Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27883
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBURZYKOWSKI, Tomasz-
dc.contributor.authorSZALAJ, Przemek-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-08T10:40:30Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-08T10:40:30Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/27883-
dc.description.abstractDevelopment of chromosome conformation capture (3C) and its derivative techniques such as Hi-C and ChIA-PET allow to capture the details of the genome organization on multiple scales and led to many new insights into the mechanisms of genome functioning. It is already well established that genome organization is closely linked to genomic processes such as gene expression regulation, cell development and cell differentiation. Moreover, a number of diseases, including multiple types of cancers, are directly caused by disruptions of this organization induced by mutations targeting structural genomic elements. This adds an additional dimension to genomic analyses, as even subtle mutations, for instance single nucleotide polymorphisms located in non-coding regions may significantly impact genes located in distant parts of the genome. To fully understand how genome functions, both in health and disease, a thorough knowledge of the genomic structure and its dynamics is thus required. Data from 3C experiments is usually presented using simple 1D and 2D representations such as interaction networks and contact maps. While these representations are useful, 3D models provide much more comprehensive view for studying genomic features such as chromatin accessibility or compaction. However, due to biological, experimental and computational limitations, it is not an easy task to create high-resolution, biologically feasible 3D models. A number of computational approaches for 3D genome modeling were developed since the advent of the 3C methods. These approaches, however, are often based solely on the contact frequency data from the experiments capturing non-specific interactions (such as Hi-C) without incorporating current knowledge about genome organization in the modeling, and thus they may not be able to adequately reflect the underlying biological structures. Moreover, due to computational reasons the simulation size is often limited, which means that these methods can be applied only to low-resolution data or to modeling short genomic regions. This work presents 3D-GNOME (3-Dimensional Genome Modeling Engine), a novel, multi-scale algorithm for modeling 3D genome organization which is able to generate high-resolution whole genome models in a reasonable time. The most prominent feature of the algorithm - and one that probably make it most distinct from the existing methods - is a very close coupling to the biological model of genome topology. 3D-GNOME works in a hierarchical fashion, where every hierarchy level corresponds to a specific scale of the genome organization (chromosome territories, topological domains, and chromatin loops) and beads used for modeling directly correspond to biological structures, as opposed to majority of the existing methods, where beads correspond to arbitrary fragments of the genome without a biological meaning. Thus, the algorithm generates models that can be viewed and analyzed at different biological scales, providing a comprehensive view of the genome topology. The algorithm was developed specifically for ChIA-PET, an advanced 3C technique that allows to capture chromatin interactions mediated by a specific protein factor, in principle, however, it can also be used with other types of data such as 5C or Hi-C. To present the capabilities of the algorithm a number of models at different resolutions were created and analyzed using a combined CTCF and RNAPII ChIA-PET dataset from a GM12878 cell line. Given the important role these factors play in genome (CTCF performs a major role in organizing chromatin, whereas RNAPII is involved in transcription of many genes) the generated structures provide a comprehensive view of genome structural and functional features. The algorithm was developed both as a stand-alone software package, which allows to easily include the algorithm in computational pipelines or to run a large number of simulations using scripting, and as a user-friendly web-server, which facilitates the use of the algorithm for non-technical users.-
