Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28296
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorD'huys, Karlien-
dc.contributor.authorBAMPS, Bram-
dc.contributor.authorPEETERS, Roos-
dc.contributor.authorDe Ketelaere, Bart-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-28T09:31:01Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-28T09:31:01Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPackaging Technology & Science, 32 (4), p. 165-174-
dc.identifier.issn0894-3214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/28296-
dc.description.abstractProper closure is an essential packaging quality aspect and can, amongst others, be achieved with ultrasonic sealing. The ultrasonic sealing performance depends on the film type, and the seal settings, such as seal time, applied force and ultrasonic amplitude. Because these parameters are less intuitive than heat seal parameters and optimal settings are undefined for many films, this work presents an efficient approach to evaluate the effect of these settings on the ultrasonic sealing performance. An experimental design defines the experiments to perform. A response surface methodology is then used to model the relation between seal settings and sealing performance. Based on these models, the seal settings are optimized. As there are several criteria to express sealing performance, single‐criteria and multicriteria optimizations are described. The approach was illustrated for a polyethylene terephthalate/linear low‐density polyethylene‐C4 film. The seal settings were optimized to obtain high seal strength, limited ultrasonic horn displacement, and low seal energy. The optimum settings were 0.1 seconds (seal time), 4.32 N/mm (force), and 28.75 μm (amplitude). The predicted optimum strength, horn displacement, and energy were 2.32 N/mm, 40 μm, and 11.66 J, respectively. Besides the optimum, the seal window is also of interest. A broad seal window ensures sufficient seal strength for a wide range of settings. For the polyethylene terephthalate/linear low‐density polyethylene‐C4 film, a strength of ≥90% of the optimum was obtained for 39% of the input combinations within the design space. The presented approach is widely applicable (other films and sealing processes) since it is flexible in the input parameters, design, and responses.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was performed within the TETRA project number 140313 “ULTRASEAL: The potential of ultrasonic sealing in packages,” funded by Agentschap Innoveren and Ondernemen (VLAIO). Bart De Ketelaere is research manager supported by the Industrial Research Fund of the KU Leuven.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd-
dc.subject.otherdesign of experiments-
dc.subject.othermulticriteria seal optimization-
dc.subject.otherpolyolefin packaging-
dc.subject.otherresponse surface methodology-
dc.subject.otherultrasonic sealing-
dc.titleMulticriteria evaluation and optimization of the ultrasonic sealing performance based on design of experiments and response surface methodology-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage174-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage165-
dc.identifier.volume32-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.references1. Robertson GL. Food Packaging: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006. 2. Dudbridge M. Handbook of Seal Integrity in the Food Industry. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2016. 3. Coles R, McDowell D, Kirwan MJ. Food Packaging Technology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2003. 4. Hishinuma K. Heat Sealing Technology and Engineering for Packaging: Principles and Applications. Lancaster: DESTech Publications Inc.; 2009. 5. Theller HW. Heat sealability of flexible web materials in hot-bar sealing applications. J Plast Film Sheeting. 1989;5:66-93. 6. Stehling FC, Meka P. Heat sealing of semicrystalline polymer films. II. Effect of melting distribution on heat-sealing behavior of polyolefins. J Appl Polym Sci. 1994;51(1):105-119. 7. Nase M, Bach S, Zankel JP, Majschak JP, Grellman W. Ultrasonic sealing versus heat conductive sealing of polyethylene/polybutene-1 peel films. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;130(1):383-393. 8. Bach S, Thürling K, Majschak JP. Ultrasonic sealing of flexible packaging films - Principle and characteristics of an alternative sealing method. Packag Technol Sci. 2012;25(4):233-248. 9. van Oordt T, Barb Y, Zengerle R, von Stetten F. Lamination of polyethylene composite films by ultrasonic welding: Investigation of peel behavior and identification of optimum welding parameters. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014:40291-1-40291-40297. 10. Stoehr N, Baudrit B, Haberstroh E, Nase M, Heidemeyer P, Bastian M. Ultrasonic welding of plasticized PLA films. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014:41351-1-41351-41358. 11. Planes E, Flandin L. Optimizing the heat sealing parameters of multilayer polymeric films. J Mater Sci. 2011;46:5948-5958. 12. Najarzadeh Z, Ajji A. A novel approach toward the effect of seal process parameters on final seal strength and microstructure of LLDPE. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014;28(16):1592-1609. 13. Matthews J, Hicks B, Mullineux G, et al. An empirical into the influence of sealing crimp geometry and process settings on the seal integrity of traditional and biopolymer packaging materials. Packag Technol Sci. 2013;26:355-371. 14. Aithani D, Lockhart H, Auras R, Tansprasert K. Heat sealing measurement by an innovative technique. Packag Technol Sci. 2006;19:245-257. 15. Yuan CS, Hassan A, Ghazali MIH, Ismail AF. Heat sealability of laminated films with LLDPE and LDPE as the sealant materials in bar sealing applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2007;104(6):3736-3745. 16. Dixon D, Eatock J, Meenan BJ, Morgan M. Application of Design of Experiments (DOE) techniques to process validation in medical device manufacture. J Valid Technol. 2006;12(2):1-9. 17. Hron J, Macák T. Application of design of experiments to welding process of food packaging. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun. 2013;LXI(100):909-915. 18. Aiyengar R, Divecha J. Experimental and statistical analysis of the effects of the processing parameters on the seal strength of heat sealed, biaxially oriented polypropylene film for flexible food packaging applications. J Plast Film Sheeting. 2012;28(3):244-256. 19. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta. 2008;76:965-977. 20. International A. ASTM F88/F88M-15 Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials. West Conshohocken; 2015. www.astm.org. 21. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 8th ed. New York: Wiley; 2012. 22. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2011. 23. Miller A. Subset Selection in Regression. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2002. 24. Zhang Z. Variable selection with stepwise and best subset approaches. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(7):136. 25. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodal inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res. 2004;33:261-304. 26. Antony J. Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003. 27. Jensen WA. Confirmation runs in design of experiments. J Qual Technol. 2016;48(2):162-177.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pts.2425-
dc.identifier.isi000460337100001-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.contributorD'huys, Karlien-
item.contributorBAMPS, Bram-
item.contributorPEETERS, Roos-
item.contributorDe Ketelaere, Bart-
item.fullcitationD'huys, Karlien; BAMPS, Bram; PEETERS, Roos & De Ketelaere, Bart (2019) Multicriteria evaluation and optimization of the ultrasonic sealing performance based on design of experiments and response surface methodology. In: Packaging Technology & Science, 32 (4), p. 165-174.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0894-3214-
crisitem.journal.eissn1099-1522-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dhuys_et_al-2019-Packaging_Technology_and_Science.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Evaluation and Optimization of seal behavior through solid contamination of heat sealed films_REVISION.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.