du droit du patrimoine culturel, (CNRS Éditions: Paris, 2012). Cornu, M., Renold, M. A., ‘New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property: Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution’, 17 (1) International Journal of Cultural Property, (2010), pp. 1-31. Cottrell, E. M., ‘Keeping the Barbarians Outside the Gate: Toward a Comprehensive International Agreement Protecting Cultural Property’, Chicago Journal of International Law, (2008-2009), pp. 627-659. Coulée, F., ‘Quelques Remarques sur la Restitution Interétatique des Biens Culturels sous l’Angle du Droit International Public’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public, (2000), pp. 358-392. Crewdson, R., ‘Putting Life into a Cultural Property Convention: UNIDROIT ; Still Some Way to Go’, 17 International Legal Practitioner (1992), pp. 45-48. Cronin C., ‘Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum: Ethical Quandaries of Art Restitution Claims Against Public Collections’, (2017), pp. 1-30. Cuno, J., ‘Museums and the Acquisition of Antiquities’, 19 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, (2001), pp. 83-96. D Das, H., “Claims for Looted Cultural Assets: Is There a Need for Specialized Rules of Evidence?”, in: The International Bureau of the Permanent Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes. Papers Emanating from the Seventh PCA International Law Seminar May 23, 2003, (Kluwer Law International [et al.]: The Hague [et al.], 2004), pp. 193-249. Daulte, F., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 86-87. Dekkers-Dirix, R., Handboek Burgerlijk Recht, Deel II, (Intersentia: Antwerpen / Oxford, derde uitgave, 2005). Delepierre, S., Schneider, M., “Ratification and Implementation of International Conventions to Fight Illicit Trafficking in Cultural Property”, in: F. Demarais (ed), Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods – The Global Challenge of Protection the World’s Cultural Heritage, (ICOM International Observatory on Illicit Traffic in Cultural Good: Paris, 2015), pp. 129-139. Demarais, F., “An International Observatory on Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods”, in: F. Demarais (ed), Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods – The Global Challenge of Protecting the World’s Cultural Heritage, (ICOM International Observatory on Illicit Traffic in Cultural Good: Paris, 2015), pp. vii-x. Demarsin, B., ‘Has the Time (of Laches) Come? Recent Nazi-Era Art Litigation in the New York Forum’, 59 (3) Buffalo Law Review, (2011), pp. 621-691. Demarsin, B., ‘The Third Time is Not Always a Charm: The Troublesome Legacy of a Dutch Art Dealer – The Limitation and Act of State Defenses in Looted Art Cases’, 28 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, (2010-2011), pp. 255-283. Demarsin, B., Schrage, E., Tilleman, B., Verbeke, A., Art and Law (Hart Publishing / Mercator Fonds / Die Keure: Oxford / Brussels, 2008). Djoudi, J., ‘Possession’, Répertoire de droit immobilier, (mars 2011 (actual. décembre 2016)). Djoudi, J., ‘Revendication’, Répertoire de droit immobilier, (avril 2008 (actual. avril 2016)). Dopagne, F., “Article 28 Non-retroactivity of treaties”, in: O. Corten, P. Klein (ed), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary – Volume I (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011), pp. 718-728. Doyal, S., ‘Implementing the UNIDROIT Convention on Cultural Property Into Domestic Law: The Case of Italy’, 657 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, (2000-2001), pp. 657-700. Doyle, M. B., ‘Note – Ownership by Display: Adverse Possession to Determine Ownership of Cultural Property’, 41 (1) The George Washington International Law Review, (2009), pp. 269-297. Dross, W. ‘Le destin singulier de l’article 2279 du code civil’, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (2006), pp. 27-52. Dross, W., Droit des Biens, (LGDJ – Lextenso édition, 2e édition, Issy-les-Moulineaux, 2014). Droz, G. A. L., “Mémoire sur le Projet de Convention d’Unidroit sur le Retour International des Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés”, in: P. J. I. M. de Waart, G. A. L. Droz, F. Rigaux, C. J. H. Brunner, Kunsthandel (Inclusief Antiquiteiten) en de Bescherming van Nationaal Cultureel Erfgoed, (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Internationaal Recht, November 1994), pp. 47-57. Droz, G. A. L., ‘La Convention d’UNIDROIT sur le Retour International des Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Rome, 24 juin 1995)’, 86 (2) Revue Critique de Droit International Privé, (1997), pp. 239-281. Dutra, M. L., ‘Sir, How Much is That Ming Vase in the Window?: Protecting Cultural Relics in the People’s Republic of China’, 5 Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, (2004), pp. 62-100. Dupuy, P.-M., “Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy”, in: E. Cannizaro (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention, (Oxford University Press: New York, 2011), pp. 123-137. Dwyer, E., “Critical Comments on the Draft Principles to Govern a Licit International Traffic in Cultural Property”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 105-108. E Elsen, A. E., “Full Disclosure by Museums to Improve the Licit International Traffic in Art”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 117-119. Estrella Faria, J. A., ‘The international protection of religious cultural property’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 594-609. Eyster, J., ‘United States v. Pre-Columbian Artifacts and the Republic of Guatemala: Expansion of National Stolen Property Act in its Application to Illegally Exported Cultural Property – Case Notes’, 5 (1) International Journal of Cultural Property, (1996), pp 185-191. F Fach Gómez, K., ‘Algunas Consideraciones en Torno al Convenio de Unidroit sobre Bienes Culturales Robados o Exportados Ilegalmente’, Anuario de Derecho Internacional Privado, (2004), pp. 237-259. Fincham, D., ‘The Distinctiveness of Property and Heritage’, 115 (3) Pennsylvania State Law Review, (2011), pp. 641-684. Fincham, D., ‘Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities’, 37 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, (2009-2010), pp. 145-206. Fincham, D., ‘How Adopting the Lex Originis Rule Can Impede the Flow of Illicit Cultural Property’, 32 Columbia Journal of Law & Arts, (2008-2009), pp. 111-150. Flynn, G., ‘The Recovery of Stolen Cultural Property in the State of Maryland’, 38 (2) University of Baltimore Law Forum, (2008), pp. 103-125. Forbes, S. O., ‘Securing the Future of Our Past: Current Efforts to Protect Cultural Property’, 9 (1) The Transnational Lawyer, (1996), pp. 235-272. Forrest, C., International Law and the Protection of Cultural Heritage, (Routledge: London and New York, 2010). Foutty, S. L., ‘Recent Development - Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc.: Entrenchment of the Due Diligence Requirement in Replevin Actions for Stolen Art’, 43 Vanderbilt Law Review, (1990), pp. 1839-1861. Fox, C., ‘The Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: An Answer to the World Problem of Illicit Trade in Cultural Property’, 9 (1) American University International Law Review, (1993), pp. 225-267. Francioni, F., “La Protección del Patrimonio Cultural a la Luz de Los Principios de Derecho Internacional Público”, in: C. R. Fernández Liesa and J. Prieto de Pedro (dirs), La Protección Jurídico Internacional del Patrimonio Cultural. Especial Referencia a España, (Colex: Madrid, 2009), pp. 13-34. Fraoua, R., “La mise en œuvre en Suisse de la Convention sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 35-52. Frigo, M., ‘The impact of the UNIDROIT Convention on international case law and practice: an appraisal’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 626-636. Frigo, M., ‘Model Provisions on State Ownership of Undiscovered Cultural Objects –Introduction’, Uniform Law Review, (2011), pp. 1024-1035. Frigo, M., ‘Cultural Property v. Cultural Heritage: A “Battle of Concepts” in International Law?’, 86 (854) International Review of the Red Cross, (2004), pp. 367-378. G Gaillard, A., ‘La séparation d’un meuble par destination – C.A. Lyon, 1ère chamber civile, Section B, 13 mars 2012, n. 10-02877’, available at http://bacaly.univ-lyon3.fr/index.php/droit-des-biens/235-la-separation-d-un-immeuble-par-destination, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Gambaro, A., “Community, State, Individuals and the Ownership of Cultural Objects”, in: J. A. Sánchez Cordero (ed), La Convención de la UNESCO de 1970 – Sus Nuevos Desafíos, (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: México, 2014), pp. 135-149. Gandur, J. -C., ‘ “Due diligence”: Les derniers maillons de la chaîne’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 651-655. Gardiner, R., “The Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation”, in: D. B. Hollis (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2012), pp. 574-506. Garner, B. A., Black’s Law Dictionary, (West, 10th edition, 2014). Gasser, J. M., “La classification des biens immeubles et meubles en droit français”, in: C. Baldus, P. -C. Müller-Graff, Droit Privé européen: l’unité dans la diversité – Convergences en droit des biens, de la famille et des successions?, (Sellier European Law publishers: München, 2011), pp. 259-266. Gerstenblith, P., “Chapter 15 – Increasing Effectiveness of the Legal Regime for the Protection of the International Archaeological Heritage”, in: J. A. R. Nafziger and A. M. Nicgorski (eds), Cultural Heritage Issues: The Legacy of Conquest, Colonization, and Commerce, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, 2009), pp. 305-324. Gerstenblith, P., Art, Cultural Heritage, and the Law: Cases and Materials, (Carolina Academic Press: Durnham, Fourth Edition, 2008). Gerstenblith, P., Art, Cultural Heritage, and the Law, Cases and Material, (Carolina Academic Press, Third Edition, 2004). Gerstenblith, P., “From Steinhardt to Schultz: The McClain Doctrine and the Protection of Archaeological Sites”, in: J. R. Richman and M. P. Forsyth, Legal Perspectives on Cultural Resources, (Altamarina Press, 2004), pp. 100-118. Gerstenblith, P., ‘The Adverse Possession of Personal Property’, 37 Buffalo Law Review, (1988-1989), pp. 119-163. Gilbert, W. S., Sullivan, A., ‘Notes – The Need for Civil-Law Nations to Adopt Discovery Rules in Art Replevin Actions: A Comparative Study’, 70 Texas Law Review, (1991-1992), pp. 1431-1467. Goldrich, I. M., ‘Balancing the Need for Repatriation of Illegally Removed Cultural Property with the Interests of Bona Fide Purchasers: Applying the UNIDROIT Convention to the Case of the Gold Phiale’, 23 (1) Fordham International Law Journal (1999), pp. 118-164. Grimonprez, B., ‘Prescription acquisitive’, Répertoire de droit civil Dalloz, V°, (janvier 2010 (actualisation juin 2016)). Grosse, L., Jouanny, J. P., ‘La Protection du Patrimoine Culturel en Vertu des Instruments de l’UNESCO (1970) et d’UNIDROIT (1995): La Position d’Interpol’, 8 (1-2) Uniform Law Review, (2003), pp. 575-580. Grover, S. F., ‘Note – The Need for Civil-Law Nations to Adopt Discovery Rules in Art Replevin Actions: A Comparative Study’, 70 Texas Law Review, (1991-1992), pp. 1431-1467. H Haanappel, P. P. C., Mackaay, E., Netherlands Civil Code – Patrimonial Law in General, P. Haanappel and E. Mackaay (eds), 1990. Haldimann, M. -A., ‘Tradition de collection et trafic d’antiquités: une réflecion sur la collection privée au XXIe siècle’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 610-616. Hayworth, A. E., ‘Stolen Artwork: Deciding Ownership is No Pretty Picture’, 43 Duke Law Journal, (1993-1994), pp. 337-383. Henry, X., Jacob, F., Tisserand, A., Venandet, G., Wiederkehr, G., Méga Code Civil, (Dalloz: Paris, 5ème édition, 2003). Henson, E. J., ‘The Last Prisoners of War: Returning World War II Art to its Rightful Owners – Can Moral Obligations be Translated Into Legal Duties’, 51 DePaul Law Review, (2001-2002), pp. 1103-1158. Hoffman, B., ‘How Unidroit Protects Cultural Property: Part II’, 213 (46) New York Law Journal, (10 March 1995), pp. 1-5. Hoffman, B., ‘How Unidroit Protects Cultural Property: Part I’, 213 (41) New York Law Journal, (3 March 1995), pp. 1-4. Hollis, D. B., “Initial Decisions on Treaty-Making”, in: D. B. Hollis (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2012), pp. 655-675. Hughes, V., Wright, L., ‘International Efforts to Secure the Return of Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: Has Unidroit Found a Global Solution?’, 32 The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, (1994), pp. 219-241. J Jayme, E., ‘Human Rights and Restitution of Nazi-Confiscated Artworks from Public Museums: The Altmann Case as a Model for Uniform Rules?’, 11 Uniform Law Review, (2006), pp. 393-398. Jayme, E., ‘Globalization in Art Law: Clash of Interests and International Tendencies’, 38 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, (2005), pp. 927-945. Jolles, A., “Un Regard Critique sur la Convention d’Unidroit”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 53-62. K Karagiannis, S., “The Territorial Application of Treaties”, in: D. B. Hollis (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties, (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2012), pp. 305-327. Kaye, L. M., ‘The Future of the Past: Recovering Cultural Property’, 4 (1) Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, (1996), pp. 23-42. Kaye, L. M., ‘The Recovery of Stolen Cultural Property: A Practitioner’s View - War Stories and Morality Tales’, 5 (1) Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal, (1998), pp. 5-17. Kelly, M. J., ‘Conflicting Trends in the Flourishing International Trade of Art and Antiquities: Restitutio in Integrum and Possessio animo Ferundi/Lucrandi’, 14 Dickinson Journal of International Law, (1995-1996), pp. 31-55. Kennon, H., ‘Take a Picture, It May Last Longer if Guggenheim Becomes the Law of the Land: The Repatriation of Fine Art’, 8 Saint Thomas Law Review, (1995-1996), pp. 373-422. Kinderman, S. A., ‘The Unidroit Draft Convention on Cultural Objects: An Examination of the Need for a Uniform Legal Framework for Controlling the Illicit Movement of Cultural Property’, 7 Emory International Law Review, (1993), pp. 457-584. Kirby, C. L., ‘Stolen Cultural Property: Available Museum Responses to an International Dilemma’, 104 Dickinson Law Review, (1999-2000), pp. 729-748. Klein, F. -E., ‘En Relisant la Convention UNIDROIT du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés: Réflexions et Suggestions’, 118 Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht, (1999), pp. 263-285. Klock, J. H., New Jersey Practice Series – Court Rules Annotated, (March 2017 update). Klomp, R. J. Q., ‘Dieven met geduld – Over Verkrijgende Verjaring te Kwader Trouw’, in: Tijd en onzekerheid, BW-krant-jaarboek 16, (Gouda Quint: Deventer, 2000), pp. 59-73, text available at https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/36936/266.pdf?sequence=1, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Kouroupas, M. P., ‘Combatting cultural property looting and trafficking: the US experience’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 528-534. Kowalski, W. W., “Claims for Works of Art and Their Legal Nature”, in: The International Bureau of the Permanent Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes. Papers Emanating From the Seventh PCA International Law Seminar May 23, 2003, (Kluwer Law International [et al.]: The Hague [et al.], 2004), pp. 31-51. Kreder, J., ‘Analysis of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016’, 20 (1) Chapman Law Review, pp. 1-24. Kuitenbrouwer, F. ‘The Darker Side of Museum Art: Acquisition and Restitution of Cultural Objects with a Dubious Provenance’, 13 European Review, (2005), pp. 597-615. Kurjatko, A., ‘Are Finders Keepers? The Need for a Uniform Law Governing the Rights of Original Owners and Good Faith Purchasers of Stolen Art’, 5 (1) U. C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, (1999), pp. 60-94. L Lagarde, P., ‘La restitution internationale des biens culturels en dehors de la Convention de l’UNESCO de 1970 et de la Convention d’UNIDROIT de 1995’, 11 Revue de droit uniforme, (2006), pp. 83-91. Lalive, P., “Réflexions sur un ordre public culturel”, in: E. Wyler / A. Papaux (eds), L'Extranéité ou le dépassement de l'ordre juridique étatique : actes du colloque des 27 et 28 novembre 1997 organisé par l'Institut d'études de droit international de la Faculté de droit de l'Université de Lausanne, (Pédone: Paris, 1999), pp. 155-185. Lalive, P., “Une Convention Internationale Qui Dérange: La Convention Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés”, in: Droit et Justice / René-Jean Dupuy (Hrsg), Mélanges en l’Honneur de Nicolas Valticos, (Pédone: Paris, 1999), pp. 177-188. Lalive, P., ‘La Convention d'UNIDROIT sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés (du 24 juin 1995)’, 1 Revue Suisse de Droit International et de Droit Européen, (1997), pp. 13-56. Lalive D’Epinay, P., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 65-66, 71-72, 72-73, 74, 78-79 and 82. Lalive d’Epinay, P., ‘Une avancée du droit international: la Convention de Rome d’Unidroit sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés’, 1 Uniform Law Review, (1996), pp. 40-58. Last, K., “The Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes: Some Issues of Definition”, in: The International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes. Papers Emanating From the Seventh PCA International Law Seminar May 23, 2003, (Kluwer Law International [et al.]: The Hague [et al.], 2004), pp. 53-84. Le Bouthillier, Y., “Article 32 Supplementary means of interpretation”, in: O. Corten, P. Klein (ed), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary – Volume I (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011), pp. 841-863. Lecocq, P., Manuel du Droit des Biens – Tome 1 – Biens et Propriété, (Larcier: Bruxelles, 2012). Lehman, J. N., ‘The Continued Struggle With Stolen Cultural Property: the Hague Convention, the Unesco Convention, and the Unidroit Draft Convention’, 14 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, (1997), pp. 527-550. Lenzner, N. R., ‘The Illicit International Trade in Cultural Property: Does the Unidroit Convention Provide an Effective Remedy for the Shortcoming of the Unesco Convention?’, 15 (3) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law, (1994-1995), pp. 469-507. Lindsay, I., The History of Loot and Stolen Art: from Antiquity until the Present Day, (Unicorn Press LTD: London, 2014). Love Levine, A., ‘The Need for Uniform Legal Protection against Cultural Property Theft: A Final Cry for the 1995 Unidroit Convention’, 36 (2) Brooklyn Journal of International Law, (2010-2011), pp. 751-780. Lowenthal, C., “Critical Comments on the Draft Principles for a Licit Trade in Cultural Property”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 129-130. Lubina, K., Contested Cultural Property – The Return of Nazi Spoliated Art and Human Remains from Public Collections, (Maastricht University Publication: Maastricht, 2009). Lubina, K. R. M., “General Regime applicable to stolen objects in the Netherlands: the right to recovery, transfer of property, and the protection of third buyers under the Dutch Civil Code (DCC)”, in: T. Kono (ed), The Impact of Uniform Laws on the Protection of Cultural Heritage and the Preservation of Cultural Heritage in the 21st Century, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden / Boston, 2010), pp. 561-638. M M’Bow, A. M., ‘A Plea for the Return of an Irreplaceable Cultural Heritage to Those Who Created It’, 7 June 1978, http://www.unesco.org/culture/laws/pdf/PealforReturn_DG_ 1978.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Mackenzie, S., ‘Illicit Antiquities, Crimonological Theory, and the Deterrent Power of Criminal Sanctions for Targeted Populations’, 7 (2) Art, Antiquity and Law, (2002), pp. 125-161. Margules, P. L., ‘International Art Theft and the Illegal Import and Export of Cultural Property: a Study of Relevant Values, Legislation, and Solutions’, 15 Suffolk Transnational Law Journal, (1991-1992), pp. 609-647. Martens, K., ‘Law, Art and the Ecclesiastical Heritage’, in: B. Demarsin, E. J. H. Schrage, B. Tilleman, A. Verbeke, Art & Law (Hart Publishing / Mercator Fonds / Die Keure: Oxford / Brussels, 2008), pp. 414-441. Massy, L., ‘La Protection du Patrimoin Culturel Mobilier au Regard du Droit Belge’, in: Alami-Hamedane, A., Cruz de Mendonça, G., Massy, L., Mazein, D., Pessoa Machado, C. A., Rönneper, J., Vigorito, A., Yameogo, R. M. N., International Protection of Cultural Property and National Legal Systems, (Aracne: Rome, 2009). Mastalir, R. W., ‘A Proposal for Protecting the “Cultural” and “Property” Aspects of Cultural Property Under International Law’, 16 (4) Fordham International Law Journal, (1992), pp. 1033-1093. Mathieu, M.