Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28858
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREINOLSMANN, Nora-
dc.contributor.authorAlhajyaseen, Wael-
dc.contributor.authorBRIJS, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorROSS, Veerle-
dc.contributor.authorTimmermans, Chantal-
dc.contributor.authorPIRDAVANI, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorHUSSAIN, Qinaat-
dc.contributor.authorBRIJS, Kris-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-02T08:22:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-02T08:22:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 44(10), p. 8439-8450.-
dc.identifier.issn2193-567X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/28858-
dc.description.abstractGraphical route information panels (GRIPs) are an alternative to conventional text-based variable message signs to address different traveler information needs. Since drivers are traveling at higher speeds on the motorways, they have to quickly comprehend and correctly respond to the graphical information displayed on a GRIP. Design elements like the shape of the route map, the meaning of colors indicating congestion and the font sizes of main and minor destinations along the route can influence the comprehension times of drivers. In this study, GRIPs with two purposes (congestion information and event destination information) were presented to 49 Belgian drivers in a computer-based task. All GRIPs were presented on an abstract and naturalistic motorway network shape. Half of the GRIPs were presented with congestion-related colors (red-only or red–orange), and the other half were presented with additional destinations being displayed in different or same font sizes to facilitate drivers visual search on theGRIP. Firstly, travel information statementswere presented to the participant, followed by a displayed GRIP layout. Afterward, the participant had to indicate as fast as possible whether the subsequently shown GRIP confirmed the same travel statement. The subjects’ response accuracy and response times were recorded to assess drivers’ quick comprehension of the graphical content. The results of a repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that for GRIP displaying congestion, the red-color element (and not the map shape) significantly reduced drivers response times. A survey among participants also revealed a preference for two-color congestion information, if shown on an abstract map shape. An abstract map shape in combination with different font sizes for major and minor destinations improved drivers’ comprehension and response times to the GRIP, whereas different destination font sizes displayed on a naturalistic map had the contrary effect. The results highlight the importance of graphical design elements with respect to the information purpose.-
dc.description.sponsorshipNPRP Award (NPRP 9-360-2-150) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation)-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG-
dc.subject.otherTraveler information systems-
dc.subject.otherGraphical route information panel-
dc.subject.otherResponse time-
dc.subject.otherResponse accuracy-
dc.subject.otherPanel layout-
dc.subject.otherIntelligent transportation systems-
dc.titleInvestigating the Impacts of Graphical Route Information Panel Layouts on Drivers’ Comprehension and Response Time-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage8450-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage8439-
dc.identifier.volume44-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.publisher.placeTIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY-
dc.relation.references1. Shalloe, S.; Sharples, S.C.; Burnett, G.;Crundall,D.; Meekums, R.; Morris, D.:Developing a graphical route information panel (GRIP) for use on the UK motorway network. The first steps. Transp. Res. Part F 27, 133–149 (2014) 2. Albert Gan, P.D.; Dibakar Saha, M.S.; Kirolos Haleem, P.D.; Priyanka Alluri, P.D.; Dennis McCarthy, P.D.: Best practices in the use of hybrid static–dynamic signs. Final report (2012) 3. Aitken, R.J.; Conway, A.; Walton, C.M.: “Implementing graphic route information panels (GRIPs) in the United States. ITE J. Inst. Transp. Eng. 82(3), 42–47 (2012) 4. Rijkswaterstaat.: Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu: Richtlijn Informatievoorziening op (berm) DRIPs, pp. 1–69 (2012) 5. Gan, H.; Sun, L.; Chen, J.: Advanced traveler information system for metropolitan expressways in Shanghai. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1944, 35–40 (2006) 6. Boddington, K.; Ralston, K.; Weeratunga, K.: Kwinana Freeway all lane running sign comprehension study, p. 13p (2014) 7. Gan, H.;Chen, S.:Why do drivers change routes? Impact of graphical route information panels. ITE J. Inst. Transp. Eng. 83(8), 38–43 (2013) 8. Richards, A.; Mcdonald, M.; Fisher, G.; Brackstone, M.: Investigation of driver comprehension of traffic information on graphical congestion display panels using a driving simulator. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 4(4), 417–435 (2005) 9. Lai, C.J.: Drivers’ comprehension of traffic information on graphical route information panels. Accid. Anal. Prev. 45, 565–571 (2012) 10. Yang, C.; Waters, D.; Cabrera, C.C.; Wang, J.; Collyer, C.E.: Enhancing the messages displayed on dynamicmessage signs. System 1997, 111–118 (2001) 11. Sharples, S.; Shalloe, S.; Burnett, G.; Crundall, D.: Journey decision making: the influence on drivers of dynamic information presented on variable message signs. Cogn. Technol. Work 18(2), 303–317 (2016) 12. Schönfeld, M.; Reischl, G.; Tsavachidis, A.: Dynamic driver information goes graphical: a new quality in urban traffic information. In: World Congress Intelligent Transport Systems Proceedings: From Vision To Reality (2000) 13. Ullman, B.; Ullman, G.; Dudek, C.; Ramirez, E.: Legibility distances of smaller letters in changeable message signs with lightemitting diodes. Transp. Res. Rec. 1918(1), 56–62 (2005) 14. Driver, J.; Monsell, S.: Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance, vol. XVIII. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000) 15. Theeuwes, J.: Visual selection: usually fast and automatic; seldom slow and volitional. J. Cogn. 1(1), 1–15 (2018) 16. Erke, A.; Sagberg, F.; Hagman, R.: Effects of route guidance variable message signs (VMS) on driver behaviour. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10(6), 447–457 (2007) 17. Cummings, M.: Electronic signs strategies and their benefits. In: Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, pp. 141–144 (1994) 18. Davidsson, F.; Taylor, N.: ITS modelling in Sweden using CONTRAM (2003) 19. Arbaiza, A.; Lucas-Alba, A.: Variable message signs harmonization principles of VMS messages design supporting guideline, pp. 1–60 (2012) 20. Ullman, G.L.; Brydia, R.; Nelson, A.; Higgins, L.; Baker, R.; Geiselbrecht, T.: Graphical route information panel signs for southbound I-35 and SH 130 travel through Austin, vol. 7, no. 19 (2012) 21. Sun, L.; Lu, J.; Yao, L.; Rong, J.: Simulation analysis on driving behavior during traffic sign recognition. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 4(3), 353–360 (2011) 22. Ullman, B.R.; Trout, N.D.; Dudek, C.L.: Use of graphics and symbols on dynamic message signs: technical report,” vol. 7, no. 2 (2009) 23. Klauer, S.G.; Dingus, T.A.; Neale, V.L.; Sudweeks, J.D.; Ramsey, D.J.: The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. NHTSA, DOT HS 810 594, Washington, DC (2006) 24. Arentze, T.A.; Dellaert, B.G.C.; Timmermans, H.J.P.: Modeling and measuring individuals’ mental representations of complex spatio-temporal decision problems. Environ. Behav. 40(6), 843–869 (2008) 25. Montesinos, M.; Ortelli, N.; Kazagli, E.; Bellocchi, L.; Geroliminis, N.: Modeling simplicity in drivers route choice behavior. In: STRC (2017) 26. Wang, J.; Cao, Y.: Assessing message display formats of portable variable message signs. Transp. Res. Rec. 1937, 113–119 (2005)-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.source.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13369-019-04014-2-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000486026700020-
dc.identifier.eissn-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationREINOLSMANN, Nora; Alhajyaseen, Wael; BRIJS, Tom; ROSS, Veerle; Timmermans, Chantal; PIRDAVANI, Ali; HUSSAIN, Qinaat & BRIJS, Kris (2019) Investigating the Impacts of Graphical Route Information Panel Layouts on Drivers’ Comprehension and Response Time. In: ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 44(10), p. 8439-8450..-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.contributorREINOLSMANN, Nora-
item.contributorAlhajyaseen, Wael-
item.contributorBRIJS, Tom-
item.contributorROSS, Veerle-
item.contributorTimmermans, Chantal-
item.contributorPIRDAVANI, Ali-
item.contributorHUSSAIN, Qinaat-
item.contributorBRIJS, Kris-
item.validationecoom 2020-
crisitem.journal.issn2193-567X-
crisitem.journal.eissn2191-4281-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
[CLEAR COPY]_Reinolsmann_GRIPmanuscript.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version634.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Reinolsmann2019_Article_InvestigatingTheImpactsOfGraph.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version840.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

142
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

66
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.