Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27611
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJareonkitpoolpol, Ajjana-
dc.contributor.authorOngkunaruk, Pornthipa-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Gerrit K.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T07:54:25Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-21T07:54:25Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationSoil use and management, 34 (4), p. 449-460-
dc.identifier.issn0266-0032-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/27611-
dc.description.abstractThe advantages of organic-chemical fertilizers have been recognised by farmers, and accordingly, the demand for them has increased. An organic-chemical fertilizer, with an amount of nutrients less than that registered or as specified on the label, is considered a fake or a nonconforming fertilizer. It has been observed that nutrient compositions of samples of organic-chemical fertilizers are much greater than what is specified on the label. This research aimed to reduce the raw materials cost of organic chemical fertilizers while increasing the conformance probability of the nutrient composition. Three models have been formulated to determine the optimal organic-chemical fertilizer blend: a linear programming model (LP), a chance-constrained programming model (CCP), and a simulation optimization model. A Monte Carlo simulation was developed to determine the out-of-specification probability of the blending formula, currently in use commercially, and the blending formulas obtained from the three optimization models. The current and three proposed models were compared in terms of total raw material cost and probability of nonconformance. All blending models could save a material cost of at least 16.6% compared with the current formula. Also, the probability of producing nonconforming fertilizers is drastically reduced. On a macro level, the use of the models allows farmers to reduce the chemical residues in the soil while Thailand could reduce the import volume of chemical substances. This research may have a significant impact on manufacturers, farmers and the Thai economy.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2018 British Society of Soil Science-
dc.subject.otherChance-constrained programming; combining organic amendments; blending problem; Monte Carlo simulation; linear programming-
dc.titleDetermination of the optimal blending problem of organic chemical fertilizer under uncertainty-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage460-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage449-
dc.identifier.volume34-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesOngkunaruk, P (reprint author), Kasetsart Univ, Fac Agroind, Dept Agroind Technol, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. pornthipa.o@ku.ac.th-
dc.relation.referencesAndreadakis, A., Mamais, D. & Gavalakis, E. 2006. Evaluation of treatment schemes appropriate for wastewater reuse in Greece. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6, 423–433. Arellano-Garcia, H. & Wozny, G. 2009. Chance constrained optimization of process systems under uncertainty. I. Strict monotonicity. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 33, 1568–1583. Butterworth, K. 1985. Practical application of linear/integer programming in agriculture. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36, 99–107. Caldwell, H.W. 1956. An application of linear programming to farm planning. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 4, 51–61. Cembali, T., Folwell, R.J., McCluskey, J.J., Huffaker, R.G. & Wandschneider, P.R. 2006. Economic analysis of the inter-year effect of alternative harvesting strategies for asparagus. Journal of Vegetable Science, 12, 29–50. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. 1959. Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6, 73–79. Chen, J.H. 2006. The Combined Use of Chemical and Organic Fertilizers and/or Biofertilizer for Crop Growth and Soil Fertility. International Workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil- Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertiliser Use, October 16–26, Bangkok, Thailand, 1-11. Cheng, H.B., Zhi, Y.S., Mei, S.H. & Gang, W.H. 2010. Using Monte Carlo Simulation with Crystal Ball to Improve Mergers & Acquisitions Decision. International Conference on E-Business and E-Government. 7–9 May 2010, Guangzhou, China, 1592–1595. Eiselt, H.A. & Sandblom, C.-L. 2007. Linear programming and its applications. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg. Escuder-Gilabert, L., Bonet-Domingo, E., Medina-Hern andez, M. & Sagrado, S. 2007. A diagnostic tool for determining the quality of accuracy validation. Assessing the method for determination of nitrate in drinking water. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 3872, 619–625. Evanylo, G.K. & Mullins, G.L. 2000. Nutrient Management in Agronomy Handbook. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Fertilizer Act. 2009. Criteria of error allowance for nutrient quantity analysis in chemical fertilizer. Available at: http://law.longdo.com/law/376/sub25324. Geletu, A., Kl€oppel, M., Zhang, L. & Li, P. 2013. Advances and applications of chance-constrained approaches to systems optimisation under uncertainty. International Journal of Systems Science, 44, 1209–1232. Gendebien, A., Ferguson, R., Brink, J., Horth, H., Sullivan, M. & Davis, R. 2001. Survey of Wastes Spread on Land. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/compost/landspreading.htm. Government Gazette. 2009. Criteria of error allowance for organic matter quantity analysis. Available at: http://siweb.dss.go.th/sta ndard/rachakitja/show_kitja.asp?Article_ID=1794 Henrion, R. & M€oller, A. 2003. Optimization of a continuous distillation process under random inflow rate. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 45, 247–262. Kataoka, S. 1963. A stochastic programming model. Econometrica, 31, 181–196. Kumral, M. 2003. Application of chance-constrained programming based on multi-objective simulated annealing to solve a mineral blending problem. Engineering Optimization, 35, 661–673. Kumral, M. & Sari, Y.A. 2017. Simulation-based mine extraction sequencing with chance constrained risk tolerance. Simulation, 93, 527–539. Law, A.M. & Kelton, W.D. 2000. Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA. Li, P., Arellano-Garcia, H. & Wozny, G. 2008. Chance constrained programming approach to process optimization under uncertainty. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 32, 25–45. LINDO. 2017. LINGO 17.0 - Optimization Modeling Software for Linear, Nonlinear, and Integer Programming. Available at: http:// www.lindo.com/index.php/products/lingo-and-optimization-mode ling. Majeke, F., Majeke, J., Mufandaedza, J. & Shoko, M. 2013. Modeling a small farm livelihood system using linear programming in Bindura, Zimbabwe. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2, 20–23. Microsoft 2017. Define and solve a problem by using Solver. Available at: https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Define-andsolve-a-problem-by-using-Solver Miller, L.B. & Wagner, H. 1965. Chance-constrained programming with joint constraints. Operations Research, 13, 930–945. Morgan, D.R., Eheart, J.W. & Valocchi, A.J. 1993. Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chanceconstrained programming technique. Water Resources Research, 29, 551–561. Motsara, M.R. & Roy, R.N. 2008. Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis. FAO Fertilizer and plant nutrition bulletin. National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards. 2011. Agricultural News. Available at: http://www.acfs.go.th/read_ news.php?id=9170&ntype=09 Office of Agricultural Economics. 2018. Value and Volume of Import Chemical Fertiliser. Available at: http://http://www.oae.go.th (in Thai) Ongkunaruk, P. 2008. Waste Reduction by Monte Carlo Simulation: A Case Study in Textile Industry. Proceedings of the 38th Computer and Industrial Engineering Conference 2008, Beijing, China, 727–734. Oracle 2017a. Oracle Crystal Ball. Available at: http://www.oracle.c om/us/products/applications/crystalball/overview/index.html.Oracle 2017b. Oracle Crystal Ball Manual. Available at: https://docs. oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/cb_user/frameset.htm?ch01s04. html Panuwet, P., Siriwong, W., Prapamontol, T., Ryan, P.B., Fiedler, N., Robson, M.G. & Boyd Barra, D. 2012. Agricultural pesticide management in Thailand: situation and population health risk. Environmental Science and Policy, 17, 72–81. Poungchompu, S. 2011. Application of linear programming to find out the ingredients of compost from rice straw with the lowest cost. KKU Research Journal, 16, 485–492. Prekopa, A. 1970. On probabilistic constrained programming, proceedings of the Princeton symposium on mathematical programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 113–138. Prekopa, A. 1995. Stochastic programming. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Prekopa, A. & Szantai, T. 1978. Flood control reservoir system design using stochastic programming. Mathematical Programming Study, 9, 138–151. Prekopa, A. & Szantai, T. 1979. On optimal regulation of a storage level with application to the water level regulation of a lake. European Journal of Operational Research, 3, 175–189. Ramaekers, K., Janssens, G.K. & Van Landeghem, H. 2006. Towards logistics systems parameter optimisation through the use of response surfaces. 4OR, 4, 331–342. Ratneetoo, B. 2012. Organic fertiliser improves deteriorated soil. Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal, 42, 115–127. Roy, R.K. 1990. A primer on the Taguchi method. Van Nostrand Reinhold, MI, US. Ruscczynski, A. & Shapiro, A. (eds.) 2003. Stochastic programming. Handbooks in operations research and management science, vol. 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Sakalli, U.S. & Birgoren, B. 2009. A spreadsheet-based decision support tool for blending problem in brass casting industry. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 56, 724–735. Sakalli, U.S., Baykoc, O.F. & Birgoren, B. 2011. Stochastic optimization for blending problem in brass casting industry. Annals of Operations Research, 186, 141–157. Sarker, R.A., Talukdar, S. & Anwarul Haque, A.F.M. 1997. Determination of optimum crop mix for crop cultivation in Bangladesh. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 21, 621–632. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D. & Ruszczynski, A. 2009. Lecture Notes on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization. Shih, J.S. & Frey, H.C. 1995. Coal blending optimization under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 83, 452– 465. Stokes, J.R. & Tozer, P.R. 2006. Optimal feed mill blending. Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, 543–552. Su, Y.Z., Wang, F., Su, D.R., Zhang, Z. & Wu, M.D. 2006. Longterm effect of fertilizer and manure application on soil-carbon sequestration and soil fertility under the wheat–wheat–maize cropping system in Northwest China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 75, 285–295. Van Ackooij, W., Henrion, R., M€oller, A. & Zorgati, R. 2014. Joint chance constrained programming for hydro reservoir management. Optimization and Engineering, 15, 509–531. Van de Panne, C. & Popp, W. 1963. Minimum-cost cattle feed under probabilistic protein constraints. Management Science, 9, 405–430.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/sum.12449-
dc.identifier.isi000453721400002-
item.fullcitationJareonkitpoolpol, Ajjana; Ongkunaruk, Pornthipa & JANSSENS, Gerrit K. (2018) Determination of the optimal blending problem of organic chemical fertilizer under uncertainty. In: Soil use and management, 34 (4), p. 449-460.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.contributorJareonkitpoolpol, Ajjana-
item.contributorOngkunaruk, Pornthipa-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Gerrit K.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0266-0032-
crisitem.journal.eissn1475-2743-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sum_12449-2015-237_Rev_EV.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version183.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Jareonkitpoolpol_et_al-2018-Soil_Use_and_Management.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version232.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Sep 29, 2024

Page view(s)

106
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

148
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.