-L., Droit civil – Les biens, (Sirey, 3e édition, 2013). Mansel, H. -P., Festschrift für Erik Jayme, (European Law Publishers, Sellier: München, 2004). McFarland-Taylor, L., ‘Tracking Stolen Artwork on the Internet: A New Standard for Due Diligence’, 16 The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, (1997-1998), pp. 937-970. Mclachlan, C., Foreign Relations Law, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2014). McKinney’s Consolidated Laws of New York Annotated, Civil Practice Law and Rules. McCord, J. A., ‘The Strategic Targeting of Diligence: A New Perspective on Stemming the Illicit Traffic in Art’, 70 Indiana Law Journal, (1994-1995), pp. 985-1008. Merryman, J. H., “The Unidroit Convention: Three Significant Departures from the Urtext”, in: J. H. Merryman, Thinking About the Elgin Marbles: Critical Essays on Cultural Property, Art and Law, (Kluwer Law International: The Hague / London / Boston, 2000), pp. 270-277. Merryman, J. H., Law, Ethics and the Visual Arts, (Kluwer Law International, 5th edition, 2007). Merryman, J. H., ‘The Free International Movement of Cultural Property’, 31 (1) New York University Journal of International Law & Policy, (1998), pp. 4-14. Merryman, J. H., “A Licit Trade in Cultural Objects”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 3-46. Merryman, J. H., “Draft Principles to Govern a Licit International Traffic in Cultural Property”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 103-104. Milo, J. M., Sagaert, V., “Private Property Rights in Cultural Objects: Balancing Preservation of Cultural Objects and Certainty of Trade in Belgian and Dutch Law”, in: B. Demarsin, E. Schrage, B. Tilleman, A. Verbeke, Art & Law (Hart Publishing / Mercator Fonds / Die Keure: Oxford / Brussels, 2008), pp. 468-491. Minkovich, A., ‘The Successful Use of Laches in World War II-Era Art Theft Disputes: It’s Only a Matter of Time’, 27 Columbia Journal of Law & Arts, (2003-2004), pp. 349-383. Montagu, A. A., ‘Recent Cases on the Recovery of Stolen Art – The Tug of War Between Owners and Good Faith Purchasers Continues’, 75 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & The Arts, (1993-1994), pp. 75-101. Morrow, J. E., ‘The National Stolen Property Act and the Return of Stolen Cultural Property to its Rightful Foreign Owners’, 30 (1) Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, pp. 249-261. Moustakas, J., ‘Group Rights in Cultural Property: Justifying Strict Inalienability’, 74 (6) Cornwell Law Review, (1989), pp. 1179-1227. N Nafziger, J., Kirkwood Paterson, R., “Cultural Heritage Law”, in: J. Nafziger & R. Kirkwood Paterson, Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade, (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014), pp. 1-18. Nafziger, J. A. R., Kirkwood Paterson, R., Handbook on the Law of Cultural Heritage and International Trade, (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014). Nafziger, J. A. R., Kirkwood Paterson, R., Dundes Renteln, A., Cultural Law- International, Comparative and Indigenous, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2010). Nafziger, J. A. R., Scovazzi, T., Le Patrimoine Culturel de l’Humanité – The Cultural Heritage of Mankind, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden / London, 2008). Nafziger, J. A. R., Scovazzi, T., “La Restitution des Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés en Temps de Paix”, in: J.A.R. Nafziger and T. Scovazzi, Le Patrimoine Culturel de l’Humanité – The Cultural Heritage of Mankind, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden / London, 2008), pp. 59-79. Nafziger, J. A. R., “Towards a More Collaborative Regime of Trnasnational Cultural Property Law”, in: J. Basedown, K. Siehr and T. M. C. Asser Instituut (eds), Private Law in the International Arena. From National Conflict Rules Towards Harmonization and Unification. Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr, (T. M. C. Asser Press: The Hague, Schulthess: Zürich, 2000), pp. 495-509. Nolte, G., “Susbequent Practice as a Means of Interpretation in the Jurisprudence of the WTO Appellate Body”, in: E. Cannizaro (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention, (Oxford University Press: New York, 2011), pp. 138-144. O O’Neal, S. V., ‘Accrual of Statutes of Limitations: California’s Discovery Exception Swallows the Rule’, 68 California Law Review, (1980), pp. 106-125. O’Keefe, P. J., Prott, L. V. (eds), Cultural Heritage Conventions and Other Instruments – A Compendium with Commentaries, (Institute of Art & Law: Builth Wells, 2011). O’Keeffe, P. J., “International Laws, Treaties, and Organizations”, in: P. M. Messenger, G. S. Smith (eds), Cultural Heritage Management: A Global Perspective (Cultural Heritage Studies), (University Press of Florida: Tampa, 2010), pp. 251-260. O’Keefe, P., ‘Using Unidroit to Avoid Cultural Heritage Disputes: Limitation Periods’, 14 Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution, (2006), pp. 227-242. O’Keefe, P. J., Le Commerce des Antiquités – Combattre les Destructions et le Vol, (Unesco: Paris, 1999). O’Keefe, P. J., ‘Developments in Cultural Heritage Law: What is Australia’s Role?’, Australian International Law Journal, (1996), pp. 36-59. O’Keefe, P. J., ‘Faisabilité d’un code international de déontologie pour les négociants en biens culturels afin de lutter plus éfficacement contre le trafic illicite de biens culturels’, CLT-94/WS/11), (15 mai 1994), pp. 1-62. O’Keefe, P. J., ‘Export and Import Controls on Movement of the Cultural Heritage: Problems at the National Level’, 10 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, (1983), pp. 352-370. Ochoa, T. T., Wistrich, A., ‘The Puzzling Purposes of Statutes of Limitation’, 28 Pacific Law Journal, (1997), pp. 453-514. Olivier, M., ‘The UNIDROIT Convention: Attempting to Regulate the International Trade and Traffic of Cultural Property’, 26 Golden Gate University Law Review, (1996), pp. 627-665. Ortiz, G., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold, (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), 69-71 and 72. Özel, S., ‘Under the Turkish Blanket Legislation: The Recovery of Cultural Property Removed from Turkey’, 38 (2) International Journal of Legal Information, (2010), pp. 177-184. Özel, S., ‘Case Notes – The Basel Decisions: Recognition of the Blanket Legislation Vesting State Ownership over the Cultural Property Found within the Country of Origin’, 9 (2) International Journal of Cultural Property, (2000), pp. 315-340. P Palmer, N., “Litigation: The Best Remedy?”, in: The International Bureau of the Permanent Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes. Papers Emanating From the Seventh PCA International Law Seminar May 23, 2003, (Kluwer Law International [et al.]: The Hague [et al.], 2004), pp. 265-290. Palmer, N., The Recovery of Stolen Art – A Collection of Essays, (Kluwer law international, 1998). Panone, F., ‘INTERPOL’s position on the 1970 and 1995 Convention governing the international circulation of cultural property’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 647-650. Papademetriou, T., ‘International Aspects of Cultural Property – An Overview of Basic Instruments and Issues’, 24 International Journal of Legal Information, (1996), pp. 270-301. Papaux, A., Samson, R., “Article 33 Interpretation of treaties authenticated in two or more languages”, in: O. Corten, P. Klein (ed), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary – Volume I (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011), pp. 866-884. Petrovich, J. G., ‘Comments – The Recovery of Stolen Art: of Paintings, Statues, And Statues of Limitations’, 27 UCLA Law Review, (1979-1980), pp. 1122-1158. Pinkerton, L. F., ‘Due Diligence in Fine Art Transactions’, 22 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, (1990), pp. 1-29. Pipkins, J., ‘ISIL and the Illicit Antiquities Trade’, XXIV International Affairs Review, (2016), pp. 100-119. Planche, E., ‘Le point de départ, la Convention de l’UNESCO de 1970 concernant les mesures à prendre pour interdire et empêcher l’importation, l’exportation et le transfert de propriété illicites des biens culturels’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 516-523. Plehwe (Von), T., ‘European Union and the Free Movement of Cultural Goods’, 20 European Law Review, (1995), pp. 431-450. Preziosi, T., ‘Applying a Strict Discovery Rule to Art Stolen in the Past’, 49 Hasting Law Journal, (1997-1998), pp. 225-252. Portes (Des), E., ‘La Lutte Contre le Trafic des Biens Culturels: Une Priorité pour les Professionnels de Musée’, 115 Gazette du Palais, (1995), pp. 327-330. Prott, L. V., ‘The Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects – Ten Years On’, 14 (1-2) Uniform Law Review, (2009), pp. 215-237. Prott, L. V., “Chapter 13 – Unesco International Framework for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage”, in: J. A. R. Nafziger and A. M. Nicgorski, Cultural Heritage Issues: The Legacy of Conquest, Colonization, and Commerce (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, 2009), pp. 257-281. Prott, L. V., Witnesses to History – Document and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects, (UNESCO Publishing, 2009). Prott, L. V., ‘The International Movement of Cultural Objects’, 12 International Journal of Cultural Property, (2005), pp. 225-248. Prott, L. V., “Keynote Address: The Prospects for the Recovery of Cultural Heritage Looted from Iraq”, in: The International Bureau of Permanent Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes. Papers Emanating From the Seventh PCA International Law Seminar May 23, 2003, (Kluwer Law International [et al.]: The Hague [et al.], 2004), pp. 23-29. Prott, L. V., “Responding to World War II Art Looting”, in: The International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes. Papers Emanating From the Seventh PCA International Law Seminar May 23, 2003, (Kluwer Law International [et al.], The Hague [et al.], 2004), pp. 113-137. Prott, L. V., “Unesco and Unidroit: A Partnership Against Trafficking in Cultural Objects”, in: N. Palmer (ed), The Recovery of Stolen Art – A Collection of Essays, (Kluwer law international, 1998), pp. 205-215. Prott, L. V., Commentary on the Unidroit Convention, (Institute of Art & Law: Leicester, 1997). Prott, L. V., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 83-84. Prott, L. V., O’Keefe, P. J., ‘ ‘Cultural Heritage’ or ‘Cultural Property’?’, 1 International Journal of Cultural Property, (1992), pp. 307-320. Prott, L. V., “Problems of Private International Law for the Protection of the Cultural Heritage”, in: Académie de Droit International de La Haye / Hague Academy of International Law, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye, V, Tome 217, (1989), pp. 219-317. Prott, L. V., O’Keefe, P. J., Handbook of national regulations concerning the export of cultural property, (UNESCO, CC. 88/WS/27, 1988). Prott, L. V., ‘International Control of the Illicit Movement of the Cultural Heritage: the 1970 UNESCO Convention and Some Possible Alternatives’, 10 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, (1983), pp. 333-351. R Rand Europe, ‘Assessing the illegal trade in cultural property from a public policy perspective’, (Cambridge, 2011), pp. 1-36. Rank-Berenschot, “Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 3, Artikel 86 [Gevolgen onbevoegdheid overdracht roerende zaak, niet registergoed, of recht aan toonder of order]”, in: J. H. Nieuwenhuis, C. J. J. M. Stolker and W. L. Valk (ed), Tekst & Commentaar Burgerlijk Wetboek, Bescherming tegen beschikkingsonbevoegdheid, (Wolters Kluwer Nederland, 11e druk, bijgewerkt tem 1 juli 2015). Reboul-Maupin, N., Droit des biens, (Dalloz, 4e édition, 2012). Redman, L. F., ‘A Wakeup Call for a Uniform Statute of Limitations in Art Restitution Cases’, 15 UCLA Entertainment Law Review, (2008), pp. 203-224. Reehuis, W. H. M., Heisterkamp, A. H. T., PITLO Het Nederlands burgerlijk recht – deel 3 - Goederenrecht, (Dertiende Druk, Kluwer: Deventer, 2012). Reehuis, W. H. M., Slob, E. E., “Invoering Boeken 3, 5 en 6 – Boek 3 Vermogensrecht in het algemeen”, in: C. J. Van Zeben, J. W. Du Pon, Parlementaire geschiedenis van het nieuwe burgerlijk wetboek, (Kluwer: Deventer, 1990). Reichel, P. (ed), Handbook of Transational Crime and Justice, (Sage Publications: California, 2005). Reichelt, G., ‘International Protection of Cultural Property (second study) by Gerte REICHELT, Univ. Dozent Vienna Institute of Comparative Law’, Uniform Law Review, (1988), pp. 52-132. Reichelt, G., ‘International Protection of Cultural Property by Gerte REICHELT, Univ. Dozent Vienna Institute of Comparative Law’, Uniform Law Review, (1985), pp. 42-151. Renold, M. -A., ‘The Legal and Illegal Trade in Cultural Property to and Throughout Europe: Facts, Findings and Legal Analysis’, Joint European Commission-UNESCO Project, “Engaging the European Art Market in the fight against the illicit trafficking of cultural property”, Study for the capacity-building conference, 20-21 March 2018, pp. 1-18. Renold, M. -A., “The International Protection of Archaeological Heritage: Questions of Private Law and of Legal Harmonization”, in: J. A. Sánchez Cordero (ed), La Convención de la UNESCO de 1970 – Sus Nuevos Desafíos, (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: México, 2014), pp. 297-307. Renold, M. -A., ‘Bettina Thorn, Internationaler Kulturgüterschutz nach der Unidroit – Konvention. Schriften zum Kulturgüterschutz, Berlin, De Gruyter Recht, 2005, pp. XX + 416, ISBN 3-89949-253-6’, 11 (2) Uniform Law Review, (2006), pp. 477-478. Renold, M. -A., ‘Interaction Entre l’Integration Régionale et l’Harmonisation Mondiale: Quelques Réflexions à Propos des Biens Culturels’, 8 Uniform Law Review, (2003), pp. 581-583. Renold, M. -A., “Stolen Art: the Ubiquitous Question of Good Faith”, in: The International Bureau of Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed), Resolution of Cultural Property Disputes. Papers Emanating From the Seventh PCA International Law Seminar May 23, 2003, (Kluwer Law International [et al.]: The Hague [et al.], 2004), pp. 251-263. Renold, M. -A., “Les Principales Règles de la Convention d'Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés”, in: M. A. Renold and C. Breitler, La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 19-34. Reygrobellet, A., Denizot, C., "Fonds de commerce", Dalloz action, (2e éd., 2012). Robert, A., ‘L’action en revindication n’est pas susceptible de prescription extinctive’, Recueil Dalloz, (1993). Robert, A., ‘La revendication d’un meuble possédé par autrui’, Recueil Dalloz, (1991). Rodriguez Pineau, E., ‘Adhesión de España al Convenio de Unidroit sobre los Bienes Culturales Robados o Exportados Ilegalmente de 1995’, LV (1) Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, (2003), pp. 573-577. Roca-Hachem, R., ‘Unesco and Unidroit Cooperation in the Fight Against Illicit Traffic in Cultural Property – Conference Celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects – Unesco, Paris (France) – 24 June 2005 – Summary Report’, 3 Uniform Law Review, (2005), pp. 536-542. Roodt, C., ‘Restitution of art and cultural objects and its limits’, 46 (1) The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, (2013), pp. 286-307. Roodt, C., ‘Keeping cultural objects ‘in the picture’: traditional legal strategies’, 27 (3) The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, (1994), pp. 314-339. Rossi, R., ‘Due diligence in the acquisition of cultural objects’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 656-658. Rostomian, P. C., ‘Looted Art in the U.S. Market’, 55 Rutgers Law Review, (2002-2003), pp. 271-299. Rudenstine, D., ‘The Rightness and Utility of Voluntary Repatriation’, 19 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, (2001), pp. 69-82. Rutelli, F., ‘Italian policies for the restitution of illicitly trafficked cultural heritage, based on the rule of law and interested cooperation’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 224-227. S Sagaert, V., Beginselen van Belgisch Privaatrecht V – Goederenrecht, (Wolters Kluwer: Mechelen, 2014). Sagaert, V., Tilleman, B., Verbeke, A. L., Vermogensrecht in Kort Bestek, (Intersentia: Antwerpen, 3de editie, 2013). Salomons, A. F., “National Report on the Transfer of Movables in The Netherlands”, in: W. Faber and B. Lurger, National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 6, (Sellier: Munich, 2011), pp. 1-158. Sánchez Cordero, J., ‘The private art collections’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 617-625. Sánchez Cordero, J., ‘The Protection of Cultural Heritage: a Mexican Perspective’, 8 Uniform Law Review, (2003), pp. 565-574. Sbolci, L., “Supplementary Means of Interpretation”, in: E. Cannizaro (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention, (Oxford University Press: New York, 2011), pp. 145-163. Schaick (van), A. C., Rechtsgevolgen en functies van bezit en houderschap (Mon. BW nr. A14), (Kluwer: Deventer, 2014). Schneider, M., “The Unidroit Convention – A Shared Vision and a Joined Repsonsibility”, in: UNESCO Havana, ‘Culture and Development – Stop the Illicit Traffic of Cultural Property’, (2013), pp. 24-27. Schneider, M., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), p. 88. Schneider, M., “Le Projet de Convention d’Unidroit sur le Retour International des Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 141-153. Schneider, M., ‘The Unidroit Convention on Cultural Property: State of Play and Prospects for the Future’, 2 (3) Uniform Law Review, (1997), pp. 494-506. Schönenberger, B., The Restitution of Cultural Assets – Causes of Action – Obstacles to Restitution – Developments, (Stämpfli Publishers Ltd: Berne / Eleven International Publishing: Utrecht, 2009). Schwartz, A., Scott, R. E., ‘Rethinking the Laws of Good Faith Purchase’, 111 Columbia Law Review, (2011), pp. 1332-1384. Sharma, K., ‘From the Mayan Machaquila Stele to Egyptian Pharaoh Amenhotep’s Head: United States Courts’ Enforcement of Foreign National Patrimony Laws After United States v. Schultz’, 56 Hastings Law Journal, (2004-2005), pp. 749-768. Sherlock, M. A., ‘A Combined Discovery Rule and Demand and Refusal Rule for New York: The Need for Equitable Consistency in International Cases of Recovery of Stolen Art and Cultural Property’, 8 Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, (2000), pp. 483-506. Shyllon, F., ‘Private Law Beyond Markets for Goods and Services: The Example of Cultural Objects’, 8 Uniform Law Review, (2003), pp. 511-527. Seligman, T. K., “What Value in Surplus Cultural Property?”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 131-133. Siehr, K., ‘Private international law and the difficult problem to return illegally exported cultural property’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 503-515. Siehr, K. G., “The Beautiful One Has Come – to Return”, in: J. H. Merryman, Imperialism, Art and Restitution, (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 114-134. Siehr, K. G., ‘A Special Regime for Cultural Objects in Europe’, 8 Uniform Law Review, (2003-1/2), pp. 551-563. Siehr, K. G., ‘The Protection of Cultural Property: the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention and the EEC Instruments of 1992/93 Compared’, 3 Uniform Law Review, (1998-2/3), pp. 671-683. Siehr, K., ‘The Protection of Cultural Heritage and International Commerce’, 6 (2) International Journal of Cultural Property, (1997), pp. 304-325. Siehr, K., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold, (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 64-65, 77-78 and 79. Siehr, K., “The 1993 European Directive and the Unidroit Convention”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 77 and ff. Siehr, K. G., ‘Editorial’, 5 (1) International Journal of Cultural Property, (1996), pp. 7-10. Siehr, K. G., ‘The UNIDROIT Draft Convention on the International Protection of Cultural Property’, 3 International Journal of Cultural Property, (1994), pp. 301-307. Siehr, K. G., “International Art Trade and the Law”, in: Académie de Droit International, Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 1989, V, Tome 217, (Martinus Nijhoff Publihers, Dordrecht / Boston / London, 1990), pp. 9-292. Sidorsky, E., ‘The 1995 Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: The Role of International Arbitration’, 5 (1) International Journal of Cultural Property, (1996), pp. 19-72. Sigmond, J. P., ‘Some Thoughts on the Importance of Cultural Heritage and the Protection of Cultural Goods’, X (1) Art Antiquity and Law, (2005), pp. 63-71. Snijders, H. J., Rank-Berenschot, E. B., Goederenrecht – Studiereeks Burgerlijk Recht, (Vijfde druk, Kluwer: Deventer, 2012). Sorel, J.