Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBAMPS, Bram-
dc.contributor.authorD'huys, Karlien-
dc.contributor.authorSchreib, Ina-
dc.contributor.authorStephan, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorDe Ketelaere, Bart-
dc.contributor.authorPEETERS, Roos-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-28T09:01:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-28T09:01:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 32(7), p. 335-344-
dc.identifier.issn0894-3214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/28290-
dc.description.abstractA method is presented to apply solid powder/granulate contamination (ground coffee, blood powder) in between the heat conductive seals of flexible packaging materials. A response surface method is tested and validated to optimize seal strength of heat conductive sealing with and without solid contamination. In this study, a maximal seal strength is defined as optimal. Using these methods, three typical packaging films with varying seal layer composition (metallocene LLDPE, plastomer and sodium ionomer) are maximized towards contaminated seal strength. Contamination caused a decrease in seal strength and narrowed down the process window (seal temperature and time combinations) in which at least 90% of the maximal strength is obtained. The influence of seal layer composition on the clean and solid (ground coffee, blood powder) contaminated seal performance (seal strength, process window and leak tightness) was evaluated. The film with the plastomer based seal layer outperformed the other films with respect to the width of the process window. It also reached a higher seal strength and a higher amount of leak tight seals (evaluated with the dye penetration test) after optimization. The hot tack test was evaluated as predictive test for the contaminated seal strength. The results of this study do not support an indicative relationship.-
dc.description.sponsorshipAgentschap Innoveren & Ondernemen (VLAIO-TETRA nr. 150817)) and German government (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi, IGF project no. 172 EBR))-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. © 2019 The Authors. Packaging Technology and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd-
dc.subject.otherseal through contamination; response surface model; hot tack; polyethylene; process window-
dc.titleEvaluation and Optimization of seal behavior through solid contamination of heat sealed films-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage344-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage335-
dc.identifier.volume32-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.references[1] Hishinuma K. Heat sealing technology and engineering for packaging: Principles and applications. DEStech Publications inc 2009, Lancaster, pp. 30-42. ISBN: 978-1-932078-85-5. [2] Tauschitz B, Washüttl M, Wepner B, Tacker M. MAP-Verpackungen: ein Drittel nicht optimal. PACKaktuell, DE 2003; 04, pp. 6–8. [3] Dudbridge M, Turner R. Seal integrity and the impact on food waste. http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Household_food_and_drink_waste_in_the_UK_-_report.pdf, date of access:22/11/2018. WRAP 2009. ISBN: 1-84405-430-6. [4] Morris B. 2017. The science and technology of flexible packaging - multilayer films from resin and process to end use. Elsevier inc 2016, Amsterdam, pp. 216-218, 249-250. ISBN: 978-0-323-24273-8. [5] Simpson MF, Presa JL. (1996): A Comparison of AFFINITY Plastomers Produced via INSITE Technology with Ethylene/Acrylic Acid Copolymers, Ionomers, and ULDPE. In: Future-Pak 1996, Chicago, USA. [6] Mesnil P, Rohse N, Arnauts J. Halle, RW. (2000): Seal Trough Contamination Performance of Metallocene Plastomers. In: TAPPI Polymers, Laminations, & Coatings Conference 2000, Chicago, USA. [7] Morris B. Sure ways to reduce package sealing failure. http://www2.dupont.com/Packaging_Resins/en_US/assets/downloads/white_papers/Reduce_Package_Sealing_Failure_Barry_Morris_November_2010.pdf, date of access: 22/11/2018. Dupont 2010. [8] Bach S, Thürling K, Majschak J-P. Ultrasonic Sealing of Flexible Packaging Films - Principle and Characteristics of an Alternative Sealing Method. Packaging Technology and Science 2011, 25 (4), pp. 233–248, DOI: 10.1002/pts.972. [9] Sadegi F,Ajji A. Application of single site catalyst metallocene polyethylenes in extruded films: effect of molecular structure on sealability, flexural cracking and mechanical properties. The Canadian journal of chemical engineering 2014, 92 (7), pp 1181-1188 2014. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.21964. [10] Bilgen M, Van Dun J. Hermetic sealing of flexible packages. In: International polyolefins conference 2014, Houston, USA. [11] D’huys, K, Bamps B. Peeters R, De Ketelaere B. Multi-criteria evaluation and optimization of the ultrasonic sealing performance based on design of experiments and response surface methodology. Accepted for publication in Packaging Technology and Science. [12] Antony J. Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists. Elsevier 2003, Amsterdam. ISBN: 9780750647090. [13] Jensen WA. Confirmation runs in design of experiments. Journal of Quality Technology. 2016, 48(2), pp 162-177, DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2016.11918157. [14] Sierra JD, Noriega MD, Nicolais V. Effect of metallocene polyethylene on heat sealing properties of low density polyethylene blends. Journal of plastic film and sheeting 2000, 16 (1), pp. 33-42, DOI: 10.1106/YYFG-9KH1-R7QU-VK9H. [15] Ward M, Li M. Seal-through-contamination and caulkability – an evaluation of sealants’ ability to encapsulate contaminants in the seal area. In: Tappi place conference 2016, Fort Worth, USA. [16] Suenaga S, Hirasawa E. Connection between Hot Tack Force and Form-Fill-Seal Performance of Packaging Films. J-stage 2004, 16(7), 450-458; DOI: 10.4325/seikeikakou.16.450. [17] Theller HW. Heatsealability of flexible web materials in hot-bar sealing applications, Journal of plastic film and sheeting 1989, 5(1), pp. 66-93, DOI: 10.1177/875608798900500107. [18] Stehling FC and Meka P. Heat sealing of semicrystalline polymer films. I. Calculation and measurement of interfacial temperatures: effect of process variables on seal properties. Journal of applied polymer science 1994, 51(1), pp. 89-103, DOI: 10.1002/app.1994.070510111.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pts.2442-
item.contributorBAMPS, Bram-
item.contributorD'huys, Karlien-
item.contributorSchreib, Ina-
item.contributorStephan, Benjamin-
item.contributorDe Ketelaere, Bart-
item.contributorPEETERS, Roos-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationBAMPS, Bram; D'huys, Karlien; Schreib, Ina; Stephan, Benjamin; De Ketelaere, Bart & PEETERS, Roos (2019) Evaluation and Optimization of seal behavior through solid contamination of heat sealed films. In: PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 32(7), p. 335-344.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn0894-3214-
crisitem.journal.eissn1099-1522-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Packag Technol Sci - 2019 - Bamps - Evaluation and optimization of seal behaviour through solid contamination of.pdfPublished version986.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on May 2, 2024

Page view(s)

88
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Download(s)

252
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.