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Centre Poland, KNOW UMB-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsOpen Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.-
dc.subject.othergenome organization; 3d modeling; chromatin; chromatin loops, topological domains; CTCF-
dc.titleModeling and analysis of spatial genome organization-
dc.typeTheses and Dissertations-
local.format.pages102-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatT1-
dc.relation.referencesAy, Ferhat, Timothy L. Bailey, and William Stafford Noble. 2014. “Statistical Confidence Estimation for Hi-C Data Reveals Regulatory Chromatin Contacts.” Genome Research 24 (6): 999–1011. Barbieri, Mariano, Mita Chotalia, James Fraser, Liron-Mark Lavitas, Josée Dostie, Ana Pombo, and Mario Nicodemi. 2012. “Complexity of Chromatin Folding Is Captured by the Strings and Binders Switch Model.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (40): 16173–78. Barrington, Christopher, Ronald Finn, and Suzana Hadjur. 2017. “Cohesin Biology Meets the Loop Extrusion Model.” Chromosome Research: An International Journal on the Molecular, Supramolecular and Evolutionary Aspects of Chromosome Biology 25 (1): 51–60. Baù, Davide, and Marc A. Marti-Renom. 2012. “Genome Structure Determination via 3C-Based Data Integration by the Integrative Modeling Platform.” Methods 58 (3): 300–306. Blackwood, E. M., and J. T. Kadonaga. 1998. “Going the Distance: A Current View of Enhancer Action.” Science 281 (5373): 60–63. Bonev, Boyan, and Giacomo Cavalli. 2016. “Organization and Function of the 3D Genome.” Nature Reviews. Genetics 17 (11): 661–78. Bonev, Boyan, Netta Mendelson Cohen, Quentin Szabo, Lauriane Fritsch, Giorgio L. Papadopoulos, Yaniv Lubling, Xiaole Xu, et al. 2017. “Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development.” Cell 171 (3): 557–72.e24. Chepelev, Iouri, Gang Wei, Dara Wangsa, Qingsong Tang, and Keji Zhao. 2012. “Characterization of Genome-Wide Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Reveals Co-Expression of Interacting Genes and Modes of Higher Order Chromatin Organization.” Cell Research 22 (3): 490–503. Cremer, T., and C. Cremer. 2001. “Chromosome Territories, Nuclear Architecture and Gene Regulation in Mammalian Cells.” Nature Reviews. Genetics 2 (4): 292–301. Dali, Rola, and Mathieu Blanchette. 2017. “A Critical Assessment of Topologically Associating Domain Prediction Tools.” Nucleic Acids Research 45 (6): 2994–3005. Davies, James O. J., A. Marieke Oudelaar, Douglas R. Higgs, and Jim R. Hughes. 2017. “How Best to Identify Chromosomal Interactions: A Comparison of Approaches.” Nature Methods 14 (2): 125–34. Dekker, J. 2002. “Capturing Chromosome Conformation.” Science 295 (5558): 1306–11. Di Pierro, Michele, Bin Zhang, Erez Lieberman Aiden, Peter G. Wolynes, and José N. Onuchic. 2016. “Transferable Model for Chromosome Architecture.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (43): 12168–73. Dixon, Jesse R., Siddarth Selvaraj, Feng Yue, Audrey Kim, Yan Li, Yin Shen, Ming Hu, Jun S. Liu, and Bing Ren. 2012. “Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions.” Nature 485 (7398): 376–80. Dostie, Josée, Todd A. Richmond, Ramy A. Arnaout, Rebecca R. Selzer, William L. Lee, Tracey A. Honan, Eric D. Rubio, et al. 2006. “Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): A Massively Parallel Solution for Mapping Interactions between Genomic Elements.” Genome Research 16 (10): 1299–1309. Duan, Zhijun, Mirela Andronescu, Kevin Schutz, Sean McIlwain, Yoo Jung Kim, Choli Lee, Jay Shendure, Stanley Fields, C. Anthony Blau, and William S. Noble. 