-M., Boré Eveno, V., “Article 31 General rule of interpretation”, in: O. Corten, P. Klein (ed), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary – Volume I (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011), pp. 804-837. Spencer, R. D., ‘Getting Good Title to Art you Purchase, As (A) Collector, or (B) An Art Dealer, or (C) A Bit of Both’, 4 (3) Spencer’s Art Law Journal, pp. 2-11. Spiegler, H. N., Kaye, L. M., “American Litigation to Recover Cultural Property: Obstacles, Options, and a Proposal”, in: N. Brodie, J. Doole and C. Renfrew (eds), Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World’s Archaeological Heritage, (McDonald Institute Monographs: Oxford, 2001), pp. 121-132. Stamatoudi, I., Cultural Property law and Restitution. A Commentary to International Conventions and European Union Law, (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011). Streiff, D., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (Débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 63-64 and 87. Symeonides, S. C., ‘A Choice-of-Law Rule for Conflicts Involving Stolen Cultural Objects’, 38 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, (2005), pp. 1177-1198. T Terré, F., Simler, P., Droit civil – Les biens, (9e edition, Dalloz: Paris, 2014). Thorn, B., Internationaler Kulturgüterschutz nach der UNIDROIT-Konvention, (De Gruyter Recht: Berlin, 2005). Tubb, K. W., “Thoughts in Response to the Draft Principles to Govern a Licit International Traffic in Cultural Property”, in: M. Briat and J. A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 113-116. Tyler, B. J., ‘The Stolen Museum: Have United States Art Museums Become Inadvertent Fences for Stolen Art Works Looted by the Nazis in World War II?’, 30 Rutgers Law Journal, (1998-1999), pp. 441-471. V Valette, V., ‘Les protections du propriétaire et du possesseur d’un objet d’art volé’, Recueil Dalloz, (2007). Valgaeren, J. H., ‘Geroofde kunstvoorwerpen tijdens WO II – Een juridisch en historisch overzicht’, 42 (4) Juris Falconis Jg., (2005-2006), pp. 599-621. Van Den Abbeele, M., ‘La vente publique volontaire d’antiquités, d’objets d’art et de collections’, 82 Droit de la consomation – Consumentenrecht, (2009), pp. 3-50. Van Erp, Weekblad voor Privaatrecht Notariaat en Registratie, 2000/6405. Van Gaalen, M. S., Verheij, A. J., ‘De Gevolgen van het Unidroit-Verdrag Inzake Gestolen of Onrechtmatig Uitgevoerde Cultuurgoederen voor Nederland’, 5 Nederlandse Juristen Blad (NJB), (1997), pp. 193-201. Vernet, J., “Les Points de Vue des Personnes et Institutions Concernées par la Convention d’Unidroit sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés (débats)”, in: C. Breitler, Q. Byrne-Sutton, F. Geisinger-Mariéthoz, M. A. Renold (eds), La Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés. Actes d’une Table Ronde Organisée le 2 Octobre 1995, (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag: Zurich, 1997), pp. 79-82. Vigneron, S., “Protecting Cultural Objects: Enforcing the Illicit Export of Foreign Cultural Objects”, in: V. Vadi and H. Schneider (ed), Art, Cultural Heritage and the Market – Ethical and Legal Issues, (Springer-Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg, 2014), pp. 117-139. Villiger, M. E., “The Rules on Interpretation: Misgivings, Misunderstanding, Miscarriage? The ‘Crucivle’ Intended by the International Law Commission”, in: E. Cannizaro (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention, (Oxford University Press: New York, 2011), pp. 105-122. Vitelli, K. D., “An Archaeologist’s Response to the Draft Principle to Govern a Licit International Traffic in Cultural Property”, in: M. Briat and J.A. Freedberg (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art, (ICC Publishing: Paris / New York, 1996), pp. 109-112. Vlies (van der), I., Kabel, J., Idsinga, N., Kunst, Recht en Beleid, (Boom Juridisch uitgevers: Den Haag, 2009). Vliet (van), L. P. W., ‘Michael Gerson (Leasing) Ltd v Wilkinson, a comparative analysis’, 5 (3) Edinburgh Law Review, (2001), pp. 361-371. Vliet (van), L. P. W., Transfer of Movables in German, French, English and Dutch Law, (Ars Aequi Libri: Nijmegen, 2000). Voulgaris, I., ‘Les Principaux Problèmes Soulevés par l’Unification du Droit Régissant les Biens Culturels’, 8 Uniform Law Review (2003-1/2), pp. 541-550. Vrellis, S., ‘Les biens archaéologiques et la Convention d’UNIDROIT (1995) sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés’, 20 Uniform Law Review, (2015), pp. 568-582. Vrodljak, A. F., International law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects, (1st edition, Cambridge University Press, 1 September 2008). W Wagenaar, Weekblad voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat en Registratie (WPNR) 2004/6603. Wallace, J., ‘New York’s Distinctive Rule Regarding Recovery of Misappropriated Art After the Court of Appeals’ Decision in Mirvish v. Mott’, 3(1) Spencer’s Art Law Journal, (June 2012), pp. 1-29. Wallace, J., ‘If the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations Bars You from Recovering Your Art from the Current Holder, When the Current Holder Sells Can You, Nevertheless, Recover Your Art from the Buyer? And, Anyway, When Did the Statute of Limitations Begin to Run Against You?’, 2 (3) Spencer’s Art Law Journal, (January 2012). Walker, S., ‘Forum Shopping for Stale Claims: Statutes of Limitations and Conflict of Laws’, 23 Akron Law Review (1989-1990), pp. 19-46. Walton, K. D., ‘Leave No Stone Unturned: The Search for Art Stolen by the Nazis and the Legal Rules Governing Restitution of Stolen Art’, 9 Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal, (1999), pp. 549-623. Warring, J., ‘Underground Debates: The Fundamental Differences of Opinion that Thwart UNESCO’s Progress in Fighting the Illicit Trade in Cultural Property’, 19 Emory International Law Review, (2005), pp. 227-303. Weiss, L. J., ‘The Role of Museums in Sustaining the Illicit Trade in Cultural Property’, 25 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, (2007-2008), pp. 837-875. Wessel, G., ‘Dealers and Collectors, Provenances and Rights: Searching for Traces’, in: F. Demarais (ed), Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods – The Global Challenge of Protection the World’s Cultural Heritage, (ICOM International Observatory on Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: Paris, 2015), pp. 1-10. White, J. J., Summers, R. S., Uniform Commercial Code, Sixth Edition, (Thomson Reuters / West, St. Paul, 2010). Wilkie, N. C., ‘Public Opinion Regarding Cultural Property Policy’, 19 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, (2001), pp. 97-104. Wolter Kluwer, ‘Verkrijging door bezitter niet te goeder trouw van eigendom strook grond door extinctieve verjaring?; art. 3:105 juncto 3:306 BW; vereisten.’, Rechtspraak van de Week (RvdW), 2012/1045, pp. 1-22. Y Yang, M., ‘Void Versus Voidable Contracts: The Subtle Distinction That Can Affect Good Faith-Purchasers’ Title to Goods’ New York State Bar Association (NYSBA), 19 (1) NYLitigator, (2014), pp. 31-35. Yasaitis, K. E., ‘Case note – National Ownership Laws as Cultural Property Protection Policy: The Emerging Trend in United States v. Schultz’, 12 (1) International Journal of Cultural Property, (2005), pp. 95-113. Youngblood Reyhan, P., ‘A Chaotic Palette: Conflict of Laws in Litigation Between Original Owners and Good-Faith Purchasers of Stolen Art’, 50 (4) Duke Law Journal, (2001), pp. 955-1043. Z Zenati, F., Fournier, S., ‘Essai d’une théorie unitaire de la prescription’, 2 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1996), pp. 339-353. Zenati, F., ‘Revendication mobilière par l’acquéreur a non domino’, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil, (1990), p. 521. Zenati-Castaing, F., Revet, T., Les Biens, (3ème édition, Presses Universitaires de France: Paris, 2008). Ziegler, K., ‘Cultural Heritage and Human Rights’, (Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Working Paper No 26 / 2007), pp. 1-23. Official reports / communications / announcements ASSOCIATION HENRI CAPITANT Association Henri Capitant des Amis de la Culture Juridique Française, ‘Proposition de réforme du livre II du Code Civil relatif aux biens’, available at http://fdv.univ-lyon3.fr/publication/ gazette/FLAvant-projet_de_reforme_du_droit_des_biens.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. BELGIUM Kunsten en Erfgoed, Direction du Patrimoine Culturel, ‘Opportuniteit en gevolgen van de toetreding door België tot het Unidroit 1995-verdrag inzake gestolen of illegaal uitgevoerde cultuurgoederen / Opportunité et conséquences de la ratification par la Belgique de la CONVENTION UNIDROIT de 1995 relative aux biens culturels volés et illicitement exportés’, Study relating to the adhesion of the Kingdom of Belgium to the UNIDROIT Convention on stolen or illegally exported cultural objects (1995), report finalised in 2012. Commissie tot hervorming van het goederenrecht, Commission de réforme du droit des biens, ‘Voorwerp van wet houdende invoeging van Boek 3 “Goederen” in het nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek’, ‘Avant-projet de loi portant insertion du Livre 3 “Les biens” dans le nouveau Code civil’, (4 may 2018), available at https://justitie.belgium.be/sites/default/files/voorontwerp_ van_wet_goederenrecht.pdf, last retrieved on 13.08.2018. Commissie tot hervorming van het goederenrecht, Commission de réforme du droit des biens, ‘Voorwerp van wet houdende invoeging van Boek 3 “Goederen” in het nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek’ – Memorie van Toelichting, ‘Avant-projet de loi portant insertion du Livre 3 “Les biens” dans le nouveau Code civil’ – Exposé des Motifs, (4 may 2018), available at https://justitie.belgium.be/sites/default/files/memorie_van_toelichting_goederenrecht.pdf, last retrieved on 13.08.2018. CALIFORNIA Assembly Bill AB 2765 – Bill Analysis, Assembly Committee on Judiciary (Mike Feuer, Chair), Subject: Statute of Limitation: Recovery of Stolen Works of Art, (May 4, 2010) available at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2751-2800/ab_2765_cfa_20100504_1417 18_asm_comm.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. COUNCIL OF EUROPE Council of Europe, Recommendation 1372 (1998), ‘Unidroit convention on stolen or illegally exported cultural property’, available at http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2 HTML-en.asp?fileid=16624&lang=en, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. EUROPEAN UNION European Parliament, Committee on Cultural and Education, ‘Opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education for the Committee on Legal Affairs with recommendations to the Commission on cross-border restitution claims of works of art and cultural goods looted in armed conflicts and wars (2017/2023(INL)), PE610.922v02-00, (26.1.2018), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+ PE-610.922+02+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs, ‘Cross-border restitution claims of work of art and cultural goods looted in armed conflicts and wars’, legislative procedure 2017/2023(INL), (2017), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil-mobile/fiche-procedure/2017/2023 (INL), last retrieved on 01.03.2018. European Parliament, European Parliamentary Research Service, ‘Cross-border restitution claims of looted works of art and cultural goods – European Added Value Assessment Accompanying the European Parliament’s legislative initiative report’, PE 610.988, (November 2017), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/610988/EPRS_STU(2017) 610988_EN.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. European Commission, ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the import of cultural goods’, COM(2017) 375 final, Brussels, 13.7.2017, available at https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/cultural_goods_proposal_en.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of the European Union, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on an Action Plan for strengthening the fight against terrorist financing’, COM(2016) 50 final, Strasbourg, 02.02.2016, text available at http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5782-2016-INIT/en/pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. European Commission, ‘Joint Communication between the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union – Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations’, JOIN(2016) 29 Final, Brussels 08.06.2016, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=JOIN%3A2016%3A29%3AFIN, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies – Policy Department C – Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs, ‘Cross-border restitution claims of art looted in armed conflicts and wars and alternatives to court litigations (Study for the Juri Committee), PE 556.947, 2016, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/ 556947/IPOL_STU(2016)556947_EN.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. European Commission, ‘Report from the commission to the european parliament, the council and the european economic and social committee – Fourth report on the application of Council Directive 93/7/EEC on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State’, (COM 2013) 310 final, Brussels, 30.05.2013. Council of the European Union, ‘Preventing and combating crime against cultural property’, December 2011, available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/ pressdata/en/jha/126866.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Commission of the European Communities, ‘Report from the commission
to the council, the european parliament and the european economic and social committee, Second report on the application of Council Directive 93/7/EEC on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State’, COM (2005), 675 final, Brussels, 21.12.2005. Commission of the European Communities, ‘Report from the commission to the council, the european parliament and the economic and social committee on the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) no 3911/92 (first report) on the export of cultural goods and Council Directive 93/7/EEC on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State’, COM (2000) 325 final, Brussels, 25.05.2000. Commission of the European Communities, ‘Communication from the Commission to the Council 
on the Protection of National Treasures Possessing Artistic, Historic or Archaeological Value: Needs Arising from the Abolition of Frontiers in 1992’, COM (89), 594 final, Brussels, 22.09.1989. Commission of the European Communities, ‘White Paper on completion of the Internal Market’, COM (85) 310 final, Brussels, 14.06.1985. OMC working group on mobility of collections – subgroup “prevention of theft/illicit traffic”, ‘Interoperability of databases’, pp. 1-33. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROMOTION OF THE RETURN OF CULTURAL PROPERTY TO ITS COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN AND RESTITUTION IN CASE OF ILLICIT APPROPRIATION Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation, Sixteenth Session, Oral Report of the Rapporteur (Professor Folarin Shyllon), Paris, UNESCO Headquarters, 21-23 September 2010, text available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001925/192535E.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation, ‘Guidelines for the Use of the ‘Standard Form Concerning Requests for Return or Restitution’’, 30 April 1986, CC-86/WS/3, available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000720/072071EB.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Expert Committee on State Ownership of Cultural Heritage, ‘Model Provisions on State Ownership of Undiscovered Cultural Objects – Explanatory Report with model provisions and explanatory guidelines, endorsed by the Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation in its Seventeenth session’, Paris, UNESCO Headquarters, on 30 June – 1 July 2011, CLT-2011/CONF.208/COM.17/5., available at http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/ HQ/CLT/pdf/UNESCO-UNIDROIT_Model_Provisions_en.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION International Law Commission, ‘The International Sale of Works of Art from the Angle of the Protection of the Cultural Heritage’, Session of Basel – 1991, available at http://www.idi-iil.org/ app/uploads/2017/06/1991_bal_04_en.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. INTERPOL INTERPOL, ‘Protecting Cultural Heritage – An Imperative for Humanity’, (United Nations, 22 September 2016), pp. 1-24, available at https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/ Publications2/Leaflets-and-brochures/Protecting-Cultural-Heritage, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. SWITZERLAND Département Fédéral de l’Intérieur (Suisse), ‘Convention d’Unidroit du 24 juin 1995 sur les biens culturels volés ou illicitement exportés – Texte et rapport explicatif’, (février 1996), pp 1-30. Département Fédéral de l’Intérieur Suisse, ‘Résultat de la Procédure de Consultation Portant sur la Convention d’Unidroit du 24 Juin 1995 sur les Biens Culturels Volés ou Illicitement Exportés’, (Office Fédéral de la Culture, mai 1996), pp. 1-22. Office Fédéral de la Culture (Suisse) (ed), ‘Transfert International des Biens Culturels. Convention de l'Unesco de 1970 et Convention d'Unidroit de 1995, Rapport du Groupe de Travail’, (l'Office Fédéral de la Culture: Berne, 1998). THE EUROPEAN FINE ART FAIR Pownall, R. A. J., ‘TEFAF Art Market Report 2017’, The European Fine Art Foundation. Mc Andrew, C., ‘TEFAF Art Market Report 2014 – The Global Art Market, with a focus on the US and China’, The European Fine Art Foundation. THE NETHERLANDS Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, 31 255 (E) Uitvoering van de op 14 november 1970 te Parijs tot stand gekomen Overeenmost inzake de middelen om de onrechtmative invoer, uitvoer of eigendomsoverdracht van culturele goederen te verbieden en te verhinderen (Uitvoerswet UNESCO-verdrag 1970 inzake onrechtmatige invoer, uitvoer of eigendomsoverdracht van cultuurgoederen) and 31 256 (R 1836) (E) Goedkeuring van de op 14 november 1970 te Parijs tot stand gekomen Overeenkomst inzake de middelen om de rechtmatige invoer, uitvoer en eigendomsoverdracht van culturele goederen te verbieden en te verhinderen (Trb. 1972, 50), verjaderjaar 2008-2009. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, Memorie van Toelichting 31 255 (nr. 3) - Uitvoering van de op 14 november 1970 te Parijs tot stand gekomen Overeenkomst inzake de middelen om de rechtmatige invoer, uitvoer of eigendomsoverdracht van culturele goederen te verbieden en te verhinderen (Uitvoeringswet UNESCO-verdrag 1970 inzake onrechtmatige invoer, uitvoer of eigendomsoverdracht van cultuurgoederen), vergaderjaar 2007-2008. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, Memorie van Toelichting 23 657 (nr. 3) - Wijzigingen van enige wetten in verband met de verplichting tot teruggave van cultuurgoederen die op onrechtmatige buiten het grondgebied van een lid-staat zijn gebracht en in verband met de uitvoer van cultuurgoederen, vergaderjaar 1993-1994. UNESCO UNESCO, ‘Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property’ (UNESCO, Paris, 1970), during the third meeting of the State Parties in May 2015. Text available at http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/OPERATIONAL_ GUIDELINES_EN_FINAL.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘UNESCO-UNIDROIT Model Provisions on State Ownership of Undiscovered Cultural Objects’, (2011), available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/ restitution-of-cultural-property/standards-for-ownership/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘Legal and Practical Measures Against Illicit Trafficking in Cultural Property – UNESCO Handbook’, (2006), CLT/CH/INS-06/22, pp. 1-43. UNESCO, ‘UNESCO and Unidroit – Cooperation in the Fight Against Illicit Traffic in Cultural Property – Conference Celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects’, 24 June 2005, UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 16 June 2005, CLT-2005/Conf/803/2, pp. 1-6. UNESCO, ‘Consultation on Illicit Traffic of Cultural Property’, (Paris, 1-4 March 1983), UNESCO Doc. CLT/CH/CS 51/4, Recommendation 4, available at http://unesdoc.unesco. org/images/0005/000569/056950EB.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘National Legal Control of the Illicit Traffic in Cultural Property’, by L. V. Prott and P. J. O’Keefe, CLT-83/WS/16, Paris, 11 May 1983, available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0005/000548/054854Eo.