Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29003
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSrivastava, Aman-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorLaes, Erik-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-20T13:37:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-20T13:37:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 52, p. 169-180-
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/29003-
dc.description.abstractDemand response (DR) can aid with grid integration of renewables, ensuring security of supply, and reducing generation costs. However, not enough is known about how residential customers' perceptions of DR shape their response to such programs. This paper offers a deeper understanding of - and reveals the heterogeneity in - this relationship by conducting a quantile regression analysis of a Belgian DR trial, combining data on response with information on household attitudes towards smart appliances. Results overall suggest that improving response requires subtle shifts in electricity consumption behaviour, which can be achieved through changes in user perceptions. Specifically, if customers are inclined to be flexible, a stronger perception of smart appliances as being beneficial can greatly improve response. With those who are less flexible, the cost of smart appliances is a bigger concern. Thus, when designing DR programs, policymakers should aim to promote modest behaviour changes - so as to minimise inconvenience - in customers, by improving awareness on the benefits of smart appliances. Uptake of such DR programs may be improved by explaining the financial benefits or offering incentives to less flexible population segments. Lastly, improving response among older population segments will require a deeper investigation into their concerns.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work continued on the results and data of the project Linear that was supported by the Flemish Ministry of Science and organised by the Institute for Science and Technology (IWT). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support extended by Wim Cardinaels at VITO in helping them access the underlying Linear data.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV-
dc.rights2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.subject.otherDemand response; Demand side management; Electricity; Household energy; User acceptance; Quantile regression-
dc.subject.otherDemand response; Demand side management; Electricity; Household energy; User acceptance; Quantile regression-
dc.titleDissecting demand response: A quantile analysis of flexibility, household attitudes, and demographics-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage180-
dc.identifier.spage169-
dc.identifier.volume52-
local.format.pages12-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Srivastava, Aman; Van Passel, Steven] Univ Antwerp, Fac Appl Econ, Prinsstr 13, Antwerp, Belgium. [Srivastava, Aman; Laes, Erik] VITO Energyville, Smart Energy & Built Environm Unit, Thor Pk, B-8310 Poort Genk, Belgium. [Van Passel, Steven] Hasselt Univ, Fac Business Econ, Martelarenlaan 42, Hasselt, Belgium.-
local.publisher.placeAMSTERDAM-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.011-
dc.identifier.isi000468215900016-
item.contributorSrivastava, Aman-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorLaes, Erik-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2020-
item.fullcitationSrivastava, Aman; VAN PASSEL, Steven & Laes, Erik (2019) Dissecting demand response: A quantile analysis of flexibility, household attitudes, and demographics. In: ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 52, p. 169-180.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn2214-6296-
crisitem.journal.eissn2214-6326-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
srivastava 1.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version2.88 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Srivastava.2019.pdfPeer-reviewed author version424.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

98
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

106
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.