Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27945
Title: | Comparative Analysis of Symbolic Reasoning Models for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps | Authors: | FRIAS DOMINGUEZ, Mabel Filiberto, Yaima Falcon, Rafael NAPOLES RUIZ, Gonzalo Bello, Rafael VANHOOF, Koen |
Issue Date: | 2019 | Publisher: | SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG | Source: | Bello, R.; Falcon, R.; Verdegay, J. (Ed.). Uncertainty Management with Fuzzy and Rough Sets, SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG, p. 127-139 | Series/Report: | Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing | Series/Report no.: | 377 | Abstract: | Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) can be defined as recurrent neural networks that allow modeling complex systems using concepts and causal relations. While this Soft Computing technique has proven to be a valuable knowledge-based tool for building Decision Support Systems, further improvements related to its transparency are still required. In this paper, we focus on designing an FCM-based model where both the causal weights and concepts’ activation values are described by words like low, medium or high. Hybridizing FCMs and the Computing with Words paradigm leads to cognitive models closer to human reasoning, making it more comprehensible for decision makers. The simulations using a well-known case study related to simulation scenarios illustrate the soundness and potential application of the proposed model. | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/27945 | ISBN: | 9783030104627 | DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-030-10463-4_7 | Rights: | Copyright Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 | Category: | B2 | Type: | Book Section | Validations: | vabb 2021 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
chapter.pdf Restricted Access | Peer-reviewed author version | 363.61 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
10.1007@978-3-030-10463-47.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 540.02 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
checked on Oct 14, 2024
Page view(s)
136
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
96
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.