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, UNESCO General Conference – Resolution 20 C4/7.6/5, (24 October to 29 November 1978), available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001140/114032e.pdf# page=92, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘Technical and Legal Aspects of the Preparation of International Regulations to Prevent the Illicit Export, Import and Sale of Cultural Property’, UNESCO/CUA/115, 14 April 1962, available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000686/068680eb.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘Promote the Return or the Restitution of Cultural Property’, text available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001394/139407eb.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property – Status of ratification, available at http://www.unesco.org/eri/la/convention.asp?KO=13039&language=E&order=alpha, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, Resolutions adopted by the United Nations General Assembly about Return and Restitution of Cultural Property, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/ restitution-of-cultural-property/resolutions-adopted-by-the-united-nations-general-assembly-about-return-and-restitution-of-cultural-property/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, Director-General of UNESCO, Recommendation on International Principles Applicable to Archaeological Excavations (1956), available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001273/ 127316EB.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT UNIDROIT, Permanent Mission of Italy to the United Nations and Permanent Mission of the Republic of Cyprus to the United Nations, ‘Concept Note – Promoting and Strengthening the international legal framework for the protection of cultural heritage – the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention’, 28 February 2017, 10.30 a.m., UN Headquarters, New York, Conference Room 5, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/news/2017/170228-cp-ny/concept-note-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, ‘Special event on “Promoting and Strengthening the international legal framework for the protection of cultural heritage-the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention and other relevant legal instruments and initiatives” (New York, Tuesday, 28 February 2017) – Summary’, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/news/2017/170228-cp-ny/summary-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, ‘Promoting and Strengthening the International Legal Framework for the Protection of Cultural Heritage – The 1995 Convention. New York, UN Headquarters, 28 February 2017.’, available at http://www.unidroit.org/537-events/2134-promoting-and-strengthening-the-international-legal-framework-for-the-protection-of-cultural-heritage-the-1995-convention-new-york-un-headquarters-28-february-2017, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Governing Council of UNIDROIT, 90th session, Rome, 9 – 11 May 2011, ‘Summary of the Conclusions’, UNIDROIT 2011 – C. D. (90) Misc. 3, available at https://www.unidroit.org/ english/governments/councildocuments/2011session/cd90-08-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Secretariat, ‘Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects: Explanatory Report’, 3 Uniform Law Review, (2001), pp. 476-564, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1995culturalproperty/1995culturalproperty-explanatoryreport-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, ‘Draft Convention providing a Uniform Law on the Acquisition in Good Faith of Corporeal Movables (LUAB)’, (1968) (revised 1974). UNIDROIT, ‘Special Committee to Review the Practical Operation of the 1995 Convention – Program of the first session’ (2012), forthcoming. UNIDROIT, 20th anniversary of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention (2015) – Program, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/news/2015/20150508-conv-culturalobjects-20years/ programme-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, 20th anniversary of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention (2015) – Report, available at http://www.unidroit.org/conferences-and-seminars/previous-years, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, ‘Report on the First Meeting of the Special Committee to Review the Practical Operation of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects’, UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 19 June 2012, forthcoming. UNIDROIT, ‘Summary of the conclusions of the Governing Council (90th session)’, 9-11 May 2011, Rome (Unidroit 2011 – C.D. (90) Misc. 3). UNIDROIT, Questionnaire ‘Fonctionnement pratique de la Convention d’Unidroit de 1995 – Belgique’, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1995culturalproperty/ 1meet-120619/answquest-ef/belgique.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, Questionnaires ‘Practical operation of the 1995 Unidroit Convention – The Netherlands’, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1995cultural property/1meet-120619/answquest-ef/netherlands.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects – Status of ratification: http://www.unidroit.org/status-cp, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Secretariat, ‘Draft Model Instrument of [ Ratification ] [ Acceptance ] [ Approval ] of the Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects’, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1995culturalproperty/modelforratification-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Secretariat, ‘Draft Model Instrument of Accession to the UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects’, available at http://www.unidroit.org/english/ conventions/1995culturalproperty/modelforaccession-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNITED KINGDOM Department of Cultural, Media and Sport, ‘Report of the Ministerial Advisory panel on Illicit Trade’, (December 2000). UNITED NATIONS United Nations Security Council Resolution 2347, (S/RES/2347 (2017), 24 March 2017, available at http://undocs.org/S/RES/2347(2017), last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2253 (2015), S/Res/2253 (2015), available at http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2253(2015), last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 66/180, (A/RES/66/180), December 2011, available at http://undocs.org/A/RES/66/180, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, ‘Workshop on Data Collection and Disaggregation for Indigenous Peoples – The Concept of Indigenous Peoples’, (New York, 19-21 January 2004), PFII/2004/WS.1/3. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ‘State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples’, (United Nations: New York, 2009), ST/ESA/328, pp. 4-7, available at http://www.un.org/ esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP/en/SOWIP_web.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United Nations, ‘Third Report on the law of treaties, by Sir Humphrey Waldock, Special Rapporteur’, Document:- A/CN.4/167 and Add.1-3, (Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission:- 1964, vol. II), pp. 5-65. Preparatory work Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Dipartimento per l’Informazione e l’Editoria, Diplomatic Conference for the Adoption of the Draft Unidroit Convention on the International Return of Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects – Acts and Proceedings, Rome, June 1995, (1996), pp. 1-374. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1995 culturalproperty/1995culturalproperty-acts-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Committee of governmental experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property – 4th session (Rome, 29 September to 8 October 1993) UNIDROIT 1995 - Study LXX - Doc. 50 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Draft final provisions capable of embodiment in the draft UNIDROIT Convention on the International Return of Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Property with Explanatory notes (drawn up by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, January 1995, pp. 1-9. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1995/study70/s-70-50-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1994 - Study LXX - Doc. 49 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Draft UNIDROIT Convention on the International Return of Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects as approved by the UNIDROIT Committee of governmental experts on 8 October 1993 and Explanatory Report (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, December 1994, pp. 1-34. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1994/study70/s-70-49-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1994 - Study LXX - Doc. 48 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Report on the fourth session (Rome, 29 September to 8 October 1993) (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, February 1994, pp. 1-63. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1994/study70/s-70-48-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 47 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Working documents submitted during the fourth session of the committee (Rome, 29 September to 8 October 1993) (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, February 1994, pp. 1-53. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/ study70/s-70-47-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 46 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Bulgaria) – Rome, September 1993, pp. 1-2. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/ study70/s-70-46-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 45 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (India) – Rome, September 1993, pp. 1-5. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/ study70/s-70-45-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 44 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Interpol) – Rome, September 1993, pp. 1-4. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/ study70/s-70-44-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 43 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Canada, France) – Rome, September 1993, pp. 1-7. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/ study70/s-70-43-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 42 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Commentary on the UNIDROIT preliminary draft Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects as revised June 1993 (prepared by Ms Lyndel V. Prott, Chief International Standards Section, Division of Physical Heritage, Unesco) – Rome, September 1993, pp. 1-59. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/ study70/s-70-42-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Committee of governmental experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property – 3rd session (Rome, 22 to 26 February 1993) UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 41 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Council Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State – Rome, May 1993, pp. 1-4. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/study70/s-70-41-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 40 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Preliminary Draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (revised text prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat following the third session of the committee) – Rome, June 1993, pp. 1-16. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/study70/s-70-40-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 39 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Report on the third session (Rome, 22 to 26 February 1993) (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, May 1993, pp. 1-49. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/study70/s-70-39-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 38 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Working papers submitted during the third session of the Committee (Rome, 22 to 26 February 1993) – Rome, April 1993, pp. 1-38. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/study70/s-70-38-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 37 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Regulation (EEC) N° 3911/92 of the Council of the European Communities of 9 December 1992 on the export of cultural goods – Rome, February 1993, pp. 1-5. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/study70/s-70-37-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 36 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Commentary on the UNIDROIT preliminary draft Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects as revised June 1992 (prepared by Ms Lyndel V. Prott, Chief International Standards Section, Division of Physical Heritage, Unesco) – Rome, February 1993, pp. 1-51. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/ study70/s-70-36-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1993 - Study LXX - Doc. 35 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Israel) – Rome, February 1993, pp. 1-6. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1993/study70/ s-70-35-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 34 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Common position adopted by the Council of the European Communities of 9 December 1992 with a view to the adoption of a Directive on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State – Rome, December 1992, pp. 1-8. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/s-70-34-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 33 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Canada) – Rome, November 1992, pp. 1-3. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/ study70/s-70-33-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 32 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Finland, Netherlands, Sweden, Turkey and Venezuela) – Rome, November 1992, pp. 1-21. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/s-70-32-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Committee of governmental experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property – 2nd session (Rome, 20 to 29 January 1992) UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 31 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Preliminary Draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (revised text prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, June 1992, pp. 1-24. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/s-70-31-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 30 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Report on the second session (Rome, 20 to 29 January 1992) (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, June 1992, pp. 1-54. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/s-70-30-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 29 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Working papers submitted during the second session of the committee (Rome, 20 to 29 January 1992) – Rome, February 1992, pp. 1-84. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/s-70-29-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 28 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Thailand) – Rome, January 1992, p. 1-2. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/s-70-28-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 27 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Germany) – Rome, January 1992, pp. 1-8. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/ study70/s-70-27-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 26 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governmental delegations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Israel) – Rome, January 1992, p. 1. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/ s-70-26-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 25 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of International Organisations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Unesco, Interpol) – Rome, January 1992, pp. 1-13. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/ study70/s-70-25-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1992 - Study LXX - Doc. 24 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of Governments on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Canada, China, France, Islamic Republic of Iran, Norway, Sweden and Turkey) – Rome, January 1992, pp. 1-22. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1992/study70/s-70-24-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Committee of governmental experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property – 1st session (Rome, 6 to 10 May 1991) UNIDROIT 1991 - Study LXX - Doc. 23 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Report on the first session (Rome, 6 to 10 May 1991) – Rome, July 1991, pp. 1-47. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1991/study70/s-70-23-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1991 - Study LXX - Doc. 22 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Working papers submitted during the first session of the committee (Rome, 6 to 10 May 1991) – Rome, July 1991, pp. 1-27. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1991/study70/s-70-22-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1991 - Study LXX - Doc. 21 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of International Organisations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee, ICPO - Interpol) – Rome, April 1991, pp. 1-3. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1991/study70/s-70-21-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1991 - Study LXX - Doc. 20 Committee of Governmental Experts on the International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations of International Organisations on the preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects (Canada, Mexico, Sweden, Turkey) – Rome, April 1991, pp. 1-8. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/ documents/1991/study70/s-70-20-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Study Group on the International Protection of Cultural Property: 1st session (Rome, 12 to 15 December 1988 / 2nd session (Rome, 13 to 17 April 1989) / 3rd session (Rome, 22 to 26 April 1990) UNIDROIT 1990 - Study LXX - Doc. 19 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Preliminary draft Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects approved by the UNIDROIT study group on the international protection of cultural property, with Explanatory Report (prepared by the Secretariat) – Rome, August 1990, pp. 1-40. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1990/study70/s-70-19-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1990 - Study LXX - Doc. 18 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Summary report on the third session of the UNIDROIT study group on the international protection of cultural property, held at the seat of the Institute from 22 to 26 January 1990 (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, May 1990, pp. 1-41. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/ documents/1990/study70/s-70-18-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 17 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Communication from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council on the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value: needs arising from the abolition of frontiers in 1992 – Rome, December 1989, pp. 1-18. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-17-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 16 Add. 2 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations relating to the preliminary draft Convention on the restitution and return of cultural objects (Study LXX – Doc. 15) – Rome, December 1989, pp. 1-3. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-16add2-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 16 Add. 1 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations relating to the preliminary draft Convention on the restitution and return of cultural objects (Study LXX – Doc. 15) – Rome, December 1989, pp. 1-3. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-16add1-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 16 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Observations relating to the preliminary draft Convention on the restitution and return of cultural objects (Study LXX – Doc. 15) – Rome, December 1989, pp. 1-22. