Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27858
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVERBRUGGHE, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorCardinaels, Loes-
dc.contributor.authorHAESEN, Mieke-
dc.contributor.authorSchouten, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorCECCARELLI, Bianca-
dc.contributor.authorPINXTEN, Wim-
dc.contributor.authorSPOOREN, Annemie-
dc.contributor.authorTIMMERMANS, Annick-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-06T14:38:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-06T14:38:59Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citation13th AAATE biennial Conference, Budapest - Hungary, 9-12/09/2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/27858-
dc.description.abstractAssistive technology (AT) is an important aid in the daily functioning of persons with disabilities [1]. It can improve independence of the user by facilitating daily tasks [2], reducing the amount of personal assistance needed [3], and decrease caregiver burden [4,5]. Because of recent progress in the development and production of specialized AT in categories such as mobility [6] and cognitive function [7], AT has the potential to support a very wide group of users. Also, in a population that is consistently growing older, more persons will require functional aid products to maintain an independent lifestyle [8]. Previous research has already shown the cost-effectiveness of AT in community-based populations of elderly persons [9]. Consequently, both the expansion of AT products and the growth in the number of users translates into a higher financial burden for the government to subsidize these new and often expensive products. In the Flemish healthcare system new financial delivery models and improved efficiency of AT use are necessary to guarantee a good quality of care [10]. One of the current problems is the nonuse of AT that are disposed to them [11,12]. This nonuse could be addressed by optimization of service delivery [13]. In other countries, reuse and recycling of AT have been considered, and these concepts have proven to be effective [14,15]. Also in a recent report of the Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (AAATE), it is advocated to study how service delivery can be optimized [16]. This study aims to inventory thoughts and opinions of various stakeholders and users in the service delivery process in Flanders concerning 1) the present model of AT service delivery, 2) possible future changes that can make this model more cost-efficient, such as reuse/recycling of AT, and 3) the registration and tracking of AT use.-
dc.description.sponsorshipHet Vlaams Agentschap voor Personen met een Handicap (VAPH)-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherassistive technology; delivery model; healthcare system; nonuse; reuse-
dc.titleA qualitative study to evaluate strategies for changes in the assistive technology service delivery in Flanders-
dc.typeConference Material-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate9-12/09/2015-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename13th AAATE biennial Conference-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceBudapest - Hungary-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
dc.relation.references[1] Lancioni, G.E. and N.N. Singh, Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities. 2014: Springer. [2] Berry, B.E. and S. Ignash, Assistive technology: providing independence for individuals with disabilities. Rehabil Nurs, 2003. 28(1): p. 6-14. [3] Hoenig, H., D.H. Taylor, Jr., and F.A. Sloan, Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly? Am J Public Health, 2003. 93(2): p. 330-7. [4] Mortenson, W.B., et al., How assistive technology use by individuals with disabilities impacts their caregivers: a systematic review of the research evidence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2012. 91(11): p. 984-98. [5] Mortenson, W.B., et al., How assistive technology use by individuals with disabilities impacts their caregivers: a systematic review of the research evidence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2012. 91(11): p. 984-98. [6] Cowan, R.E., et al., Recent trends in AT for mobility. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2012. 9: p. 20. [7] de Joode, E., et al., Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil, 2010. 24(8): p. 701-14. [8] Agree, E.M., The potential for technology to enhance independence for those aging with a disability. Disabil Health J, 2014. 7(1 Suppl): p. S33-9. [9] Lansley, P., C. McCreadie, and A. Tinker, Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? Age Ageing, 2004. 33(6): p. 571-6. [10] Jo Vandeurzen. Beleidsnota Kabinet Welzijn, Volksgezondheid, Gezin. Vlaamse regering 2014-2019. [11] Wessels, R., et al., Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technology and disability, 2003. 15(4): p. 231-238. [12] Federici, S. and S. Borsci. The use and non-use of assistive technology in Italy: Preliminary data. in 11th AAATE Conference: Everyday technology for independence and care. 2011. [13] Walsh, E. et al., Design for Assitive Technology applications: usefulness of re-use? Under review. [14] Kniskern, J., C.P. Phillips, and T. Patterson, Technology (AT) Reutilization (Reuse): What We Know Today. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2008. 5(1): p. 59-71. [15] Vincent, C., Practices of recycling assistive technology in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1999. 66(5): p. 229-239. [16] Andrich, R., et al., Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: An AAATE/EASTIN position paper. Technology and Disability, 2013. 25(3): p. 127-146.-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedPresentation-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationVERBRUGGHE, Jonas; Cardinaels, Loes; HAESEN, Mieke; Schouten, Ben; CECCARELLI, Bianca; PINXTEN, Wim; SPOOREN, Annemie & TIMMERMANS, Annick (2015) A qualitative study to evaluate strategies for changes in the assistive technology service delivery in Flanders. In: 13th AAATE biennial Conference, Budapest - Hungary, 9-12/09/2015.-
item.contributorVERBRUGGHE, Jonas-
item.contributorCardinaels, Loes-
item.contributorHAESEN, Mieke-
item.contributorSchouten, Ben-
item.contributorCECCARELLI, Bianca-
item.contributorPINXTEN, Wim-
item.contributorSPOOREN, Annemie-
item.contributorTIMMERMANS, Annick-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AAATE 2015 abstract - 20150403 AT system in Flanders - final.docx
  Restricted Access
Conference material33.18 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Jun 30, 2022

Download(s)

4
checked on Jun 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.