Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27502
Title: Seen through the patients' eyes: quality of chronic illness care
Authors: DESMEDT, Melissa 
VERTRIEST, Sonja 
Petrovic, Mirko
BERGS, Jochen 
Vrijhoef, Hubertus
Dessers, Ezra
HELLINGS, Johan 
VANDIJCK, Dominique 
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Source: FAMILY PRACTICE, 35(4), p. 446-451
Abstract: Background. Most well-developed healthcare systems are facing the challenge of managing the increasing prevalence of patients with chronic diseases. Comprehensive frameworks, such as the chronic care model (CCM), receive widespread acceptance for improving care processes, clinical outcomes and costs. Objective. The purpose of this study was to explore chronic patients' perceptions of the quality of chronic care and the alignment with the CCM. Since previous research indicated that a patient's assessment may depend on socio-demographic or disease-related characteristics, the relationship between the mean Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) score and possible aforementioned predictors was also explored. Methods. An observational, cross-sectional study design was applied, and participants were recruited from the Flemish Patients' Platform (Belgium). An online questionnaire was designed to assess chronic patients' socio-demographic characteristics, medical consumption, quality of life (EuroQol-5D survey) and the perspective of chronic illness care PACIC survey. Results. The mean overall PACIC score was 2.87 on a maximum score of 5.The highest mean score for the PACIC subscales was found for 'patient activation' (3.26), followed by 'delivery system design/decision support' (3.23), 'problem solving/contextual counselling' (2.86), 'goal setting/ tailoring' (2.70) and 'follow-up/coordination' (2.59). Quality of life, as measured by the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale, had a significantly positive correlation with the mean PACIC score (P = 0.005). Conclusion. The CCM is considered an important step towards improved care for patients with chronic diseases. However, the findings of this study showed that elements from the CCM have not yet been fully implemented. Aspects such as dealing with problems which interfered with achieving predefined goals, helping patients to set specific goals for their care delivery and arranging followups are less common in today's care of chronic diseases.
Notes: [Desmedt, Melissa; Vertriest, Sonja; Bergs, Jochen; Hellings, Johan; Vandijck, Dominique] Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium. [Petrovic, Mirko] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium. [Vrijhoef, Hubertus] Tilburg Univ, Ctr Care & Welf, Tilburg, Netherlands. [Vrijhoef, Hubertus] Natl Univ Singapore, Hlth Serv Res, Singapore, Singapore. [Dessers, Ezra] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Sociol Res, Leuven, Belgium.
Keywords: Chronic care; patient preference; quality improvement; quality of care; quality of life;Chronic care; patient preference; quality improvement; quality of care; quality of life
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27502
ISSN: 0263-2136
e-ISSN: 1460-2229
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmx123
ISI #: 000439794800014
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2019
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1093@fampra@cmx123.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version116.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Apr 16, 2024

Page view(s)

46
checked on Jun 14, 2022

Download(s)

24
checked on Jun 14, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.