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-16-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 15 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Preliminary draft Convention on the restitution and return of cultural objects (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat in the light of the discussions of the study group on the international protection of cultural property at its second session held in Rome from 13 to 17 April 1989 – Rome, July 1989, pp. 1-9. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-15-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 14 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Summary report on the second session of the UNIDROIT study group on the international protection of cultural property, held at the seat of the Institute from 13 to 17 April 1989 (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, June 1989, pp. 1-28. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/ documents/1989/study70/s-70-14-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 13 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Notes on the first session of the UNIDROIT study group on the international protection of cultural property (submitted by Ms Lyndel V. Prott) – Rome, March 1989, pp. 1-6. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-13-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 12 The International Protection of Cultural Property. Summary of the statement of Mr Pieter Van Nuffel (observer representative of the Commission of the European Communities) at the first session of the UNIDROIT study group on the international protection of cultural property – Rome, March 1989, pp. 1-3. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-12-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 11 Preliminary draft Convention on the restitution and return of cultural objects (prepared by the UNIDROIT Secretariat) – Rome, February 1989, pp. 1-8. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-11-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 10 UNIDROIT, The International Protection of Cultural Property – Summary report on the first session of the Unidroit study group on the international protection of cultural property, held at the seat of the Institute from 12 to 15 December 1988 (prepared by the Unidroit Secretariat), Study LXX – Doc. 10, Rome, January 1989, pp. 1-18. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-10-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 9 UNIDROIT, The International Protection of Cultural Property – Unidroit draft Convention providing a Uniform Law on the Acquisition in Good Faith of Corporeal Movables (LUAB, 1974), Study LXX – Doc. 9, Rome, January 1989, pp. 1-8. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1989/study70/s-70-09-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1989 - Study LXX - Doc. 8 UNIDROIT, The International Protection of Cultural Property – UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (14 November 1970), Study LXX – Doc. 8, Rome, January 1989, pp. 1-12. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1989/ study70/s-70-08-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1988 - Study LXX - Doc. 7 UNIDROIT, The International Protection of Cultural Property – Observations submitted by Ms Lyndel Prott, Study LXX – Doc. 7, Rome, December 1988, pp. 1-4. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1988/study70/s-70-07-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1988 - Study LXX - Doc. 6 UNIDROIT, The International Protection of Cultural Property – Good Faith Redefined – A Practical Solution (paper prepared by Richard Crewdson, Chairman, Cultural Property Committee International Bar Association (SGP)), Study LXX – Doc. 6, Rome, November 1988, pp. 1-4. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/ 1988/study70/s-70-06-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Early documents UNIDROIT 1988 - Study LXX - Doc. 5 UNIDROIT, The International Protection of Cultural Property – Extract from the report of the 67th session of the Governing Council (Rome, 14 to 17 June 1988) relating to item 5 (d) on the agenda (C.D. 67 – Doc. 8; Study LXX – Docs. 2 and 3) (prepared by the Unidroit Secretariat), Study LXX – Doc. 5, Rome, October 1988, pp. 1-12. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1988/study70/s-70-05-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1988 - Study LXX - Doc. 4 UNIDROIT, The International Protection of Cultural Property – Second Study Requested from UNIDROIT by UNESCO on the International Protection of Cultural Property with Particular Reference to the Rules of Private Law Affecting the Transfer of Title to Cultural Property and in the Light of the Comments Received on the First Study (prepared by Gerther Reichelt, Univ. Dozent at the Vienna Institute of Comparative Law), Study LXX – Doc. 4, Rome, April 1988, pp. 1-43. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/ 1988/study70/s-70-04-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1988 - Study LXX - Doc. 3 UNIDROIT, Preliminary draft Convention on the restitution of cultural property (drawn up by Mr Roland Loewe in the light of the two studies prepared by Mme G. Reichelt), Study LXX – Doc. 3, Rome, June 1988, pp. 1-5. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1988/study70/s-70-03-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1988 - Study LXX - Doc. 2 UNIDROIT, Outlines for a private law Convention on the International Protection of Cultural Property (submitted by Mr Riccardo Monaco, President of Unidroit), Study LXX – Doc. 2, Rome, May 1988, pp. 1-4. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/ english/documents/1988/study70/s-70-02-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT 1986 - Study LXX - Doc. 1 UNIDROIT, The Protection of Cultural Property – Study requested by UNESCO from Unidroit concerning the international protection of cultural property in the light in particular of the Unidroit Draft Convention providing a Uniform Law on the Acquisition in Good Faith of Corporeal Movables in 1974 and of the UNESCO Convention of 1970 on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, (Prepared by Gerte Reichelt, Univ. Dozent of the Vienna Institute of Comparative Law, Study LXX – Doc. 1, Rome, December 1986, pp. 1-48. Document available at the following url: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/1986/study70/s-70-01-e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Digital sources UNESCO, ‘UNESCO Director-General and Heads of agencies discuss means to strengthen the fight against illicit trafficking’, available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/single-view/news/unesco_director_general_and_heads_of_agencies_discuss_means/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Onwership of Cultural Property, Status of ratification http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/ themes/illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-property/1970-convention/states-parties/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. 14th edition of Europe Lecture about the protection of Cultural Heritage (13 June 2016), available at https://www.europelecture.com/id/vk1lecrl7cvb/europe_lecture_cultural_heritage, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Al-Afyouni, A., Shafiq, A., ‘How archaeological heritage boosts tourism’, IOL, 16 May 2016, available at http://www.iol.co.za/travel/world/africa/how-archaeological-heritage-boosts-tourism-2022181, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Amineddoleh, L., ‘Why Turkey Tried––and Failed–– to Halt Christie’s Auction of a $14.4 Million Statue’, Artsy Editorial, 3 May 2017, avalaible at https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-turkey-failed-halt-christies-auction-144-million-statue, last retrived on 01.03.2018. BBC News, ‘Italy unearths huge Roman barracks during Rome metro dig’, 17 May 2016, available at http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36311156, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Bohstrom, P., ‘ISIS Plundered, Destroyed Ancient Assyrian City in Syria, Liberators Find’, HAARETZ, 8 August 2016, available at http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/archaeology/1.735889, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Burnett, J., ‘Cooling U.S. Market Sends Tomb Raiders Abroad’, NPR, 29 May 2007, available at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10457558, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Carabinieri, ‘Carabinieri for the Protection of Cultural Heritage and Anti-Counterfeiting’, available at http://www.carabinieri.it/multilingua/en/english/carabinieri-for-the-protection-of-cultural-heritage-and-anti-counterfeiting, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Christie’s, ‘The Gennol Stragazer’, Press release, March 2017, available at http://www.christies.com/presscenter/pdf/8647/REL_StarGazer_8647_1.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Committee for Cultural Policy, ‘The Guennol Stargazer – Pre-1970 provenance isn’t good enough?’, 27 April 2017 / Updated 1 May 2017, text available at https://committeeforculturalpolicy.org/the-guennol-stargazer-pre-1970-provenance-isnt-good-enough/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Commission for Looted Art in Europe, International Principles, available at http://www.lootedartcommission.com/international-principles, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Dunne, D., ‘PICTURE EXCLUSIVE: Inside the ‘Lost City of the Monkey God’ protected from visitors by a flesh-eating disease’, Daily Mail, 8 March 2017, available at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4290690/Douglas-Preston-talks-Lost-City-Monkey-God.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Dunston, L., ‘Revealed: Cambodia’s vast medieval cities hidden beneath the jungle’, The Guardian, 11 June 2016, available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/11/lost-city-medieval-discovered-hidden-beneath-cambodian-jungle?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Facebook, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Edwards, R., Williams, J., ‘Antique dealer attacks ‘scandalous’ European extradition laws’, The Telegraph, 28 August 2010, available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7968373/Antique-dealer-attacks-scandalous-European-extradition-laws.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018; Europol, ‘Over 41 000 Artefacts Seized in Global Operation Targeting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Goods’, Press release, 21 February 2018, available at https://www.europol.europa.eu/ newsroom/news/over-41-000-artefacts-seized-in-global-operation-targeting-illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-goods, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Europol, ‘3561 Artefacts Seized in Operation Pandora’, Press release, 23 January 2017, available at https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/3561-artefacts-seized-in-operation-pandora, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Evans, D., ‘Meet Lidar: the amazing laser technology that’s helping archaeologists discover lost cities’, The conversation, 14 June 2016, available at http://theconversation.com/meet-lidar-the-amazing-laser-technology-thats-helping-archaeologists-discover-lost-cities-60915?utm_medium= email&utm_campaign=Latest+from+The+Conversation+for+June+15+2016+-+5038&utm_ content=Latest+from+The+Conversation+for+June+15+2016+-+5038+CID_97ad8c6841e35 de0b8dd53f2946877fd&utm_source=campaign_monitor_uk&utm_term=Meet+Lidar+the+amazing+laser+technology+thats+helping+archaeologists+discover+lost+cities, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. García, D., ‘Gendarmería protegerá el patrimonio cultural’, El Universal, 26 August 2017, available at http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/nacion/seguridad/gendarmeria-protegera-el-patrimonio-cultural, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Gargschagen, O., ‘Het gevecht om de mummie in lotushouding’, NRC, 13 juli 2017, available at https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/07/13/het-gevecht-om-de-mummie-in-lotushouding-12017 539-a1566602, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Hardy, S. A., ‘Illicit Trafficking, Provenance Research and Due Diligence: the State of the Art’, Research study, 30 March 2016, text available at http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/ MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/Hardy_2016_UNESCO_antiquities_trafficking_review_materia.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Hassan, K., ‘Weak security plagues Egypt’s archaeological sites’, Al-Monitor, 7 September 2015, http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/08/egypt-lax-security-archaeological-sites.html#, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. ICOM, ‘On illicit traffic’, available at http://obs-traffic.museum/illicit-traffic-0, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Interpol, ‘Works of art’, available at https://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Works-of-art/Works-of-art, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Jarus, O., ‘Blood & Gold: Children Dying As Egypt's Treasures Are Looted’, Live Science, 8 August 2016, available at http://www.livescience.com/55687-children-dying-in-egypt-looting.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. La Repubblica, ‘Roman Necropolis Emerges From The Excavations Of Florence Tramway’, Archaeology News Network, 10.02.2018, available at https://archaeologynewsnetwork. blogspot.nl/2018/02/roman-necropolis-emerges-from.html?m=1#OHF7zSVpuYDpOf71.97, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Leonard, T., ‘Cannibals. Human sacrifice. Have explorers finally found the fabled lost City of the Monkey God?’, Daily Mail, 6 March 2015, available at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982044/Have-explorers-finally-fabled-lost-City-Monkey-God.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Leveille, D., ‘Paris auction house turns deaf ear to Native American appeals’, Public Radio International, 27 May 2016, available at https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-05-27/paris-auction-house-turns-deaf-ear-native-american-appeals, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Lockhart, K., ‘Construction workers unearth over half a tonne of Roman coins in Spain’, The Telegraph, 29 April 2016, available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/29/ construction-workers-unearth-over-half-a-tonne-of-roman-coinsin/?cid=sf25340211&sf253 40211=1, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Luck, T., ‘Syrian rebels loot artefacts to raise money for fight against Assad’, The Washington Post, 12 February 2013, text available at the following url: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/ middle_east/syrian-rebels-loot-artefacts-to-raise-money-for-fight-against-assad/2013/02/12/ ae0cf01e-6ede-11e2-8b8d-e0b59a1b8e2a_story.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Mackey Frayer, J., ‘China to crack down on brick-by-brick theft of Great Wall’, The Guardian, 29 July 2016, available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/28/china-to-crack-down-brick-by-brick-great-wall-theft, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Mashberg, T., ‘Ancient Vase Seized From Met Museum on Suspicion It Was Looted’, The New York Times, 31 July 2017, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/31/arts/design/ ancient-vase-seized-from-met-museum-on-suspicion-it-was-looted.html?_r=0, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Monteforte, F., ‘Italy seizes more than 5,000 looted antiquities in record haul’, Business Insider, 21 January 2015, text available at http://www.businessinsider.com/afp-italy-seizes-more-than-5000-looted-antiquities-in-record-haul-2015-1?utm_source=feedburner&ut&IR=T, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Mueller, T., ‘How Tomb Raiders Are Stealing Our History’, National Geographic, June 2016, available at http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2016/06/looting-ancient-blood-antiquities/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Preston, D., ‘Exclusive: Lost City Discovered in the Honduran Rain Forest’, National Geographic, 2 March 2015, available at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/150302-honduras-lost-city-monkey-god-maya-ancient-archaeology/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Qin, A., ‘Tomb Robbing, Perilous but Alluring, Makes Comeback in China’, The New York Times, 15 July 2017, available at https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/15/world/asia/china-tomb-robbing-qin-dynasty.html?referer=https://t.co/VOQaCVOmxe, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Ramzy, A., ‘Chinese Tomb Robbers Used Feng Shui to Steal Antiquities’, The New York Times, 27 May 2015, available at https://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/chinese-tomb-robbers-used-fengshui-high-tech-probes-to-steal-antiquities/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Ray, K. P., ‘Von Saher: Court Says Statute of Limitations for Recovery of Stolen Art Runs Anew Against Subsequent Purchasers/Transferees’, Cultural Assets – Legal Analysis and Commentary on Art and Cultural Property – A Greenberg Traurig Blog, (1 May 2015), available at https://www.gtlaw-culturalassets.com/2015/05/von-saher-court-says-statute-of-limitations-for-recovery-of-stolen-art-runs-anew-against-subsequent-purchaserstransferees/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Rueb, T., ‘Ik heb jullie mummie niet, zegt de Nederlandse verzamelaar in de rechtbank’, NRC, 15 juli 2017, available at https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/07/15/ik-heb-jullie-mummie-niet-zegt-de-nederlandse-verzamelaar-in-de-rechtbank-12067252-a1566782, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Ruiz, C., ‘What do we really know about Islamic State’s role in Illicit Antiquities trade?' The Art Newspaper, 1 March 2016, available at http://old.theartnewspaper.com/news/news/what-do- we-really-know-about-islamic-state-s-role-in-illicit-antiquities-trade/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Sharp, K., ‘An Exclusive Look at the Greatest Haul of Native American Artifcats, Ever’, Smithsonian Magazine, November 2015, available at http://www.smithsonianmag.com/ history/exclusive-greatest-haul-native-american-artefacts-looted-180956959/?utm_source =twitter.com&no-ist, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Smit, E., ‘Een Nederlandse architect versus de Chinese autoriteiten’, Follow the Money, 23 juli 2017, available at https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/de-nederlandse-architect-en-de-chinese-boeddha? share=1, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Swait, A., ‘Commentary on prosecution of UK man for antiquities smuggling’, Institute of Art & Law, 30 August 2017, available at https://www.ial.uk.com/commentary-on-prosecution-of-uk-man-for-antiquities-smuggling/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Torres López, F., ‘Diplomats and collectors under suspicion in the trafficking of Latin American art’, Memoria Robada, available at https://memoriarobada.ojo-publico.com/investigaciones/ diplomats-and-collectors-under-suspicion-in-the-trafficking-of-latin-american-art/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT, International Protection of Cultural Property – Preparatory work, available at http://www.unidroit.org/preparatory-work-cp, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘Addressing the illicit trafficking of cultural property at the end of the market chain’, available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-property/meetings/un-march-meeting/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘First Meeting on the Art Markets of Stolen Works of Art’, in UNESCO Partnership Initiative ‘Protecting Cultural Heritage – an Imperative for Humanity: Acting together against the destruction and trafficking of cultural property by terrorist groups and organized crime’, March 2016, available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-property/meetings/un-march-meeting/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Round table, ‘The movement of cultural property in 2016: regulation, international cooperation and diligence of professionals for cultural heritage protection’, March 2016, available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-property/ meetings/art-market-round-table/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, 'UNESCO and Lonely Planet: Do not pack other people's cultural heritage in your luggage!', available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-property/awareness-raising-initiatives/lonely-planet/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, 'A good practice against illicit trafficking UNESCO clips on display in airport', available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-property/awareness-raising-initiatives/georgia-good-practice/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘Stepping up stakeholders’ involvement in the fight against trafficking of culture’, available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/dynamic-content-single-view/ news/stepping_up_stakeholders_involvement_in_the_fight_against-1/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO, ‘Second Meeting of State Parties to the 1970 Convention’ http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/illicit-trafficking-of-cultural-property/meeting -of-states-parties/2nd-msp-2012/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Database of National Cultural Heritage Laws, available at http://www.unesco.org/ culture/natlaws/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNODC – United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime – UNODC promotes innovative ways of tackling trafficking in cultural property, available at http://www.unodc.org/unodc/ en/frontpage/2016/May/unodc-promotes-innovative-ways-of-tackling-trafficking-in-cultural-property.