Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/28927
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAUBERT BONN, Noemie-
dc.contributor.authorPINXTEN, Wim-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-08T13:44:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-08T13:44:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, p. 338-352-
dc.identifier.issn1556-2646-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/28927-
dc.description.abstractResearch on research integrity has become a field of its own; yet, a comprehensive overview the field is still missing. We systematically searched SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed for relevant articles published between 2005 and 2015. We extracted the topic, methodology, focus, and citations from each articles. From the 986 articles included, only 342 report empirical data. Empirical papers predominantly targeted researchers and students. Although empirical articles questioning causes for misconduct mostly blamed research systems (e.g., pressure, competition) for detrimental research practices, articles proposing approaches to foster integrity focused on researchers’ awareness and compliance rather than on system changes. Involving nonresearchers and reconnecting what is known to what is proposed may help research on research integrity move forward-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The project is funded by internal funding from Hasselt University through the Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (BOF), grant number 15NI05. NAB has received an award with financial reward from the World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI) at the Fifth WCRI in 2017 for the present work. The authors would like to thank professor Raymond De Vries for his help in revising the manuscript. They would also like to thank the organisers of the Doctoral Forum of the 5th World Conference of Research Integrity (Nicholas H. Steneck, Elizabeth Heitman, and Nils Holger Axelsen) as well as its participants for their comments and recommendations regarding this work. Finally, the authors would like to thank the peer-reviewers from PLOS One and Science and Engineering Ethics for their useful comments which helped improve earlier version of our manuscript.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.rightsThe Author(s) 2019-
dc.subject.otherresearch integrity-
dc.subject.otherresearch misconduct-
dc.subject.otherquestionable research practices-
dc.subject.otherdetrimental research practices-
dc.subject.othermeta-researchresearch fraud-
dc.titleA decade of empirical research on research integrity: what have we (not) looked at?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage352-
dc.identifier.spage338-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesBonn, NA (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Fac Med & Life Sci, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium. noemie.aubertbonn@uhasselt.be-
local.publisher.place2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr1556264619858534-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1556264619858534-
dc.identifier.isi000479358200001-
dc.identifier.eissn1556-2654-
local.uhasselt.internationalno-
item.contributorAUBERT BONN, Noemie-
item.contributorPINXTEN, Wim-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationAUBERT BONN, Noemie & PINXTEN, Wim (2019) A decade of empirical research on research integrity: what have we (not) looked at?. In: The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, p. 338-352.-
crisitem.journal.issn1556-2646-
crisitem.journal.eissn1556-2654-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Accepted Version For repository.pdfPeer-reviewed author version1.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity_ What Have We (Not) Looked At_.pdf
  Restricted Access		Published version1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

32
checked on Oct 14, 2024

Page view(s)

104
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

192
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.