2010. “A Three-Dimensional Model of the Yeast Genome.” Nature 465 (7296): 363–67. Flyamer, Ilya M., Johanna Gassler, Maxim Imakaev, Hugo B. Brandão, Sergey V. Ulianov, Nezar Abdennur, Sergey V. Razin, Leonid A. Mirny, and Kikuë Tachibana-Konwalski. 2017. “Single-Nucleus Hi-C Reveals Unique Chromatin Reorganization at Oocyte-to-Zygote Transition.” Nature 544 (7648): 110–14. Forcato, Mattia, Chiara Nicoletti, Koustav Pal, Carmen Maria Livi, Francesco Ferrari, and Silvio Bicciato. 2017. “Comparison of Computational Methods for Hi-C Data Analysis.” Nature Methods 14 (7): 679–85. Fraser, James, Carmelo Ferrai, Andrea M. Chiariello, Markus Schueler, Tiago Rito, Giovanni Laudanno, Mariano Barbieri, et al. 2015. “Hierarchical Folding and Reorganization of Chromosomes Are Linked to Transcriptional Changes in Cellular Differentiation.” Molecular Systems Biology 11 (12): 852. Fudenberg, Geoffrey, Maxim Imakaev, Carolyn Lu, Anton Goloborodko, Nezar Abdennur, and Leonid A. Mirny. 2016. “Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion.” Cell Reports 15 (9): 2038–49. Ganji, Mahipal, Indra A. Shaltiel, Shveta Bisht, Eugene Kim, Ana Kalichava, Christian H. Haering, and Cees Dekker. 2018. “Real-Time Imaging of DNA Loop Extrusion by Condensin.” Science 360 (6384): 102–5. Gassler, Johanna, Hugo B. Brandão, Maxim Imakaev, Ilya M. Flyamer, Sabrina Ladstätter, Wendy A. Bickmore, Jan-Michael Peters, Leonid A. Mirny, and Kikuë Tachibana. 2017. “A Mechanism of Cohesin-Dependent Loop Extrusion Organizes Zygotic Genome Architecture.” The EMBO Journal 36 (24): 3600–3618. Goloborodko, Anton, Maxim V. Imakaev, John F. Marko, and Leonid Mirny. 2016. “Compaction and Segregation of Sister Chromatids via Active Loop Extrusion.” eLife 5 (May). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14864. Gorkin, David U., Danny Leung, and Bing Ren. 2014. “The 3D Genome in Transcriptional Regulation and Pluripotency.” Cell Stem Cell 14 (6): 762–75. Gürsoy, Gamze, Yun Xu, Amy L. Kenter, and Jie Liang. 2014. “Spatial Confinement Is a Major Determinant of the Folding Landscape of Human Chromosomes.” Nucleic Acids Research 42 (13): 8223–30. He, Chao, Michael Q. Zhang, and Xiaowo Wang. 2015. “MICC: An R Package for Identifying Chromatin Interactions from ChIA-PET Data: Fig. 1.” Bioinformatics , btv445. Hnisz, Denes, Abraham S. Weintraub, Daniel S. Day, Anne-Laure Valton, Rasmus O. Bak, Charles H. Li, Johanna Goldmann, et al. 2016. “Activation of Proto-Oncogenes by Disruption of Chromosome Neighborhoods.” Science 351 (6280): 1454–58. Hu, Ming, Ke Deng, Zhaohui Qin, Jesse Dixon, Siddarth Selvaraj, Jennifer Fang, Bing Ren, and Jun S. Liu. 2013. “Bayesian Inference of Spatial Organizations of Chromosomes.” PLoS Computational Biology 9 (1): e1002893. Hu, Ming, Ke Deng, Siddarth Selvaraj, Zhaohui Qin, Bing Ren, and Jun S. Liu. 2012. “HiCNorm: Removing Biases in Hi-C Data via Poisson Regression.” Bioinformatics 28 (23): 3131–33. Imakaev, Maxim, Geoffrey Fudenberg, Rachel Patton McCord, Natalia Naumova, Anton Goloborodko, Bryan R. Lajoie, Job Dekker, and Leonid A. Mirny. 2012. “Iterative Correction of Hi-C Data Reveals Hallmarks of Chromosome Organization.” Nature Methods 9 (10): 999–1003. Jost, Daniel, Pascal Carrivain, Giacomo Cavalli, and Cédric Vaillant. 2014. “Modeling Epigenome Folding: Formation and Dynamics of Topologically Associated Chromatin Domains.” Nucleic Acids Research 42 (15): 9553–61. Jost, Daniel, Cédric Vaillant, and Peter Meister. 2017. “Coupling 1D Modifications and 3D Nuclear Organization: Data, Models and Function.” Current Opinion in Cell Biology 44 (February): 20–27. Laat, Wouter de, and Denis Duboule. 2013. “Topology of Mammalian Developmental Enhancers and Their Regulatory Landscapes.” Nature 502 (7472): 499–506. Lesne, Annick, Julien Riposo, Paul Roger, Axel Cournac, and Julien Mozziconacci. 