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. World Intellectual Property Organization, ‘ICOM-WIPO Art and Cultural Heritage Mediation’, available at http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/specific-sectors/art/icom/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Yates, D., ‘Motunui Panels’, Trafficking Culture, 3 April 2015, available at http://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/case-studies/motunui-panels/, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Zamarrón, H., ‘Gendarmería vigilará el patrimonio cultural’, Milenio.com, 21 August 2017, http://www.milenio.com/policia/gendarmeria-vigilara-patrimonio-cultural-proteger-inah-inba-milenio_0_1015698439.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. France Diplomatie, ‘Collection Schloss – Introduction historique’, http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/sites/archives_diplo/schloss/sommaire_ang.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Miscellaneous sources American Law Reports ALRD3d 847. CNRS, Protection de la propriété culturelle et circulation des biens culturels – Étude de droit comparé Europe/Asie, (Septembre 2008), pp. 1-428. Crevoisier, J. -M., ‘La Suisse Aimerait Mieux Protéger les Biens Culturels Étrangers’, Le Journal de Genève, 18 January 1996. Fiches d’orientation Dalloz, text available at www.dalloz.fr. Gold, A. S., ‘A Theory of Redressive Justice’, (unpublished document, on file with author), (4 February 2011). Klock, J. H., ‘New Jersey Practice Series – Court Rules Annotated’, (March 2017 update). Marsan, G. A., ‘Unidroit Lawyers Meet for International Agreement on Restitution of Stolen Works of Art’, 15 The Art Newspaper, 01 February 1992. Schneider, M., ‘Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects and its Complementarity with the 1970 UNESCO Convention’, UNIDROIT, ‘Fight against illicit traffic of cultural property in South-East Europe.’ (Regional Training Workshop) Gaziantep, Turkey, 19-21 November 2012, powerpoint presentation available at https://www.slideshare.net/ UNESCOVENICE/marina-schneider-1995-unidroit-convention-16003850, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Prott, L. V., ‘Strength and Weaknesses of the 1970 Convention: An Evaluation 40 years after its adoption’ (Background paper)’, in UNESCO, ‘The fight against the illicit trafficking of cultural objects, The 1970 convention: past and future’, (UNESCO Headquarters: Paris, 15-16 March 2011), CLT/2011/CONF.207/7, pp. 1-11. The Tablet, 21 March 1885, p. 38. Douglas Preston’s presentation of his book on the discovery of the city of the Monkey God at University Book Store in Seattle, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= dGpmXxKYmXo, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. LEGISLATION International instruments Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Work (1886), available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=283698, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of Europe, Convention on Offences relating to Cultural Property (2017), available at https://rm.coe.int/1680704b30, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of Europe, European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Revised) (1992), available at https://rm.coe.int/168007bd25, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe (1985), available at https://rm.coe.int/168007a087, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of Europe, Resolution on Return of Works of Art (1983), available at http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=16219&lang=en, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of Europe, European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (1959), https://rm.coe.int/16800656ce, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of Europe, European Cultural Convention (1954), https://www.coe.int/en/web/ conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168006457e, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council of Europe, European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950), available at http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of Intercountry Adoption (1993), available at https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=69, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (1954), available (with its two protocols) at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001875/187580e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. ICPO-Interpol Resolution AGN/64/RES/6 (1995), available at https://www.interpol. int/content/download/22469/210873/version/5/file/AGN-64-RES-6%20%20Stolen%20 cultural%20property.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. International Labour Organization, Convention No 169 on Tribal and Indigenous Peoples (1989), text available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ ILO_CODE:C169, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Organization of American States, Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological, Historical, and Artistic Heritage of the American Nations (1976), available at http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/ treaties/c-16.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Declaration Concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage (2003), available at http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17718&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_ SECTION=201.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001), available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001246/124687e.pdf#page=56 (at pp. 50 and ff.), last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972), available at http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (1970), available at http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13039&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNESCO Recommendation on International Principles Applicable to Archaeological Excavations (1956), available at http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13062&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC& URL_SECTION=201.html, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. UNIDROIT Convention on the International Financial Leasing (1988), available at https://www.unidroit.org/leasing-ol/leasing-english, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2199 (2015), available at https://www.un.org/en/ ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2199%20%282015%29, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (2000), available at https://www.unodc.org/documents/middleeastandnorthafrica/organised-crime/UNITED_ NATIONS_CONVENTION_AGAINST_TRANSNATIONAL_ORGANIZED_CRIME_AND_THE_PROTOCOLS_THERETO.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1980), available at http://www.un.org/ depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980), available at https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/sales/cisg/V1056997-CISG-e-book.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. European Union Law Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (Recast), available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014L0060, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 of 18 December 2008 on the export of cultural goods (Codified version), available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex: 32009R0116, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the return of cultural objects unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ HTML/?uri=CELEX:01993L0007-20010730&from=EN, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Council Regulation (EEC) No 3911/92 of 9 December 1992 on the export of cultural goods, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31992R3911, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. National Legislation Belgium • Belgian Civil Code • Belgian Criminal Code California • California Code of Civil Procedure • California Civil Code • California Penal Code • California Uniform Commercial Code France • French Civil Code (English translation), available at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/ Media/Traductions/English-en/code_civil_20130701_EN, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. • French Criminal Code New Jersey • New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice • New Jersey Rules of Court • New Jersey Revised Statutes • New Jersey Statutes Annotated New York • New York Civil Practice Law and Rules • New York Penal Section • General Construction Law • New York Uniform Commercial Code The Netherlands • Dutch Civil Code • Dutch Criminal Code Switzerland • Swiss Civil Code (English translation), available at https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/ classified-compilation/19070042/201701010000/210.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. United States of America (Federal) • National Stolen Property Act (1934), available at https://eca.state.gov/files/bureau/18-2314.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. • Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (1983), available at https://eca.state.gov/files/bureau/97-446.pdf, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. • Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation (1990), available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/chapter-32, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. Soft Law instruments Uniform Commercial Code, available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc, last retrieved on 01.03.2018. CASE LAW Belgium Cour de Cassation, République Islamique d’Iran c. V. D., C.11.0686.F., 4 octobre 2012. Cour de Cassation, B.V. c. S. G., Nr C.09.0538. F, 16 décembre 2010. Cour de Cassation, B. M. c. Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Nr. C.08.0183.N., 19 juin 2009. Cour d’appel de Bruxelles, 17ème chambre, 2002/AR/1209, 1 mars 2004. Cour de Cassation, Garanta Versicherung A.G. c. AXA Belgium, Nr. C.02.0567.F, 31 octobre 2003. Cour d'appel de Mons, arrêt n° F-19931122-4, 22 novembre 1993. Hof van beroep te Antwerpen, arrest nr N-19840222-1, 22 februari 1984. Hof van Cassatie, 20 december 1974, Arr.Cass. 1975, 478, RCJB 1976, noot C. Renard en RW 1974-75, 1.835. Cour de Cassation, 2 octobre 1924, Pasicrisie 1924, I, 530. France Cour d’appel de Toulouse, Chambre 06 Première Présidence, No 16/01790, 28 octobre 2016. Cour d’appel de Bordeaux, 1ère chambre civile, section B, Nº 13/03833, 7 Octobre 2015. Cour d’appel de Paris, Pôle 02, Chambre 02, N° 13/01936, 7 mars 2014. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 12-82.958, 28 janvier 2014. Cour d’appel de Paris, Pôle 02, 2ème chambre, Nº 11/08156, 24 janvier 2014. Cour d’appel d’Aix-en-Provence, Chambre 01 A, N° 12/20691, 24 septembre 2013. Cour d’appel de Colmar, 2ème chambre civile, Section A, N° 11/00501, 268/2012, 30 mars 2012. Cour d’appel de Lyon, Chambre civile 01 B, N° 10/02877, 13 mars 2012. Cour d’appel de Colmar, 2ème chambre civile, Section A, N° 173/2012, 11/05505, 22 février 2012. Cour de Cassation, Chambre commerciale, N° de pourvoi 10-24.436, 27 septembre 2011. Cour d’appel de Paris, Pôle 2, Chambre 2, Nº 08/05639, 18 juin 2010. Cour d’appel de Nancy, 1ère chambre civile 01, Nº 07/03123, 27 avril 2010. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, pourvoi 08-19293, 3 février 2010, Journal du Droit International (Clunet), n. 4/2010, p. 1272, commentaires T. Vignal. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, Nº de pourvoi D 07-12.290, 19 mars 2009. Cour d’appel de Riom, Chambre des appels correctionnels, No 08/00271, 15 juillet 2008. Cour d’appel d’Amiens, Chambre correctionnelle, N° 06/00850, 14 février 2007. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 16 mai 2006, D., 2006, p. 2365, note B. Mallet-Bricout; D. 2007, p. 132-135, note V. Valette. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, Nº de pourvoi 04-81962, 1 février 2005; Bull. Crim. n. 37. Cour d’appel de Riom, 3 juin 2004. Cour de Cassation, Chambre commerciale, Nº de pourvoi 02-10.753, 3 décembre 2003. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, Nº de pourvoi 02-11612, 9 juillet 2003; Bull. Civ. III, n. 156. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, Nº de pourvoi 01-14.817, 12 juin 2003. Cour d’appel de Paris, Pôle 02, Chambre 02, No 11/20441, 30 octobre 2002. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, Nº de pourvoi 99-18335, 27 novembre 2001; Bull. Civ. I, n.295; D. 2002, p. 671, note J.-P. GRIDEL et p. 2505, obs. B. MALLET-BRICOUT. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, Nº de pourvoi 99-18.335, 27 novembre 2001 Bull. civ. I, no 295, D. 2002. 671, note J. -P. Griedel. Cour d’appel de Lyon, 8 novembre 2001, JCP 2003. IV. 1203. Cour d’appel de Paris, 1ère chambre, Section A, No 2000/12570, 2 avril 2001. Cour d’appel de Colmar, 2ème chambre civile, Section B, No 2 B 199900184, 8 décembre 2000. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, N° de pourvoi 96-21912, 13 avril 1999. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 30 mars 1999, D. 1999, IR 124. Cour d’appel de Paris, 1ère chambre, section A, No 1998/11048, 24 mars 1999. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 13 janvier 1999, no 96-19.735, Bull. civ. III, no 13, JCP 1999. I. 175, no 6, obersvations Périnet-Marquet. Tribunal de Grande Instance de Strasbourg, 1ère chambre civile, No 9103533, 11 janvier 1999. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 96-85871, 4 juin 1998. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 6 mai 1997, Bull. Civ. I, n. 144. Cour d’appel de Montpellier, 23 janvier 1997, JCP 1997. II. 22958, note Eid. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 96-80.430, 12 décembre 1996. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 14 mai 1996, JCP 1996. I. 3972, observations Périnet-Marquet, RTD civ. 1998. 408, observations Zénati. Cour de Cassation, Chambre commerciale, 5 mars 1996, JCP E 1996. I. 584, observation Cabrillac. RTV civ. 1997. 472, observations Crocq. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 9 janvier 1996, Bull. civ. I, nº 22. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chamber civile, 15 février 1995, Bull. Civ. III, n. 53; Defrénois 1995. 1117, obs. Atias; RDI 1995. 284, observations Bergel. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 7 avril 1994, no 92-13.048. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, N° de pourvois 90-21982, 91-10429, 91-10971, 91-12013, 2 juin 1993. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 2 juin 1993, Bull. Civ., I., n. 197, D. 1993, Som. 306, observations A. Robert; RTD civ. 1994, p. 389, obs. F. Zénati. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 02 juin 1993, Nº de pourvoi 90-21982 91-10429 91-10971 91-12013. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 92-83.662, 28 avril 1993. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 26 juin 1991, D. 1993.3, note I.Freij-Dalloz, JCP 1992.II.21825, note Barbièri, RTD civ. 1992.14, obs. F. Zénati. Cour d’appel de Paris, 1ère chambre A., 7 mai 1991, D. 1991. Somm. 306, observations Robert. Cour d’appel de Paris, 3 octobre 1990. Cour d’appel de Paris, 30 mars 1990, JCP 1990. II. 21584, note Barbièri. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 88-80858, 14 mars 1989. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 7 février 1989, Bull. Civ. n. 57; RTD civ. 1990. 109, observations Zénati. Cour de Cassation, Assemblée plénière, N° de pourvoi 85-10262, 85-11198, 15 avril 1988. Cour de Cassation, 15 avril 1988, Receuil Dalloz Sirey 1988, 325 ff. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 8 décembre 1987, D. 1989. somm. 29, observations Robert. Cour d’appel de Paris, 26 février 1987. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 85-92.736, 4 mars 1986. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, 12 décembre 1984, Bull. crim. n° 403. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 29 octobre 1984, no 82-14.037, Bulletin civil III, no 177. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 22 juin 1983, JCP éd. N 1986.II.263, note Barberi. Cour d’appel de Paris, 22 mars 1983, Gaz. Pal. 1983. 1, somm. 207. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, Nº de pourvoi 80-14955, 3 novembre 1981, Bull. Civ., I, n. 324. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 27 février 1980, D. 1980.IR.419. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 16 janvier 1980, Bull. Civ. I, n° 31, RTD civ. 1980. 785, observation Giverdon, D. 1983, IR 16, osbervations Robert. Cour d’appel de Pau, 3 juillet 1979, D., 1981. IR. 232, observations Robert. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 7 novembre 1978, n. 77-10618; Bull. Civ. III n. 334. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 77-91.639, 31 mars 1978. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 20 mars 1978, Bull. Civ. III, n. 128. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 15 mars 1978, Bull. civ. III, no 123, RTD civ. 1979. 153, observations C. Giverdon. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 1 juin 1977, ibid., 1978. 161, observations Giverdon. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 6 November 1975. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 27 octobre 1975, D. 1976, IR 11. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 27 novembre 1973, Bull. Civ. I, n. 324. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 16 avril 1973, N° de pourvoi 72-13758. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 4 janvier 1972, Bull. Civ. I, n° 4. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 16 juin 1971, n. 69-12843; D. 1971, p. 566, note A. B.; RTD civ. 1972, p. 153, observations J.-D. BREDIN. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, N° de pourvoi 69-90.372, 30 octobre 1969. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 30 avril 1969, Bull. Civ. III, n. 348. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 3 juillet 1968. Cour de Cassation, 3ème chambre civile, 15 février 1968, Bull. civ. III, no 60. Cour d’appel de Paris, 5 février 1966, JCP 1996, IV, 99. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 7 juillet 1965, Bull. Civ. I, n. 459. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 23 mars 1965, Bull. Civ. I, n. 206. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile 1, N° de pourvoi 63-10254, 2 février 1965.371 ; RTD Civ. 1965.676, observation J.-D. Bredin. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 15 janv. 1965, Bull. Civ. I, n. 30. Cour de Cassation 1ère chambre civile, 13 juin 1963, Bull. Civ. I, n. 317. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civil 1, 29 janvier 1962, ibid. I, n. 61. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 26 novembre 1956, JCP, 1957.II.9919, note Voirin. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 13 octobre 1956, Bull. civ. I, n° 296. Cour de Cassation, 1ère chambre civile, 18 mai 1955, Bull. civ. I, no 308. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 11 janvier 1950, D. 1950, jur., p. 125, note Leonan. Cour d’appel de Grenoble, 20 juillet 1949, D. 1952. 551, note Grevesie. Tribunal civil de la Seine, 1 juin 1949, D. 1949.350, note Ripert. Cour d’appel de Poitiers, 25 janvier 1938, DH, 1938. 190. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 19 juin 1928, DP 1929, 1, p. 45. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 19 juin 1928, DH 1928. 448. Cour de Cassation, Chambre des requêtes, 21 novembre 1927, DP 1928. 