Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28410
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLIEBEN, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorJOUCK, Toon-
dc.contributor.authorDEPAIRE, Benoit-
dc.contributor.authorJANS, Mieke-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-14T09:07:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-14T09:07:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationPergl, Robert; Babkin, Eduard; Lock, Russel; Malyzhenkov, Pavel; Merunka, V. (Ed.). EOMAS 2018: Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation, Springer International Publishing,p. 49-62-
dc.identifier.isbn9783030007874-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/28410-
dc.description.abstractIn the domain of process discovery, there are four quality dimensions for evaluating process models of which simplicity is one. Simplicity is often measured using the size of a process model, the structuredness and the entropy. It is closely related to the process model understandability. Researchers from the domain of business process management (BPM) proposed several metrics for measuring the process model understandability. A part of these understandability metrics focus on the control-flow perspective, which is important for evaluating models from process discovery algorithms. It is remarkable that there are more of these metrics defined in the BPM literature compared to the number of proposed simplicity metrics. To research whether the understandability metrics capture more understandability dimensions than the simplicity metrics, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 18 understandability metrics. A sample of 4450 BPMN models, both manually modelled and artificially generated, is used. Four dimensions are discovered: token behaviour complexity, node IO complexity, path complexity and degree of connectedness. The conclusion of this analysis is that process analysts should be aware that the measurement of simplicity does not capture all dimensions of the understandability of process models.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Business Information Processing-
dc.rightsSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2018-
dc.subject.otherUnderstandability metrics; Simplicity; Process models; Exploratory factor analysis; BPMN-
dc.titleAn Improved Way for Measuring Simplicity During Process Discovery-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsPergl, Robert-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsBabkin, Eduard-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsLock, Russel-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsMalyzhenkov, Pavel-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsMerunka, V.-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate11 Jun 2018 - 12 Jun 2018-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameWorkshop on Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceTalinn, Estonia-
dc.identifier.epage62-
dc.identifier.spage49-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
dc.description.notesLieben, J (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium. FWO, Egmontstr 5, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium. jonas.lieben@uhasselt.be-
local.publisher.placeCham-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.relation.ispartofseriesnr332-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-00787-4_4-
dc.identifier.isi000465015700004-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleEOMAS 2018: Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationLIEBEN, Jonas; JOUCK, Toon; DEPAIRE, Benoit & JANS, Mieke (2018) An Improved Way for Measuring Simplicity During Process Discovery. In: Pergl, Robert; Babkin, Eduard; Lock, Russel; Malyzhenkov, Pavel; Merunka, V. (Ed.). EOMAS 2018: Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation, Springer International Publishing,p. 49-62.-
item.contributorLIEBEN, Jonas-
item.contributorJOUCK, Toon-
item.contributorDEPAIRE, Benoit-
item.contributorJANS, Mieke-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on May 1, 2024

Page view(s)

160
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

116
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.