2014. “3D Genome Reconstruction from Chromosomal Contacts.” Nature Methods 11(11):1141-43. Lieberman-Aiden, Erez, Nynke L. van Berkum, Louise Williams, Maxim Imakaev, Tobias Ragoczy, Agnes Telling, Ido Amit, et al. 2009. “Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome.” Science 326 (5950): 289–93. Li, Guoliang, Melissa J. Fullwood, Han Xu, Fabianus Hendriyan Mulawadi, Stoyan Velkov, Vinsensius Vega, Pramila Nuwantha Ariyaratne, et al. 2010. “ChIA-PET Tool for Comprehensive Chromatin Interaction Analysis with Paired-End Tag Sequencing.” Genome Biology 11 (2): R22. Liu, Tong, and Zheng Wang. 2018. “scHiCNorm: A Software Package to Eliminate Systematic Biases in Single-Cell Hi-C Data.” Bioinformatics 34 (6): 1046–47. Lupiáñez, Darío G., Katerina Kraft, Verena Heinrich, Peter Krawitz, Francesco Brancati, Eva Klopocki, Denise Horn, et al. 2015. “Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions.” Cell 161 (5): 1012–25. Lupiáñez, Darío G., Malte Spielmann, and Stefan Mundlos. 2016. “Breaking TADs: How Alterations of Chromatin Domains Result in Disease.” Trends in Genetics: TIG 32 (4): 225–37. Nasmyth, Kim, and Christian H. Haering. 2009. “Cohesin: Its Roles and Mechanisms.” Annual Review of Genetics 43 (1): 525–58. Nora, Elphège P., Anton Goloborodko, Anne-Laure Valton, Johan H. Gibcus, Alec Uebersohn, Nezar Abdennur, Job Dekker, Leonid A. Mirny, and Benoit G. Bruneau. 2017. “Targeted Degradation of CTCF Decouples Local Insulation of Chromosome Domains from Genomic Compartmentalization.” Cell 169 (5): 930–44.e22. Ong, Chin-Tong, and Victor G. Corces. 2014. “CTCF: An Architectural Protein Bridging Genome Topology and Function.” Nature Reviews. Genetics 15 (4): 234–46. Parada, Luis A., and Tom Misteli. 2002. “Chromosome Positioning in the Interphase Nucleus.” Trends in Cell Biology 12 (9): 425–32. Paulsen, Jonas, Tonje G. Lien, Geir Kjetil Sandve, Lars Holden, Ornulf Borgan, Ingrid K. Glad, and Eivind Hovig. 2013. “Handling Realistic Assumptions in Hypothesis Testing of 3D Co-Localization of Genomic Elements.” Nucleic Acids Research 41 (10): 5164–74. Paulsen, Jonas, Einar A. Rødland, Lars Holden, Marit Holden, and Eivind Hovig. 2014. “A Statistical Model of ChIA-PET Data for Accurate Detection of Chromatin 3D Interactions.” Nucleic Acids Research 42 (18): e143. Phanstiel, Douglas H., Alan P. Boyle, Nastaran Heidari, and Michael P. Snyder. 2015. “Mango: A Bias-Correcting ChIA-PET Analysis Pipeline.” Bioinformatics 31 (19): 3092–98. Phillips, Jennifer E., and Victor G. Corces. 2009. “CTCF: Master Weaver of the Genome.” Cell 137 (7): 1194–1211. Pope, Benjamin D., Tyrone Ryba, Vishnu Dileep, Feng Yue, Weisheng Wu, Olgert Denas, Daniel L. Vera, et al. 2014. “Topologically Associating Domains Are Stable Units of Replication-Timing Regulation.” Nature 515 (7527): 402–5. Rao, Suhas S. P., Su-Chen Huang, Brian Glenn St Hilaire, Jesse M. Engreitz, Elizabeth M. Perez, Kyong-Rim Kieffer-Kwon, Adrian L. Sanborn, et al. 2017. “Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains.” Cell 171 (2): 305–20.e24. Rao, Suhas S. P., Miriam H. Huntley, Neva C. Durand, Elena K. Stamenova, Ivan D. Bochkov, James T. Robinson, Adrian L. Sanborn, et al. 2014. “A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping.” Cell 159 (7): 1665–80. Rosa, Angelo, and Ralf Everaers. 2008. “Structure and Dynamics of Interphase Chromosomes.” PLoS Computational Biology 4 (8): e1000153. Rousseau, Mathieu, James Fraser, Maria A. Ferraiuolo, Josée Dostie, and Mathieu Blanchette. 