Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27945
Title: Comparative Analysis of Symbolic Reasoning Models for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
Authors: FRIAS DOMINGUEZ, Mabel 
Filiberto, Yaima
Falcon, Rafael
NAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo 
Bello, Rafael
VANHOOF, Koen 
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
Source: Bello, R.; Falcon, R.; Verdegay, J. (Ed.). Uncertainty Management with Fuzzy and Rough Sets, SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG, p. 127-139
Series/Report: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing
Series/Report no.: 377
Abstract: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) can be defined as recurrent neural networks that allow modeling complex systems using concepts and causal relations. While this Soft Computing technique has proven to be a valuable knowledge-based tool for building Decision Support Systems, further improvements related to its transparency are still required. In this paper, we focus on designing an FCM-based model where both the causal weights and concepts’ activation values are described by words like low, medium or high. Hybridizing FCMs and the Computing with Words paradigm leads to cognitive models closer to human reasoning, making it more comprehensible for decision makers. The simulations using a well-known case study related to simulation scenarios illustrate the soundness and potential application of the proposed model.
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27945
ISBN: 9783030104627
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10463-4_7
Rights: Copyright Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
Category: B2
Type: Book Section
Validations: vabb 2021
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
chapter.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version363.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
10.1007@978-3-030-10463-47.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version540.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Page view(s)

136
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

96
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.