1. 172. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 12 décembre 1921, DP 1922. 1. 28 ; Terré et Simler, nº 434. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 24 Juillet 1912, DP 1914. 1. 36. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 7 février 1910, DP 1910. 1. 201, note Nast. Cour de Cassation, Chambre des requêtes, 12 juillet 1905, DP, 1907.1.141, rapp. Potier; S., 1907.1.273, note A. Whal. Cour d’appel de Paris, 10 décembre 1904, D., 1906.2.61. Cour de Cassation, Chambre des requêtes, 1 février 1893, DP 1894. 1. 278. Cour de Cassation, Chambre des requêtes, 2 août 1886, DP 1887. 1. 293; S. 1886. 1. 417. Cour de Cassation, 1ère Chambre Civile, 6 juillet 1886, DP, 1887, 1, 25. Tribunal de la Seine, Duc de Frias c. Baron Pichon, 17 avril 1885, Journal de Droit International Privé (Clunet), 1886, 593. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 16 juillet 1884, D. 1885.1.232. Cour de Cassation, Chambre des requêtes, 31 juill. 1879, DP 1880. 1. 273 ; S. 1880. 1. 409. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 5 mai 1874, S. 1875. 1. 49, note Labbé. Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, 24 janvier 1875, S., 1875.1.168. Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, 18 Novembre 1837, S. 1838. 1. 366. Ireland Webb v. Ireland, [1988] IR 353; [1988] ILRM 565. Italy Republic of Ecuador v. Danusso, 18 Rivista di diritto internazionale private e processuale 1982, p. 625. Switzerland Union de l'Inde, c. Crédit Agricole Indosuez (Suisse) SA, Tribunal Fédéral Suisse, ATF 131 III 418, JdT 2006 I, 63. L. c. Chambre d’accusation du canton de Genève, Tribunal Fédéral Suisse, ATF 123 II, 134, SJ 1997, 529 (Switz., 1 April 1997). Türkische Republik v. Kanton Basel-Stadt und Prof. Dr. Peter Ludwig, 16 August 1993, unpublished. The Netherlands Gerechtshof ’s-Hertogenbosch, zaaknummer 200.157.545_01, 06 juni 2017. Rechtbank Limburg, zaaknummer C/03/1747752/HA ZA 12-371, 28 mei 2014, Maastricht. Rechtbank Haarlem, 4 oktober 2012 LJN BY2126. Hoge Raad, Civiele kamer, 10 augustus 2012, N. 11/00459, ECLI:NL:PHR:2012:BW5324. Hoge Raad, 10 augustus 2012, NJ 2012/484 (Hunnink/Opdam). Hoge Raad, 14 januari 2011, NJ 2012/88 (Van der Plas/Janssens). Rechtbank Rotterdam, 20 augustus 2008, LJN BE9341. Rechtbank Arnhem, 27 juni 2006, LJN AY4918. Hoge Raad, 31 oktober 2003, NJ 2004/38. Hof ’s-Hertogenbosch 28 oktober 2003 Landelijk Jurisprudencie Nummer (LJN) AN9548. Hoge Raad, 8 september 2000, NJ 2000/629. Hoge Raad, Strafkamer, zaak n. 3967, 12 oktober 1999, ECLI:NL:PHR:1999:ZD1744. Hoge Raad, Strafkamer, 12 oktober 1999, Nederlandse Juristenblad (NJ) 2000/36, ECLI:NL:1999:AC2680. Rechtbank ’s-Hertogenbosch, 24 september 1998, Nederlandse Juristenblad, 1999/39. Hoge Raad, 8 mei 1998, NJ 1999/44, r.o. 3.6. Hoge Raad, 14 November 1997, NJ 1998, (Uitslag/Wolterink). Hoge Raad, 8 mei 1997, NJ 1999/301 (Luidens c.s./Het Land Aruba). Hoge Raad, 3 mei 1996, NJ 1996/501 (Huizing/Stichting Andere Woonvormen). Hoge Raad, 17 mei 1991, NJ 1992/668 (Martinistad/Zomerhuis). Hoge Raad, 18 januari 1991, NJ 1992/667; AA 1991, p. 1128 (Centraal Beheer/Gritter). Hoge Raad, 18 september 1987, NJ 1988/983; AA 1988, p. 396 e.v. (Berg/De Bary). Hoge Raad, 1 mei 1987, NJ 1988/852 (Lease Plan/IBM). Hoge Raad, 4 april 1986, NJ 1986/810; AA 1986, p. 790 (Apon/Bisterbosch). Hoge Raad, 29 juni 1979, NJ 1980/133; AA 1980, p. 181 (Hoogovens/Matex). Hoge Raad, 1 juli 1977, NJ 1978/212. Hoge Raad, 14 november 1969, NJ 1970/283. Hoge Raad, 5 mei 1950, NJ 1951, 1 (DJV). Hoge Raad, 30 november 1945, NJ 1946/49. United Kingdom Bumper Development Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1991] 1 WLR 1362. Bumper Development Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, 1991 WL 839377. Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. The Barakat Galleries Limited, [2007] EWHC 705 (QB). Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. The Barakat Galleries Limited, [2007] EWCA Civ 1374. Islamic Republic of Iran v. Berend, [2007] EWHC 132 (QB) 1 Bus. L.R. D65. Kingdom of Spain v. Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd [1986] 1. W.L.R. 1120. Attorney General of New Zealand v. Ortiz & Sotheby’s, [1984] AC 1. Winkworth v. Christie, Manson and Woods Ltd and Another, [1980] 1 ER (Ch.) 496 [1980], 1 All ER 1121. Pramatha Nath Mullick v. Pradyumna Kumar Mullick (1925) 27 BOMLR 1064. United States of America – Federal cases Wallace Wood Properties v. Wood, 117 F.Supp.3d 493, (July 24, 2015). CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S.Ct. 2175, 189 L.Ed.2d 62, 78 ERC 1505, (June 9, 2014). Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, 754 F.3d 712, 14 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6251, 2014 Daily Journal D.A.F. 7229, (June 6, 2014). Baiul v. William Morris Agency, LLC, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 1804526, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 12, 486, (May 6, 2014). Lozano v. Montoya Alvarez, 134 S.Ct. 1224, 188 L.Ed.2d 200, 82 USLW 4159, (March 5, 2014). Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 132 S.Ct. 604, 187 L.Ed.2d 529, 82 USLW 4035, (December 16, 2013). Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, 737 F.3d 613, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13, 245, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15, 986, (December 9, 2013). Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, 592 F.3d 954, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 575, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 735, (January 14, 2010). U. S. v. Portrait of Wally, 663 F.Supp.2d 232, (September 30, 2009). Orkin v. Taylor, 487 F.3d 734, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5490, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7064, (May 18, 2007). United States v. Schultz, 333 F.3d 393, (June 25, 2003). United States v. Portrait of Wally, A Painting by Egon Schiele, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2002 WL 553532, (April 12, 2002). United States v. Schultz, 178 F. Supp. 2d 445, (January 3, 2002). Allens Creek/Corbetts Glen Preservation Group, Inc.v. Caldera, 88 F.Supp.2d 77, 30 Envtl. L. Rep. 20, 469, (March 22, 2000). SongByrd, Inc. v. Estate of Grossman, 206 F.3d 172, (March 10, 2000). Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem v. Christie’s, Inc., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 1999 WL 673347, (August 30, 1999). United States v. An Antique Platter of Gold, 184 F.3d 131 (July 12, 1999). Songbyrd, Inc. v. Estate of Grossman, 23 F.Supp.2d 219, (September 21, 1998). Ikelionwu v. United States, 150 F.3d 233, (August 5, 1998). Graffman v. Espel, Not Reported in F.Supp., 1998 WL 55 371, (February 11, 1998). Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal., Inc., 522 U.S. 192, 118 S.Ct. 542, 139 L.Ed.2d 553, (December 15, 1997). Ivani Contracting Corp. v. City of New York, 103 F.3d 257, (January 7, 1997). Continental Casualty Co. V. Stronghold Insurance Co. Ltd, 77 F.3d 16, 64 USLW 2564, (February 13, 1996). Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. Leisure Time Productions, B.V., 17 F.3d 38, 1994-2 Trade Cases P 70, 740, (February 17, 1994). Charash v. Oberlin College, 14 F.3d 291, 88 Ed. Law Rep. 1011, 1994 Fed.App. 0011P, (January 20, 1994). Robins Island Preservation Fund, Inc. v. Southold Development Corp., 959 F.2d 409, (March 23, 1992). Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, 501 U.S. 350, 111. S.Ct. 2773, 115 L.Ed.2d 321, (June 20, 1991). Government of Peru v. Wendt, 933 F.2d 1013, 1991 WL 80599 (Table), (May 15, 1991). Country Floors, Inc. V. Partnership Composed of Gepner and Ford, 930 F.2d 1056, 19 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1319, 18 U.S.P.Q.2d 1577, (April 16, 1991). Williams v. Stone, 496 U.S. 937, 110 S.Ct. 3215, 110 L.Ed.2d 662, (June 18, 1990). Stone v. Williams, 891 F.2d 401, 1990 Copr.L.Dec. P 26, 516, 13 U.S.P.Q.2d 1166, (December 5, 1989). Hoelzer v. City of Stamford, Conn., 722 F.Supp. 1106, (October 16, 1989). Stone v. Williams, 873 F.2d 620, 1989 Copr.L.Dec. P 26, 419, 10 U.S.P.Q.2d 1624, (April 21, 1989). Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265, (June 25, 1986). Majorica, S.A. v. R.H. Macy & Co. Inc., 762 F.2d 7, 226 U.S.P.Q. 624, (May 2, 1985). Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. Elicofon, 678 F.2d 1150, (May 5, 1982). Sheridan Suzuki, Inc. v. Caruso Auto Sales, Inc., 110 Misc.2d 823, 442 N.Y.S.2d 957, 32 UCC Rep.Serv. 1127, (September 23, 1981). Clark v. U.S., 481 F.Supp. 1086, (November 19, 1979). United States v. McClain, 593 F.2d 658, (April 23, 1979). United States v. McClain, 545 F.2d 988, (January 24, 1977). United States v. Hollinshead, 495 F.2d 1154, (June 17, 1974). Owens v. White, 342 F.2d 817, (March 12, 1965). Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal, 359 U.S. 231, 79 S.Ct. 760, 3 L.Ed.2d 770, 1959 A.M.C. 2092, (April 20, 1959). Morisette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, (January 7, 1952). Gardner v. Panama R. Co., 342 U.S. 29, 72 S.Ct. 12, 96 L.Ed. 31, 1951 A.M.C. 2048, (November 5, 1991). Hoelzer v. City of Stamford, Conn., 933 F.2d 1131, (May 28, 1991). Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. United States, 304 U.S. 126, 58 S. Ct. 785, 82 L.Ed. 1224 (1938). Davis v. Gifford, 182 A.D. 99, 169 N.Y.S. 492, (March 8, 1918). Northern Pac. R.R. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 33 S.Ct. 554, 57 L.Ed. 931, (April 28, 1913). Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620, 6 S.Ct. 209, 29 L.Ed. 483, (December 7, 1885). Bicknell v. Comstock, 113 U.S. 149, 5 S.Ct. 399, 28 L.Ed. 962, (January 19, 1885). Dickerson v. Colgrove, 100 U.S. 578, 10 Otto 578, 1879 WL 16577, 25 L.Ed. 618, (October 1, 1879). Mitchell v. Hawley, 83 U.S. 544, 1872 WL 15359, 21 L.Ed. 322, 16 Wall. 544, (December 1, 1872). Riddlesbarger v. Hartford Insurance Company, 74 U.S. 386, 1868 WL 11165, 7 Wall. 286, (December 1, 1868). Croxall v. Shererd, 72 U.S. 268, 1866 WL 9426, 18 L.Ed. 572,5 Wall. 268, (December 1, 1866). Leffingwell v. Warren, 67 U.S. 599, 2 Black 599, 1862 WL 6748, 17 L.Ed. 261, (December 1, 1862). Townsend v. Jemison, 50 U.S. 407, 9 How. 407, 1850 WL 6883, 13 L.Ed. 194, (January 1, 1850). McElmoyle, for Use of Bailey v. Cohen, 38 U.S. 312, 13 Pet. 312, 1839 WL 4300, 10 L.Ed. 177, (January 1, 1839). Shelby v. Guy, 24 U.S. 361, 1826 WL 2635, 6 L.Ed. 495, 11 Wheat. 361, (March 10, 1826). Brent v. Chapman, 5 Cranch 358, 9 U.S. 358, 1809 WL 1666, 3 L.Ed. 125, (February 1, 1809). Foxley's Case, 5 Coke, 109 a. United States of America – State cases ALABAMA Rowe v. Bonneau-Jeter Hardware Co., 245 Ala. 326, 16 So.2d 689, 158 A.L.R. 1266, (December 16, 1943). Van Antwerp v. Van Antwerp, 242 Ala. 92, 5 So.2d 73, (December 18, 1941). Drummond v. Drummond, 232 Ala. 401, 168 So. 428, (May 21, 1936). Van Ingen v. Duffin, 158 Ala. 318, 48 So. 507, 132 Am.St.Rep. 29, (January 14, 1909). L. Grunewald Co. v. Copeland, 131 Ala. 345, 30 So. 878, (November 26, 1901). Lucas v. Daniels, 34 Ala. 188, 1859 WL 699, (January 1, 1859). Newcombe v. Leavitt, 22 Ala. 631, 1853 WL 429, (January 1, 1853). Benje v. Creagh's Adm'r, 21 Ala. 151, 1852 WL 115, (June 1, 1852). Jones v. Jones, 18 Ala. 248, 1850 WL 377, (June 1, 1850). Howell v. Hair, 15 Ala. 194, 1849 WL 242, (January 1, 1849). ALASKA Kelly v. Miller, 575 P.2d 1221, 23 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 632, (March 10, 1978). ARIZONA Harris v. Purcell, 193 Ariz 409, 973 P.2d 1166, 284 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 21, (December 17, 1998). Jackson v. American Credit Bureau, Inc., 23 Ariz. App. 199, 531 P.2d 932, 79 A.L.R.3d 841, (February 18, 1975). ARKANSA Henderson v. First Nat. Bank of Dewitt, 254 Ark. 427, 494 S.W.2d 452, (May 14, 1973). CALIFORNIA David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, D.C. No. 2:05-cv-03459-JFW-E, (July 10, 2017). David Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, Case No CV 05-3459-JFW (Ex), 153 F.Supp.3d 1148, (June 4, 2015). Marei von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art At Pasadena, et al., Case No CV 07-2866-JFW (JTLx), (April 2, 2015). Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, Case No. CV 05-3459-GAF (CTx), 2012 WL 12875771, (May 24, 2012). Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc., 40 Cal. 4th 623, 151 P.3d 1151, 54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 735, (February 15, 2007). In re Marriage of Klug, 130 Cal.App.4th 1389, 31 Cal.Rptr.3d 327, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6042, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8237, (July 7, 2005). Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., 35 Cal. 4th 797, 110 P.3d 914, 27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 661, (May 9, 2005). Simms v. NPCK Entreprises, Inc., No. C039756, 109 Cal.App.4th 233, 134 Cal.Rptr.2d 557, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4505, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5712, (May 28, 2003). Waffer Internat. Corp. v. Khorsandi, 69 Cal.App.4th 1261, 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 241, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1225, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1471, (February 16, 1999). Naftzger v. American Numismatic Society, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d, 1999 WL 1074009, (June 17, 1999). Strasberg v. Odyssey Group, Inc., 51 Cal.App.4th 906, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 474, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9177, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15, 114, (December 17, 1996). Society of California Pioneers v. Baker, 43 Cal.App.4th 774, 50 Cal.Rptr.2d 865, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1810, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3079, (March 15, 1996). Naftzger v. American Numismatic Society, 42 Cal.App.4th 421, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 784, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 780, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1140, (February 1, 1996). Morgold, Inc. v. Keeler, 891 F.Supp 1361, 27 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 315, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11, 641, (April 27, 1995). Bernson v. Browning–Ferris Industries of California, 7 Cal.4th 926, 873 P.2d 613, 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440, 22 Media L. Rep. 2065, (June 6, 1994). U.S. v. Pre-Columbian Artifacts, 845 F.Supp. 544, (October 14, 1993). Government of Peru v. Wendt, 933 F.2d 1013, 1991 WL 80599 (May 15, 1991). Government of Peru v. Johnson, 720 F.Supp. 810, (June 29, 1989). Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co., 44 Cal.3d 1103, 751 P.2d 923, 245 Cal. Rptr. 658, (April 7, 1988). April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTV, 147 Cal.App.3d 805, 195 Cal.Rptr. 421, (October 5, 1983). DeLeon v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., 33 Cal.3d 456, 658 P.2d 108, 189 Cal.Rptr. 181, (February 17, 1983). Leaf v. City of San Mateo, 104 Cal.App.3d 398, 163 Cal.Rptr. 711, (April 10, 1980). Seelenfreund v. Terminix, Inc., 84 Cal. App. 3d 133, 148 Cal.Rptr. 307, (August 22, 1978). Seelenfreund v. Terminix of Northern Cal., Inc., 84 Cal.App.3d 133, 148 Cal.Rptr. 307, (August 22, 1978). Sanchez v. South Hoover Hospital, 18 Cal.3d 93, 553 P.2d 1129, 132 Cal.Rptr 657, (September 17, 1976). Union of India v. The Norton Simon Foundation, United States District Court, Southern District Court of New York, 74 Circ. 5331 (SDNY 1976); United States District Court, Central Districht of California, Case No. CV74-3581-RJK (CD Cal. 1976). Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand, 6 Cal. 3d 176, 491 P.2d 421, 98 Cal. Rptdr. 837, (December 2, 1971). Howe v. Pioneer Mfg. Co., 262 Cal. App. 2d 330, 68 Cal.Rptr 617, (May 21, 1968). Bufano v. City & County of San Francisco, 233 Cal.App.2d 61, 43 Cal.Rptr. 223, (March 17, 1965). Culp v. Signal Van & Storage, 142 Cal.App.2d Supp. 859, 298 P.2d 162, (May 23, 1956). Bennet v. Hibernia Bank, 427 Cal. 2d 540, 305 P.2d 20, (December 27, 1946). Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Jones, 27 Cal.2d 819, 164 A.L.R. 685, (March 28, 1946). Pashley v. Pacific Elec. Co., 25 Cal.2d 226, 153 P.2d 325, (November 21, 1944). First Nat. Bank in Richmond v. Thompson, 60 Cal. App. 2d 79, 140 P.2d 75, (August 2, 1943). Metropolitan Finance Corp. v. Morf, 42 Cal.App.2d 756, 109 P.2d 969, (February 6, 1941). Huysman v. Kirsch, 6 Cal.2d 302, 57 P.2d 908, (May 1, 1936). San Francisco Credit Clearing House v. Wells, 196 Cal. 701, 239 P. 319, (August 19, 1925). Brownrigg v. de Frees et al., 196 Cal. 534, 238 P. 714, (July 30, 1925). Anzar v. Miller, 90 Cal. 342, 27 P. 299, (July 24, 1891). Harpending v. Meyer, 6 P.C.L.J. 201, 55 Cal. 555, 1880 WL 1991, (July 1, 1880). COLUMBIA Nyhus Travel Management Corp., 466 F.2d 440, 151 U.S.App.D.C. 269, (August 11, 1972). CONNECTICUT Yale University v. Konowaloff, 5 F.Supp.3d 237, 308 Ed. Law Rep. 797, (March 20, 2014). Polizos v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 255 Conn. 601, 767 A.2d 1202, (April 3, 2001). Polizos v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 54 Conn.App. 724, 737 A.2d 946 (September 7, 1999). M. Itzkowitz & Sons, Inc. v. Santorelli, 128 Conn. 195, 21 A.2d 376, (July 15, 1941). FLORIDA Brown v. Reynolds, 872 So. 2d 290, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D952, (April 14, 2004). GEORGIA Woodcliff Gin Co. v. Kittles, 173 Ga. 661, 161 S.E. 119, (October 17, 1931). Gaillard v. Hudson, 81 Ga. 738, 8 S.E. 534, (January 14, 1889). ILLINOIS E.J. Korvette, Div. Of Spartan Indus., Inc. v. ESKO Roofing Co., 38 Ill. App. 3d 905, 350 N.E.2d 10, (May 14, 1976). Tom Olesker’s Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. 61 Ill. 2d 129, 334 N.E.2d 160, (May 19, 1975). Reat v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 47 Ill. App. 2d 267, 197 N.E.2d 860, (April 17, 1964). Isham v. Cudlip, 33 Ill. App.2d 254, 179 N.E.2d 25, (January 9, 1962). O’Connel v. Chicago Park Dist., 376 III. 550, 34 N.E.2d 836, 135 A.L.R. 698, (April 10, 1941). Carr v. Barnett, 21 Ill.App. 137, 1886 WL 5616, (may 1, 1886). INDIANA Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, 917 F.2d 278 (1990). Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, 717 F.Supp. 1374 (August 3, 1989). Burks v. Rushmore, 534 N.E.2d 1101, (March 9, 1989). Lou Leventhal Auto Co., Inc. v. Munns, 164 Ind. App. 368, 328 N.E.2d 734, (June 4, 1975). Guy v. Schuldt, 236 Ind. 10, 138 N.E.2d 891, (December 20, 1956). KANSAS Christensen Grain, Inc. v. Garden City Co-op., Equity Exchange, 192 Kan. 785, 391 P.2d 81, (April 11, 1964). Robbins v. Sackett, 23 Kan. 301, 1880 WL 843, (January 1, 1880). KENTUCKY Dragoo v. Cooper, 9 Bush 629, 72 Ky. 629, 1873 WL 6671, (September 11, 1873). MAINE Morey v. Haggerty, 122 Me. 212, 119 A. 527, (February 9, 1923). Galvin v. Bacon, 2 Fairf. 28, 11 Me. 28, 1833 WL 464, 25 Am.Dec. 258, (June 1, 1833). MASSACHUSSETS The Republic of Turkey v. OKS Partners, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23526 (D. Mass. 1998) The Republic of Turkey v. OKS Partners, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17032 (D. Mass. 1994) Republic of Turkey v. OKS Partners, 146 F.R.D. 24 (February 3, 1993). Republic of Turkey v. OKS Partners, 797 F.Supp. 64 (July 20, 1992). Chapin v. Freeland, 142 Mass. 383, 8 N.E. 128, 56 Am.Rep. 701, (September 8, 1886). MARYLAND Hahn v. Claybrook, L.R.A. 1917C, 1169, 130 Md. 179, 100 A. 83, (January 31, 1917). MICHIGAN Baker v. Oakwood Hosp. Corp., 239 Mich.App. 461, 608 N.W.2d 823, (January 18, 2000). Jackson County Hog Producers v. Consumers Power Co., 234 Mich. App. 72, 592 N.W.2d 112, (February 12, 1999). MINNESOTA Brandenburg v. Northwestern Jobbers’ Credit Bureau, L.R.A. 1915D, 474, 128 Minnesota 411, 151 N.W. 134, (February 11, 1915). MISSOURI Taylor v. McNeal, 523 S.W.2d 148, (May 6, 1975). Wells v. Halpin, 59 Mo. 92, 1875 WL 7864, (January 1, 1875). NEW HAMPSHIRE Quimby v. Blackey, 63 N.H. 77, 1884 WL 3509, (June 1, 1884). NEW JERSEY O’Keeffe v. Snyder, 83 N.J. 478, 416 A.2d 862, (July 17, 1980). O’Keeffe v. Snyder, 170 N.J.Super 75, 405 A.2d 840, (July 27, 1979). Burd v. New Jersey Tel. Co., 76 N.J. 284, 386 A.2d 1310, (May 23, 1978). Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267, 300 A.2d 563, (February 20, 1973). Lopez v. Swyer, 115 N.J.Super. 237, 279 A.2d 116, (June 22, 1971). Kutner Buick v. Strelecki, 111 N.J.Super. 89, 267 A.2d 549, (June 29, 1970). Mannillo v. Gorski, 54 N.J. 378, 255 A.2d 258, (July 7, 1969). Brewer v. Porch, 53 N.J. 167, 249 A.2d 388, (January 20, 1969). Brewer v. Porch, 98 N.J.Super 583, 238 A.2d 193, (January 22, 1968). Fernandi v. Strully, 35 N.J. 434, 173 A.2d 277, (June 30, 1961). Joseph v. Lesnevich, 56 N.J.Super. 