2011. “Three-Dimensional Modeling of Chromatin Structure from Interaction Frequency Data Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling.” BMC Bioinformatics 12 (October): 414. Sanborn, Adrian L., Suhas S. P. Rao, Su-Chen Huang, Neva C. Durand, Miriam H. Huntley, Andrew I. Jewett, Ivan D. Bochkov, et al. 2015. “Chromatin Extrusion Explains Key Features of Loop and Domain Formation in Wild-Type and Engineered Genomes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (47): E6456–65. Schoenfelder, Stefan, Mayra Furlan-Magaril, Borbala Mifsud, Filipe Tavares-Cadete, Robert Sugar, Biola-Maria Javierre, Takashi Nagano, et al. 2015. “The Pluripotent Regulatory Circuitry Connecting Promoters to Their Long-Range Interacting Elements.” Genome Research 25 (4): 582–97. Schoenfelder, Stefan, Robert Sugar, Andrew Dimond, Biola-Maria Javierre, Harry Armstrong, Borbala Mifsud, Emilia Dimitrova, et al. 2015. “Polycomb Repressive Complex PRC1 Spatially Constrains the Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Genome.” Nature Genetics 47 (10): 1179–86. Serra, François, Davide Baù, Mike Goodstadt, David Castillo, Guillaume J. Filion, and Marc A. Marti-Renom. 2017. “Automatic Analysis and 3D-Modelling of Hi-C Data Using TADbit Reveals Structural Features of the Fly Chromatin Colors.” PLoS Computational Biology 13 (7): e1005665. Serra, François, Marco Di Stefano, Yannick G. Spill, Yasmina Cuartero, Michael Goodstadt, Davide Baù, and Marc A. Marti-Renom. 2015. “Restraint-Based Three-Dimensional Modeling of Genomes and Genomic Domains.” FEBS Letters 589 (20 Pt A): 2987–95. Sexton, Tom, Eitan Yaffe, Ephraim Kenigsberg, Frédéric Bantignies, Benjamin Leblanc, Michael Hoichman, Hugues Parrinello, Amos Tanay, and Giacomo Cavalli. 2012. “Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome.” Cell 148 (3): 458–72. Spitz, François. 2016. “Gene Regulation at a Distance: From Remote Enhancers to 3D Regulatory Ensembles.” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 57: 57–67. Tang, Zhonghui, Oscar Junhong Luo, Xingwang Li, Meizhen Zheng, Jacqueline Jufen Zhu, Przemyslaw Szalaj, Pawel Trzaskoma, et al. 2015. “CTCF-Mediated Human 3D Genome Architecture Reveals Chromatin Topology for Transcription.” Cell 163 (7): 1611–27. Tanizawa, Hideki, Osamu Iwasaki, Atsunari Tanaka, Joseph R. Capizzi, Priyankara Wickramasinghe, Mihee Lee, Zhiyan Fu, and Ken-Ichi Noma. 2010. “Mapping of Long-Range Associations throughout the Fission Yeast Genome Reveals Global Genome Organization Linked to Transcriptional Regulation.” Nucleic Acids Research 38 (22): 8164–77. Wang, Siyu, Jinbo Xu, and Jianyang Zeng. 2015. “Inferential Modeling of 3D Chromatin Structure.” Nucleic Acids Research 43 (8): e54. Wang, Xue Qing David, and Josée Dostie. 2017. “Chromosome Folding and Its Regulation in Health and Disease.” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 43 (April): 23–30. Wendt, Kerstin S., Keisuke Yoshida, Takehiko Itoh, Masashige Bando, Birgit Koch, Erika Schirghuber, Shuichi Tsutsumi, et al. 2008. “Cohesin Mediates Transcriptional Insulation by CCCTC-Binding Factor.” Nature 451 (7180): 796–801. Xu, Bingxiang, and Zhihua Zhang. 2016. “Computational Inference of Physical Spatial Organization of Eukaryotic Genomes.” Quantitative Biology 4 (4): 302–9. Yaffe, Eitan, and Amos Tanay. 2011. “Probabilistic Modeling of Hi-C Contact Maps Eliminates Systematic Biases to Characterize Global Chromosomal Architecture.” Nature Genetics 43 (11): 1059–65. Zhang, Zhizhuo, Guoliang Li, Kim-Chuan Toh, and Wing-Kin Sung. 2013. “3D Chromosome Modeling with Semi-Definite Programming and Hi-C Data.” Journal of Computational Biology: A Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology 20 (11): 831–46.-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedPhd thesis-
item.fullcitationSZALAJ, Przemek (2019) Modeling and analysis of spatial genome organization.-
item.contributorSZALAJ, Przemek-
item.embargoEndDate2024-10-28-
item.accessRightsEmbargoed Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:PhD theses
Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20190304 Doctoraat Przemyslaw Szalaj pag102.pdf
  Until 2024-10-28
10.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

92
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

44
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.