Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuldhammer Skjerbæk, Anders-
dc.contributor.authorBoesen, Finn-
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Thor-
dc.contributor.authorVestergaard Rasmussen, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorStenager, Egon-
dc.contributor.authorNørgaard, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorFEYS, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorKjeldgaard-Jørgensen, Marie Louise-
dc.contributor.authorGrøndahl Hvid, Lars-
dc.contributor.authorDalgas, Ulrik-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-27T10:10:28Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-27T10:10:28Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationMultiple Sclerosis Journal,-
dc.identifier.issn1352-4585-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/28264-
dc.description.abstractBackground: In multiple sclerosis (MS), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) reflects disease severity. Although parts of the EDSS are dependent on actual walking distance, self-reported statements are often applied. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was, therefore, to compare self-reported walking distance to actual walking distance to outline how this influences EDSS scoring. Methods: MS patients with EDSS 4.0–7.5 (n=273) were included from the Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study (n=427). All patients subjectively classified their maximal walking distance according to one of seven categories (>500; 300–499; 200–299; 100–199; 20–99; 5–19; 0–4m). Subsequently, actual maximal walking distance was assessed and EDSS was determined from both self-reported walking distance (EDSSself-report) and actual walking distance (EDSSactual). Results: In 145 patients (53%), self-reported walking distance was misclassified when compared to the actual walking distance. Misclassification was more frequent in patients using walking aids (64% vs. 44%, p<0.05) and in patients with primary progressive MS (69%, p<0.05). Misclassification of walking distance corresponded to incorrect EDSS scores (EDSSself-report vs EDSSactual) of ⩾0.5 point in 24%. Conclusion: In MS patients with EDSS 4.0–7.5, 53% misclassified their walking distance yielding incorrect EDSS scores in 24%. Therefore, correct EDSS determination must be based on measurement of actual walking distance.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD-
dc.subject.otherOutcome measurement; EDSS; Walking; primary progressive MS; multiple sclerosis; Expanded Disability Status Scale-
dc.titleCan we trust self-reported walking distance when determining EDSS scores in patients with multiple sclerosis? The Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1660-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spage1653-
dc.identifier.volume25-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.place1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.source.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1352458518795416-
dc.identifier.isi000489170300013-
dc.identifier.eissn-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationGuldhammer Skjerbæk, Anders; Boesen, Finn; Petersen, Thor; Vestergaard Rasmussen, Peter; Stenager, Egon; Nørgaard, Michael; FEYS, Peter; Kjeldgaard-Jørgensen, Marie Louise; Grøndahl Hvid, Lars & Dalgas, Ulrik (2018) Can we trust self-reported walking distance when determining EDSS scores in patients with multiple sclerosis? The Danish MS hospitals rehabilitation study. In: Multiple Sclerosis Journal,.-
item.contributorGuldhammer Skjerbæk, Anders-
item.contributorBoesen, Finn-
item.contributorPetersen, Thor-
item.contributorVestergaard Rasmussen, Peter-
item.contributorStenager, Egon-
item.contributorNørgaard, Michael-
item.contributorFEYS, Peter-
item.contributorKjeldgaard-Jørgensen, Marie Louise-
item.contributorGrøndahl Hvid, Lars-
item.contributorDalgas, Ulrik-
crisitem.journal.issn1352-4585-
crisitem.journal.eissn1477-0970-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1352458518795416.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version481 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.