340, 153 A.2d 349, (July 15, 1959). Braue v. Fleck, 23 N.J. 1, 127 A.2d 1, (November 19, 1956). De Bow v. Hatfield, 19 N.J. 327, 116 A.2d 829 (Mem), (September 12, 1955). Wilomay Holding Co. v. Peninsula Land Co., 19 N.J. 618, 118 A.2d 128 (Mem), (November 21, 1955). Wilomay Holding Co. v. Peninsula Land Co., 36 N.J.Super 440, 116 A.2d 484, (August 1, 1955). De Bow v. Hatfield, 35 N.J.Super. 291, 114 A.2d 10, (May 12, 1955). Predham v. Holfester, 32 N.J.Super. 419, 108 A.2d 458, (October 22, 1954). Baron v. Peoples National Bank of Secaucus, 9 N.J. 249, 255-256, 87 A.2d 898, (April 7, 1952). Mueller v. Technical Devices Corp., 8 N.J. 201, 84 A.2d 620, (November 26, 1951). Baron v. Peoples National Bank of Secaucus, 16 N.J.Super. 243, 84 A.2d 492, (November 5, 1951). Zimmerman v. Cherivtch, 5 N.J.Super. 59, 5 N.J.Super. 590, 68 A.2d 577, (September 6, 1949). National Retailers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gambino, 1 N.J.Super. 627, 64 A.2d 927, (December 15, 1948). Redmond v. New Jersey Historical Society, 31 Backes 464, 132 N.J. Eq. 464, 28 A.2d 189, (September 8, 1942). Redmond v. New Jersey Historical Soc., 28 Backes 57, 129 N.J. Eq. 57, 18 A.2d 275, (February 14, 1941). O’Brien v. Bilow, 121 N.J.L. 576, 36 Grummere 576, 3 A.2d 641, (January 13, 1939). Sullivan v. Stout, 120 N.J.L. 304, 35 Grummere 304, 199 A. 1, 118 A.L.R. 211, (April 29, 1938). Content v. Dalton, 21 Backes 425, 122 N.J. Eq. 425, 194 A. 286, 112 A.L.R. 1031, (September 22, 1937). Kleinfeld v. General Auto Sales Co., 118 N.J.L. 67, 33 Gummere 67, 191 A. 460, 110 A.L.R. 350, (April 12, 1937). Pintenics v. Menwig, 113 N.J.L. 4, 28 Gummere 4, 172 A. 377, (May 9, 1934). Weinstein v. Blanchard, 109 N.J.L. 332, 24 Grummere 332, 162 A. 601, (October 17, 1932). Howard v. West Jersey & S.S.R. Co., 1 Backes 517, 102 N.J.Eq. 517, 141 A. 755, (May 10, 1928). Burr v. Bloomsburg, 101 N.J.Eq. 615, 16 B.Stockton 615, 138 A. 876, (August 29, 1927). De Luca v. Melin, 103 N.J.L. 140, 18 Grummere 140, 134 A. 735, (October 18, 1926). Wittke v. Wittke, 102 N.J.L. 176, 17 Grimmere 176, 130 A. 598, (October 19, 1925). Folkman v. Myers, 93 N.J. Eq. 208, 8 B.Stockton 208, 115 A. 615, (September 30, 1921). Northern R. Co. of New Jersey v. Demarest, 94 N.J.L. 68, 0 grummere 68, 108 A. 376, (November 25, 1919). Mason v. home Real Estate Co., 90 N.J. Eq. 455, 5 B.Stockton 455, 108 A.4 (July 30, 1919). Myers v. Folkman, 89 N.J.L. 390, 4 Grummere 390, 99 A. 97, (November 10, 1916). Cohn v. Plass, 85 N.J.Eq. 153, 15 Buchanan 153, 95 A. 1011, (November 15, 1915). Leigh v. Howard, 87 N.J.L. 113, 2 Grummere 113, 93 A. 680, (March 27, 1915). Nelson v. Bock, 84 N.J.L. 123, 55 Vroom 123, 85 A. 1009, (March 5, 1913). Ashton v. Allen, 70 N.J.L. 117, 41 Vroom 117, 56 A. 165, (November 9, 1903). Foulke v. Bond, 41 N.J.L. 527, 12 Vroom 527, 1879 WL 6751, (November 1, 1879). Woodside v. Adams, 40 N.J.L. 417, 11 Vroom 417, 1878 WL 8324, (November 1, 1878). Chambers v. Hunt, 18 N.J.L. 339, 1841 WL 3017, 3 Harrison 339, (November 1, 1841). NEW YORK In re Flamenbaum, 22 N.Y.3d 962, 1 N.E.3d 782, 978 N.Y.S.2d 708, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 07510, (November 14, 2013). Dorothy G. Bender Found., Inc. v. Carroll, 40 Misc.3d 1231 (a), 975 N.Y.S.2d 708 (Table), 2013 WL 4487458, (August 20, 2013). Joseph P. Carroll Ltd v. Baker, 889 F.Supp.2d 593, 78 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 552, (August 29, 2012). In re Flamenbaum, 95 A.D.3d 1318, 945 N.Y.S.2d 183, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 04165, (May 30, 2012). Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. V. Scialpi, 94 A.D.3d 1067, 944 N.Y.S.2d 160, 2012 N.Y. Slip. Op. 03153, (April 24, 2012). Mirvish v. Mott, 18 N. Y.3d 510, 965 N.E.2d 906, 942 N.Y.S.2d 404, 2012 N.Y. Slip. Op. 01149, (February 16, 2012). Bakalar v. Vavra, 819 F.Supp.2d 293, (August 17, 2011). Kozar v. Christie’s, Inc., 31 Misc.3d 1228(A), 929 N.Y.S.2d 200 (Table), 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50887(U), (May 18, 2011). Bakalar v. Vavra, 619 F.3d 136, (September 2, 2010). Mirvish v. Mott, 75 A.D.3d 269, 901 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 04525, (May 27, 2010). In re Flamenbaum, 27 Misc. 3d 1090, 899 N.Y.S.2d 546, 2010 N.Y. Slip. Op. 20117, (March 30, 2010). Malanga v. Chamberlain, 71 A.D.3d 644, 896 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 01767, (March 2, 2010). Grosz v. Museum of Modern Art, 772 F.Supp.2d 473, (January 6, 2010). Sotheby’s, Inc. v. Shene, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2009 WL 762697, (March 23, 2009). Kamat v. Kurtha, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2009 WL 103643, (January 15, 2009). Malanga v. Chamberlain, 20 Misc.3d 1134(A), 872 N.Y.S.2d 691 (Table), 2008 WL 3521349, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 51724(U), (August 13, 2008). Close-Barzin v. Christie’s, Inc., 51 A.D.3d 444, 857 N.Y.S.2d 545, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 04196, (May 6, 2008). Kamat v. Kurtha, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2008 WL 5505880, (April 14, 2008). Matter of Peters v. Sotheby’s Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 809, 865 N.E.2d 1257, 834 N.Y.S.2d 90 (Table), (March 29, 2007). Pahlad ex rel. Berger v. Brustman, 33 A.D.3d 518, 823 N.Y.S.2d 61, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 07767, (October 26, 2006). Matter of Peters v. Sotheby’s Inc., 34 A.D.3d 29, 821 N.Y.S.2d 61, 2006 N.Y. Slip. Op. 06480, (September 14, 2006). Tenamee v. Schmukler, 438 F.Supp.2d 438, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 11, 117, (July 13, 2006). Dilorenzo v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 29 A.D.3d 853, 814 N.Y.S.2d 750, 2006 N.Y. Slip. Op. 04041, (May 23, 2006). Zumpano v. Quinn, 6 N.Y.3d 666, 849 N.E.2d 926, 816 N.Y.S.2d 703, 2006 N. Y. Slip Op. 01245, (February 21, 2006). Putter v. North Shore University Hosp., 25 A.D.3d 539, 807 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 00144, (January 10, 2006). Board of Managers of Soho International Arts Condominium v. City of New York, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 1153752, 75 U.S.P.Q.2d 1025, (May 13, 2005). Borumand v. Assar, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 741786, (March 31, 2005). Batsidis v. Batsidis, 9 A.D.3d 342, 778 N.Y.S.2d 913 (Mem), 2004 N.Y. Slip. Op. 05772, (July 6, 2004). Sanchez v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 94847, (January 18, 2004). Kaufman v. Cohen, 307 A.D.2d 113, 760 N.Y.S.2d 157, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 14433 (May 27, 2003). Peyser v. Searle Blatt & Co., Ltd., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2003 WL 1610772, (March 24, 2003). Christie’s Inc. v. Davis, 247 F.Supp.2d 414, 2002 WL 31730992, (November 27, 2002). State of New York v. Seventh Regiment Fund, Inc., 98 N.Y.2d 249, 774 N.E.2d 702, 746 N.Y.S.2d 637, 2002 N.Y. Slip Op. 04464, (June 4, 2002). United States of America v. Portrait of Wally, A Painting by Egon Schiele, 2002 WL 553532, No. 99 Civ. 9940(MBM), (April 12, 2002). Wertheimer v. Cirker’s Hayes Storage Warehouse, Inc., Not Reported in N.Y.S.2d, 2001 WL 1657237, 2001 N.Y. Slip. Op. 40445(U), (September 28, 2001). Securities Investor Protection Corp. V. BDO Seidman, L.L.P., 95 N.Y.2d 702, 746 N.E.2d 1042, 723 N.Y.S.2d 750, 2001 N.Y. Slip Op. 01470, (February 20, 2001). U.S. v. Fireman's Funds Ins. Co., Not Reported in F.Supp., 2001 WL 88226, No. 99 Civ. 2622 (BSJ), (January 31, 2001). Feld v. Feld, 279 A.D.2d 393, 720 N.Y.S.2d 35, 2001 N.Y. Slip Op. 00595, (January 25, 2001). Jose Armando Bermudez & Co. v. Bermudez Intern., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2000 WL 1225792, 2000 Copr.L.Dec. P 28, 148, (August 29, 2000). Green v. Arcadia Financial Ltd., A.D.2d 896, 689 N.Y.S.2d 596 (Mem), 1999 N.Y. Slip. Op. 04094, (May 07, 1999). Tanges v. Heidelberg North America, Inc., 93 N.Y.2d 48, 710 N.E.2d 250, 687 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1999 N.Y. Slip Op. 02633, (March 30, 1999). Czartoryski–Borbon v. Turcotte, N.Y.L.J., Apr. 28, 1999, at 27 col. 2 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Cty.1999). Martin v. Briggs, 235 A.D.2d 192, 663 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1997 N.Y. Slip Op. 08869, (October 28, 1997). Green v. Arcadia Financial Ltd., 174 Misc.2d 411, 663 N.Y.S.2d 944, 36 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 89, 1997 N.Y. Slip. Op. 97583, (October 15, 1997). Chesrow v. Galiani, 234 A.D.2d 9, 650 N.Y.S.2d 158, (December 3, 1996). G & S Quality, Inc. v. Bank of China, 233 A.D.2d 215, 650 N.Y.S.2d 97, (November 19, 1996). Vigilant Ins. Co. of America v. Housing Authority of City of El Paso, 87 N.Y.2d 36, 660 N.E.2d 1121, 637 N.Y.S.2d 342, 27 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 1285, (November 1, 1995). Candela v. Port Motors, Inc., 208 A.D.2d 486, 617 N.Y.S.2d 49, 25 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 681, (October 3, 1994). DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 38 F.3d 1266, (May 16, 1994). Republic of Croatia v. The Trustee of the Marquess of Northampton, 203 A.D.2d 167, 610 N.Y.S.2d 263 (April 21, 1994). Snyder v. Town Insulation, 81 N.Y.2d 429, 615 N.E.2d 999, 599 N.Y.S.2d 515, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 13, 683, (June 15, 1993). DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 804 F.Supp. 539, 61 USLW 2271, 24 Fed.R.Serv.3d 362, (October 16, 1992). Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation v. Lubell, 77 N.Y.2d 311, 569 N.E.2d 426, 567 N.Y.S.2d 623, (February 14, 1991). Republic of Lebanon v. Sotheby’s, 167 A.D.2d 142, 561 N.Y.S.2d 566, (November 8, 1990). Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation v. Lubell, 153 A.D.2d 143, 550 N.Y.S.2d 618, (January 25, 1990). Takisada Co., Ltd. v. Ambassador Factors Corp., a Div. of Fleet Factors Corp., 147 Misc.2d 435, 556 N.Y.S.2d 788, (September 5, 1989). Rizk v. Cohen, 73 N.Y.2d 98, 535 N.E.2d 282, 538 N.Y.S.2d 229, 52 Ed. Law Rep. 190, (February 16, 1989). Matter of Steyer, 70 N.Y.2d 990, 521 N.E.2d 429, 526 N.Y.S.2d 422, (February 11, 1988). DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 836 F.2d 103, 56 USLW 2402, (December 30, 1987). Smith v. Smith, 830 F.2d 11, (September 30, 1987). DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 658 F.Supp.688, (April 20, 1987). Cantor v. Anderson, 639 F.Supp.364, 2 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 312, (June 16, 1986). Duffy v. Horton Memorial Hospital, 66 N.Y.2d 473, 488 N.E.2d 820, 497 N.Y.S.2d 890, (December 26, 1985). Curtis v. Board of Educ. Of Lafayette Cent. School Dist., 107 A.D.2d 445, 487 N.Y.S.2d 439, 24 Ed. Law Rep. 418, (April 5, 1985). Matter of General Bldg. Contrs. Of N.Y. State v. Egan, 106 A.D.2d 688, 483 N.Y.S.2d 746, (December 06, 1984). East Side Car Wash, Inc. v. K.R.K. Capitol, Inc., 102 A.D.2d 157, 476 N.Y.S.2d 837, (June 12, 1984). Risi v. Interboro Industrial Parks, Inc., 99 A.D.2d 466, 470 N.Y.S.2d 174, (January 3, 1984). Sporn v. MCA Records, Inc., 58 N.Y.2d 482, 448 N.E.2d 1324, 426 N.Y.S2d 413, (March 31, 1983). Two Clinton Square Corp. V. Friedler, 91 A.D.2d 1193, 459 N.Y.S.2d 179, (January 31, 1983). Dedvujak v. Madonado, 115 Misc.2d 211, 453 N.Y.S.2d 965, (April 22, 1982). Sheridan Suzuki, Inc. v. Caruso Auto Sales, Inc., 110 Misc. 2d 823, 442 N.Y.S.2d 957, 32 UCC Rep.Serv. 1127, (September 23, 1981). Kunstsammlungen zu Weimar v. Elicofon, 536 F.Supp. 829, (June 15, 1981). Meese v. Miller, 79 A.D.2d 237, 436 N.Y.S.2d 496, (February 26, 1981). Carlson v. Stern’s Boatyard, Inc., 79 A.D.2d 981, 434 N.Y.S.2d 478, (January 12, 1981). Augustine v. Szwed, 77 A.D.2d 298, 432 N.Y.S.2d 962, (November 13, 1980). Greenfield v. Kanwit, 87 F.R.D. 129, 31 Fed.R.Serv.2d 559, (July 3, 1980). Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Glass, 75 A.D.2d 786, 428 N.Y.S.2d 246, (May 29, 1980). Arbutina v. Bahyleyan, 75 A.D2d 84, 428 N.Y.S.2d 99, (May 23, 1980). Jordan v. Ford Motor Co., 73 A.D.2d 422, 426 N.Y.S.2d 359, (March 28, 1980). Al-Roc Product Corp. v. Union Dime Sav. Bank, 74 A.D.2d 834, 425 N.Y.S.2d 525, (March 10, 1980). Porter v. Wertz, 68 A.D.2d 141, 416 N.Y.S.2d 254, 26 UCC Rep.Serv. 876, (May 10, 1979). Simcuski v. Saeli, 44 N.Y.2d 442, 377 N.E.2d 713, 406 N.Y.S.2d 259, (May 4, 1978). Smith v. Driscoll, 69 A.D.2d 857, 415 N.Y.S.2d 455, (April 16, 1979). Schanbarger v. Edward Dott’s Garage, Inc., 61 A.D.2d 243, 402 N.Y.S.2d 72, (February 16, 1978). Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co., 43 N.Y.2d 583, 374 N.E.2d 97, 403 N.Y.S.2d 185, (January 18, 1978). Frigi-Griffin, Inc. v. Leeds, 52 A.D.2d 805, 383 N.Y.S.2d 339, (May 18, 1976). Stroganoff-Scherbatoff v. Weldon, 420 F.Supp. 18, (May 18, 1976). Johnny Dell, Inc. v. New York State Police, 84 Misc.2d 360, 375 N.Y.S.2d 545, 18 UCC Rep.Serv. 378, (November 17, 1975). Federal Insurance Co. V. Fries, 78 Misc.2d 805, 355 N.Y.S.2d 741, (May 20, 1974). Kunstsammlungen zu Weimar v. Elicofon, 478 F.2d 231, (April 25, 1973). In re Barabash’s Estate, 31 N.Y.2d 76, 286 N.E.2d 268, 334 N.Y.S.2d 890, (July 6, 1972). Rabinhof v. U.S., 329 F.Supp. 830, 28 A.F.T.R.2d 71-5310, 71-2 USTC P 9601, (July 9, 1971). Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp., 29 N.Y.2d 124, 272 N.E.2d 533, (July 6, 1971). Glenesk v. Guidance Realty Corp., 36 A.D.2d 852, 321 N.Y.S.2d 685, (April 26, 1971). People v. Begole, 27 N.Y.2d 138, 261 N.E.2d 655, 313 N.Y.S.2d 744, (July 1, 1970). Flanagan v. Mount Eden General Hospital, 24 N.Y.2d 427, 248 N.E.2d 871, 301 N.Y.S.2d 23, (April 17, 1969). Menzel v. List, 24 N.Y.2d 91, 246 N.E.2d 742, 298 N.Y.S.2d 979, 6 UCC Rep. Serv. 330, (February 26, 1969). Atlas Auto Rental Corp. v. Weisberg, 54 Misc.2d 168, 281 N.Y.S.2d 400, 4 UCC Rep.Serv. 572, (July 10, 1967). Menzel v. List, 28 A.D.2d 516, 279 N.Y.S.2d 608, (May 11, 1967). General Stencils, Inc. v. Chiappa, 18 N.Y.2d 125, 219 N.E.2d 169, 272 N.Y.S.2d 337, (July 7, 1966). Menzel v. List, 49 Misc.2d 300, 267 N.Y.S.2d 804, (February 10, 1966). 509 Sixth Ave. Corp. v. New York City Transit Authority, 24 A.D.2d 975, 265 N.Y.S.2d 429, (December 21, 1965). Menzel v. List, 22 A.D.2d 647, 253 N.Y.S.2d 43, (October 6, 1964). Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co., 11 N.Y.2d 754, 181 N.E.2d 629, 226 N.Y.S.2d 692 (Mem) (February 22, 1962). Devens v. Gokey, 10 N.Y.2d 898, 179 N.E.2d 516, 223 N.Y.S.2d 515 (Mem), (November 16, 1961). Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co. of Rochester, 14 A.D.2d 509, 217 N.Y.S.2d 576 (Mem), (June 30, 1961). Erbe v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co., 13 A.D.2d 211, 214 N.Y.S.2d 849, (May 19, 1961). Devens v. Gokey, 12 A.D.2d 135, 209 N.Y.S.2d 94, (January 5, 1961). Austin v. Board of Higher Ed. of City of N.Y., 5 N.Y.2d 430, 158 N.E.2d 681, 186 N.Y.S.2d 1, (April 9, 1959). Varga v. Credit–Suisse, 5 A.D.2d 289, 171 N.Y.S.2d 674, (March 18, 1958). Zendman v. Harry Winston, Inc., 305 N.Y. 180, 111 N.E.2d 871, 36 A.L.R.2d 1355, (April 9, 1953). Safrin v. Friedman, 27 Misc.2d 687, 96 N.Y.S.2d 627, (March 14, 1950). In re Barret’s Estate, 82 N.Y.S.2d 137, (August 9, 1948). Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp., 188 Misc. 198, 67 N.Y.S.2d 905, (January 2, 1947). Butler v. Wolf Sussman, Inc., 221 Ind. 47, 46 N.E.2d 243, 145 A.L.R. 740, (February 3, 1943). Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N.Y. 325, 28 N.E.2d 856, (July 24, 1940). Cohen v. M. Keizer, Inc., 246 A.D. 277, 285 N.Y.S. 488, (February 14, 1936). Employer’s Fire Inc. Co. V. Cotten, 245 N.Y. 102, 156 N.E. 629, 51 A.L.R. 1462, (May 3, 1927). Belotti v. Bickhardt, 228 N.Y. 296, 127 N.E. 239, (April 3, 1920). Feinberg v. Allen, 208 N.Y. 215, 101 N.E. 893, (April 22, 1913). Feinberg v. Allen, 143 A.D. 866, 128 N.Y.S. 906, (March 8, 1911). Lightfoot v. Davis, 198 N.Y. 261, 91 N.E. 582, 29 L.R.A.N.S. 119, 19 Am.Ann.Cas. 747, (April 5, 1910). MacDonnell v. Buffalo Loan, Trust & Safe Deposit Co., 193 N.Y. 92, 85 N.E. 801, (October 6, 1908). Tompkins v. Fonda Glove Lining Co., 188 N.Y. 261, 80 N.E. 933, (April 9, 1907). Sinnott v. Feiock, 3 Bedell 444, 165 N.Y. 444, 59 N.E. 265, (February 1, 1901). Honey v. Bromley, 85 Hun 540, 67 N.Y.St.Rep. 147 (Mem), 33 N.Y.S. 400, (April 12, 1895). Reid v. Board of Supervisors of Albany County, 83 Sickets 364, 128 N.Y. 364, 28 N.E. 367, 40 N.Y.St.Rep. 90, (October 06, 1891). Hulbert v. Clark, 83 Sickels 295, 128 N.Y. 295, 28 N.E. 638, (October 6, 1891). Duryea v. Andrews, 58 Hun 607, 34 N.Y.St.Rep. 774, 12 N.Y.S. 42, (December 10, 1890). Doherty v. Matsell, 74 Sickels 646, 119 N. Y. 646, 23 N.E. 994, (March 11, 1890). Smith v. Clews, 69 Sickels 190, 114 NY 190, 21 N.E. 160, (April 23, 1889). Ganley v. Troy City Nat. Bank, 53 Sickels 487, 98 N.Y. 487, 1885 WL 10581, (March 24, 1885). Dickinson v. Mayor of New York, 47 Sickels 584, 92. N.Y. 584, 1883 WL 14218, (June 5, 1883). Pease v. Smith, 16 Sickels 477, 61 N.Y. 477, 1875 WL 10719, (January 1, 1875). Gillet v. Roberts, 12 Sickels 28, 57 N.Y. 28, 1874 WL 11171, (January 1, 1874). Basset v. Spofford, 6 Hand 387, 45 N.Y. 387, 1871 WL 9713, 6 Am.Rep. 101, (April 25, 1871). Stevens v. Hyde, 32 Barb. 171, (March 5, 1860). Poor v. Horton, 15 Barb. 485, (January 1, 1853). Silsbury v. McCoon, 3 N.Y. 379, 3 Comst. 379, 53 Am.Dec. 307, (July 1, 1850). Ely v. Ehle, 3 N.Y. 506, 3 Comst. 506, (July 1, 1850). Barrett v. Warren, 3 Hill 348, (July 1, 1842). Connah v. Hale, 23 Wend. 462, (January 1, 1840). Saltus & Saltus v. Everett, 20 Wend 167, 32 Am.Dec. 541, (January 1, 1838). Williams & Chapin v. Merle, 11 Wend. 80, 25 Am.Dec. 604, (January 1, 1833). Reynolds v. Shuler, 5 Cow. 323, (February 1, 1826). Murray and Ogden v. S. Burling, 10 Johns. 172, (May 1, 1813). Bristol v. Burt, 7 Johns. 254, (November 1, 1810). Jackson, Gansevoort v. Parker, 3 Johns.Cas. 124, (April 1, 1802). Stone v. Marsh, 6 Barnewall & Creswell, 551. Marsh v. Keating, 1 Bingham, New Cases, 198. Marsh v. Keating, 2 Clarke & Finelly, 250. White v. Spettigue, 13 Meeson & Welsby, 603. Twinam v. Swart, 4 Lans., 263. OHIO Jedlicka v. Good Mechanical Auto Co., 21 Ohio App.3d 19, 486 N.E.2d 121, 21 O.B.R. 20, (July 8, 1984). OKLAHOMA Reynolds v. Bagwell, 200 Okla. 550, 198 P.2d 215, 1948 OK 193, (September 28, 1948). Chilton v. Carpenter, 78 Okl. 210, 189 P. 747, 1920 OK 126, (March 23, 1920). Adams v. Coon, 36 Okla. 644, 129 P. 851, 44 L.R.A.N.S 624, 1913 OK 1, (January 7, 1913). Vault v. Gatlin, 31 Okl. 394, 120 P. 273, 1911 OK 450, (November 14, 1911). OREGON Plummer v. Kingsley, 190 Or. 378, 226 P.2d 297, (January 4, 1951). Velzian v. Lewis, 15 Or. 539, 16 P. 631, 3 Am.St.Rep. 184, (January 2, 1888). PENNSYLVANIA Erisoty v. Rizik, Not Reported in F.Supp., 1995 WL 91406, (February 23, 1995). Com. v. Dean, 245 Pa. Super. 322, 369 A.2d 423, (November 22, 1976). Priester v. Milleman, 161 Pa. Super. 507, 55 A.2d 540, (November 12, 1947). SOUTH DAKOTA Strassburg v. Citizens State Bank, 581 N.W.2d 510, 1998 SD 72, (July 8, 1998). Tennessee Wells v. Ragland, 31 Tenn. 501, 1852 WL 1792, 1 Swan 501, (April 1, 1852). Texas Connor v. Hawkins, 71 Tex. 582, 9 S.W. 684, (October 26, 1888). Munson v. Hallowell, 26 Tex. 475, 1863 WL 2726, 84 Am.Dec. 582, (January 1, 1863). Utah Dee v. Hyland, 3 Utah 308, 3 P. 388, (August 24, 1883). Vermont Merrill v. Bullard, 59 Vt. 389, 8 A. 157, (March 1, 1887). Virginia In Re “Paysage Bords de Seine,” Unsigned Oil Painting on Linen by Pierre-Auguste Renoir United States of America v. Baltimore Museum of Art, et al., 991 F.Supp. 2d 740 (14 January 2014). Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. C.L. Hyman Auto Wholesale, Inc., 256 Va. 243, 506 S.E.2d 14, 16 (1998). Layne v. Norris’ Adm’r, 16 Gratt. 236, 57 Va. 236, 1861 WL 2634, (April 16, 1861). Newby’s Adm’rs v. Blakey, 3 Hen. & M. 57, 13 Va. 57, 1808 WL 615, (October 1, 1808). Wisconsin Spitler v. Dean, 148 Wis.2d 630, 436 N.W.2d 308, (March 1, 1989).-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedPhd thesis-
dc.identifier.doi10.26481/dis.20181002ag-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationGROENEN, Amoury (2018) UNIDROIT 1995: Tackling the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property Through Private Law Means – An Evaluation of the Appropriateness of the 1995 Unidroit Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects to Cultural Property Theft in Comparative Perspective.-
item.contributorGROENEN, Amoury-
Appears in Collections:PhD Theses - Law
Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
E-book Dissertatie Amoury Groenen.pdf14.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

974
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

34
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.