Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29044
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Bart-
dc.contributor.authorKNAPEN, Elke-
dc.contributor.authorWINKELS, Peggy-
dc.contributor.authorVERBEECK, Griet-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-27T08:29:03Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-27T08:29:03Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationTransition Towards a Net Zero Carbon Built Environment, 323 (Art N° 012138).-
dc.identifier.issn0948-3349-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/29044-
dc.description.abstractThe growing need to shift from a linear to a circular economy has inspired producers of building materials and systems to innovate their products to match the requirements of a future circular economy. Others have been developing modular systems in the past to simplify the building process and are now reconsidering these products for their potential in a circular economy. However, at this early stage on the road towards a circular economy, claims of circularity are often made too easily and many producers as well as architects and builders are still struggling with the practice of circular building. In this context and within an assignment for master students in architecture, three cavity walls, each 9m² and composed with a different system for the inner and the outer wall, have been constructed and disassembled in order to test their potential for circularity. The extent of circularity has been critically analysed with an existing framework of evaluation criteria for design for change: three criteria on interface level (reversibility, simplicity, speed), three on component level (compatibility, durability, manageability) and three on composition level (independence, pace-layering, prefabrication). This analysis was complemented with an environmental assessment of the materials used and with interviews with contractors who have experience with these systems. In a final step, proposals for improvement of the products and systems have been made and tested on a mock-up scale, in order to better fit a possible future circular economy.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis student research was possible thanks to involved manufacturers.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIOP Conference Series-Earth and Environmental Science-
dc.rightsContent from this work may be used under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd-
dc.titleOutcomes of a Student Research Project on Circular Building Systems – Focus on the Educational Aspect-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsPasser , A.-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsLutzkendorf, T.-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsHabert, G.-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsKrompKolb, H.-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsMonsberger, M.-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate11 – 14 September 2019-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameSustainable Built Environment Conference 2019-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceGraz Austria-
dc.identifier.volume323-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeDIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND-
dc.relation.referencesEC (European Commission), 2011. Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe COM (2011) 571 final (Brussels: European Commission). Janssens, B. and Verbruggen, M. (2014). Feasibility of upgrading the energy performance of recent massive brick houses. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3, p. 44–54. Rovers, R. (2008). Sustainable Housing Projects: Implementing a Conceptual Approach. Amsterdam: Techne Press. Hegger, M., Fuchs, M., Stark, T. and Zeumer, M. (2008). Energy Manual: Sustainable Architecture. Munich: Edition Detail, Birkhäuser. Abdalla, G., Maas, G., Huyghe, J. and Oostra, M. (2011). Criticism on environmental assessment tools. IPCBEE, 6, pp. V2-443–V2-445. WEF (World Economic Forum), 2015. New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential of Technology. Vandenbroucke M. (2016). Using environmental life cycle assessment to inform decision-making for demountable building elements. Doctoral dissertation. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.relation.ispartofseriesnr323-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr012138-
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012138-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000562136800137-
local.provider.typeWeb of Science-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleSUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019 (SBE19 GRAZ)-
local.uhasselt.uhpubyes-
item.fullcitationJANSSENS, Bart; KNAPEN, Elke; WINKELS, Peggy & VERBEECK, Griet (2019) Outcomes of a Student Research Project on Circular Building Systems – Focus on the Educational Aspect. In: Transition Towards a Net Zero Carbon Built Environment, 323 (Art N° 012138)..-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Bart-
item.contributorKNAPEN, Elke-
item.contributorWINKELS, Peggy-
item.contributorVERBEECK, Griet-
item.validationecoom 2021-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SBE Graz paper_final_9-6-2019.pdfPeer-reviewed author version895.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
JanssesnsB_2019.pdfPublished version2.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Sep 20, 2024

Page view(s)

188
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

316
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.